Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ISSN 2041-9090 University of East London Do ckla nds Ca Ca ISSN 2041 - 9090 Crossing Conceptual Boundaries VIII School of Social Sciences 1 University of East London Docklands Campus University Way London E16 2RD Crossing Conceptual Boundaries PhD Annual Yearbook New Series Volume VII A peer-reviewed graduate publication, School of Social Sciences, UEL, UK Cover Image: ‘Crossing borders – Athena's voyage of discovery’ by Sharon Gallagher All Yearbooks are available to download at: https://www.uel.ac.uk/Schools/Social-Sciences/What-we-do/Research 2 School of Social Sciences Crossing Conceptual Boundaries VIII Editorial Board: Dr Gergana Alzeer, School of Social Sciences (UEL alumna, PhD degree awarded: 2016) Dr Camille Barbagallo, School of Social Sciences (UEL Alumna, PhD degree awarded: 2016) Prof Erika Cudworth, School of Social Sciences Dr Cigdem Esin, School of Social Sciences Dr Seyoum Hameso, School of Social Sciences (UEL alumnus, PhD degree awarded: 2015) Mr John Haworth, School of Social Sciences (UEL, PhD candidate) Prof Maria Tamboukou, School of Social Sciences Dr Angie Voela, School of Social Sciences 3 School of Social Sciences Crossing Conceptual Boundaries VIII 4 5 Articles Elena Fejdiova: We were like sisters: Collective beauty rituals and fictitious sisterhood Latefa Guemar: Women of the 1990s Algerian Diaspora: Transnational Belonging, Resilience and Political Engagement Sharon Gallacher: Inscribing Selves: Discursive, Material and Dialogic Turns for ME Phoebe Boedell Working the hyphens: reflections on doing psycho-social research in Bangladesh. Review Article Haworth, John: Social Movements: A Critical Review of the Literature Publications by UEL Alumnae and Alumni, 2015-2016 6 7 Articles 8 9 We were like sisters: Collective beauty rituals and fictitious sisterhood Elena Fejdiova Abstract In this paper I present the results of an ethnographic study of collective cosmetic rituals among women in Slovakia. I focus on the internal relationships and dynamics that developed within small collectives of women through shared ritualized consumption of direct sales cosmetics. The analysis of the data is theoretically informed by sexual selection theory and Darwinian signalling theory. On one hand the researched women used their beautification practices to be appealing to men. On the other hand, however, when launching their cosmetic rituals women used their beauty knowledge and cosmetic resources to form strong intimate bonds amongst each other. Through expected sharing of intimate bodily information constructed as secret and by carefully monitoring their ritual behaviour and commitment to the collective women showed to each other in a reliable way their cooperative intentions. By regular participation in these rituals women learnt what seems to be a transferable ritual template that enabled them to enter the wider cooperative networks of women across all regions of Slovakia. Whereas some theoretical approaches argue that women would use their attractiveness to compete with each other for men and resources I show that in the observed cosmetic rituals women created ties of intimacy, solidarity and cooperation through beauty that extended beyond the ritual context to other areas of their lives. Cosmetics and its obligatory collective manipulation served as markers of their reciprocal cooperative relations. Researched women also reversed the competitive dynamics of the cosmetic companies that focused on highest profits and competition through beauty and favoured the group levelling ritual processes instead. Key words: women, cosmetics, collective rituals, solidarity, cooperation 10 Introduction The direction of this research grew out of my interest in the relationship between women, cosmetics and beautification practices and in what became clear to me was a gap in the literature on women and attractiveness. When reviewing the literature on the topics I realized that many feminist and gender studies scholars tend to see women as striving for perfect bodies with the consequence of objectifying, sexualizing and commodifying themselves (Bordo, 2003; Grosz, 1994). Women are seen as objects of male desire, displaying for their enjoyment and controlled by their gaze and agency (Bartky, 1990; Bordo, 2003; Mulvey, 1989). In line with this understanding women would learn how to be feminine through images transmitted through the mass media that tell them what clothes, body shape, facial expression, movements and behaviours are desirable (Bordo, 2003). The beauty ideals are seen as arbitrary and culturally constructed. These scholars further argue that women would individualistically show-off their attractiveness to men and compete with each other through beauty (Wolf, 1990). Accordingly, women would pursue their beautification practices in privacy and isolation from other women which would then foster divisions amongst them (Wolf, 1990). If beauty forms the basis of women’s identity, this makes them vulnerable not only to the approval of men but to the critical appraisal of other women, too. However this idea is based on theorizing representations instead of looking at everyday practices. Contrary to this view are authors who often base their arguments on qualitative studies of concrete women. In their view women can use their beautification practices as a way towards achieving agency, empowerment and pleasure (Beausoleil, 1994; Davis, 1995, Gimlin, 1996; Weitz, 2001). The findings of some of these scholars might suggest that there could be some collective aspects to the beauty experience that are shared amongst women (Dellinger, Williams, 1997; Masi de Casanova, 2004). Another corpus of theoretical approaches to beauty comes from the evolutionary psychology. These authors, contrary to the feminist and gender studies theorist, understand that although some beauty standards may indeed vary across cultures and can therefore be culturally constructed (Jones, 1996), there are some bodily features that are universally and cross-culturally seen as attractive and therefore cannot be an outcome of social construction (Buss, 1989; Buss, 1994). According to evolutionary psychology, female attractiveness is the main feature that men seek in women and women should therefore accentuate signals such as slim waists or symmetrical features (Buss, 1989). These signals are proxies for the future reproductive potential that men would look for in their future long-term partners. According to this view, and consistent with the feminist argument, women would use their attractiveness to compete with each other through enhancing their physical appearance through cultural means such as clothing, make-up and other forms of bodily adornments (Buss, 1994; Etcoff, Stock, Haley, Vickery, House, 2011; Low, 1979, 2001). If the competition through beauty argument is correct we would expect individualistic use of cosmetics by single, isolated women. Women would also hide their beautification knowledge and cosmetic resources from each other in order to gain advantage over other women. But when we look at concrete descriptions found in the anthropological literature on the use of cosmetics in ritual contexts it is surprising how these differ from the above mentioned theorizing about women and pursuing their beautification practices in isolation. Women anthropologists in particular refer to collectives of women who were involved in the beautification of initiated girls. This collective use of cosmetics amongst women in ritual contexts is often interpreted as marking off reciprocal cooperative networks of affiliation of their users. For example, among the African Ndembu during the female initiation ritual Edith Turner points out that a collective of women 11 were involved in decorating the girl’s body and hair with red ochre. She comments on the ‘strong camaraderie’ that developed behind the scenes among the women who beautified the initiated girl (Turner, 1987). Another example comes from among the African Bemba where ‘a form of beauty magic’ a purification ritual called whitening magic was held at the end of menstruation of the initiated girls. With the presence of women from the village, the girls were washed, dried and whitewash was applied all over their bodies and faces to make them beautiful (Richards, 1956). Among the Muslim Hausa there exists a special institution of bond friendship kawaye among the young girls that was initiated and confirmed by the exchange of oil and henna. One of the girl friends provided oil, perfume and henna and brought it to the other, so she could dress her hair (Smith, 1954). Amongst the women under colonial rule in Mozambique tattoos provided access to networks of reciprocal alliances among the tattooed women that were used as resources in times of need. The desire to be attractive to men certainly mattered but the tattooed women represented it as a side effect. As women moved across the country tattoos were a way to create new networks of female ´fellowship´ (Gengenbach, 2003). The above mentioned girls’ initiation rituals were costly, lengthy and often traumatic. They were crucial in mate choice: the girls who failed to undergo initiation were seen as unmarriageable. But much of the cosmetic display occurred in secrecy and could not be directly seen neither by the members of the opposite sex nor by the members of the same sex who were the possible competitors (Power, 1999). So what was actually being advertised in these rituals and to whom? My own observations of everyday practices centring on direct sales cosmetics amongst my female family members and girl friends suggested too sharing and commitment to the collective within small circles of women rather than beauty rites carried out in isolation by individual women competing with each other through beauty. I became intrigued to investigate this contradiction between theoretical understanding of relationships between women, beautification and cosmetics and the actual everyday practices that reflect this relationship. I wanted to understand the processes that were at play amongst the women who shared the beauty experience together. What was going on amongst them and why did they share it? This article presents the interpretation of some of the key findings of my PhD research. It shows that the ritualized consumption of cosmetics encouraged bonding and solidarity among the participating women as a result of taking part in the collective cosmetic rituals. To interpret the data I use an alternative Darwinian model of female cosmetic coalitions (Power, 1999, 2009) that while acknowledging Darwinian female-female competition stresses female strategies of using cosmetics with ritual intent to create cooperating alliances and coalitions. My analysis is based on ethnographic research of small collectives of women in urban environment of Slovakia’s capital who were selling, buying and using Avon and Oriflame direct sales cosmetics. My focus was on sales representatives and their buyers. I worked with 42 women from 15 different small collectives aged 18 to 60. I conducted the research mainly at the work places of the researched women. At times I worked with the research participants in cafes or at their homes. The professions of the researched women varied from primary and secondary school teachers, headmasters, administrative workers, public services workers, researchers, waitresses, a journalist, to Civil Service employees and sale executives. Out of 42 studied women 16 were representatives of one of the researched cosmetic company and the other 26 women were their customers. For the period of research I myself became an Oriflame seller and through 12 this a member of such a collective. I conducted an ethnographic study using Spradley’s ethnographic method (Spradley, 1979, 1980). Unlike in the UK where the Avon cosmetics is sold through Avon parties organized from above by the cosmetic company itself, in Slovakia the shopping procedure as encouraged by both studied cosmetic companies is a one-to-one encounter between a company representative and her client. Both companies recommend to their representatives to go through the catalogue with her client who would ask questions about cosmetics. Then the catalogue would be left with the client and collected ideally the next day together with the order. On the agreed date the representative would bring in the ordered cosmetics, give it to her client and collect the money. The client would inspect the cosmetics to check its quality such as packaging or colour and possibly address questions to her representative. Then the selling procedure and distribution of cosmetics would be considered completed. The aim of these optimized and instrumental selling and buying behaviours is to make the highest profit possible and to make the best (often by both parties represented as the best bargain) buy possible. Such behaviour demands and encourages competition between representatives who should aim at the highest achievable profit. It also fosters competition between the clients through the best individual buys. But these formally optimized profit and advantage generating selling procedures represented the opposite of the observed spontaneous non-instrumental ways women themselves organized around the cosmetic practices into small bonded collectives. The shopping events I observed were collective gatherings of several women (usually three to four but at times five to six or more) where the representative could but did not have to be present. The collective decisions of all the participating women often led to overspending for the clients and loss of profit for the representative. She sold cosmetics to the researched women for the cost price effectively giving up the override that would represent her gain. The observed collective practices that generated ritualized female sociality, bonding and commitment to the group had strong preference and precedence subverting the cosmetic companies’ interests in maximising profit. Attractiveness On one hand, women I worked with were all very aware of the fact that men pay attention to female attractiveness and they enhanced it through cosmetics. In both following examples they acknowledge the advantages they could potentially or actually gain from their enhanced appearance that was aimed at men in general such as better work position or tips from male clients: “(...) So every one of us presents herself (...), she wants to look well, well groomed. Especially male clients very much take on board how one looks (...). So maybe each of us will buy it [cosmetics] because she has a feeling that it will make her look more attractive (…)“ (Research participant Nr.5, age 22, coffee shop team manager and university student) “At my previous jobs the more attractive she looked the better position she had (…) really, the more attractive the better position she had.” (Research participant Nr.12. age 26, team coordinator) But there seems to be collective as well as cooperative dimensions to such beauty enhancement. In the following description of the later situation from above the researched women incite each other to engage with beautification at work place: 13 “(…) [in my previous job] one of [my colleagues wore make up] and we drew the other in to make her wear it, too. We, actually, we used to have our hair done up every day, we used to be nicely made up. Yes, all kinds of eye shadows, four colours I used to wear. (…) we were close to each other (…) we were a good team, and each of us came in made up, one prettier than the other, that’s how it worked there.” (Research participant Nr.13, 26, team coordinator) Here, the collective of women is marked through wearing make-up and to join in equals to start wearing it. But despite the fact that the result of wearing make up is the boost in attractiveness of the participating women so that ‘one was prettier than the other´ they are still ‘close to each other´ and ´a good team´. This closeness and ability to create and maintain good team relations can be interpreted as manifestation of the cooperative internal relations of the researched women that developed and are maintained amongst them through shared and collectivized wearing of cosmetics. In this female collective the incentive for using make-up to enhance one’s attractiveness is strong. The women encourage each other to put on make-up to achieve the best results, to be as attractive as possible. The strength and cohesion amongst them can be seen in the power they have to ´draw the other in to make her wear [make up] ´ and through this make her part of their collective. On the other hand the women I worked with wanted to be attractive for their current sexual partners: “... they want to make themselves up, to be more attractive for their boyfriends, and for example, [I’m thinking] when my boyfriend will smell this on me, he will surely like it, or when he will notice this, I want to know his view on it.“ (Research participant Nr.6, age 21, Oriflame representative, coffee shop waitress and university student) The sensual experience of their partners is important for my research participants. Smell, colour, touch and texture are all used to engage their boyfriends in noticing and acknowledging their attractiveness. So the women often choose cosmetics with regard to their partners: “[my mum] asks my father for his opinion about what colour a lipstick she should get or what fragrance, because she wants that he will like it, because he will be smelling it.“ (Research participant Nr.21, age 21, Oriflame representative, university student) An important part of engaging their current sexual partners in noticing their attractiveness was the regular display of the direct sales cosmetics bought with their girl-friends: “(…) I show it to my boyfriend. ‘See what a beautiful woman you’ve got?!’ And I spread it all out on the kitchen table, everything.” (Research participant Nr.13, 26, team coordinator) “It’s not something [cosmetics] that you buy [in a store] and chuck it in your bag but it’s something that ´look what I’ve ordered´ and you can show off with it. You come home and you can show what you have ordered. At least I always do it. I show it to my boyfriend.” (Research participant Nr.5, age 22, coffee shop manager and university student) Here ‘look what I’ve ordered’ translates ‘look what I’ve ordered with my girl-friends’ and functions as a reliable signal of my research participant’s attractiveness. This attractiveness does not come just from the beauty knowledge and cosmetic resources she can employ to enhance it. Because there is a collective dimension to it, namely the coalition of women with whom she shares the cosmetic experience, the attractiveness equally stems from being part of such a bonded female collective. 14 Ritualized consumption But being appealing to men was not the only reason the researched women would get together to share the direct sales cosmetics experience. An essential component of these practices was setting up a safe space where they created specific form of female sociality that centred on mutual trust, closeness and bonding. An inevitable condition for such sociality to evolve and thrive was the establishing, marking and confirmation of reciprocal cooperative relationships within the researched circles of women through collective ritual practices. I studied two different types of ritual practices centring on sales and purchases of cosmetics in the researched direct sales companies settings. On one hand, there were big formal institutional rituals of ´recognition´ called ´conferences´ organized at the national level for the sales representatives. Only representatives who have made a profit high enough could attend such events. The guidelines for the height of profits were set beforehand in the companies´ newsletters. These ´conferences´ were organized and orchestrated by the cosmetic companies themselves and stressed not only the hierarchies within the company itself but among the representatives as well. At these events the best selling representatives called ´leaders´ were publicly ´recognized´. They were rewarded for their sales achievements by being called up on the stage, applauded by the audience, at times with standing ovations, and they received achievements awards from the company leaders. These awards were represented by various certificates, by ´winning´ the right to attend the next year ´conference´, ´winning´ the family holiday or ´winning´ the right to use the company car for the next year. The competitiveness and the hierarchical organization of the companies and of the whole selling process were clearly discernible in these rituals. The whole institutional ritual centred on ´winning´ awards for the best selling representatives. It also aimed at motivating the ´conference´ participants to the highest profits achievable. These ‘recognition’ rituals had a very clear formalized structure. The participants sometimes experienced heightened emotional states that were manifest during applauses, through exclamations in the audience or tears on the stage when moved representatives shared their success stories. On the other hand and in stark contrast to these big highly formalized events, were the group levelling collective rituals organized from below by the researched women themselves. These group levelling rituals usually took place at work places, cafes or at the research participants’ homes. They were small scale including up to five or six women. With comparison to the above described highly formalized corporate ceremonies, these rituals lacked an elaborate formal structure and were often improvised. During these rituals the work hierarchies were relaxed and the participating women became one collective. The observed ritual behaviours were often temporally restricted and lasted between ten to thirty minutes. However, I also observed cosmetic rituals that lasted as long as two hours. Essential components of these rituals were collective emotional high created by the ritual participants, collective assertive loudness, uproarious laughter and exaggerated feminine behaviour (Sanders, 2000): “(…) one [of the women] was sitting and browsing it [the catalogue] and three others were standing above her, sometimes four, depending on whether there was someone with the authority to dissipate them or not (laughs). (...) And it worked like this, the person [a female colleague] came to work and maybe it was strait at the first morning coffee or after the lunch break, that she took it [the catalogue] out and “oh, I have a new Avon catalogue!” and now they all swarmed together (laughs) and “Show me, show me!” and they started to 15 leaf through it and now, I don’t know, “oh, what a lipstick!”, “Look, this would suit me!”, “oh no, it wouldn’t suit you” and a similar hen gabble (laugh).“(Research participant Nr. 9, age 35, sales executive) The cosmetic ritual starts with the recognized shibboleth ‘I have a new Avon catalogue!’ followed by all the present women dashing towards the woman who pronounced it. One of them is sitting and turning the pages the others are looking at them while standing above her talking and shouting often at the same time. This is all happening without the presence of the companies’ representative. It is launched entirely by the women themselves. All the women are expected to join in, and they do. The emotional input of the participating women is strong. They all shout and laugh loudly. They are all energized and they show it to each other through their bodily engagement in exalted, exaggerated movements. During such performance purchasing is decided collectively: ‘One persuades the others and then we just all agree on who will order what.’ As a result women often overspend because they feel obliged to buy cosmetics recommended by their girl-friends or they all buy the same cosmetics, e.g. same fragrances, lipsticks, nail varnishes etc. Women taking part in such rituals endure costs of time and energy in engaging in collective emotional high and of the money spent on cosmetics (Zahavi, Zahavi, 1997). Shared and reciprocal circulation of beauty knowledge forms an obligatory part of these rituals. Women refer to it as ‘giving advice’ that often follows the act of revealing of beauty flaws. Such disclosure is expected by all the women taking part in the ritual despite the fact that it is seen by them as potentially risky: There must be a certain degree of trust. It´s as if you confined it to someone, that even though it´s just cosmetics, it´s something intimate. And I wouldn´t want to risk, that someone would judge me, to tell the truth. [It´s intimate] in that it´s essentially about the body. You know, as if you confessed to someone, that you beautify yourself, that in reality you´re not that beautiful, but that you beautify yourself to be it, maybe that´s it. Such a confession (...) maybe because it´s about the body and (...) because that´s mine, it´s closely interrelated with my person. (...) To those other women I usually don´t talk about cosmetics, so I tell them, I don´t know, that ´you look good´ but I don´t ask them any further ´what do you use´ or so. As if I distinguished between people, it´s not about that I wouldn´t want to know, but it´s something intimate. I´d probably have a feeling that they would expect from me, that, I don´t know. I wouldn´t ask a person I don´t trust. (...) I associate the world of cosmetics with people who are closest to me, because it´s about beauty, that´s closest to my person and maybe if I were a top model who looks great, then maybe I wouldn´t have problems to talk about it, the more because I have complexes or I can see my imperfections that I´m aware of, the more I´m sensitive about what concerns myself as much as cosmetics. That´s why I talk about it only with certain people (...). (Research participant Nr.2, age 26, admin manager). In the above statement the research participant stresses that for her to disclose the information concerning her attractiveness to the other women the essential condition of trust must be met. She understands cosmetics as an intimate matter concerning her body. To reveal this kind of information to someone else represents a risky confession that shows that she actually might not ´be as beautiful´. So even though it is ´just cosmetics´ her description gives evidence about something very important concerning the relevance of beauty and its enhancement. Her ´imperfections´ make her vulnerable to others. They are therefore understood as secrets and revealing them is done only to the women she trusts. The ´world of cosmetics´ is kept exclusively for those people who ´are closest´ to her. By this she means her girl-friends with whom she shares 16 the same direct sales cosmetics. Cosmetics are seen by this woman as the most intimate concern. They literary touch the body proper, something that she inherently sees as hers. When she speaks about her flaws she is sharing information that could be manipulated by other women. Sharing such information carries with it potential risk because it can harm her reputation (Buss, 1994; Hess, Hagen, 2002) where attractiveness is understood as one of its most important components (Rucas et al., 2006). Therefore a misuse of such information can put a woman into a disadvantaged position in relation to other women with whom she would possibly compete. For the disclosure to occur there must be real trust amongst the women who share it. Under the circumstances of female competitiveness (Buss, 1994; Campbell, 2004) women would not talk about it outside the bonded and trusted circle of their girl-friends. Thus for the ´other women´ she only reserves the type of conversations that do not require any exposing and sharing of such intimate information. If the disclosure of beauty flaws occurs it is expected from the present women to reciprocate with the best advice possible. Because of the implied vulnerability of reputation of the disclosing women such intimate bodily knowledge, flaws and advice alike, is amongst the researched female collectives constructed as secret. It is reserved only for the closed circle of the trusted group of fellow-women. By exposing one´s vulnerability to the group and by giving the best advice they could the women in the coalition send a reliable message to each other that among themselves it is safe to do so. The outcomes of the collective cosmetic ritual performance shared within the trusted circle of women is felt as intimate closeness and bonding that some of the women I worked with compared to sisterhood: (...) and then I felt we were on the same wave length, that doesn’t have to happen at each gathering, when we meet up like this [to hand out cosmetics], but then I really had the feeling that we were as if sisters or something like that, you know (...). That was great, when the woman left, then Anika had for us those small samples and it all gathered around the bed and we were either sitting on the bed or kneeling around it as if around a fire pit. And that was great and I remember such an emotion that we all smelled each others´ perfumes and it was very spontaneous and pretty mad. (...) And we were so happy about it that, what a fragrance and what a sample. That was great. I really enjoyed it very much. And it was fun (...) like Anika was giving away those things [cosmetics] and we were squealing and I think we all knew, that, wow, what are we doing, you know, but we really enjoyed it very much. It was a very liberating feeling that maybe the world looks at women stereotypically, that a woman and cosmetics that’s like, but there we could really express it because we were among us and all of us knew that is was important for us. Thus I wasn’t scared to do ´uaaa, what a fragrance!´ and open it straight away and ´smell it!´ and ´what cream is this?!´ and so on. It was very familial and so maybe bonding. Also that we were joking together and that we were laughing together. Well, during that evening that group, who we were there, was very bonded, I think. (Research participant Nr. 2, age 26, admin manager) When the ritual starts women mutually attune and synchronize their emotions to the point that they feel it as ´being on the same wave length´. Through the shared emotions they create a space where they can experience fictitious sisterhood. Here they are ´as if sisters´. Around the double bed in the middle of the room they form an “all-embracing circle” that does not allow any hierarchy nor external control. It creates its own internally referential space where the ritual participants address to themselves, not to the external audience (James, 2003: 83). The bed is their focal point, their ´fire pit´ around which they sit or kneel with their own representative, who 17 is one of them. With her they start to play a ´throw and catch´ game: she is throwing cosmetics at the women and they are snatching it with squeals. In their own emotionally centralizing space created by themselves for themselves they go ´pretty mad´. It is this madness that sets the whole event apart from everyday ordinary behaviour. Here behaving ´pretty mad´ means to be loud, unbound, wild and free because they know they can feel equal and therefore they can dare to ´behave badly´ and they enjoy it. These women stop being cautious about how they are seen by others because they know they are safe amongst each other and what they do is important to all of them. Then they can ´really express´ all the joy and have fun. They are squealing, yelling, shouting, laughing and joking in the familiarity of the close and known bodies that are moving in synchrony around the imaginary but felt ´fire pit´. Women themselves reflect that what they are doing is not ordinary behaviour. They all know that ´wow, what are we doing´ but they keep doing it and they ´really enjoy it very much´. With exaggerated gestures accompanied by amplified communication of screams and squeals women grab the thrown cosmetics, open them, smell them and try them on, even mutually: one smears the other. They all make sure, however, that all of them are in the circle and all of them do the same. They smell each others´ samples and they snatch them from each others´ hands. ´What a fragrance!´ they scream. They open it straight away and they yell again at each other ´Smell it!´ and they do. Although ´it doesn’t have to happen at each gathering´ during that evening as an outcome of such collectively performed joy the group is ´very bonded´. The observed cosmetic rituals followed their own order which was similar in all the observed groups. Its elements were collective browsing through catalogues, use of specific coded language referring to cosmetics and beautification, collective decisions what to order, accentuated sensory experiences centring on the body such as mutual touching, smelling of cosmetics and putting it on, and exalted emotional states of the participating women. These structural elements showed a tendency towards stylization, repetition, redundancy and stereotyping, all obvious aspects of ritual (Rappaport, 1999). The cosmetic rituals usually took place in spaces where the participating women felt they would not be disturbed, such as the back office of the coffee shop or in teachers´ room. The women I studied referred to these places as ´our office´ or ´our lobby´. The rituals were launched at fixed times usually every three weeks with each new catalogue and under special circumstances, for example, when the boss was not present. These gatherings had marked beginnings and endings, often starting with the formula ´I’ve got the new catalogue!´ or ´Have you got the new catalogue?´ or ´I’ve got the cosmetics´ and finishing with the closing of the catalogue or putting the new cosmetics aside. All the women present in such a space were expected to join in the collective behaviour. The observed women engaging in cosmetic rituals performed for each other. With the exclusion of men they signalled their cooperative intentions and trustworthiness to each other in a costly and therefore reliable way. In ´their lobby´ or in ´the back room´ the cosmetic ritual was seized by the women only. The competitive gender relations between women remained on the other side of the closed door. The observed collective gatherings varied in their length, size and intensity but their content and form were identical across Slovakia. By regular participation in these rituals women learnt what seems to be a transferable ritual template that, similarly to the ethnographic examples mentioned above, enabled them to enter the wider cooperative networks of women across all regions of Slovakia that formed in the context of direct sales cosmetics. These networks provided their female members with benefits that extended beyond the actual ritual context. The research women supported each other at work, often through spreading important information amongst them or covering up for each other as well as in their personal lives, in their relationships with their current sexual partners, sometimes even helping out with childcare. 18 Monitoring behaviour An intrinsic part of the observed cosmetic rituals was careful monitoring of the behaviour of the participating women. On one hand, women were extremely interested in the other women’s purchases: “We always look at each other’s purchased cosmetics. We are curious. (…) and we peek into the others´ bags, to see what the others got, because then you’re very interested in that. (...) it’s about watching.” The result of such careful and repeated ‘watching’ was detailed knowledge about who ordered what cosmetics amongst the participating women effectively tracking down the commitment to the collective that was manifest through regular purchasing of the respective direct sales cosmetics. It was expected that women will allow others to look at the bought cosmetics and, reciprocally, that they themselves will show off with what they purchased. These women regularly displayed the ordered cosmetics to each other. But only the direct sales cosmetics that was bought together with the other fellow-women was seen as clearly demarcating the extent of the female bonded collective: “Only if I have cosmetics, that also the other women ordered from Avon, just then we show it to each other, but otherwise, that I bought another brand of cosmetics and would come to work and say, I bought this, I don’t do that.” (Informant Nr.26, age 34, Avon representative, Civil Service employee) Not only women watched the purchases made by others, they assessed themselves within their collective, too. They made sure their orders were high enough to match up to the commitment to the group but not too high in order not to be seen as overdoing it or showing off: “When I got the ordered cosmetic I checked who ordered what among the other girls and whether I’m in the upper or the lower line [in terms of amount of ordered products].” (Research participant Nr.19, age 22, university student) Women I worked with regularly assessed each others attractiveness, too. But again, there were collective as well as cooperative aspects to it. This assessing of beauty was expressed in the act of ´noticing´ the way women within a respective collective looked and again it was linked to the use of the collectively purchased direct sales cosmetics. Women expected it and encouraged it: “ (…) when I come to work and I stop here [at the counter], they are very attentive so they’ll notice for sure, for example, I had new eye shadows, and they went ´show us, which ones you’ve got?´ so I would close my eyes to let them see them and they look at them immediately and then they talked about it, how long they last, what are they like, whether the colour suits me or not, so. It’s always like that here.” (Research participant Nr.7, age 23, waitress) The same situation from above is in the following statement described by another coalition member: “(...) one of our colleagues had a new eye liner, she bought it in Oriflame and she came in the morning and we noticed it instantly, that she had something new and that it suited her. So we complimented her and she was pleased and maybe it persuaded her to use it and, we notice, we notice such details, those, you do notice, (…) and the other colleague tells her ´cool, it suits you, you look different´ and she will continue using it. And on the contrary, if someone comes in and we’ll say ´oh, not this´ then she won’t use it.“ (Research participant Nr.5, age 22, coffee shop team manager and university student) On one hand, this ‘noticing´ fulfilled the function of displaying the use of the collectively bought cosmetics. As seen in the second example, it was always accompanied by giving honest advice about the observed looks leading to the improvement of looks of the displaying women. On the 19 other hand, it levelled the attractiveness distinctions within the observed female collectives. Here, it was expected that the information about the desired feminine looks would be shared and reciprocated. An inseparable component of the observed ritualized cosmetic purchases was the use of formalized coded language that represented yet another form of testing for group membership. These were obligatory linguistic formulae expected at both ritual occasions of catalogue browsing as well as distribution of cosmetics. They came in a matching question and answer (call and response) format and they were taught and used in the collective cosmetic rituals and only the insiders knew how and when to use them. They effectively represented the secret knowledge that belonged to the bonded and trusted female collective. The researched women carefully listened for these formulae and always responded with matching questions or answers. There are ethnographic parallels of use of secret language in ritual contexts of girls’ initiations such as chisungu among Bemba and vusha/domba cycles among Venda (Blacking, 1961; Power, 2000; Richards, 1956). In the initiation rituals the girls learnt a secret language of rhymes and riddles, that served as proof of passing the rite and opened up the entry into the female reciprocity networks. The use of secret language demonstrated and maintained the boundaries of a ritually established trusting „gossiping community“ (Power, 2000). Similarly, the use of the formalized coded language amongst the studied women clearly demarcated and sustained the trusted circle of girl-friends. The researched women knew exactly who was taking part in the collective cosmetic rituals by listening for these obligatory formulae: (...) the one who doesn’t order [cosmetics] (...) she doesn’t ask for my opinion, ´tell me, what does it smell like?´, right, or ´what’s it like?´, ´for how many uses?´ or so, she only goes through it [the catalogue] and nothing. The one who does buy it and spots, I don’t know, something new in the catalogue, she asks me straight away ´what’s it like?´ (...) so that’s the difference (...) the one who buys it always asks for my opinion, or what it’s like or whether I liked it or whether I have tried it on, so. (Research participant Nr.6, age 21, Oriflame representative, waitress and university student) Against the everyday habitus James points out that ritual derives its power “partly from speaking against and ironically with ´ordinary´ habitus” (James, 2003: 79). During the ritual performance the studied women established a temporal counter-culture of opposition to and exaggeration of the expectations of everyday femininity. Collectively they created a form of hyper-femininity - a type of femininity that inflated and exaggerated the components of the expected normative everyday practice associated with work environment and personal gender relations with men and they opposed it. When engaging in mutual grooming women’s gestures were exaggerated, their talk and laughter were amplified, often assuming forms of squealing. ´They were like crows´ swooping down on the cosmetics. When talking about their behaviour in these rituals women themselves pointed out that they pushed their behaviour from ordinary to exaggerated: ´it was pretty mad´ and ´we all knew, that, wow, what are we doing!´. Grabbing cosmetics, snatching it from each other and starting it putting on straight away, smelling it and squealing, using exalted gestures and amplified sounds were all types of behaviour intended for this ritual time. But this femininity incorporated in itself elements of masculine assertiveness. These masculine elements were discernible in the throw and catch games women played when throwing cosmetics 20 at each other, in the drinking of beer because “that’s what men drink while they watch football” and in the often femininely unflattering positions they assumed while smelling and trying on cosmetics and browsing the catalogues. Because hyper-femininity combined both, feminine as well as masculine aspects, it was no more gender specific but ritual specific with gender ambivalent characteristics – it came to existence only within the ritualized time and space (Power and Watts, 1999). When the ritual ended, the gender returned back to its polarized un-ambiguous norm. But as long as the cosmetic ritual lasted the gendered signal became so expanded, so amplified and it carried with it potential for so much collective agency that it took on another meaning – there was a power in it - that of a bonded group of women who shared their fantasy together. Yet this extravaganza was fragile, and could be easily eradicated by just one person present and not engaging in it. It was also temporal - it only lasted the time when the ritual took place. These collective ritual practices carried in themselves the potency of reversal. The heightened emotional states, catching exaggerated laughter, following Bakhtin (1984), permitted the relaxation of authority and social hierarchy in favour of the emergence of a temporal collective counter-culture. Whereas the behaviour desired at work often took the forms of seriousness, modesty, silence, individualism, achievements, competition and showing of respect towards existing work hierarchies, the actual observed behaviour during the ritual time was distinguished by playfulness, jokes, immodesty, loudness, sharing, showing off commitment to the group, noncompetition and levelling of work hierarchies. When in the ritual mode the participating women effectively reversed the mode of everyday working routine. Regardless of their status they engaged in playful behaviours centred on manipulation of cosmetics and of bodily appearance that was intertwined with humour and jokes followed by waves of shared uproarious laughter. They focused on their bodies and on the aesthetic elaborations upon them (Gordon, 2003). They employed their bodily senses in exploring the cosmetics just distributed. During these acts of exploration and enjoyment women often behaved frivolously. Through their shared bodily experience expressed in often mutual grooming aimed at maximum beautification of all the participating women, the studied women created a form of exaggerated femininity where the loud amplified assertive communication, including uproarious laughter, joking relationship and mutual grooming were used as mechanisms through which a levelling space was achieved where the female collective became prominent. Through the collective cosmetic rituals the researched women were transformed into an empowered group of supportive allies. When the rituals stopped they carried in themselves the memory of their mutual support and collective ritual agency. When they congregated again they re-kindled that spirit. As one of my research participant said, each time after the cosmetic ritual in sauna with her friends she was ´leaving in high spirits´ full of confidence because she had the support of her girl-friends. In an image of her walking home she did not only hear her own footsteps but she could hear the steps of her girl-friends as if walking alongside with her. Conclusion In this article I explored the female sociality that unfolded amongst the researched Slovak women through the collective cosmetic rituals launched in the context of shopping for direct sales cosmetics. This sociality was characterized by sharing of beautification practices within the bonded collectives of women. The researched relationships of closeness were based on cooperation through beauty. Women regularly displayed to each other their cooperative 21 intentions through a series of practices related to cosmetic resources, their purchase and use as well as to circulation of beauty knowledge. The willingness to cooperate within the bonded collective of women was regularly monitored through series of displays that enabled the women to gain reliable information about who was committing to the group. This reliability was guaranteed by costs of time, energy, money and of giving up individual advantage through beauty that the participating women imposed on themselves. Sharing of beauty secrets, using of coded language, displaying and manipulating the collectively bought cosmetics, showing and noticing the attractiveness and levelling it within the bonded collectives were all practices applied by the researched women to track down the extend and strength of their cooperating cosmetic coalition. Not only did women displayed to each other. Through regular showing off of the collectively purchased direct sales cosmetics they showed to their current sexual partners that they were embedded within a bonded collective of women. I interpreted the observed phenomena in line with the assumption that women cooperate through collective sharing of beautification resources and information about attractiveness when they are part of boded reciprocating coalition. This assumption is in contrast with the idea that beauty is the main aspect of female intrasexual competition predicted by sexual selection theory and argued in many feminist writings. The institutional structure that preceded and facilitated the emergence of the researched ritual situations was provided by the way the direct sales cosmetic companies operate. In this environment the business practices are accomplished through the pre-existing social relations and networks. It is expected that representatives will exploit their personal networks and that due to such exploitation financial distance will replace former closeness of personal relationships (Biggart, 1989). The whole structure and ideology of the researched cosmetic companies as well as the promoted practices of their representatives are aimed at encouraging profit. The selling strategy the representatives are encouraged to follow is designed as a one-to-one interaction between the representative and her customer. The representative is assisted to support the shopping with the intention of making a gain. But the collected empirical data show behaviour that contradicts these institutionalized expectations. Half of the representatives in my sample did not make any profit at all selling cosmetics to the collectives of women for the cost price. The other half of the representatives kept their profits permanently low through several counterstrategies. Far from fostering competitiveness among women through pursuing the highest possible profits and through aiming at the exclusivity of the best possible purchase effectuated by single women the observed beautification practices intensified the relationships among the researched women. In the studied cultural setting the collective appropriation and sharing of these practices became a priority. The observed prioritizing of the collective and of committing to it represented the non-institutionalized counter-culture of opposition to and reversal of the competitive individualistic gender practices incorporated in the institutionalized cultures of both cosmetic companies. Once the shopping procedure became the property of the collectives of women it assumed entirely different functions where displaying and monitoring of the group commitment became prominent. Women in the researched coalitions instead of competing with each other through attractiveness and beautification practices cooperated with each other through collective rituals of reversal. By pooling the beauty knowledge they equalized their chances to arrive at comparable levels of attractiveness within their bonded collective. Whereas the institutional expectations of the researched cosmetic companies foster division and competition among women the behaviour that emerged among the researched women transgressed these institutional norms, rendering the observed ritual practices anti-normative. The studied women collectively created a resistance culture to the competitive ideology of the researched cosmetic companies. This resistance culture was conditional and episodic originating in the ritual performance. It was not institutional and normative. It transgressed the norms of the 22 cosmetic companies and it only came together at those sites and in those instances where women felt equal. This counter-culture was clearly observable in the ritual situations in which sharing, bonding and becoming part of the collective were prominent and manifest among the participating women. In these situations the status differences among the present women were effaced, the elation, excitement and joy underpinned the collective dimension of the event. In these ´moments out of time´ the instants of communitas (Turner, 1969) among the participating women came to existence. At these particular moments the collectives of researched women, bonded and intimately close, got in a position where it was impossible to refuse to share. Research of the reciprocal cooperative relations within women’s coalitions is a new challenging area that can yield interesting insights into female – female cooperation to inform both theory and practice. Focusing on everyday aspects of collectivized female sociality centred on beautification practices and their sharing can help us further understand deep social processes of gender relations. References Bakhtin, M.M. (1984). Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Bartky, S.L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge. Beausoleil, N. (1994). Makeup in everyday life: An inquiry into the practices of urban American women of diverse backgrounds. In: N. Landry Sault (Ed.), Many mirrors: Body image and social relations. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Biggart, N.W. (1989). Charismatic capitalism: Direct selling organizations in America. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Blacking, J. (1959). Fictitious kinship amongst girls of the Venda of the Northern Transvaal. Man, 59(243), 155-8. Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press. Buss, D.M. (1994 ). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books. Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49. Campbell, A. (2004). Female Competition: Causes, Constraints, Content, and Contexts. The Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16-26. Davis, K. (1995). Reshaping the female body: The dilemma of cosmetic surgery. New York: Routledge. 23 Dellinger, K, Williams, C.L. (1997). Makeup at Work: Negotiating Appearance Rules in the Workplace. Gender and Society, 11(2), 151-177. Etcoff, N.L., Stock, S., Haley L.H., Vickery S.A., House, D.H. (2011). Cosmetics as a Feature of the Extended Human Phenotype: Modulation of the Perception of Biologically Important Facial Signals. PLoS ONE 6(10), e25656. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025656 Gengenbach, H. (2003). Boundaries of beauty: tattooed secrets of women's history in Magude district, Southern Mozambique. Journal of Women's History, 14(4), 106-141. Gimlin, D. (1996). Pamela's place: Power and negotiation in the hair salon. Gender and Society, 10(5), 505-526. Gordon, B. (2003). Embodiment, community building and aesthetic saturation in “Restroom worlds”, a backstage women’s space. Journal of American Folklore, 116(462), 444-464. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Hess, N.H., Hagen, E.H. (2002). Informational Warfare: Coalitionary gossiping as a strategy for within group aggression. Retrieved from http://anthro.vancouver.wsu.edu/media/PDF/Hess_and_Hagen_Informational_warfare_submi tted_to_EHB_June_2009__.pdf James, W. (2003). The ceremonial animal: A new portrait of anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jones, D. (1996). Evolutionary perspectives on physical attractiveness. Evolutionary anthropology, 5(3), 97-109. Low, B.S. (2001). Why sex matters: A Darwinian look at human behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Low, B.S. (1979). Sexual selection and human ornamentation. In: N. Chagnon, W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary theory and human social organization (462-486). North Scituate: Duxbury Press. Masi de Casanova, E. (2004). "No ugly women": Concepts of race and beauty among adolescent women in Ecuador. Gender and Society, 18(3), 287-308. Mulvey, L. (1989). Visual and other pleasures. London: Macmillan. Power, C. (2009). Sexual selection models for the emergence of symbolic communication: Why they should be reversed. In: R. Botha, C. Knight (Eds.), The cradle of language (257–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Power, C. (2000). Secret language use at female initiation: Bounding gossiping communities. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, J. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language (81-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 24 Power, C. (1999). ´Beauty magic´: the origins of art. In: R. Dunbar, C. Knight, C. Power (Eds.), The evolution of culture (92-112). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Power, C., Watts, I. (1999). First gender, wrong sex. In: H. Moore, T. Sanders, B. Kaare (Eds.), Those who play with fire: Gender, fertility and transformation in East and Southern Africa (101-132). London: Berg. Rappaport, R. (1999). Ritual and religion in making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, A.I. (1956). Chisungu. A girl’s initiation ceremony among the Bemba of Northern Rhodesia. London: Faber and Faber. Rucas, S.L., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., Winking, J., Gangestad, S., Crespo, M. (2006). Female intrasexual competition and reputational effects on attractiveness among the Tsimane of Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(1), 40-52. Sanders, T. (2000). Rains gone bad, women gone mad: Rethinking gender rituals of rebellion and patriarchy. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(3), 469-486. Smith, M. (1954). Baba of Karo. London: Faber. Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning. Spradley, J.P. (1980). The participant observation. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning. Turner, E. (2012). Communitas: The anthropology of collective joy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Weitz, R. (2001). Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender and Society, 15(5), 667-686. Wolf, N. (1990). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. London: Vintage. Zahavi, A., Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwinian puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25 Elena Fejdiova is a doctoral candidate at the School of Social Sciences, University of East London. Her research focuses on the conditions and mechanism for cooperation amongst women. She in particular investigates the female collective rituals that involve manipulation of cosmetics and shared bodily practices. Further she interrogates the aspects of transgression and reversal expressed in such rituals. Elena holds and MA in Ethnology and MA in German and Italian languages from Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia. Before she studied anthropology Elena worked as a translator for the European Parliament. Vontact details: Elena Fejdiova, School of Social Sciences, University of East London 4-6 University way, London E16 2RD e-mail: [email protected] 26 Women of the 1990s Algerian Diaspora: Transnational Belonging, Resilience and Political Engagement Latefa Guemar Abstract This research explores the role of gender in shaping diasporas, not as a consequence of migration, but rather as a complex process by which migrant women articulate new identities and new social and political meanings about their relationship to one another, to co-nationals living elsewhere and to an imagined ‘homeland’. The contemporary era of global transformations has re-oriented academic debates on the construction of ethnic and racial boundaries, with an emphasis on the growth of non-nation-based solidarities. This debate has helped to identify the economic and political removal of national borders, as well as the growth of transnational cultural constructions. However, despite this, social constructionists suggest that the concept of diaspora continues to privilege the notion of ethnicity or nationality as the point of origin in the construction of migrant solidarity; they argue that this perspective fails to explain trans-ethnic commonalities and overlooks the differences of social class and gender. This research interrogates this contention by investigating the motivation behind the emigration of highly skilled Algerian women during the 1990s, taking into account the increased levels of violence in Algeria at the time. It looks at the agendas and expectations of this particular set of migrants, and the extent to which they feel they belong to a diaspora. Their political engagement takes a variety of specific forms, but certain modes of discourse and manifestations of a diasporic social consciousness are common to the self-presentation of the women concerned. In order to investigate the networks of these highly skilled Algerian women living abroad I used Social Networking Websites Analysis, mainly analysing their Facebook discourse; Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) to sample and recruit participants; and narrative in-depth interviews to better understand the participants’ connections and sense of solidarity with each other and with other Algerian diasporic networks. Key words: Diasporas, Gender, Identity, Algeria 27 I-Introduction According to the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), by 2015 the number of displaced people worldwide had reached 244 million, which equates to approximately three percent of the world’s population (IOM, 2015). In addition, there are an estimated 19 million refugees, and 25 million people around the world who have been internally displaced, mainly as a result of conflict. Around 50 percent of these are women and children (UNHCR, 2016). The phenomenon of migration, therefore, not only concerns every country it touches, but also challenges the very notion of the nation-state and its constructed borders, as shown by the recent ‘refugee crisis’ at the European Union’s external border, for example in the migrant camps in Calais and Lesbos. Indeed, between January and May 2016, an estimated 2,443 migrants have drowned in the Mediterranean in the attempt to reach what has become known as ‘Fortress Europe’ (IOM, 2016). Although the recent attention focused on migration gives it the appearance of a specifically modern phenomenon, it has always been a feature of the world stage, a manifestation of wide disparities in socio-economic circumstances, and has long been regarded as a potential means of improving life or human security. However, during the post-Cold War and post-9/11 periods, and more recently, the Syrian civil war, migration has assumed new dimensions and patterns. Analysts and academics from different disciplines suggest that various contemporary changes have caused the mass exodus of populations, re-shaping patterns of population movements (Van Hear, 1998). Technological transformations and the emergence of ethnic, religious and nationalist conflicts have resulted in national and worldwide instabilities, particularly in the Global South, furthering population displacement (Human Development Report, 2009). Recently, another force – global warming – has generated a new wave of forcibly displaced populations. Added to this, the globalisation of the world market has cemented pathways that encourage the movement of skilled workers and professionals from developing countries to fill gaps in the labour markets of more developed countries (Castles and Miller, 2009). Despite the intentions of policy-makers in the receiving countries, a large proportion of these ‘guest-workers’ do not return after ending their work contracts, even if their overstay is deemed illegal, placing them in a state of economic insecurity and social discrimination. Children, who have either arrived as dependents or are born in the receiving country, are often cast into a confusing situation: even though they may feel more at home there, they frequently continue to experience the same discrimination as their parents (Weiner, 1996). On the one hand, globalisation creates the idea that people will gain from migrating to richer and more secure countries, increasing the pressures to do so, while on the other it propagates negative perceptions and fears in the receiving countries concerning the political, social and security consequences of migration (Bakewell, 2008). The dominant political and media discourses on migration, and hence public opinion, in the receiving countries are increasingly subject to political manipulation, particularly around fears such as loss of national identity (Papademetriou, 2012). Despite the declaration by the US, the dominant global power at the end of the Cold War, of a ‘new world order’ promising peace and plenty, it displayed extreme incompetence in managing the social issues that resulted from the re-composition of new states, the creation of new borders and the redefinition of people’s identities (Chomsky, 2001). Noam Chomsky argues that the problems of identity recognition and negotiation in this new global context increased ethnocentrism and racism in most western countries, and this has been reinforced by the rise of Islamophobia after 9/11 (Carr, 2016). The practices of contemporary 28 globalisation have thus encouraged the rise of racism alongside an increase in the claims of indigenous ethnicities (Castles and Miller, 2009; Salomos and Wrench, 1993). Translated into policies and social practices, these claims not only result in keeping people excluded in the Global South, but also deepen the disparities suffered by minorities living in western countries (or the Global North). The rise in nationalism and hostility towards migrants has fuelled the popularity of right-wing ideologues within many European societies (Skenderovic, 2007). According to James Carr (2016, p.2), the so-called ‘war on terror’ initiated after 9/11 has created an ‘antiMuslim racism’ that has exacerbated an “Islamophobia in western public opinion that spans centuries”. Endowed with multiple commitments to various places, without being totally disconnected from their homelands, the emergence of these transnational populations attracted academic and policy interest during the last quarter of the 20th century, emphasizing the development of what is called a “diasporic consciousness” (Van Hear, 1998: 4). Cohen has put forward seven criteria or attributes which identify a group as a Diaspora: The action of dispersal and scattering; the collective trauma behind the scattering; the group’s cultural flowering within a new environment; the difficulty of integration in this environment; the feeling of belonging to a particular community; the transcendence of national borders; and finally the cultivation of the idea of return. More recently, Peggy Levitt and Nadya Jaworsky (2007) have tracked the changes in the scholarly study of migration which ultimately show that contemporary migrants, supported by new technologies and social networking websites, always maintain some kind of relationship with their country of birth. As a result, new kinds of migrants are appearing, comprising those whose networks, activities and patterns of life encompass both their host societies and their countries of origin. Unexpectedly, this research has shifted towards Algeria, not only as a geographical place from which the participants mentioned in this article migrated following a contemporary conflict, but also as a “locus of identification that is broken, war-torn, unfamiliar and irrevocably lost”. This has been particularly so for women, as Hiddleston (2006: p.1) describes in Assia Djebar: Out of Algeria. Diaspora is per se political, a network of solidarities formed between groups of migrants to keep the memory of “home” alive. As a consequence, Diaspora has become, de facto, gendered. I-1 Significance, motivation and aims of the research The importance of this research rests on two facts. Firstly, female migrants have frequently been neglected by researchers and policy-makers, or have been represented in a stereotypical manner as passive dependents, and as “victims and needy” (Morokvasic, 1984). Secondly, although there is a substantial body of literature on Algerian migrants in France due to the importance of the Maghrebi/North African migration there in terms of its size and social significance (Sayad, 2007), there has been very little research into the category of Algerian women who migrated to countries other than France during the internal conflict of the 1990s. For example, Collyer (2004, 2006, 2008) is one of the few researchers to have carried out significant research on Algerians in the UK. Thus, by placing Algerian women who fled the traumatic internal conflict of the 1990s at the centre of an investigation into diasporic consciousness, this research breaks new ground. It has been argued that feelings of belonging to a cohesive diaspora are relatively weak among Algerian migrants because of the significant political, linguistic and other differences within the Algerian community, especially between those who migrated (specifically to France) during the 1960s and 1970s and those who arrived in the 1990s (Sayad, 2004; Begag, 2002). The highly skilled and generally politically involved Algerians forced out of the country during the 1990s 29 contrasted greatly with the rural or low-skilled men and their spouses, daughters or dependents associated with earlier migration flows (Collyer, 2006). It could be argued, however, that in fact several Algerian diasporic networks have been created in different times and spaces, and under different circumstances. Also, as Collyer (2008, p.694) points out, “[t]he Algerian diaspora has always been a focal point for political innovation and contestation. For the first years of Algerian independence, the ruling regime therefore paid great attention to developments in France and developed sophisticated surveillance methods” to track its nationals living abroad. However, it is true that the experience of women who migrated during and after the 1990s differs from that of previous waves of Algerian migration, and as a consequence it has often been associated with forms of resistance and solidarity. This can be illustrated by the case of Fatiha and Maamoura, two survivors of the so-called ‘Hassi Messouad event’. On 13 July 2001 at Hassi Messaoud, a southern Algerian city centred around the production of oil, a group of local men attacked, abused and raped more than a hundred women (Kaci, 2010). They were incited by a local imam, who issued a call to ‘cleanse’ the city of ‘impure women’ (Lezzar, 2006). The majority of these women were divorced, widowed or single mothers who had been internally displaced from other parts of Algeria and had come to the city to look for work and to escape the harsh patriarchal rules they were forced to submit to in their own communities due to their social status (Lamarene-Djerbal, 2006). In the eyes of their aggressors, however, they were all ‘prostitutes’ and a threat to the community (Kaci, 2010). Although the majority of these women were silenced and constrained from speaking out, Fatiha and Maamoura managed to leave the country. Once in France they met Nadia Kaci, an Algerian artist and writer who had left Algeria in the 1990s. Kaci recorded their testimonies and published a book, Left for Dead: The Lynching of Women in Hassi Messaoud (Kaci, 2010). This gives a detailed account of the horrors that occurred during the night of the attack, and also describes the juridical and social context of the event, including an exposition of the status of women in Algeria (Lezzar, 2006). II-Beyond ethnicity: Diaspora as a gendered device and political engagement Looking beyond its particular emphasis on Algerian women, but central to it, this article also aims to discuss the proposition that “diasporic experiences are always gendered” (Clifford, 1994: 313). Indeed, the etymology of the word “Diaspora” always refers to the migrant's social condition, which is constructed from multifaceted identities, relating their past, to their current circumstances, as well as to their future (Brah, 1996; Anthias, 1998; Soysal, 2000). I know from my own experience that migration is a non-linear journey, which is always marked by the migrant’s resistance to the process of forgetting “home” when negotiating his or her belonging to the new host societies. This process is not without experiencing an on-going duality between “self” and others’ perception of “self”. The importance of gender in this process has been fully acknowledged by feminist scholars such as Yuval-Davis (2000), who points out that women in general are given the role of transmitting and reproducing the community by assuring the continuity of its traditions and languages. This “burden of ethno-cultural continuity” (YuvalDavis, 1999: p.196) dictates women’s behaviour since they are the makers of their communities (Timmerman 2000). In order to link this argument with the establishment of a Diaspora consciousness among migrants in multicultural and multi-ethnic societies, it is crucial to revisit Paul Gilroy’s The Black Atlantic (1993), which Anthias (1998) presents as one of the turning points in the theoretical arguments highlighting the importance of Diaspora as a social condition. Gilroy paved the way for other writers on transnational migration, displacement and re30 settlement to consider diaspora as a heuristic device to better understand migrants’ relationship to “others”, to their host country and to their homeland (cf. Vertovec, 1996). Prior to Gilroy, Stuart Hall’s work, by emphasizing the importance of adjusting the approach to race and cultural identity, also had a significant influence on diaspora studies (Hall, 1990). Hall’s work was a significant improvement on the traditional approach to ethnic and national boundaries, which placed the first within fixed territorial borders and the second within political limits. According to Anthias (1998), his influence helped to open up the concept of Diaspora to other groups, and forged a pathway for constructionist critics of the classic notion of Diaspora, permitting the addition of social class and gender as essential features. The foremost argument this article investigates is that feelings of belonging to a cohesive Algerian Diaspora are relatively weak because of the significant political, linguistic and other differences within the Algerian community abroad, but mainly among those who migrated to France before or during the 1970s (Begag, 2002). The highly skilled and generally politically involved Algerians forced out of the country during the 1990s, not necessarily to France, contrasted greatly with the rural, mainly low-skilled male migrants and their spouses and dependants associated with earlier migration flows (Collyer, 2006). Algerians in France, including the Pieds-Noirs, the Jews and the Harkis, who left Algeria in 1962 at the time of independence, tended to portray themselves as exiled individuals rather than as belonging to a cohesive Algerian Diaspora. It is important to stress the fact that both exile and diaspora involve the displacement of people who are struggling to proclaim their identity with their original environment (Sullivan, 2001). The difference between the diasporic condition and exile is that the concept of exile assumes coherent and well-defined certainties about the host countries and original homelands, whereas the concept of Diaspora often suggests a challenge to the notions of home, borders and nation-states. Safran (2005) suggests that the continued commitment to “home” through the development of a Diaspora consciousness and the idea of restitution of what has been lost only occurs as a result of the violence and cruelty that forced the displacement of a particular group. Drawing on these arguments regarding the Algerian diaspora, as well as on the debate around the different definitions cited earlier as part of the social constructionist discourse on Diaspora, this study intentionally attempts to work out a definition of Diaspora that will best reflect the experience of the particular set of migrants under investigation. Regardless of where they now reside or their legal status in their host countries, Algerian women who left the country due to the increase in violence during the 1990s, struggle with the feeling of not being accepted within their new societies, including professionally, and share a common, strong sense of a desired Algeria, with or without a wish to return to it as a particular physical place Conventional definitions of feminism often state that the term “woman” is, in itself, a necessary and valid category as all women – by virtue of their gender – share the same set of experiences, regardless of their status as migrants. It is further argued that these similar experiences are not only based on women’s common biological traits, but also on the social and political oppression they suffer, making “woman” a socially and politically constructed category. Nevertheless, saying that all women experience social and political oppression does not mean that all women share the same experience of oppression. The notion of sisterhood, of women coming together, therefore, should take the form of political solidarity in the fight against oppression and discrimination. However, as hooks (1986: p.127) explains, “some feminists now seem to feel that unity between women is impossible given our differences”. The social contexts in which women live and struggle differ widely from one society to another across the world. Djebar (2012, 2002) recounts that, under the French occupation, Algerian women created networks of solidarity, despite their 31 differences. At the time, Algerian women had to fight two distinct enemies, the colonizer and the indigenous patriarchy, and in the process they created two distinct strategies of resistance and forms of solidarity. Later, during the Black Decade, women were faced not only with patriarchal rules but also with radical political Islam, which is nothing less than an even more extreme form of patriarchy. Highly skilled Algerian women who were forced into exile during this period consequently developed a sense of self-awareness that has enabled them to create an efficient network in order to overcome their divisions and thus ease the pain of exile. This research, therefore, helps verify feminist and social constructionist arguments by exploring these networks and the experiences of highly skilled (as a social class) Algerian women (as a gender) who migrated following the traumatic Black Decade. III- Violence against women and the feminization of Algerian migration during the 1990s It often seems that not only are women required to bear the burden of representing their own communities’ cultural and religious values, they are also expected to act as the embodied carriers of the traditions and symbols of the community as a whole, specifically by accepting patriarchal laws and practices (Yuval-Davis, 1997). Women who dare to challenge or violate the codes of conduct imposed by the patriarchal authority can be subjected to retaliatory abuse, ongoing ill treatment, and are often ostracized (Yuval-Davis, 1997). Restrictions on women are often dictated by family codes which reflect the assumption that giving “too much” freedom to women – for example, by allowing their direct involvement in the public sphere – will eventually lead to disorder, threatening social stability and cultural cohesion, as well as undermining the family. Moghadam (1994a: p.14), in her investigation into the gender dynamics of political movements in different countries, explains that religiosity, “revolution and nationalism” are all “gendered processes”, and that in the ideology of nationalism in the Third World, the woman becomes a symbol of collective liberation and a role model for the new nationalist patriarchal community. For example, Mahfoudh Benoune (1999: p.23) considers the participation of Algerian women in the armed liberation struggle, following which, despite their full participation, their status was quickly reshaped “by the urgent needs of the male to restore Islam as the religion of the state, Arabic as the unique language and themselves as sovereigns of the family”. Women who opposed this restoration were accused of being disloyal to the nation and to Islam, and were “sent back to their private spheres” (Hajdukowski-Ahmed, 2008: p.42). During the political and economic crisis of the 1980s that led to the rise of Islamic movements, unveiled women and their access to the public sphere were blamed for the situation (Benoune 1999). In 1990, following the victory of the Algerian Islamist Party (FIS) in local elections, women suffered verbal intimidation, harassment and often physical attacks in the street – acid was thrown at the legs of women who were accused of dressing “indecently” (Salhi 2004). According to Karima Bennoun (2013), up to 71,500 university graduates, men and women, fled Algeria between 1992 and 1996 alone, a brain-drain with significant consequences. Alaoui (2011) indicates that Algeria may have lost considerable economic wealth during the conflict; a significant portion of this loss was the result of the assassination and forced dispersal of such a large number of highly qualified men and women, intellectuals and professionals who constituted the majority of the Algerian – mainly left-wing – middle class. The Algerian official press and NGOs claim that, between 1997 and 2005, more than 2,000 women were kidnapped, violated and, in the majority of cases, assassinated by terrorists. Nevertheless, the true number of women 32 victims on both sides greatly exceeds these official figures (Elkarama, 2008), which may not include all the gender-based violence committed by groups other than the Islamic Salvation Army (AIS) or Armed Islamic Group of Algeria (GIA). Women were victims of the harassment, physical violence and repression carried out not only by various radical Islamist groups, but also by different state security bodies, including police and gendarmes. Although rape, violence and the assassination of women committed by the Islamist armed groups have been widely acknowledged by several NGOs and well documented in the work of Bennoun (2013) (Your Fatwa Does not Apply Here), there has been little investigation into the experiences of women who suffered at the hands of gendarmes and other state officials in 1990s Algeria (Souadia 2008). Women, then, faced several disparate enemies against whom they had to develop strategies of resistance. To put this in context, the victory of the Algerian Islamic Party (FIS) in the first round of the general elections in December 1991 was perceived as a threat against democracy, and before the second round took place on 11 January 1992, the Algerian regime decided to cancel the democratic process and declared a state of emergency. Opinions among the Algerian elite was divided between “eradicators”, those who called for the cancellation of the elections and the protection of the army, and the “dialoguistes”, who were in favour of continuing the democratic process and engaging in a dialogue with the Islamic party, predicting the violence that followed the cancellation of the elections (Souadia, 2008: p.271). It is important to mention that a great number of Algerian women were not necessarily supportive of the cancellation and were in favour of the continuation of the democratic process, which they believed might implement a state governed by the rule of law and thus give women a better opportunity to fully exercise their citizenship rights (Moghadam, 1994a). They believed that the call to discontinue the democratic process was perhaps more to do with the desire to ensure the continuity of the traditional structures of power that enforced the establishment of the discriminatory Family Code. The conflict ended in a decade of horror, commonly known as the “Black Decade” or the “Algerian Dirty War” (Chomsky, 1999). Alaoui (2011) points out that the rise in violence, which continued in post-conflict Algeria, increased the rate of the feminization of migration from about 36 percent in 1982 to 51 percent today (NAQD 2011). These women fled the persecution of fundamentalists, their own families and communities, and in some cases, the Algerian security services. According to Ait Zai (2011: p10), “[t]he family law inspired [by] pure Islamic tradition is the main obstacle to the emancipation of women. It even generates violence towards women as men’s and women’s relationships are based on subordination and submission”, and she claims“[o]ver 10,000 women have been raped and killed during the black decade”Consequently, women completely lost any hope of change, since the Algerian authorities were unable to protect them. Worse still, after the bloody conflict, the amnesty laws and the Law of Rahma (clemency law) were negotiated with the former terrorists. So more and more educated women became convinced that the situation was reverting and that, once again, they would have to pay the price, particularly as it became clear that the amnesties would be negotiated at their expense. The law of reconciliation rehabilitated the terrorists, who agreed to lay down their arms, without giving their victims justice, including their many women victims. In addition, although in 1996, at the peak of the conflict, the Algerian government ratified the international Convention on Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), it tabled significant reservations to some of the clauses. As one participant to this study claimed: “The promises made to women have not been kept. We have been betrayed. We lost”. As a result, many of educated women became increasingly aware that the Algerian government had 33 sacrificed women in order to pacify the Islamic fundamentalist opposition, and they began to see no other option than to leave the country for a safer harbor. If the main assumption of this study is the non-existence of solidarity among Algerians, I would like to present one of the many counter-examples of Algerian women acting in solidarity. On 13 July 2001 in Hassi Messoud, south Algeria, more than 100 women were attacked and physically abused by a group of men. These attacks were motivated by the call from a fundamentalist imam to “clean” the city of “impure women” (Lezzar, 2006). Two women managed to flee the horror. These women met up with Nadia Kaci, an Algerian artist and writer who had herself left Algeria for France in the 1990s. Kaci recorded their testimonies, and in February 2010, published a book, Left for Dead: The Lynching of Women in Hassi Messaoud (Kaci 2010). IV-Methodology My initial concern when designing this research was to offer evidence of the high numbers of highly skilled, professional women who fled Algeria during the Black Decade – a female brain drain that was ignored and even denied by the Algerian rulers. Based on my observations and experience, there appeared to be a surprising lack of solidarity and cohesion amongst these women, who were now living abroad. Nevertheless, I was motivated to explore whether the networks these women engage in act, or could act, as agents of women’s development in both home and receiving countries, and the political and policy implications of such activities. In order for this to be the case, the women involved in these networks need to be motivated by a sense of solidarity and political mobilisation; above all, they need to display a diasporic consciousness. This raised questions concerning the women’s wellbeing and adaptation to their new environments, whether they nurtured the idea of returning home, and their contribution to the debate around national reconciliation and how to rebuild society in a post-conflict situation. The literature on transnationalism and diaspora contends that the dream of return is nearly always just that, a dream, and it rarely occurs in practice. Nevertheless, as this ‘myth of return’ still retains a strong emotional attraction and generates a sense of nostalgia among many Algerian migrants, I was motivated to discover whether, and how, these women mobilise and engage with each other as a group in order to create positive changes both for themselves in their new environments and for their peers in Algeria. This motivation is essentially what gives this research its feminist underpinning. Consequently, the methodology is informed by the body of feminist theoretical literature on research into women’s narratives, lives and experiences (Maynard and Purvis, 1994; Ramazanoglu, 1992; Hemmings, 2011; Hesse-Biber, 2013). V-Methods of sampling the network Feminist research in general should be conducted by and for women, and has always been related to women’s struggles against oppression and violence against women. I argue that feminist research should also aim to enhance women’s wellbeing and happiness in the society where they have chosen to live. As Hesse-Biber (2013) shows, feminist values and beliefs, as well as critiques of the positivist concepts and methodologies that have previously overlooked gender, are the foundation of any research framed by feminist theories. Feminist research focuses on the meanings that women give to their lives and the world around them; this is particularly important to bear in mind when choosing participants and analysing the data collected during fieldwork. 34 Feminist research, moreover, is characterised by its interdisciplinary nature and this gives it the freedom to use different methods of interpreting data, methods that must be constantly redefined in light of the researcher’s concern to provide solutions to the problems posed by the main questions. This has meant that I have been able to explore different ideas and choose the tools that will best help me to answer my initial questions on whether, and how, the group of women I have been investigating create transnational networks, mobilise themselves collectively and thus develop a diasporic consciousness. Overall, the main argument of feminist researchers is that the experience of women is ontologically fractured and complex as they do not all share one unique and substantial experience during their life journey. There is an equal concern that universalising analyses risk presenting women’s oppression as the sole definition of womanhood. According to such a viewpoint, migrant women are generally deemed to lack power or agency. This is particularly the case with women who migrate from South to North, or who come from the so-called ‘patriarchal belt’ (Caldwell, 1982) – as do the subjects of this research. By contrast, drawing on the work of Wise and Stanley (1983), this investigation is based on the premise that oppression should be seen as an extremely complex process, but one in which women are not totally powerless; they often use their strength and internal resources to resist injustice and inequality. Feminist refugee scholars have shifted the discourse from “traumatised and needy women” to women who are also “resilient and resourceful” (Loughry, 2008, p.167). This literature, however, is often ignored, and the discourse on exiled women as traumatised, needy and lacking agency is often the predominant one, particularly when it comes to informing international humanitarian programmes. Maryanne Loughry (2008, p.169) argues that although the literature exists, the resilience narrative is not predominant because research is conducted by scholars who come from a “variety of areas and academic disciplines that often do not communicate easily with each other”. Scientific knowledge is traditionally defined by the fact that evidence must be both truthful and credible. Objectivity, therefore, remains the core tenet of the dominant scientific model, which is “mainly based upon the empiricist approach known as ‘positivism’” (Bryman, 1988; Phillips, 1977). However, this epistemology depends on the position of the social scientist within the research itself and within the group under investigation. The positivists believe that there is a ‘reality’ out there that the investigator has to discover by developing techniques and statistical instruments that will gradually uncover it. The concept of objectivity is itself grounded on two principal criteria: first, any knowledge claim must also be proven by others in the field, using established and observable facts; secondly, a social scientist’s values, emotions and political beliefs should not influence the knowledge claims he/she makes. In other words, to ensure objectivity when testing a hypothesis, the researcher must systematically follow a common method in order to exclude bias and ensure the neutrality of the research process and data analysis. However, it is well established that there is no such thing as neutrality in life. So, in contrast to the objectivist and positivist arguments, feminist researchers encourage the development of a wide range of innovative methodological approaches, such as personal observation, discussions with individuals, and attending gatherings and other unplanned events – in a word, taking an 35 ‘emic approach’.1 For example, feminist researchers do not necessarily encourage the use of coding to break down data into different sections and themes (Hesser-Biber, 2013). The reason is that if the researcher is required to fit the data into given themes it inhibits the emergence of valuable questions that were not foreseen in the initial theoretical outline of the research. This research has proven the value of this argument. This approach is not exclusively feminist and “there are other intellectual trends in social sciences that have stimulated this interest” such as those promoted by the social constructionists and post-modernists (Hesser-Biber, 2013). Their work has helped reveal the white, male bias of many of the dominant scientific explanations of social life, proposing instead that human behaviour is socially constructed and that reality is fashioned in interaction (Campbell, 1994; Harding, 1993). This bias indicates that political ideology has indeed influenced research findings, despite the claims to objectivity. In fact, there is some evidence to suggest that the hypothesis-testing method is not and cannot be ‘value-free’, and so cannot be ‘objective’ in the strict empirical sense. Several philosophers of science – such as Kuhn (1977) and Winch (2007) – have also argued that observation is always mediated by a prior understanding of how the world interconnects. The formulation of any research question, as well as the process of research itself, including the method of empirical observation, takes place within an overall theoretical framework. It is not possible for it to be otherwise, because this is what gives meanings to the process: We do not deploy seeing in the activities of observation with a mind purged of all its contents; just the opposite is true, we need to know what sort of thing we are looking for before we can find anything to which we could give a name. We come, in fact, to the activities of observation with minds crammed full of ideas. (Steedman 1992, p.54) Which particular models for understanding and interpreting data are dominant at any given time is determined by what theories are available and, crucially, which of these theories is preferred above others. In this sense, the process of empirical observation cannot be neutral as it is inevitably affected by the researcher’s theoretical choices and personal commitments, which in turn are influenced by the commitments of the wider scientific community in which they are situated. Political ideas may be an important factor in determining which theories are preferred in the scientific community, and may play a role in shaping the research process (Ramazanoglu, 1992; Herman, 1992). It is important to note, however, that emotions can provide a valuable source of knowledge. The analysis of emotional response affecting the researcher during both fieldwork and data analysis often generates important insights into the dynamics of the group under investigation (Kleinman and Copp, 1993; Kirkwood, 1993). Whether these emotions are acknowledged and analysed or not, all researchers are affected by them at some time in the course of their studies. Historically, the notion of empiricist objectivity, so fundamental to the positivist approach, has been highly influential in the development of ideas in the field of the social sciences. 1 The ‘emic approach’ investigates how people think and perceive the world, and their rules of behaviour, as opposed to the ‘etic (scientist-oriented) approach’, which shifts the focus from local observations and interpretations to the observations of the ‘impartial’ anthropologist. 36 V-1 Sampling the network To say that feminist researchers use specific methods to conduct research is incorrect: although feminist theorists initially criticised quantitative methods, particularly surveys and questionnaires, considering them to be ‘masculinist’, they later recognised the necessity to adapt whichever existing research tools would most benefit their investigation. If I was to reveal the existence of a network of Algerian highly skilled women migrants, my first challenge was to discover where exactly they had fled during and in the aftermath of the Black Decade. As there is no known methodology to study diaspora, I decided to experiment with Douglas Heckathorn’s (1997, 2011) innovative research method, Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS), which he used to study the spread of HIV within a specific group of people. I found the method particularly interesting, and after exchanging emails with Professor Heckathorn regarding the possibility of adapting his method to investigate the existence of an Algerian women’s diaspora, I resolved to use it to at least sample my network. RDS is a method that combines ‘egocentric’ and ‘snowball’ sampling techniques based on referral from individuals to other people they are connected to (Heckathorn 2007). These individuals in turn refer more people. The first points of the network – in this case, myself and other persons I am well connected to – are called ‘seeds’. These seeds are dispersed geographically, thus resembling the original Greek meaning of the word ‘diaspora’ – the dispersion or scattering of seeds. Seeds then recruit ‘nodes’, to whom they are connected by ‘ties’, a relationship defined by specific criteria. As part of the initial network, I web-recruited six seeds (two male and four female) through Facebook, blogs and other personal networks, who were geographically dispersed in Algeria, France, Canada, the UK, Spain and the US. The seeds were selected to reflect the geographical dispersal of Algerians during the 1990s. These seeds went on to recruit nodes using a web-based process, sending a survey to at least one other person (three or more is the ideal). This recruitment should be repeated six times or more – this is called the “six waves of recruitment”; regardless of whether or not the global size of the network is known, mathematicians consider reaching six waves reasonably representative of a network (Heckathorn, 1997). The second observation upon which RDS is based is that information gathered during the sampling process, using a questionnaire, can provide the means for making extrapolations about the underlying network structure (Bearman et al., 2004). It was at this point that my input as a feminist researcher was crucial, as the sampling process is usually driven by the assumption that surveys and questionnaires are tools with which to measure objective social facts through a supposedly detached and value-free form of data collection (Maynard 1994). To remedy this bias, I designed the survey based on a semi-structured questionnaire, which I explain later in this section. The first page of the survey sent to the respondents gave a brief description of myself, my personal status and my professional and academic background, as well as the aims of the research. It also explained the process of recruitment and assured the participants of the strict confidentiality of the process. The survey was accessible online for nine months, starting from spring 2013. The basic element of analysis for RDS-SN was the first ‘recruitment’. Each participant recruited had to have the same characteristic of being an Algerian professional woman who had migrated from Algeria during the 1990s. While the recruitment of ‘strangers’ is possible 37 and often inevitable, respondents were encouraged to recruit friends, current or former colleagues, or members of their professional associations. Survey and questionnaire design The survey’s design was based on a semi-structured, open-ended questionnaire, available in three languages, English, French and Arabic, with 43 questions. Together with the interview questions, the questionnaire was framed to explore the definition of what constitutes a diaspora, based on the findings of the literature review conducted at the outset of the research . It included the circumstances of the participant’s departure from Algeria, their life abroad, whether or not they belong to an Algerian network, and whether or not they intend to return to Algeria. There was also a set of questions on participants’ use of the internet to connect with each other and with Algeria, and to remain informed on Algerian affairs. The majority of the questions gave participants the option to choose more than one answer and the space to add comments. The in VI-Data analysis The purpose of this section is to present and analyze the data from the survey, supported by quotations from the interviews. The analysis is broken down into five subsections: the characteristics of the participants; the circumstances under which they left Algeria; their life experience(s) abroad; their negotiation of new identities and their perceptions of belonging to a female Algerian Diaspora; and the barriers women face to returning to Algeria. VI.1 Characteristics of the participants Nearly half (45 percent) of the research participants left Algeria between the ages of 25 and 35, constituting the majority of the research participants, with a further 35 percent under 25. Those aged between 36 and 40 constituted only 13 percent. Five respondents were aged over 45, one of whom was in her sixties. Around a third (42 percent) left Algeria as university students (first or second degrees), meaning they had student visas. Only 12 percent said they left as labour migrants, nine percent as refugees, three percent as undocumented migrants, and a further nine percent who did not wish to say. It has been argued that the feminization of highly skilled Algerian women only increased after 1999, a fact that was well illustrated in the survey. Indeed, more than a half (53 percent) of the respondents left after 2000. Around a third (38 percent) left between 1996 and 2000, and only 18 percent left between 1990 and 1995. Nine of the participants declared they left before 1990 but could not go back to Algeria because of the instability and violence. The women who participated in the research held a variety of qualifications from educational institutions ranging from universities to national high schools. Around a third left Algeria holding a first degree or a Masters in humanities, 18 percent held Masters degrees in science and technology, and nearly seven percent had a PhD in science and technology. Five percent were medical practitioners, two percent of whom left as specialist doctors who had been working in teaching hospitals in Algiers. Nearly half (43 percent) were willing to give more details about their 38 qualifications and professions, which varied from journalism, law and architecture to private medicine, dentistry and pharmacy. The participants had migrated to a wide range of countries. The largest group, nearly a third, had settled in France, 20 percent in the UK, 21 percent in Canada, 18 percent in Spain and seven percent in the US. Four participants responded from Belgium, two each from Dubai, Italy and Switzerland, and one each from Australia, Qatar, Germany, Turkey and Tunisia. This shows the efficiency of the RDS method in reaching those who are geographically isolated but still connected to friends or perhaps former colleagues. Two said that their first destination was France, but they then moved to the US and Qatar, respectively; one first left for Dubai then went to the US; one migrated to East Africa, then moved to Canada; and one left for the Canary Isles and then went on to Spain. Two left for France but had returned to Algeria at the time of completing the survey. In addition, only two participants revealed they wear the hijab, and only one revealed her sexual orientation as a lesbian. VI.2 Circumstances of leaving Algeria Different circumstances forced Algerian women to take the decision to migrate during the 1990s, although these circumstances did not make all of them refugees in their host countries, as understood by the 1951 Refugee Convention and its protocols: Let me make it clear to you. When I left Algeria in June 1994, I was in a bad relationship with [my husband]. At a party attended by family and friends a few months ago, he announced that he wanted to repudiate [divorce] me; it was such a humiliation for me. I went to seek help everywhere, visited all our friends and his family, but they all took his side. When we received a death threat in a letter from the GIA, and because I am halfAlgerian, half-French, I went to the French consulate to organize our departure. He refused to leave with us. I took my children [to France] and left him in Algiers; he was assassinated five months later. Maya, who worked as a sub-editor for the same newspaper as her murdered husband, explicitly stated that her decision to leave was based first on the shock and humiliation she felt when her husband declared publicly that he wanted to divorce her without informing her first. Under the Algerian Family Code, Maya would have to stay in the family home until the divorce process ended, and this could take between three months and two years. But, in any case, Maya, as many Algerian women in her situation, had nowhere else to go. In Algerian culture, it is very common for family house to be registered in the name of the husband, even though both husband and wife may have contributed towards buying it. Maya explained in the interview that when she went to SOS Women in Distress to seek help, she was told that as she was half-French, she was better off leaving the country, especially as terrorism was at its peak at the time. At this point, Maya was looking for feminist solidarity as a woman who was experiencing discrimination as a result of the Family Code, which was strongly condemned both by SOS Women in Distress itself and by the left-wing milieu she and her husband frequented. Judging from her quotation, she was disappointed by this lack of solidarity and believed that the cause was the fact that she was seen as a ”foreigner”, rather than a woman, who could use the opportunity of holding a French passport to leave the country. 39 When the GIA sent the death threat to her and her husband, Maya even expressed solidarity with him and offered him the chance to leave the country with her. During the interview, Maya expressed sadness that her husband considered her solidarity as an offence to his Algerian male pride. After he repudiated her, he was too proud to accept her offer and was assassinated six months after she and their children left. As she explained, in tears, ‘we never divorced in the end, but he is not here any more’. Maya’s story exposes the extent to which the decision to leave a country in a time of war and conflict is gendered. This particular story also reveals the relationship between Algerian feminism, culture and the experiences of women such as Maya, who happen to be from a minority group. The following quotation is from an interview conducted with Louisa who now lives in the US: For us it was going or dying. You go, you don’t know where; you meet other people, different people. And at some point, you lose your self, you don’t know where you are anymore. It is a symbolic death, because you are out of your realm. Call it hell or heaven, but for me, it was the after-death. Louisa and her husband were both journalists in Algeria. Louisa explained how difficult it was to obtain visas from any Western country. Algeria was indeed isolated in its war against terrorism. When an opportunity to leave the country was presented to Louisa’s husband, even their combined salary was not enough to afford the flights Louisa sold all her jewellery to buy her husband a ticket and to enable him “to find a decent place to stay there”, while she remained in Algeria with her baby for a further few months. In the meantime, she continued to work and provide for herself and her child despite being personally persecuted by the GIA. Terrorism in Algeria at the time was another opportunity to express violence and hatred towards, and exert more control over, women. It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss all the participants’ experiences, which are unique in content but similar in context: moving between their struggle in the private and the public sphere in 1990s Algeria. It is undeniable that the participants in this study all revealed a certain degree of post-traumatic stress due to the context in which their departure occurred, which first and foremost involved the loss of a sense of “home”. Here, as suggested by the psycho-social scholar Peter Papadopoulos (2006), loss of “home” is a metaphor that not only refers to the loss of a physical space, but also to the loss of continuity in the respondents’ relationship with the external world. Papadopoulos explains that loss of home also involves the loss of a locus of identity that could enable the individual to value him/herself in exile. In the following sections, this article illustrates how the process of regaining a sense of “home” by reconstructing new identities is gendered, and how recovery of a complex sense of self has “opened up a space for developing agency” from which “transforming opportunities [can] emerge” (Hajdukowski-Ahmed, 2008: p.41). VI.3 Life-experiences abroad Although many faced obstacles to re-building their lives and careers, more than two-thirds of the participants (78.5 percent) have now entered the labour market in their host countries. For many 40 of them, it was necessary to re-establish their academic or high-profile careers, not only to give something back to their adoptive countries but also to regain their lost identity. The survey revealed that more than a half (65 percent) had to re-qualify in order to enter the labour market in their host countries. If, for some, the main reason was to improve job opportunities, for others, it was to perfect their knowledge or even to change careers or enter the networks of professional bodies. As one of the participants explained: “I wanted to deepen my knowledge, not only [in order] to work, but also for my personal development.” Those who live in the US, Canada and the UK explained that their Algerian diplomas were not recognized. As a result, many had to start their higher education from zero or re-qualify in another field. This was particularly the case for architects and medical doctors. Indeed, this study revealed that several doctors who migrated to countries other than France faced difficulties in pursuing their medical careers. As one participant, who now works as a counter assistant in a pharmacy in the UK, said: ‘Algeria spent much money on educating us up to this level, but lost us. Unfortunately, with the nonrecognition of our diplomas, our host countries also lose us, and God knows, they need doctors here.’ Women also needed to retrieve the standard of living they lost during their journey into exile: My degree was insufficient to find a good job with a good salary, so it was necessary to enrol for a Masters when I arrived. However, regarding my PhD, I found it unnecessary, and would not advise any women to go for it if she does not intend to work in academia again. It was a five-year waste of my life, but it was imposed by my family, which I had to obey, unfortunately. This quotation intimates that undertaking further studies may have been a condition for this participant in obtaining permission from her parents to prolong her stay in her host country. In some cases, Algerian parents are held accountable by other members of the extended family for their daughter’s “conduct”, and it is often considered unacceptable for a young woman to travel or to stay abroad if not for the purposes of further education or marriage. Other participants explained that obtaining an extension to their visa was the only motive for undertaking further education. Around one third (31.33 percent) of participants declared they had been discriminated against because of their Algerian nationality, but only seven percent said they experienced gender discrimination when applying for jobs or training. Ten percent said that their administrative status was often a barrier to accessing courses, funding and the labour market in general. VI-4 Identity, identification and belonging The survey revealed that half (53 percent) of the participants considered themselves to belong to an Algerian network, although it meant little for two-thirds of them other than a means of meeting other Algerian women and sharing their experiences. Among other things, participants mentioned lack of time as one reason for not networking or attending gatherings. Often isolated from family and friends, mothers – particularly single mothers – struggle with childcare costs. Added to which, rebuilding professional lives in a new, often hostile environment is timeconsuming and very demanding. Interviewees gave their answers greater depth by mentioning other barriers to networking: 41 Those illiterate [women] who came to the US with green cards have no jobs, live in bad areas and spend their time in Pakistani or Saudi Arabian mosques – that’s what you find most in the US. They have nothing to do with our Maghrebi sense of Islam. The wives wear the hijab, and the worst is that they influence the highly skilled women here. I’m sorry but I don’t feel any [sense of] belonging to this hypocrisy. I don’t trust an Islamist whatever [their] level of education. I don’t get together with anyone. I have so many friends in the grave today and [undertook] that entire, cruel journey into exile because of ‘them’. So I prefer to keep away from ‘them’. Louisa’s quotation reminds us of the current urgent debate on political Islam and its effects on Muslim communities in the West, particularly when terrorist acts occur in the name of political Islam. Although Louisa was one of the few who mentioned this issue, members of the Algerian Women Diaspora Facebook network discuss it on a daily basis. Following the terrorist attacks in Paris, Algerian women, at least those who consider themselves as secular, were put in the difficult position of having to dissociate themselves from their communities, members of whom were often wrongly stereotyped as radical Muslims. The subjectivity of this process can make it problematic to negotiate belonging to a host society that does not see any difference between secular and non-secular Muslims, considering all Muslims to be a threat to their indigenous identity and internal security. Maya, mentioned above, lives in France but appeared more concerned about the way the phenomenon of regionalism creates a further barrier to establishing a network: I am connected to a group of Algerian women intellectuals who fled here. We meet sometimes, but regionalism remains the main issue, as it was in Algeria. I remember once I invited the group for an afternoon coffee. The discussion was around whose cake tastes better – the usual Blida versus Algiers [contest] – then whose dresses are the most beautiful, whose accent is classier, etc. The discussion quickly turned to [the question of] which region’s women participated most during the war [against France], and suddenly it all became political, [revolving] around the Black Decade. In the end, no one agreed on anything. I became sickened [by it] and just do my own work [now]. I may publish a book soon. Maya’s example shows that she was interested in organising a network of intellectual women who fled to France. She intimated during the interview that not all who attended this afternoon gathering knew each other from Algeria. Regionalism is both a well-established way of networking and a scourge in Algeria, and is grounded in the country’s system of post-liberation governance. Which network an individual belongs to is believed to be the main criterion for nomination to a high-ranking position in the government. It also gets translated into Algerians’ ordinary social and domestic lives. The quotation above suggests regionalism even continues to affect the establishment of networks of solidarity between Algerian women abroad, at least in the French context. During my fieldwork, I also asked my interviewees about their perception of the existence of an Algerian Diaspora. The majority of participants, although they believe an Algerian Diaspora does not exist, agreed there is an urgent need to establish one. What follows is an interesting comment from Faroudja, who now lives in France: 42 No, there is none. However, there is a will to establish a diaspora, there is a will to do something for Algeria, but there is always something there to obstruct the transmission of solidarity mechanisms for women. The Algerian regime manages this division wherever Algerians are, through consulates, embassies, fake diasporic organizations, etc. This suggests that the Algerian regime considers Diaspora networks a threat. Feroudja explained that, after all, the idea of an Algerian nation was born in France within an Algerian patriotic network and that is possibly, why any initiatives to establish a network is met with suspicion: “It saddens and angers me: everyone is suspicious of everyone; it’s draining. We are the new Greeks, a people that thrive on drama.” For Fatiha, a secondary-school teacher in the UK, suspicion and lack of trust were the main obstacles to establishing a network of solidarity between Algerian women in her surrounding area. She also claimed that in the UK “most of the other Algerians” are “illegal”, not highly educated and tend to be “radical Islamists”. VI-5 the question of returning to Algeria More than a half of the participants believed they had integrated well into their host societies. At the same time, however, up to 95 percent used the internet, mainly Face book, to remain informed about Algerian news, two-thirds used Skype to communicate with family and friends in Algeria, and nearly half subscribed to international professional e-mail lists that included former colleagues from Algeria. This shows the role of online resources in helping in the struggle not to forget “home”. More than half-consulted Facebook many times a day and shared information related to women’s human rights in Algeria and elsewhere. When questioned if they missed Algeria, up to 82 percent of participants said yes, but only a third considered an eventual “return”, while two-thirds said there were too many barriers in place. The main barriers invoked were social, political, economic and domestic. More than two-thirds (78.16 percent) said of all the barriers they faced to returning, the first was social: Algeria is a country [that is] hard to live in now. When on holiday, I get frustrated with almost everything – the unfriendly shopkeepers, the lack of customer services, horrible staff at every [level of] public administration, mountains of stupid paperwork, no facilities for children, no parks, a poor education system, no health and safety, no good hospitals. And most dramatic is the Islamization of society – it is a very poor understanding of the religion and the expansion of a very poor and twisted form of Islam, focused on women’s outfits . Ah, and the lack of libraries and cinemas... The list is long and I can top it with the fact that I am in a mixed marriage now. It is impossible for my Western husband to live happily in Algeria. Nadia is a former lawyer who lives in Canada where she works for a humanitarian NGO. Many other participants agreed with Nadia on the fact that public services have dramatically deteriorated in post-Black Decade Algeria. In relation to the state of Algerian hospitals today, four participants evoked chronic illness as the main barrier to their return. The new amendments of the Family Code are supposed to have given more freedom to women; however, there is a lack of awareness or understanding of the context within which these amendments have been made. Hence, participants expressed concern about the lack of information and communication from Algerian consulates about the amendments and their 43 impact on women’s rights, particularly regarding those married to non-Algerians. The reality is that, in practice, Algerian civil servants remain deeply influenced by patriarchal ideology and do not translate this new legislation in a way that enhances the position of Algerian women living abroad. As a result, women may be reluctant to physically return to Algeria, as consulates are the first contact point between a country and its community living abroad. In addition, participants frequently mentioned the Amnesty Law, implemented in 2005, which is often held responsible for driving Algerian society into the arms of a more radical kind of fundamentalism, as a barrier to their return. It is clear that the women who participated in this research evolved in contexts that facilitated the reconstruction of their identities, both personally and professionally. Host societies in which gender equality is mainstream in policy-making encourage the process of re-selving and the development of women’s agency. In some cases, though, participants revealed that they felt they were perceived as “other” due to the fact that they are women of color and Muslim, and were, de facto, stereotyped. It remains the case, however, that their identity as intellectuals and professionals helped them challenge this traditional form of identification and enabled them to adopt multiple identities in order to promote their adaptation to their host societies, regardless of where they lived. In this context, it is interesting to recall that Algeria has historically been a meeting point of diverse cultures and civilizations (Evans, 2012). This has enriched the Algerian personality, including that of women, who remain the essential transmitter of this diversity. I would therefore argue that the participants in this research, despite the plight of their exile, developed an inner strength in adopting positions that reflect both an Algerian originality and a transnational identity, and this eased the process of melding into their host societies. They showed an attachment to an “imagined Algeria”, which they identified with – an Algeria that women of their generation fought for and dreamed of plural, tolerant, just and economically prosperous. It is this Imagined Algeria that they carried into exile and to which many of the women I met dream of returning. However, the cyber facilities and online social networks that allow frequent virtual returns to Algeria, sometimes several times a day, as well as women’s physical visits to the country, whether on vacation or business trips, make it obvious that the dreamed-of that Algeria no longer exists and is, in fact, lost forever. That said this is not unique to Algeria but could be applied to any other society that has emerged out of the collective trauma and economic disaster caused by war and internal conflict. Consequently, a mutant Algerian society has emerged, facing great challenges to the reconstruction of its economy and identity, particularly given the current geopolitical atmosphere in the region. The transitional governance of Algeria may have achieved more-or-less good results, but it appears to remain a country that is now “alien” to those women who do not live there anymore. VII-Conclusion This research sought to investigate the extent to which the lack of freedom of thought, the restrictions associated with the Algerian Family Code, and the increased levels of violence against women prompted these highly skilled women to flee the country. It was also motivated, therefore, by the ambition to provide recommendations to those organisations that influence policies aimed at addressing the barriers such women face in rebuilding their lives in the countries to which they have migrated, as well as examining the barriers they face if they decide to return to 44 Algeria. This raised the question of whether or not such networks could act as a diaspora. For this reason, the chapter revisits the decision to use the term, particularly in light of the debate between traditional scholars of diaspora and the social constructionists’ understanding of the concept as a social condition as well as a heuristic tool with which to explore and better understand the interactions between a group of migrants, its new environment and its country of origin. Here, the term was used not simply in a descriptive sense but as a concept permitting the study of the social interactions, identity reconstruction, sense of belonging and mobilisation of this particular group which is now located in transnational space outside Algeria. The decision to use the concept of diaspora to explore the lives of this particular group of Algerian migrants was twofold. First, the highly skilled Algerian women I met, including online, often expressed the urgent need to create an Algerian diaspora. What they meant by ‘diaspora’ was a network of Algerians who live outside the country but are still attached to and interested in its political, economic and social affairs. They believed such a network should also be a space in which the solidarity between its members would help them to adjust to and integrate into their host societies. The second reason was the assumption that there is no solidarity between Algerians living abroad, regardless of their gender or level of education. This assumption has been supported by a number of researchers who have concluded that an Algerian diaspora does not exist. Research on Algerian migrants has mainly been conducted in France; however, as this study points out, the post-Cold War situation and the eruption of new conflicts around the world, the emergence of new technologies of communication and the spread of the global market has both encouraged and facilitated a surge of population movement, and this means there is now enough evidence to show that migrants no longer necessarily seek out countries where they have cultural and post-colonial ties or existing personal or family networks. Hence, it is necessary to study Algerian migrants in countries other than the traditional locus of Algerian exile, France, and in this specific case the research has yielded some interesting results that do not fully accord with the previous consensus. The violence increased the rate of feminisation of migration amongst intellectuals and highly skilled Algerians, which was particularly noticeable from the beginning of the 2000s onwards. There were several coercive reasons behind the research participants’ displacement, ranging from the general climate of fear and insecurity, or persecution specifically directed against them or their immediate families, to social and familial repression. Some participants who had initially moved abroad with the aim of enhancing their skills, to take advantage of job opportunities or to pursue further education were unable to return due to the prevailing terrorism and insecurity. Thus, the fact that their decision to depart (or not to return) took place in an atmosphere of conflict and terror meant that the participants’ experience of exile often displayed a traumatic character. This was illustrated by the interviews conducted for this study. The interviews further revealed the trauma related to the specific oppression and sexual harassment of women which increased during the Black Decade. Moreover, both when fleeing the country and on arrival in the receiving country, participants faced the barriers of restrictive asylum and immigration policies. The general flouting of the international law protecting women who suffer gender-based violence, as well as the stigma attached to all newcomers from Algeria who are frequently regarded as potential terrorists, made it particularly difficult for women to obtain visas or to be recognised as political refugees once in the country of asylum. The experience of the international gender-blind asylum process is a traumatic event in its own right. The lack of administrative status for those who decided not to claim asylum was no less traumatic. 45 Once they were living in their countries of migration, participants deplored the lack of recognition of their Algerian diplomas as well as of their efforts to adjust, re-invent new identities and build new lives. This lack of recognition often fed a sense of being unwelcome in their new societies. Although participants showed some degree of resilience and even obstinacy when it came to rebuilding their lives, particularly their professional lives, it was not without facing a high level of discrimination. The study revealed that women who grow up and live under harsh patriarchal rules bring resilience to any new struggle they face, if only by virtue of their gender. As they experience more personal freedom in the countries they migrate to, their struggle moves from their private to their public lives. The participants were all agreed that they now enjoyed more rights as women, and although the adjustment to their new countries differed from one woman to another, the majority appeared to now enjoy financial independence and have either widened their knowledge in the field in which they studied and worked in Algeria or requalified in another. It also appeared that due to their settlement in multiple locations, the nurturing of an idea of a ‘homeland’ is now negotiated in a transnational space, often virtually in cyberspace. Social networking sites such as Facebook are used to exchange ideas of resistance, scientific knowledge, music and recipes from Algeria, as well as information on political and social developments in the country. Participants also showed the desire to fully belong to the societies in which they now live. Furthermore, the research has shown the complexity of the relationships of the participants with present-day Algeria and with their peers still living there, whom they often appeared to believe to be either incompetent and corrupt or too traditional and overtly religious. It seems that the participants individually attributed to themselves the imaginary Algerian identity – democratic, liberated, secular – that they dreamed of possessing before being forced to flee. It therefore appears that, for the most part, they can only foresee the implementation of women’s rights and gender equality in Algeria if the country pursues a policy of secularism. I would argue, however, that this is not necessarily what the majority of women living in Algeria aspire to. Hence, educational levels, age and political beliefs certainly add to this complexity of imagining an Algeria that never existed and perhaps never will. When compared with other diasporic groups who have successfully managed to mobilise and transfer knowledge and technology to their countries of origin, and make positive social and economic changes there, Algerians appear to have lacked the initiative to do so. However, the participants in this research readily shared ideas on how they think the situation could be fixed ‘back home’. They put forward many ideas on how the nation can be helped to recover from its trauma. Indeed, the lack of social cohesion and the crisis of identity in Algeria, including the language crisis and the entrenched regionalism inherited from the colonial era, need to be urgently addressed in consultation with an organised civil society that involves Algerian women living abroad. For this to happen, it is increasingly important to find ways of mobilising the existing networks revealed in this research. Regarding the role of officials, women in particular will have to exert more effort to overcome the patriarchal attitudes seemingly embedded in Algerian consulates and diplomatic offices. For example, many of the women I met during the course of this study reported incidents that revealed the lack of knowledge and will on the part of Algerian officials when it comes to implementing new amendments to the Family Code in favour of women’s rights. Consulates could become more open to enabling a process of reform by providing the space for meetings and perhaps other kinds of logistical support to all those concerned with capacity building amongst Algerian women living abroad. 46 For all this to happen, however, the Algerian regime needs to first acknowledge the potential existence of a diaspora that is prepared to engage in working for the benefit of the country. Algerian policy-makers need to engage with highly skilled women living abroad by improving services at consulates, reducing bureaucracy and fighting corruption in the administration, which are often perceived as barriers to returning home. It is also important to build partnerships between Algeria and the receiving countries in order to facilitate social enterprises and the transfer of goods and services. The fundamental requirement, however, as far as this research is concerned, is to ensure the effective implementation of existing laws and to design new policies and guidelines that will assist women and protect them from the violence and discrimination they still experience in their daily lives in Algeria, particularly as these factors have been identified as one of the main barriers that the participants face to returning to the country from which they fled. Bibliography Ait Zai, N. (2011). ‘Middle East and Northern Africa at a Crossroads: “Arab Springs” analysed by key feminist actors from the region’. Published conference paper. Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Amidst the ‘Arab Springs’. 27 and 28 October 2011. Brussels, Belgium. [Online]. Available at: http://crtda.org.lb/sites/default/files/WIDE%20CRTDA%20AC%202011.pdf (Accessed 12 January 2015). Algeria Watch (1997). ‘Le massacre de Bentalha (22-23 September 1997)’. [Online]. Available at : http://www.algeria-watch.org/fr/article/pol/bentalha/bentalhadossier.htm (Multiple accesses). Algeria Watch (2001). ‘Les parties civiles du procès Lounès Matoub demandent un supplément d'information’. [Online]. Available at: http://www.algeriawatch.org/farticle/matoub/proces_information.htm (last access: 14 August 2016). Algeria Watch (2002). ‘Le chef d’état-major, le général Mohamed Lamari lors d’une conférence de presse, “L’ANP est une armée républicaine”’. [Online]. Available at :http://www.algeriawatch.org/farticle/sale_guerre/conf_presse_lamari.htm (Last access: 14 August 2016). Andrews, M. (1999) ‘Truth-telling, justice, and forgiveness: a study of East Germany’s “Truth Commission”’. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 13(1), pp. 103-120. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022959624594 (Accessed: 13 May 2016). Andrews, M. (2000). ‘Forgiveness in Context’. Journal of Moral Education, 29(1), pp. 75-86. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/030572400102943 (Accessed: 13 May 2016). Arkoun, M. (2002). The Unthought in Contemporary Islamic Thought. London: Saqui Books. Abdelhady, D. (2011). The Lebanese Diaspora: The Arab Immigrant Experience in Montreal, New York, and Paris. New York and London: NYC University Press. Agger, I. (1994). The Blue Room: Trauma and Testimony Among Refugee Women: A Psycho-Social Exploration. London: Zed Books. Alaoui .H, M. (2010). ‘Surmonter l’exil par le militantisme : Le cas des femmes algériennes en France et au Québec’. Femmes et Migration, Travail, Bizness, Exil, Asile. Algérie: NAQD (28), pp. 265-286. 47 Anthias, F. (1998). ‘Evaluating Diaspora: Beyond Ethnicity?’ The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 32, pp. 557 580. [Online]. Available at: http://maxweber.hunter.cuny.edu/pub/eres/SOC217_PIMENTEL/anthias.pdf (Accessed: 20 July 2016). Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). ‘Contextualising Feminism: Gender, Ethnic and Class Divisions’. Feminist Review, 15, pp. 62-75. Avebury, E. (1999). ‘Forward’, in Bedjaoui, Y., Aroua, A. and Ait-Larbi, M. (eds). An Inquiry into Algerian Massacres. Geneva: Hoggar, pp. xvii-xx. Badran, M. (2009). Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences. Oxford: One World Publications. Bakewell, O. (2008). ‘In search of the Diasporas within Africa’. International Migration Institute, University of Oxford. Paper accepted for publication in African Diasporas, 1(1-2), pp.5-27. [Online]. Available at: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/docserver/18725457/v1n1_splitsection2.pdf?expires=1 470848068&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A9BB1161A01AB36998D4D1F915B8B10F (Accessed: 20 July 2016). Bauböck, R. (2007) ‘Citizenship and Migration: Concepts and Controversies’, in Bauböck, R. (ed.). Migration and Citizenship: Legal Status, Rights and Political Participation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Bedjaoui, Y., Aroua, A. and Ait-Larbi, M. (1999). An Inquiry into the Algerian Massacres. Geneva: Hoggar. Begag, A. (2002). ‘Les relations France-Algérie vues de la Diaspora Algérienne’. Modern & Contemporary France, 10(4), pp. 475-482. [Online] Available at : http://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0963948022000029556 (Accessed: 10 January 2016). Belalloufi, A. (2015). ‘AFP Algiers’, El Arabya [Online]. Available at: http://english.alarabiya.net/en/perspective/features/2015/02/28/In-Algeria-women-imamsbattle-Islamist-radicalization-.html (Accessed 19 June 2016). Belhimer, A. (1998). La dette extérieure de l’Algérie : une analyse critique des politiques d’emprunt et d’ajustement. Algérie: Casbah éditions. Belhimer, A. (2014a). ‘Violence politique, dialogue et réconciliation nationale en Algerie’. Human Development Network Algeria. Algérie: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation. Belhimer, A. (2014b). ‘Une justice transitionnelle pour la vérité et contre l’impunité est-elle envisageable?’, Unpublished Conference Paper. Les politiques de réconciliaton nationale, 24-25 November 2014. Beyrouth, Lebanon. Belhouari-Musette, D. (2006). ‘Le Combat des Algériennes pour la Citoyenneté’. Femmes et Citoyenneté, 22/23, pp. 177-19. Algérie: NAQD. Bennoune, M. (1999). Les Algériennes Victimes de la Sociéte Néopatriarcale. Algérie: Marinoor. Bennoune, K. (2013). Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here: Untold Stories from the Fight Against Muslim Fundamentalism. New York: W.W. Norton. Benmayor, R and Stoknes, A. (1994). Migration and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 48 Benrabeh, M. (2013). Language Conflict in Algeria: From Colonialism to Post-Independence .UK: MPG. Available from Google Ebooks Library. Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York and London: Routledge. Brah, A. (1996) Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. New York and London: Routledge. Brendel, D.H. (2006). ‘Psychotherapy and the truth and reconciliation commission: the dialectic of individual and collective healing’, in Potter, N.N. (ed.) (2006). Trauma, Truth and Reconciliation: Healing Damaged Relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.15-26. Brubaker, R. (2005). ‘The Diaspora’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), January 2005, pp.1-19. [Online] Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0141987042000289997 (Accessed: 10 January 2012). Bouklia-Hassane, R. (2011). ‘La Féminisation de l’immigration d’origine algérienne: Un état de lieux’, in Gender and Migration Series, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), pp.1-42. [Online]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/15617 (Accessed 14th June 2016). Bourdieu, P. and Leca, J. (1995). ‘Non à la Ghettoisation de l’Algérie!’ Le Monde (France), 24 March 1995. Consulted at Bibliothèque Nationale de France Francois Mitterand, Paris on 13 September 2013. Bourdieu, P. (2013). Algerian Sketches. USA, New Zealand: Polity Press. Boussoumah, M. (2005). La Parenthese des Pouvoirs Publics Constitutionnels de 1992 à 1998. Algérie: Office des Publications Universitaires. Carr, J. (2016). ‘Experiences of Islamophobia: Living with Racism in the Neoliberal Era’. Routledge Research in Race and Ethnicity. Oxon and New York: Routledge. Castles S. and Miller, M.J. (2009). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. CEDAW (2006). Country Report on Reservation. [Online]. Accessible at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reservations-country.htm (Accessed: 23 February 2016). Cetti, F. (2015). ‘Fortress Europe: The War Against Migrants’. International Socialism. Autumn 2015. Chambon, A. (2008). ‘Befriending Refugee Women: Refracted Knowledge and Shifting Viewpoint’, in Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M., et al. (eds.) (2008). Not Born a Refugee Woman, Contesting Identities, Rethinking Practices. New York and Oxford: Berghahn, pp.101-110. Cheriet, B. (1997). ‘Fundamentalisms and Women’s Rights: Lessons from the City of Women’, in Afkhami, M and Fried, E. (eds) (1997). Muslim Women and the Politics of Participation: Implementing the Beijing Platform. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, pp.11-17. Chomsky, N. (1999). ‘Forward’, in Bedjaoui, Y., Aroua, A. and Ait-Larbi, M. (eds). An Inquiry into Algerian Massacres. Geneva: Hoggar, pp. xiii-xv. Chomsky, N. (2001). 9–11. New York: Seven Stories Press. Christou, A. (2003). ‘Migrating Gender: Feminist Geographies in Women’s Biographies of Return Migration’. Michigan Feminist Studies, Special issue: Gender and Globalism, 17, pp. 71-103, [Online] Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.ark5583.0017.004 (Accessed: 20 December 2015). 49 Christou, A. (2004). ‘Reconceptualising Networks through Greek-American Return Migration: Constructing Identities, Negotiating the Ethnos and Mapping Diasporas - Theoretical Challenges Regarding Empirical Contributions’. Spaces of Identity, 4(3), pp. 53-70. [Online]. Available at: http://www.yorku.ca/soi/_Vol_4_3/_PDF/Christou.pdf (Accessed 12-15 January 2016). Clifford, J. (1994). ’Diaspora’. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), pp.302-380. [Online] Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/656365 (Multiple accesses). Collyer, M. (2004) ‘Refugee Populations in the UK: Algerians’. London: Information Centre on Asylum Seekers and Refugees. [Online] Available at: http://icar.livingrefugeearchive.org/navgdalgerians.pdf (Multiple accesses). Collyer M. (2008) ‘ The Reinvention of Political Community in a Transnational Setting: Framing the Kabyle Citizens’ Movement ‘, in Ethnic and Racial Studies, (31), 4, pp. 687-707.[Online]. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01419870701784455?needAccess=true (Accessed: 15 January 2016) Crawley, H. (2001). Refugees and Gender: Law and Process. Bristol: Jordans. Crawley, H. (2010). Chance or Choice? Understanding why Asylum Seekers Come to the UK. Swansea: Centre for Migration Policy Research, Swansea University. Cohen, R. (1997). Global Diasporas, An Introduction. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. Cohen, R. (2008) (2nd edn). Global Diasporas: An Introduction. London: UCL Press. Cohen, R. (2010) (3rd edn). Global Diasporas, An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge. Cohen, R. (2012). ‘Interview with Dr Alan Gamlen’ [Online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTo52DmmlOQ (Accessed: 26 July 2016). Dahmani-Lovichi, F. (2006). ‘Migration des Femmes, une mémoire oubliée. El-Watan, 14 February 2006. [Online]. Available at http://www.djazairess.com/fr/elwatan/36255 (Accessed 10 January 2016). Daoud, Z. (1996) (2nd edn). Féminisme et politique au Maghreb. France: EDDIF. Davies, R. (2007). ‘Reconceptualising the Migration-Development Nexus: Diasporas, Globalisation and the Politics of Exclusion. Third World Quarterly, 28(1), pp.59-76. [Online]. Available at: DOI: 10.1080/01436590601081823. (Accessed: 15 June 2016). Derrida, J. (2001). On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. Djebar, A. (1995). Vaste est la prison. France: Albin Michel. Djebar, A. (2002). Le blanc de l’Algérie. France: Edition le Seuil. Dejevsky, M. (1995). ‘Bomb Kills 4 People in Paris’. Independent, 25 July 1995. [Online]. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bomb-kills-4-in-paris-metro-1593213.html (Accessed 26 July 2016). Edwards, J. (2009). Language and Identity: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 50 Ellingson, L, L. (1998). ‘“Then you know how I feel”: Empathy, identification, and reflexivity in fieldwork’. Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 192-514. [Online]. Available at: DOI: 10.1177/107780049800400405. (Accessed: 10 July 2016). Evans, M. and Philips, J. (2007). Algeria: Anger of the Dispossessed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Fanon, F. (1968). Sociologie d’une revolution. Paris: Maspero, pp. 176-180. Fanon, F. (1986). Black Skin, White Masks. London and Sydney: Pluto Press. Fawcett, J.T. (1989). ‘Networks, Linkages and Migration Systems’. International Migration Review, 23(3), pp. 671-680. Fenster, T. (2005). ‘The Right to the Gendered City: Different Formations of Belonging in Everyday Life’. Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), pp. 217-231. Taylor & Francis Online. Available at: DOI: 10.1080/09589230500264109 (Accessed: 14-19 May 2015). Fisk, R. (2015). Robert Fisk on Algeria: Why Algeria's Tragedy Matters. London: Independent Print Limited. Fonow, M.M. and Cook, J.A. (1991). ‘Back to the Future: a Look at the Second Wave of Forbes-Martin, S. (2003). Refugee Women. New York: Lexington Books. Gadant, M. (1995). Le Nationalisme algérien et les femmes. Paris: L’Harmatan. Gilroy, P. (1997). ‘Diaspora and the Detours of Identity’, in Woodward, K. (ed.). Identity and Difference. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications in Association with the Open University, pp.299-343. Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso. Gingell, J. (1974). ‘Forgiveness and Power, Analysis’, in Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today, 34, pp.180-183. Grenfell, M, J. (2004). Pierre Bourdieu: Agent Provocateur. London and New York: Continuum. Available from Google Ebook Library. (Accessed: 13 June 2016). Guémar, L, N. (2011). The Challenges of Accessing Mental Health Care for Refugee Women. Case Studies within the Swansea Area. Swansea: Hafan Books. Available at www.lulu.com/hafan. Hall, S. (1990). ‘Cultural identity and diaspora’, in J. Rutherford (ed.). Identity. London: Lawrence & Wishart. Hall, S. (1993). ‘Cultural identity in question’, in S. Hall, D. Held and T. McGrew (eds), Modernity and its Futures. Cambridge: Polity. Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M., et al. (eds). (2008). Not Born a Refugee Woman. Contesting Identities, Rethinking Practices. New-York, Oxford: Berghahn Books. Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M. (2008) ‘A Dialogical Approach to Identity: Implications for Refugee Women’, in Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M. et al. (eds). Not Born a Refugee Woman: Contesting Identities, Rethinking Practices. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, p. 28. Hayward, L., Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M., Plooeg, J., Trollope-Kumar, K. (2008). ‘“We Want to Talk, They Give Us Pills”: Identity And Mental Health of Refugee Women From Sudan’, in Hajdukowski-Ahmed, M. et al. (eds). Not Born a Refugee Woman: Contesting Identities, Rethinking Practices. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp.196-214. 51 Heckathorn, D. (1997) ‘Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations’. Social Problems, 44, pp. 174–199. [Online]. Available at: http://www.respondentdrivensampling.org/reports/RDS1.pdf (Multiple accesses). Heckathorn , D., Semaan, S., Broadhead, R.S. and James J. Hughes, J.J. (2002). ‘Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of injection in drug users aged 18–25’. AIDS and Behavior, 6(1), pp. 55–67. [Online]. Available at: http://www.respondentdrivensampling.org/reports/steering.pdf (Accessed : 10 October 2013). Hemmings, C. (2011). Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Western Feminist Theory. Durham: Duke University Press. Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2013). ‘A Re-invention to Feminist Research’, in Hesse-Biber, S.N. (ed.). Feminist Research Practice: A Primer (2nd edn.), London: Sage, pp.1-13. Hiddleston, J. (2006). Assia Djebar: Out of Algeria. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. hooks, b. (1986). ‘Sisterhood: Political solidarity between women’, Feminist Review, 23, pp. 125138. IREX (2005). Annual Report 2005, pp. 3-16 [Online]. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001520/152010e.pdf (Accessed : 20 January 2016). International Organization for Migration (2016). World Migration: Costs and Benefits of International Migration, (3). IOM Migration Reports. [Online]. Available at: http://iomgmdac.org/globaltrends-2015-factsheet/ (Accessed: 12 May 2016). Johansson-Nogués, E. (2013). ‘Gendering the Arab Spring? Rights and (In)security of Tunisian, Egyptian and Libyan Women’. Security Dialogue, 44(5-6), October-December 2013, pp. 393-409. [Online]. Available at: DOI: 10.1177/0967010613499784. (Accessed: 18 January 2016). Joffé, G. (2008). ‘National Reconciliation and General Amnesty in Algeria’. Mediterranean Politics, 13(2), pp. 213-228. [Online]. Available at: DOI: 10.1080/13629390802127539. (Multiple accesses). Jordan, B and Duvell, F. (2003). Migration: The Boundaries of Equality and Justice. Oxford: Blackwell. Joseph, S. (2012). What Doesn’t Kill Us: The New Psychology of Post-Traumatic Growth. London: Piatkus Little Brown. Kaci, N. (2010). Laissées pour mortes : Le lynchage des femmes de Hassi Messaoud. France: Max Milo. Kelly, L., Burton, S. and Regan, L. (1994). ‘Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research’, in Maynard, M. and Purvis, J. (eds). Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 27-49. Khaled, K. (2014). Ruptures et exils forces des intellectuels algériens, in Ghalamallah,M. (ed.). L’Université Algérienne et sa gouvernance. Algérie: CREAD, pp. 57-99. Khiari, W. (2009). Nos Silences. Tunis: ELYZAD. Kuhn, T.S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Kinealy, C. (1995). This Great Calamity: The Irish Famine 1845-52. Lanham, MD: Roberts Rinehart Publishers. 52 Kirkwood, C. (1993). ‘Investing Ourselves: Use of Researcher Personal Response in Feminist Methodology’, in Groot, J. and Maynard, M. (eds.). Women’s Studies in the 1990s: Doing Things Differently? London: MacMillan, pp. 199-210. Kleinman, C. and Copp, M.A. (1993). Emotion and Fieldwork. London: Sage. Knapp, M.L and Hall, J.A (2009). Non-Verbal Communication (7th edn.). California: Wadsworth Publishing. Knauss, P. (1987). The Persistence of Patriarchy: Class, Gender, and Ideology in Twentieth Century Algeria. New York and London: Greenwood Publishing Group. Koddmani-Darwich, B. (1997) La diaspora Palestinienne. Paris: Press Universitaire de France. Labdel.aoui, H. (2012). ‘L’Algérie face à l’évolution de son émigration ‘. Revue francaise de reference sur les dynamiques migratoires: Hommes et migrations, pp. 22-37. [Online]. Available at: https://hommesmigrations.revues.org/1872 (Accessed: 18 July 2016). Lakhdar, L. (2002). La femme selon al-ijma. Tunis: Ceres Edition. Lakhdar, L. (2007). Les femmes au miroir de l'orthodoxie Islamique. (Trans. by Abdessamad, H.). Paris: Edition de l’aube. Lalami, F. (2012). Les Algeriennes contre le code de famille. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. Lazreg, M. (2009). Questioning the Veil: Open Letters to Muslim Women. New Jersey and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Lamarene-Djerbal, D. (2006). ‘L’affaire de Hassi Messaoud’. Femmes et Citoyenneté, 22/23, pp. 1539. Algérie: NAQD. Lepinard,E. and Lieber, M. (2015). ‘The Policy on Gender Equality in France’. European Parliament manuscript, pp.13-26. [Online]. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/510024/IPOL_IDA(2015)51002 4_EN.pdf (Accessed: 16 March 2016). Le Sueur, J,D. (2010). Algeria Since 1989: Between Terror and Democracy (Global History of the Present). Canada: Fernwood Publishing Ltd. Lezzar, N-E. (2006). ‘Affaires des Femmes de Hassi Messaoud: Le Procès du Procès’. Femmes et Citoyenneté, 22/23, pp. 41-46. Algérie: NAQD. Levitt, P. and Jaworsky, B.N. (2007). ‘Transnational Migration Studies: Past Developments and Future Trends’. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, pp.129-156. [Online]. Available at: DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131816 (Accessed: 13 January 2016). Leftwich, A. (2005). ‘Democracy and development: Is there an institutional incompatibility?’ Democratization, 12(5), pp. 686-703. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510340500322173 (Accessed: 14 January 2016). Lifton, R. J. (1991). Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina. Lloyd, C. (2006). ‘From Taboo to Transnational Political Issue: Violence against Women in Algeria’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29 (5), pp. 453–62. [Online]. Available at: DOI :10.1016/j.wsif.2006.07.003 Maalouf, A. (1998). Les identités meurtrières. Paris: Editions Grasset & Fasquelle. 53 McDougall, J. (2011). ‘Dream of Exile, Promise of Home: Language, Education, and Arabism in Algeria’. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43, Special Issue 2, May 2011, pp. 251-270. [Online]. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020743811000055 (Accessed: 13 January 2016). Martinez, L. (2000). The Algerian Civil War 1980-1998. (Trans. by Jonathan Derrick). London: C. Hurt & Co. (Publishers) Ltd. Merdaci, A. (2004). ‘La Hogra en Algérie : essai de lecture’. La Tribune. [Online]. Available at: http://www.algerie-dz.com/article604.html (Accessed: 16 January 2016). Merolla, D. (1998). ‘Communauté et Féminité dans le Printemps Désespéré et Illis Meksa’, in De Ruyter-Tognotti, D. and Strien-Chardonneau, M.V. (eds). Le roman francophone actuel en Algérie et aux Antilles. Amsterdam : Edition Rodopi B.v, Amsterdam-Atlanta. Moghadam, V. M. (ed.). (1994) Gender and National Identity: Women and Politics in Muslim Societies. London: Zed Books, pp. 9-159. Moghadam, V.M. (2003). ‘Feminism in Iran and Algeria: Two Models of Collective Action for Women’s Rights’. Journal of Iranian Research and Analysis, 19(1), pp. 18-31. Moghadhem, V.M. (2011). ‘Algerian Women in Movement: Three Waves of Feminist Activism’, in Debra Bergoffen, D., Gilbert, P.R., Harvey,T. and Connie L. McNeely,C.L. (eds.). Confronting Global Gender Justice: Women’s Lives, Human Rights. London: Routledge, pp. 180-199. Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. Morokvasic, M. (1984). ‘Birds of Passage are also Women’. The International Migration Review, Special Issue: Women in Migration, 18 (4), pp. 886-907. JSTOR. New York: The Centre for Migration Studies. M’Rabet, F. (1983). La femme algérienne suivi de, Les Algériennes. Paris: Francois Maspéro. Mostghanemi, A. (2004). Chaos of The Senses (trans. by Baria Ahmar). Cairo and New York: The American University in Cairo Press. Mundy, J.A. (2010). Representation, Civil War and Humanitarian Intervention: The International Politics of Naming Algerian Violence, 1992-2002. PhD thesis. University of Exeter, UK [Online]. Available at: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/117792/MundyJ.pdf?sequence=2 (Accessed: 14 June 2015). Nyberg Sørensen, N. (2007). ‘Living Across Worlds: Diaspora, Development and Transnational Engagement’. International Organisation for Migration, pp.5-14 [Online]. Available at: http://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/living_across_worlds.pdf (Accessed: 15 January 2016). Ollivier, M. & Tremblay, M. (2000) Questionnements féministes et méthodologie de la recherche. Editions l’Harmattan. Available from Google Ebooks Library. (Accessed: 16 January 2016). Papadopoulos, R. K. (ed.) (2006) Refugees and Psychological Trauma: A Psychological Perspective. [Online]. Available at: www.nbc.org.uk/arc (Accessed: 13th January 2016). Papadopoulos, R. K. (2005). ‘Political Violence, Trauma and Mental Health Interventions’, in Kalmanowitz, D. and Lloyd, B. (eds.). Art Therapy and Political Violence: With Art, Without Illusions. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis, pp. 35-59. Papadopoulos, R. K. (2002). ‘Refugees, Home and Trauma’, in Papadopoulos, R.K (ed.) (2002). 54 Therapeutic Care for Refugees: No Place like Home, London: Karnac, pp.9-40. Available from Google eBooks Library (Accessed: 16 January 2016). Pedwell, C. (2007). Gender, Embodiment and Cultural Practice: Towards a Relational Feminist Approach. PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Pearce, L. (1994). Reading Dialogic. London: Routledge, Chapman and Hall. Phoenix, A. (1994). ‘Practising Feminist Research: The Intersection of Gender and “Race” in the Research Process’, in Maynard, M. and Purvis, J. (eds). Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective. London: Taylor and Francis, pp 49-72. Potter, N.N. (2006). Trauma, Truth and Reconciliation: Healing Damaged Relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Purcell, M. (2003). ‘Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), pp. 564-590. [Online]. Available at: DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00467. (Accessed: 15 June 2016). Ravenel, B. (1998). ‘La gauche française au miroir de l’Algérie’. Algeria-Watch. [Online]. Available at: http://www.algeria-watch.org/farticle/ravenel2.htm (Accessed : 14 January 2016). Ramazanoglu, C. (1992). ‘On Feminist Methodology: Male Reason versus Female Empowerment’. Sociology, 26(2). Sage Journals Online. Available at: http://soc.sagepub.com/cgi/pdf_extract/26/2/207 Rebai-Maamri, M. (2009). ‘The Syndrome of French Language in Algeria’. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(3), pp. 77-89. [Online]. Available at: http://openaccesslibrary.org/images/Malika_Rebai_Maamri.pdf (Accessed 12 January 2016). Roberts, H. (2003). The Battlefield: Algeria 1988-2002, Studies in a Broken Polity. London and New York: Verso. Saad, L. (2014). ‘The “40-Hour” Workweek is Actually longer by Seven Hours’, in Gallup. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/175286/hour-workweek-actually-longer-sevenhours.aspx Saada, E. (2000). ‘Abdelmalek Sayad and the Double Absence: Toward a Total Sociology of Immigration’. French Politics, Culture and Society, 18(1), pp. 28-48. [Online]. Available at: https://esaada.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/pdf-sayad.pdf (Multiple accesses). Said, E.W. (2000) Reflection on Exile and Other Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp.173-186. Said, E.W. (2003). Orientalism. London: Penguin Books Safran, W. (1991). ‘Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return’. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1(1), Spring 1991, pp. 83-99. Safran, W. (1999). ‘Comparing Diasporas: A Review Essay’. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 8(3), Winter 1999, pp. 255-291. Salganik, M.J and Heckathorn, D (2004), ‘Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent driven sampling’. Sociological Methodology, 34, pp. 193–239. Salhi, S. (2015). ‘Les violences faites aux femmes par le Sénat’. Association for Women’s Rights in Development. [Online]. Available at: http://www.awid.org/fr/nouvelles-et-analyse/algeriedeclaration-suite-ladoption-de-la-loi-contre-les-violences-faites-aux (Accessed: 13 July 2016). 55 Salhi, Z. (2013). Gender and Diversity in the Middle East and North Africa. London: Routledge. Samraoui, M. (2003). Chronique des années de sang. Algérie Comment les services ont manipulé les groupes islamistes. Paris: Editions Denoël. Sassen, S. (2000). ‘Women’s burden: Counter-geographies of globalization and the feminization of survival’. Journal of International Affairs, 53(2), pp.503-524. Sayad, A. (1999). La double absence: Des illusions de L’émigré aux souffrances de l’immigré. Paris: Editions le Seuil. Sayad, A. (2002). Histoire et recherche identitiaire. Paris: Edition Bouchene. Sayad, A. (2007). The Suffering of the Immigrant. Boston, US and Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Schiller, N.G. (2009). ‘A global perspective on migration and development’. Social Analysis, 53(3), pp.14-37 [Online]. Available at: DOI:10.3167/sa.2009.530302 (Accessed: 12 May 2016). Schultz, H, L. (2003). The Palestinian Diaspora: Formation of Identities of Homeland. London: Routledge. Scott, J. (2002). Social Networks: Critical Concepts in Sociology, Vol. 1. London: Taylor & Francis. Scott, J. (2012). Social Network Analysis. 3rd edition. London: Sage. Sidhoum, S. (2003). ‘L’intelligence qu’on assassine’, in Algeria-Watch [Online]. Available at: http://www.algeria-watch.org/fr/mrv/mrvrap/sidhoum_intelligence.htm (Accessed: October 2014). Solomos, J. and Wrench, J. (1996). ‘Racism and Migration in Western Europe’. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 21(2), pp. 295-298. [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3341995 (Accessed 12 May 2015). Souadia, H. (2006). ‘Dans la République de la peur, le viol est une arme de guerre’. Algeria-Watch [Online]. Available at: http://www.algeriawatch.org/fr/article/tribune/souaidia_arme_guerre.htm (Accessed: May 2012). Soysal, Y. (2000). ‘Citizenship and Identity: Living in Diasporas in Post-War Europe’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(1), pp.1-15. Sullivan, Z.T (2001). Exiled Memories: Stories of the Iranian Diaspora. Philadelphia, Penn.: Temple University Press. Spiller, W. et al. (2012). Respondent Driven Sampling RDSAT7.1 User Manual. Available at: http://www.respondentdrivensampling.org/ Stanley,L and Wise, S. (1987). Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Timmerman, C. (2000). ‘Muslim women and nationalism: the power of image’. Current Sociology 48(4), pp. 15-27. Tölölyan, K. (1991). ‘The nation-state and its others: in lieu of a preface’. Diaspora, 1(1), pp. 3-7. Tölölyan, K. (1996). ‘Rethinking Diaspora(s): Stateless Power in the Transnational Moment’, Diaspora, 5(1), pp.3-36. Tremlett, G. (2005). ‘Spain grants amnesty to 700,000 migrants’, The Guardian. 56 UNHCR report on refugee women. [Online]. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/uk/women.html (Accessed:16 July 2016). UNDP (2009). ‘Overcoming barriers: human mobility and development’, Human Development Report. [Online]. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/269/hdr_2009_en_complete.pdf (Accessed:10 December 2015). Van Hear, N. (1998). New Diaspora. UCL Press: Routledge. Vertovec, S. (1997). ‘Three meanings of “diaspora”, exemplified by South Asian religions’. Diaspora, (6), pp. 573-582. Weiner, M. (1996). ‘Determinants of Immigrant Integration: An International Comparative Analysis’, in Carmon, N. (ed.). Immigration and Integration in Post-industrial Societies: Theoretical Analysis and Policy-Related Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.46-62. Wejnert, C. (2009). ‘An empirical test of respondent-driven sampling: point estimates, variance, measures of degree, and out-of-equilibrium data’, Sociological Methodology, (39), pp. 73-116. Wejnert, C. (2009). ‘Social Network analysis with respondent-driven sampling data: a study of racial integration on campus’. Sociological Methodology, 32(2), May 2010, pp. 112-124. White, R. G. et al (2011). ‘Respondent driven sampling – where we are and where should we be going?’ Editorial based on presentations at the 19th Biennial International Society for STD Research conference in Quebec, Canada, July 2011. Winch, P. (2007). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (3rd edn). London and New York: Routledge. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender & Nation. London: Sage. Yuval-Davis, N. & Anthias, F. (1989). ‘Introduction’, in Yuval-Davis, N. & Anthias, F. (ed.) Woman-Nation-State. New York: St Martins, pp. 2-15. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). ‘Intersectionality and feminist politics’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3), pp. 193-209. Yuval, N., Gross, R. and Marshall, R.D. (2006). ‘Mental health in the wake of terrorism: making sense of mass casualty trauma’, in Yuval, N., Gross, R., Marshall, R.D. and Susser, E.S. (eds). 9/11: Mental Health in the Wake of Terrorist Attacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 314. 57 Latefa Guemar is a Post-graduate student a the School of Sciences, UEL and has recently submitted her PhD thesis on Women of the New Algerian Diaspora: Online Discourse, Social Consciousness and Political Engagement. Having received refugee status in the UK in 2004, Latefa has had to re-orient her study and has undertaken an MSc on Population Movement and Policy at Swansea University. Latefa has made an important contribution to the 2011 review of gender / women's issues in Country of Origin information for making decision on asylum applications in the UK; Latefa has also undertaken research on the conduct of asylum interviews at UKBA looking at the range of issues , including gender, sexuality, religion, and age, which might impact upon the ability of asylum applicants to discuss their experiences; On the impact of forced migration on women's mental health; On the decision making of asylum seekers to come in the UK. Latefa is also accredited OISC Level 1&2 immigration advisor and has extensive experience supporting women in their asylum applications. Latefa has a particular interest in gender issues in forced migration, Diasporas and identities. She was a research associate for the Centre of Migration Policy Research at Swansea University between 2009 and 2015 and a visiting Fellow at the LSE, Gender Institute between 2012 and 2014. Contact details: Latefa Guemar, School of Social Sciences, University of East London 4-6 University way, London E16 2RD e-mail: [email protected] 58 Inscribing Selves: Discursive, Material and Dialogic Turns for ME Sharon Gallagher Abstract In this paper, I demonstrate how my kaleidoscope view is employed to the problematics of living with what can be described, as a ‘contested’ and experienced as a ‘severe’ chronic illness. Specifically the paper refers to the illness, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) (also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome). This is a chronic illness that has multivariate symptoms and remains shrouded in medical contention and social scepticism. This has produced dilemmas and challenges for those diagnosed with ME and/or CFS. The kaleidoscopic view reflects on Foucauldian, Deleuze & Guattari and Bakhtinian concepts in relation to power, desire and the importance of context for ‘doing’ and ‘being’ ill. I propose the metaphor of a kaleidoscope offers a useful visual illustration to understand the complexities of living with an illness of this nature. The problematics can then be explored by theorising the dominant discursive controls on naming and framing chronic illness, the material embodied experiences of living with a chronic illness and to the socio-cultural contexts for constituting ways to fulfil healthy/unhealthy identities. My particular readings on Foucault’s governmentality, heterotopia are employed to theorise the act of power and attend to the languages of ritualised spaces that are challenged when house/bedbound. Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizome for situating multiplicities of desire which continuously destabilise the definable and can intensely disrupt the material production of possibilities for living with a chronic illness. The inclusion of Bakhtin draws on the importance of context and the chronotope to conceptualise the connectedness between temporal and spatial relations in narrating a life affected by chronic illness. My insights are motivated by a transdisciplinary approach, where like Foucault and Deleuze, I concur that a methodological toolbox establishes the importance of theory as a practical tool, not to be confined by, but to appropriate particular concepts to offer a depth or alternative meaning. I have conceptualised the challenges and struggles of a chronic illness by exploring the acts of ‘doing’ and the experiences of ‘being’ ill and argue that this theorisation as enhanced understanding for what it means to negotiate a chronic illness of this nature. 59 Introduction This paper is concerned with theorising the topic of chronic illness, specifically that of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. As a controversial disease in terms of its causation and treatment the illness continues to be shrouded in medical and social debate. Social and psychological studies tend to focus on the issues of living with a contested illness. However, little attention has been given to those who live with severe ME which causes those who suffer to remain house and/or bedbound for long periods. Medical research has interrogated the risk factors (Pheby and Saffron 2009), effects of treatment programmes and the management of stress to decrease the burden of severe ME/CFS (Cox and Findley 2000; Lattie, Antoni et al. 2013). Medical and social researchers have explored issues associated with uncertainty and controversy for ME sufferers and/or medical professionals (Cooper 1997; Guise, Widdicombe et al. 2007). However, there has been little or no specific reference to those who experience severe ME, which exacerbates the lack of understanding within medical and social research and beyond. My doctoral research departed from previous research by recruiting participants who had been formally diagnosed with ME and/or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and at least four of the participants had been diagnosed with severe ME/CFS. At present the umbrella term of ME/CFS is the most widely used term. My method of investigation was both life stories and photo-elicited-diaries, both of which revealed the processes and practices that underpin negotiations of the illness experience. My research aimed to elicit an active conceptualisation for understanding ‘doing’ and ‘being’ chronically ill. As a person who lives with the illness under investigation, I agree with ‘the theoretical fact that only those directly concerned can speak in a practical way on their own behalf’ (Deleuze cited in Bouchard 1977:209). The present paper focuses on some of the key theoretical concepts which informed my transdisciplinary research to theoretically ask: How can we understand ME/CFS as a disease of 1,000 names, which espouses culturally derogatory responses such as, ‘it’s all in the mind’, ‘yuppie flu’ and a ‘malingers’ disease’?2 If ME/CFS defies medical theories of containment, how is it possible to gain a conceptual understanding of both the issues of contestation associated with a diagnosis and the subjective experiences of living with severe illness symptoms? In order to respond to these questions, I developed a ‘kaleidoscopic view’ to account for the discursive, material and contextual aspects of living with chronic illness. It is this kaleidoscope that I wish to recompose in this paper. The ‘kaleidoscope’ has been employed previously as a conceptual metaphor to analyse gender (Spade and Valentine 2007), and to demonstrate the multiplicities of life within biographical methods (Stanley 1987). My employment of this metaphorical device is to demonstrate how each part holds multiple reflections that work References: Chronic Fatigue Immune Disease [CFID] A Disease of a 1,000 names (Pollard, 1988) and media coverage most recently condemning and countering the term past media phrase of ‘all in the mind’ in the article by Jenny Hope [accessed 10/11/2015] for the Daily Mail ME Patients are told: it’s all not all in the mind’. Finally Tucker (2015) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Wrong name, real illness [Medscape Rheumatology 8/01/2015] [Accessed 10/11/2015] 2 60 together and can be read differently, depending on the viewer, subject and intention. The parts are set out into three sections and conclude with a diagram that represents each view to unravel, the reflective acts of power, desire and productions of context, via a particular reading of Foucault, Deleuze and Guattari, and finally Bakhtin. Foucault’s genealogical perspective offers a means to understand the historical and discursive impasses and iterations which perpetuate the uncertainties associated with contested illnesses. Deleuze and Guattari offer the means to critically account for the intensities of pain and suffering which alters life trajectories and acts of becoming. This may be particularly relevant to those living with an illness like severe ME, which requires continuous work in the making and remaking of self. Bakhtin reveals the act of narrating as relational, which is useful when discussing the fragility of life in relation to chronic illness. These approaches are employed to conceptualise the issues of contestation, subjective and material conditions by which a severe chronic illness of this nature may be theorised and understood. Philosophical reflections on discursive subjects This section will explore how the power to inscribe subjects through language not only constituting particular realities, but also the means by which we accept our material existence. Michel Foucault’s genealogical perspective allows us to explore the emergence of particular notions of truth in relation to knowledge and power, which helps us understand present conditions. This sets out the ways in which it is possible to conceptualise acts of performance, interactions with space, and unravel so called medical truths and thereby, unravel the social constructions that belie our multiple identities which are governed by these contexts. A genealogical perspective: the emergence of particular truths Foucault’s critical theories were based on the premise that systems of thought were deployed and governed by power, which produced knowledge and activated particular discourses that constitute ‘the truth’ of existence. Foucault’s work described how asylums, clinics and schools became exemplary sites of discipline that controlled and maintained subjects such as the madman, the patient and the pupil. In Madness and Civilization (Foucault [1961] 2001), for instance, Foucault used an archaeological approach to excavate the notion of madness. Although he had not at that time explicitly developed his genealogical approach, it was the implicit application of genealogy that allowed him to trace the emergence of a particular truth, namely the category of ‘madness’. By analysing the contingencies and events that were put in place to govern and regulate ‘madness’, Foucault was able to argue that medical discourses and institutional practices, such as psychiatry, used scientific neutrality to sanction a truth of existence (Foucault [1961] 2001:136). He further argued that this process produced the ‘birth of the asylum’ and led to a plethora of social, political and ethical controls upon the body of the insane, which still exist in psychiatry (Foucault [1961] 2001). 61 In this way, the genealogical approach offered Foucault a tool to trace discursive formations and filter historical epochs, also allowing him to cut through the disruptions and discontinuities of knowledge that lie behind social and political change. Foucault was able to go beyond the existence of a category, such as ‘madness’ (Foucault [1966] 2002), and analyse discursive formulations that govern ‘practices which are apparently organised around something that is supposed to be madness’ (Foucault [1978-79] 2008:3). He thereby traced the discursive structures of psychiatry by unearthing and unpicking both the silences and the languages which create knowledge and the power to control, identifying the category of ‘madness’ as political governance and cultural practice which ‘both establishes and impugns it’, andmapping particular moments to describe how discursive and social practices executed the social and physical exclusion of madness (Foucault [1961] 2001:xiv). Foucault’s genealogy provides a set of strategies to consider how the power of language disciplines the body though classification and regulation, while his study on madness can be employed as a means to understand the emergence of the sick body. In the Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (BoC) ( [1963] 2003), Foucault examined the rise of socio-political interventions to counter the process of normalisation that occurs within institutions such as medicine. Principally, the work was ‘about space, about language, and about death; […] about the act of seeing, the gaze’ (Foucault [1963] 2003:ix). Foucault traced the history of medical discourses to examine the dimensions of ‘disease’. in order to ‘disentangle the conditions of its history from the density of discourse’ (Foucault [1963] 2003:xxii. He critically explored how this power produced epistemic shifts in the organisation and management of the sick body. By exploring how the medical institution developed, Foucault contextualised the ways in which disciplinary systems of the body emerged. His theory of the clinic offers a way to understand how the patient/subject is constructed and constituted through a discursive corporeality by which language constitutes the body. This approach describes how it is possible to question the reality of a disease that is constructed via past knowledges, an observable, constantly shifting organism embodied and embedded within a medico-political and sociocultural context. In BoC, Foucault charts the emergence of medical discourse via the anatomical observations of the autopsy, whereby investigations began to invade the body and, following Cartesian dualism, divide or split the mind and the body. Foucault argued that a medical system is derived from the practical processes of observation combined with medical discourse where ‘diseases’ constitute a nosology, a particular set of languages – such as the use of Latin names – that are maintained by wardens of control or medical experts. Foucault developed the term ‘the clinical gaze’ to describe the power of observation and language used to govern sick bodies and validate an illness experience, as symptoms are observed and analysed within a medicalised ‘speaking eye’ to legislate illness and sanction the truth of existence via a medico-politicised system (Osborne 1994:35). This closed system of medical knowledge was gradually to reach a further stage (Rose 2007), whereby the subject of illness was totally removed and technologies that determine illness were based on a set of observable medical truths. Foucault’s approach offers a means to observe how 62 institutional power emerges not in a linear evolution but by a complex system of disciplinary regimes (Foucault [1963] 2003). Foucault was able to deconstruct the particularities of madness and disease and to identify the transitions that led to present day psychiatric and pathologic realities. His approach is, therefore, helpful in revealing the events and contingencies which brought about the emergence of present understandings of current social categories, such as that of a contested illness. Foucault also offers a way to expose the processes which constitute pathological realities, revealing the bio-political gaze that normalises material bodies. In this way, he presents an opportunity to disrupt the ideas, discourses and images of the body, and to ethically and reflectively question the modes of power and truth that procure knowledge of self and other. Inherently, genealogy3 sets out to map the exercises and effects of power in relation to context and the specifics, as with socio-historical and institutional settings. With the concept of governmentality it is about the act of power which denotes not wholly negative power but represents how subjectivity becomes entwined within patterns of truth which as with medical discourses produce doctors/patients that will conform to medical scrutiny and thereby normalise the processes of illness via diagnosis, treatment and to legislate illness. Government bodies are then internalised via particular discursive tools as with surveillance that will enforce and reinforce subjects to conform to the status quo. This is operationalised via experts with ‘the knowledge’ that allows institutions and various disciplines to govern and control4. This art of governing is via bio-power which establishes stable fixed categorises for subject-positions, not only via technologies of domination, but also through discursive systems of control that govern families, school and the workplace. Foucault’s conceptualisations of the often ambiguous and messy processes that constitute social norms, highlights not only acts of conformity, but also how subjugated voices may display resistance. It is important, therefore, that we question regimes of truth and the mechanisms of control that produce discourses within a particular time and space, such as those surrounding contested illness. Foucault uses the term dispositif to describe an apparatus, namely ‘the system of relations’ between a ‘heterogeneous ensemble consisting of discourses, institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative measures, scientific statements, philosophical, moral and philanthropic propositions’. He identifies an ‘interplay of shifts of position and modifications of function’ between these elements and sees the apparatus as ‘responding to an urgent need’ at a ‘given historical moment’, such as the need to control madness, sexual illness and neurosis at a time of a mercantilist economy (Foucault 1980:195). This offers a way to examine the surveillance and policing of the sick body within an ethico-political context (Dreyfus and Rabinow 1982:121). The sick subject is managed via systems, such as the UK’s expert patient programme which relies on self-surveillance (Rose 2007; Nettleton 2013). The dispositif, 3 Please note when discussing genealogy this is in terms of Foucault’s take on Nietzsche’s ‘Genealogy of Morals’ ([1913] 2003). 4 Foucault began to develop the concept of governmentality in his lecture series – 1977-78 Security, Territory, Population Edited by Michel Senellart General and Editors: François Ewald and Alessandro Fontana translated by Graham Burchell Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke (2007). In Foucault’s Discipline and Punish (1975) a genealogy of the state and subject (docile bodies) is tackled and his later works History of Sexuality (1984) via technologies of the self draws connections into how governmentality works 63 therefore, provides an analytical tool for mapping out the various epistemic power systems and inscribe the subject into society, through language and discourse so that the subject can arguably be seen as the residue of power relations. Resistance occurs in breaking through the walls of language by finding the voices that are missing. This is not to suggest that Foucault had no ontological recognition of the human conditions, but rather that his interests lay with the structures of power and the ‘doing’ of subjectivity woven within the threads of knowledge and discourse. Conceptualising other spaces As Foucault states in BoC his aim was to find out ‘how the medical gaze was institutionalised and effectively inscribed as a social space, so that the norm of the hospital was both the effect and the support of a new type of gaze’ (Foucault 1980:146). These specialist spaces, such as hospitals and clinics, were governed by doctors and the political imperatives that sought to administer them and were, in essence, managed through surveillance of space and time (Foucault 1980). For Foucault, spaces are not real but relational, made up by the disciplines that contain them. The systems of spaces that have been institutionalised, from the home to those of leisure and work, contain cultural, social and moral codes of conduct and behaviour (Foucault [1984] 1998:177). Although theses spaces are culturally communicated, it is the concept of production and the act of producing spaces through the context of time that is of interest for long term illness (Lefebvre [1974] 1991:15). Foucault argued these social spaces became sites of control, but he also recognised that spaces were affected and effected sites, as well as being contested places for those who need to resist the normative practices of institutional sites. Foucault’s genealogical approach offers a means to focus on the relationship between space and time, as well as relations of proximity within private and public spaces, between the family space, cultural space and useful space, between spaces of leisure activities and the space of work. Foucault states that ‘these are controlled by an unspoken sacralisation’ and normalised (Foucault [1984] 1998). Cultural expectations of how spaces should function are woven into the fabric of our social identities and are systematically part of our subjective processes. However, those who become severely ill may be unable to fulfil the social imperatives that dictate how places should be used, so that the physical geo-politics of the fixed states of family living and its power relations can become unsettled. Spaces may become unworkable when severely ill bodies disrupt the ‘network of relations’ by which the ‘semi-closed sites of rest – the house, the bedroom, the bed etcetera’ (Foucault [1967] 1984:46), opposing the social practices by which these sites are maintained. Spaces that are opposed or alternative to so-called ‘real places’ can be read through Foucault’s notion of the heterotopia, which is ‘fundamentally and essentially unreal’ (Foucault [1967] 1984:46). Foucault used many examples to explain the concept of heterotopia, the most common being the analogy of the mirror. He states that ‘due to the mirror I discover myself absent from the place where I am since I see myself over there’ (Foucault [1984] 1998:179). It has been argued that the concept of the heterotopia can be vague and lacks consistency (Genochio 1995:37; Soja 1995:162; Johnson 2012). I agree with Johnson that, rather than a detailed examination of spaces, the idea helps to account for how ‘spaces do not exist, except in relation to other spaces’ (Johnson 2012). 64 For Foucault, heterotopias are based on the tensions between ‘myth and the contestation of the real’ (Foucault [1967] 1984:48). These spaces determine how it is possible to invent places for particular types of people and behaviour. He sees crisis heterotopias as forbidden places, putting certain people, such as menstruating women and adolescents, in isolation (Foucault [1967] 1984:47). In her genealogical examination of the historical autobiographies of women teachers (2003), Maria Tamboukou opened up the spatial dynamics of the private and public spaces occupied by the female educator. Talking about a set of technologies of space, she developed Foucault’s notion of crisis heterotopias, referring to ‘spaces of transition and tension, emplacements that gave rise to women in crisis’ (Tamboukou 2003:80). Foucault outlines how crisis heterotopias were replaced by heterotopias of deviation; spaces for people whose behaviour deviates from required norms, such as psychiatric hospitals and old people’s homes (Foucault [1984] 1998:180). This is relevant to those who become severely ill and bedridden, disrupting the institutional setting of the home and the bedroom by using the bed, not as a place of rest, but as a place to live and survive. The concept of heterotopia offers a way to understand how heterogeneous spaces are governed by social and systematic proprieties, by time and context. For those who become bedridden due to serious illness, the site of the bed/bedroom may, therefore, cause a need to transcend both real and metaphorical places. Deploying a genealogical perspective My approach to genealogy enables me to critically analyse discourse associated with past illnesses. My study explores the medical language trapped within the scientific lens, which ignores its own methodological flaws that constitute contested illnesses. In BoC Foucault’s interrogation of French medicine argued that the principles of language confined the sick subject, which may be rhetorically challenging when converting the approach to British medicine (Atkinson 1995:41). However, others continue to use Foucauldian frameworks to generalise the employment of medical power and knowledge and historicise the separation of the body from the mind (Lupton 1994; Armstrong 1997; Nettleton 2013). Performative perspectives on the sick body Foucault’s genealogical approach was employed by Judith Butler in Gender Trouble (1990) and Bodies that Matter (1993) to interrogate the reified category of the female, as a unified identity that stands outside of other classifications, such as class and ethnicity. Butler’s theory of performativity and the ‘doing’ of gender also used Lacanian ideas to challenge the morphological and constitutive ideologies that constrain and maintain the body of the female within social, political and cultural systems that function to label being female as ‘biological, linguistic and/or cultural difference’ (Butler 1990:9). This notion of inscribing bodies was taken up by Elizabeth Grosz in Volatile Bodies (1994) to account for corporeal space and to conceptualise the repressive site of the female body. As with Foucault, this not only contests discourses of power but also dislodges epistemological weapons that seek to constrain the body within particular political and ideological truths. The regulative and normative practices that recognise and govern the body of the female as other can be applied to the sick body. The dualistic medical approach to the body continually outlines the need for sick bodies to either return to healthy subject positions or fulfil 65 the sick role. The presentation of the self is not only about performing an appropriate role, but also avoiding the stigma associated with an undiagnosed and/or untreatable condition (Goffman 1963; [1959] 1969). Those who are diagnosed with a contested illness and/or a Medically Unexplained Illness (MUI) are continually made to feel responsible, as their condition falls outside accepted medical truths and socio-political governance that grant legitimacy (Nettleton 2006:1167). Butler’s argument for dispelling political and social forces, which reinforce the myth of gender, can be used to investigate the myth of the healthy subject. Like Foucault, Butler emphasises the biopolitical regimes surrounding the body, whereby ethics of control categorise, regulate and maintain economic and social order. Similarly, the institutional domains that categorise identity – and thereby the sick body – are formulated by patriarchal powers. Butler’s theory offers a way to understand how social powers operate to produce categorisations that often work to marginalise those living with contested illnesses. This marginalisation has been identified by feminist writers interested in disability studies. Margrit Shildrick, inspired by Foucault’s genealogy, sought to ontologically map the web of power, which entrapped the disabled body. Her theorisations, inspired by her work with illnesses such as ME, explored the historical and political processes by which disability became a social entity. A number of feminist writers call for an ethics of vulnerability to illuminate the processes and practices of contested illnesses (Price and Shildrick 1998; Moss and Dyck 2003; Gilson 2013). As Shildrick and Price (1998) argue, the ‘broken body’ of illnesses like ME/CFS, is an opportunity for us to explore the fantasies that constrain our identities, where contested illnesses make it possible to observe the vulnerability of being outside the binary boundaries that define the experience of illness via the power of medical discourses. Power of medical discourses Social medical theories investigate the structures of discourse which form clinical and political institutions and thus inform society and culture about the meaning of illness (Mishler 1984). Paul Atkinson (1995) argues that medical discourses are based on a language of recognition which produces, challenges and redefines knowledge(s) to construct an accepted narrative. Medical research thus exists by validating evidence-based research methods. These methods of inquiry are the primary means by which illnesses such as ME/CFS are defined, labelled and become a psychological and/or pathophysiological truism. Poststructuralist feminists such as Debra Lupton specifically challenge how medical discourses create knowledge(s) and truths, arguing that the subject may not be separated from the practices which position them, as the subject’s biography becomes entwined within medical discourses (Lupton 1994:160). In effect, the patient is in a paradox, as they experience a dependency on medicine to define the cause of illness and disillusionment when their illness remains contested. Following Foucault, David Armstrong (1995) investigates the discursive powers which manage the sick and sees the rise of surveillance medicine creating a normative structure of what is meant by health and illness. Docile bodies are moved from ‘compliance’ to ‘concordance’ as medical logic embraces the expert patient, which leads to the question what happens to bodies which cannot be coerced into good health, namely the long-term severely ill. Bryan Turner states that 66 human beings ‘have bodies and they are bodies’ (1996:37). This reflects the emergence of social theories which discuss the effects of a somatic society, where the body is both an object of enquiry and a symbol of political and social control. For Turner the body is a site of corporeal uncertainty, where issues of ontology are mapped between the complex relationships of discursive management and the social role of the citizen. Turner suggests that, with the decline of morbidity rates within western society, we have seen an ageing of the nation and a prevalence of chronic illnesses, which conflicts with society’s demands for the body to remain healthy (Turner 1996). Medical sociologists interested in contested illnesses have challenged the medical and political systems that discursively constitute particular illness behaviours as a social deviancy (Conrad 1992). This arguably, situates the disabled, or what may be described as a disordered body, as passive and malleable. Post-structural theorists concerned with chronic illness suggest that contested illnesses offer a view of what could be described as the ‘leaky body’, trapped within the discursive practices and the material experience of illness (Shildrick 1997). The vicissitudes associated with ME/CFS allow us to ponder the fact that all our bodies are unstable and ultimately ‘unknowable’. In relation to her own experiences of living with ME, Price’s desire to know and read the body as a feminist, in order to take control back from others, demanded that the instability of the body be silenced – a fantasy that cannot be sustained when illness has taken up residence (Price and Shildrick 1998:243). Equally, Moss and Dyck (2003) focus on the issues of the material and discursive practices of what they term ‘radical body politics’. Their approach takes into account Foucault’s approach, which decentralises the subject and centralises the notion of power and knowledge. These accounts of living with a chronic illness such as ME are useful in acknowledging the discursive disciplines that actuate how specific bodies are controlled and managed by a play of dominations which, through processes and practices, situate self, subjectivity and identity (Grosz 1994). As Price and Shildrick state in their moving accounts of being disabled (living with ME) and non-disabled, ‘it becomes clear that vulnerability is not the special case of disabled people, but the condition of all of us’ (1998:246). This section has identified a particular discursive view which has been heavily influenced by a particular reading of Foucauldian concepts, a useful way to conceptualise this is by portraying the perspective via a kaleidoscopic view as follows: Diagram 1 – Turn Discursive 67 This section has identified a discursive view that demonstrates how power is always circulating, moving reflecting from outside and inside through the acts of discourse, knowledge and truth. This calls to mind Foucault’s dispositif that accounts for the social structures which produce an epistemological foundation for governing and constituting the subject through language. Philosophical reflections on materiality I will now move from Foucault’s epistemological approach to a more ontological approach that centres on the practices of ‘being’ ill. The nature of a severe chronic illness means that it affects the sensory modalities of human existence and can, through the reality of suffering, subordinate the ability to describe and share the depth of pain. The physical pain displaces that which is known, the intensities of pain and suffering causing language to maybe become momentarily lost. How is it then possible to explain long term suffering? How is it possible to confront, live and survive with an impaired body? While Foucault employed a genealogical lens to understand the mechanisms of power, Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004) utilised the notion of the rhizome as a conceptual tool through which to amalgamate the multiplicities of desire that constitute life. For them, existence moves in and out of discourse, with no walls or divides, a flowing system. Delving into particular aspects of Deleuzian theory helped me to understand chronic illness and in particular ME, whereby it was possible to examine the process of becoming through rhizomatic assemblages. These terms were employed to conceptualise the multiplicities, the continuous flux and flow of desire. Below I will unravel particular ideas by Deleuze and later with Guarrtari on the notion of being and becoming an unhealthy/healthy subject. Critically mapping subjective experiences In Difference and Repetition ([1968] 2004), Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) builds on mathematical concepts to map out multiple capacities for the continuous process of ‘becoming’, rather than the journey to the destination of ‘being’. For those who live with a chronic illness, change is constant through physical suffering. ME patients face an additional problem: the capricious nature of the illness means that diagnostic labels and symptomology are difficult to stabilise. Deleuze develops his work on becoming, together with Felix Guattari (1930-1992) in the two volumes of 68 ‘Capitalism and Schizophrenia’, namely Anti-Oedipus (Deleuze and Guattari [1972] 2004) and A Thousand Plateaus ([1980] 2004). Guattari, a trained psychiatrist and radical activist, explored mental illness and worked with Deleuze to counter psychoanalytical myths. The dense and often difficult concepts they developed offer ways to understand the productions of desire, to make materialist connections between identities/entities and selves/bodies, and may be employed in the ontological abyss where actions and words are intimately related (DeLanda 2002). Conceptualising desire My reading of Deleuze’s philosophy of immanence sees thought as part of a force, as a flow or movement where reality comes via an active process of becoming. Deleuze questioned Kantian views on pure reason and argued for going beyond the epistemological basis of rational thought. If Foucault identified the historical constructions of categories and processes through which power exists in the present, Deleuze and Guattari explored the relational practices by which the processes of logic produce particular realities. As with Foucault’s genealogy that mapped the constructions of a particular phenomenon, Deleuze worked from the premise that all matter creates difference, which leads to repetition. He applied a machinic assemblage to the flows of energy and exposed not a passive but an active process in the continuous unfolding of life. While Foucault’s genealogical approach is useful for tracing the emergence of a contested illness such as ME, Deleuze and Guattari use the concept of the rhizome as an anti-genealogical approach as ‘a map and not a tracing’ process (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:13). The act of mapping refers to productions rather than reproductions. Importantly for those with severe illnesses, it could be argued that the nature of suffering is in a constant state of flux, giving rise to different strata of multiplicities, so that rhizomes may produce different ways of surviving embodied pain. These multiple dimensions produce codes of survival, through a process of becoming detached, reversed, modified, torn, reworked or mounted on, by an individual or social formation (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:13). The uncertainties of diagnosis and suffering which typify the disruptive nature of ME constitute multiplicities, are not only associated with the contestation and confinement associated with ME and severe illness, but also the paradox of accepting the physical confines of pain and escaping through the sensory world of the imagination. Deleuze developed the notion of multiplicities in his early Logic of Sense (1969), as energies that are non-linear, not necessarily sequential, always workable and hold an active capacity for lines of development to produce affects as with the management/living with a chronic illness. Deleuze suggests that this notion of multiplicity has been used in Foucault’s work, such as Archaeology of Knowledge, whereby the ‘discursive order of places and the position occupied by the subject’ correlates and connects to ‘the statement and the subject’, which he sees as a possible multiplicity in action (Deleuze [1986] 2006:10). Equally, those with a contested illness such as ME, may continually be forced to search for the discursive stability of a label/diagnosis that offers the subject a positioned identity. He further states that the Order of Things, the processes through which scientific structures produce the episteme enabling knowledge to constitute the conditions of possibility, ‘represents the most decisive step yet taken in the theoretical-practice of 69 multiplicities’ (Deleuze [1986] 2006:13). It then follows that any situation, event, movement is as an assemblage of multiplicities. Foucault’s use of a dispositif [apparatus] is similar to that of Deleuze’s notion of assemblages [arrangements] as both comprise diverse strata. Deleuze employed his concept as a means of reference for the dynamics of desire to include the expressive material response of life: On the one hand it is a machinic assemblage of bodies, actions and passions, an intermingling of bodies reacting to one another; on the other hand it is a collective assemblage of enunciation, of acts and statements, of incorporeal transformations attributed to bodies. Then on a vertical axis, the assemblage has both territorial sides, or reterritorialized sides, which stabilize it, and cutting edges of deterriotrialization, which carry it away (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:97-98). In relation to severe illness, the bedroom, the bed and the bedridden can be seen as an assemblage necessary for survival. However, these do not represent the totality of a life of severe illness; these are parts, not determinants, as the capacities are always relational (DeLanda 2002:67). In other words, the capacities are always transient and in a constant the process of being and becoming ill, requires assistance from inside the home family/carers to the doctors/health professionals outside the space of the home. Deleuze’s idea of singularity identifies the possible decisive points where change occurs. In relation to those with severe illness, these singularities may be seen as the active responses to the subjective experience of pain and fatigue. The combined singularities constitute the multiplicities of a moment, an episode of suffering, where the sufferer is not passive but takes an active response to becoming bedridden. This may not be directly connected to, but is affected by, the multiplicities of the social world beyond the doors or windows of the bedroom. As Proust described bedbound it is possible one waits remembers taste, people and listens to the world seemingly unconnected, but dependent on the social context of time. However, for the house/bedbound there may be a serious necessity to listen and wait for others who aid their daily survival. Actions are, therefore, relational, affected by the perceptions, beliefs and actions of self and others. This reflects the affects and effects of objects and subjects. So, it could be argued that, although not engaging with the social world whist bedridden inside a bedroom, one is nonetheless affected by the social multiplicities beyond the space of the bed as one may wait remembering the social world, outside, if totally dependent possibly, waiting for the hours to pass for medication. So that movement is part of actual and/or virtual multiplicities, while the intensities differ and reflect the flows and flux of energy, constituting a particular materiality by which a life can be lived with embodied suffering. DeLanda offers a point at which to develop a new material ontology by synthesising connections between past and present memories, the cyclical return that binds and stabilises both traditional ideas for the subject and the desire that metamorphoses and ruptures self (DeLanda 2002). Where those with long term illnesses may expereince the return as memories that become dreams, desires to be that which one was in the now. 70 Employing a particular reading of the concepts of desire The schizophrenic approach in Anti-Oedipus could be said to craft connections between what Foucault thought of as power and Deleuze and Guattari as desire. Yet, the notion of the desiring machine can be used to understand life with a chronic illness, as it is based on two concepts – desiring-production and social-production. These are used conjointly in systems such as capitalism, which encourages us to be a labouring workforce that continues to produce energy, so that we are valued as machines through financial rewards. This sparks the psychic desire to live outside of the body’s confines and adhere to the social norms of the work ethic. Pleasure is based on psychic energy and demonstrates how social productions work to manifest desire, ranging from the individual need to be healthy to work and be part of the institutions of the family, the workplace, the hospital. The rise of TB during the 19th century and Yuppie Flu in the 20th century demonstrates how illness affected the means of production and confounded social norms. As a desiring machine, a severely ill subject may not always be able to put into language the experience of illness. The psyche and social productions can drive the body to work beyond its capacity, as the supply of energy strives to disrupt and distribute, to work and rework ‘the productions of consumptions’, to feed the endless demands for interrelated actions and passions within the desiring machine (Deleuze and Guattari [1972] 2004:4). Importantly, these actions distinguish all types of energy forces whether animal, plant or the environment. This approach takes into account the purity of life where all forms are bound by binary laws of flow-producing forces and desiring productions. For the unhealthy ME body, energy input and output becomes disrupted, while the inability to manifest a social self and manage the body under attack causes the sufferer to experience a draining of their life force. For Deleuze and Guattari, the human body has the capacity to represent all living organisms as it can affect and be affected. Deleuze’s early reading of Antonin Artaud’s (1948) notion of a ‘Body without Organs’ (BwO) in Logic of Sense (1969) was further developed with Guattari in terms of the production of desire. This is not necessarily connected to an actual body, as BwO offers a means to envisage the state of constant flux within and outside a body. It refers to organisms, an organ which has no boundaries, which has the capacity for continuous change and the potential to venture into spaces. In its simplest form, it is an essence of different intensities and rests on assemblages that produce different affects within the fields of immanence and the state of continually becoming. The BwO cannot escape the psyche; it is not about lack, as in psychoanalysis, rather it is tied to processes of production and is the opposite of lack. Shildrick suggests that with a disability, as with sexuality, the focus should not be on parts of bodies, or disabled or able bodies, but rather upon ‘the process of becoming that is often an unmapped circulation of desire’ (Shildrick 2009:135). My reading of Deleuze’s BwO is that the synthesis constitutes a particular mode of production and requires an infinite analysis that is part of and may be included in the body, which is always occupied and populated by intensities. Importantly, the BwO ‘is not space, nor is it in space; it is matter that occupies space to a given degree’ (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:169). The BwO could be said to personify the desire for the perpetual becomings that is life itself – it is the raw existence of life, the matter that rests on the 71 plane of consistency. Fox (2011) takes up the BwO to account for how ill-health is an assemblage that is attached to various networks that include biological, psychological and sociocultural relations. He argues for biomedical approaches to move the focus from within bodies, to explore embodiment itself, the ontological aspects that shape the ill body, not as a separate entity, but as a living cell without boundaries, a ‘Body without Organs’ that is based on assemblages, and consistent territorialisation (Fox 2011:359). Fox’s (2002) notion of refracting health in terms of the body/self - examines the dynamic tensions that exist between cultural practices and embodied subjectivity. He focused on the effects of anorexia, which can be seen as a psychological issue that produces physical effects. Both anorexia and ME may cause particular singularities through which to escape the imaginary or physical confines of pain. The multiplicities of physical limitation, such as being confined to the bed, may mean that outside stimuli will be used to deterritorialize from the incorporeity of pain, of the shame of being bedridden. This may suggest a role for the virtual aspects of the self, in order to excite memories that will offer a way to escape the reality of pain and open up new possibilities for surviving life with a severe chronic illness. Deleuze’s materialist stance creates a particular ontological reading of the relationship between repetition and difference. Repetition of time and structure produces difference via the notion of habit, which leads to assumptions which produce what he terms larvae selves (Deleuze [1968] 2004). In contrast with Foucault’s use of the inscribed subject, larvae selves are made up of miniature egos that can be part of material as well as constructed notions of reality. Equally, Freud used these excitations, or energies, in a systematised way (Freud [1912-1938] 1984). For Deleuze, egos fragment the meanings associated between I and self (Deleuze [1968] 2004:320). Like Proust (Proust [1913] 2014), Deleuze demonstrates how the relationship between the past and the present reveals the cyclical nature of time. Repetitions ignite sensory evocations, where actions or memories in the moment can produce a passion linked to the past, while a rupture that breaks through anew produces difference within what is termed empty time (Deleuze [1968] 2004:136). A chronic illness is continually rupturing and moving, at times, in on itself, as the body in pain may be said to exist outside the constructions of time. Deleuze’s notion of the refrain, although often employed within music theory, may also be used in relation to the experience of chronic illness. The concept relates not only to the socio-political imperatives that produce the subject, but also to the ontological and aesthetic methods for producing the beginnings of order out of the forces of chaos. The refrain can mark out a territory such as a home, as well as suggesting lines of flight from that centre into the sphere of the cosmos (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:343-344). Deleuze’s notion of the refrain denotes a relationship between the forces of chaos and the rhythm of life which is helpful in understanding the way in which those who are bedridden plug in and plug out of their social worlds. Foucault offers a way to understand the dynamics of power that operate to produce the subject. Deleuze, meanwhile, allows us to explore the rhizomatic and interconnected nature of all experiences, people, bodies, events and places. For Deleuze and Guattari, it is not about the substance of matter but the assemblages and multiplicities by which forces unfold. The line of 72 flight could be said to refer to ‘the deterritorialization that carries away all of the assemblages but also undergoes all kinds of reterritorializations’ (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:98). For those who are bedridden, the boundaries of the bed represent an imaginary circle within which they negotiate living in an internal space, while the forces of chaos are the continual occurrences of pain and suffering. The battle with illness takes place as those who suffer may search for lines of flight to escape the confines of the body in pain and find a passage out of what may be experienced as a ‘black hole’ (Deleuze and Guattari [1980] 2004:344). This section has been concerned with the material effect of illness. The following kaleidoscopic view is employed to demonstrate the reflective power of desire from outside and inside, much as Foucault had examined power. Diagram 2 – A Turn to New Materialism For Deleuze and Guarrtari the model of the rhizome demonstrates how different intensities and multiplicities activate particular acts of becoming. This diagram could be used to demonstrate Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of an assemblage, as well as employed to understand the epistemological and ontological dynamics that identify the process of becoming. Bakhtinian philosophical reflections on the narrating subject This section will look at how narrative is both a functional and communicative social tool. For Foucault and Roland Barthes (1915-1980) language is based on a structure, a regulative device that signifies inclusion and exclusion of the author. For Mikhail Bakhtin (1895-1975), Foucault 73 and Deleuze, language inscribes the subject through text and the dialogic apparatus of the linguistic and the institutional power relations. This takes into consideration the context in which one inscribes the self. Bakhtin employs particular concepts to understand the dialectic context specifically the chronotope which is about positionality, his ideas on utterances which are seen as always relational and his term heteroglossia which encompasses all aspects of language and reiterates the importance of how the dialogic process is governed by the relational and contextual. A particular reading of Bakhtinian concepts Bakhtin’s work on the interactions between time and space, the dialectic qualities of speech and language and how storied selves produce a social, cultural and personal context, are all relevant in this context. Bakhtin’s concept of the chronotope provides a way to understand the relationship between time and space in narration. Bakhtin recognised the temporal and spatial relations, which in literary novels are governed by particular genres, relating to an event or particular moment in which a story is told. Specific to chronotope is the positionality of the narrator – who speaks and when – and the fact that the narration is always governed by context. For Bakhtin, foremost is the social and cultural context which governs memories, actions, speech and acts of listening and ‘characterises the chronotope’ (Bakhtin 1981:250). Bakhtin goes on to suggest that the chronotope produces narrative events that constitute a particular materiality. He offers specific and heterogeneous ways in which to understand places on the journey of life, within time and space. Importantly, the chronotope is historically contextualised as it moves from one moment to another. Bakhtin critiques the figure of the ready-made hero in the majority of novels, suggesting that ‘the aspect of man’s essential becoming’ is often ignored as ‘events change his destiny... but he himself remains unchanged’ (Bakhtin 1986:19-20). Unlike the literary hero, in the context of ME/CFS the hero/heroine continually changes in time and space. Chronotopes have an interactive quality that is governed by the relationship of the reader to the text, or the relationship between the narrator and the listener in the case of spoken narrative. Bakhtin identified the links between language and materiality as a means by which the chronotope is able to facilitate the interactions between real and possible worlds, as well as mediating the relationship between self and other. For Bakhtin, the utterance is shaped by the object of discourse (such as illness) and the listener, displaying their belief systems and how this can be understood (Bakhtin 1986:17). An utterance is made by the subject and is produced in social and personal contexts, in relation to the situatedness of the subject in terms of others, objects and space. The author/narrator needs to convey to their audience the authorship of the utterance. With a contested illness, a storyteller may be aware of both the social stigma associated with their illness and the medical contestation affecting the presentation of their story. Following Bury’s idea of the ‘biographical disruption’ that is associated with chronic illness (1982), Gomersal and Madill develop the notion of chronotope disruption, which focuses on ‘the grounding of biographical disturbance in time and space’ (2015:408). They argue that a chronotopic analysis is useful for establishing connections and disconnections between the spatial 74 and temporal situatedness of illness. The fusion that usually occurs in a chronotope is made problematic when one is chronically ill. The chronotope, in its endeavours to include both time and space, also takes into consideration cultural aspects not only in relation to illness but to all the fragmentations of life. Unlike Foucault’s genealogy which concentrated on the interaction between history and language, Bakhtin’s use of the term heteroglossia relates to the specificity of the relationship between utterance and context. He employs the term to account for the multiplicities of language, dialects and the associated qualities they have with various social groups. all languages of heteroglossia, whatever the principle underlying them and making each unique, are specific points of view on the world, forms for conceptualizing the world in words, specific world views, each characterized by its own objects, meanings and values. As such they all may be juxtaposed to one another, mutually supplement one another, contradict one another and be interrelated dialogically. (Bakhtin 1981:291-2) In this way, heteroglossia takes into account how language does not exist in isolation but is a product of and is constituted by context. For Bakhtin, language is always in relation to another, even when that other is the inner voice (Bakhtin 1981:xxi). In terms of heteroglossia, it is the layers of language, the dialogic qualities that reveal how, in the involuntary acts of language such as laughter, the parody of life can seep through. Therefore, stories that include the events that lead to the diagnosis and a life of chronic illness may not simply be conveyed in words, but also through actions. Bakhtin’s theory of language is useful in the context of my research as a tool to conceptualise the way in which language can be understood in terms of the historical and contextual disruptive aspects of living with chronic illness. In order to understand how heteroglossia can be used in terms of chronic illnesses, it is useful to make connections with Hyden’s notions of illness and narrative as a particular amalgamation between languages and a specific community of speakers. When telling the story of illness it is often recounted through the tension between a healthy and unhealthy subject. Hyden states that: Often the narrator vacillates between these two perspectives in one and the same illness narrative. To speak in the illness voice is to depict the illness ‘from the inside’, from the vantage point of the suffering person’s ongoing situation. To speak in the illness voice is to identify with the illness and accompanying suffering. It is to talk like a person who is, in fact, ‘ill’. To speak in the voice of the healthy is to talk about the illness as something extraneous, something that has invaded one’s life from the outside; or also it is to talk about something that has been, something that had befallen one earlier in life (Hyden 1997:62). In this way, Hyden highlights the capacity of narrative to depict the different voices that co-exist when conveying the unsettling experience of illness. 75 Performance and narrative Bakhtin describes the carnival in terms of its historical manifestation as an oppositional display of medieval ecclesiastical and feudal culture, whereby the performer has the opportunity to live a kind of utopian existence for a moment when all things seem possible (Bakhtin 1984:4). Participation offered both the actor and the spectator freedom and release in the form of humour, akin to Bergson’s notion of the parodies of laughter (Bergson [1911] 1999). This offered the possibility of living briefly as the other, resisting the boundaries of social and cultural hierarchy and morality and the realities of life. Ironically, severe illness may also allow the individual to step outside normal social roles, by presenting an opportunity to succumb to the desire to abandon the acceptable appearance of the social self. Just like Bakhtin’s aesthetic materiality of the grotesque, unfinished bodies reside in a non-vernacular world, where a mask may be worn to juxtapose reality and imagery (Bakhtin 1984:40). With severe illness it could be argued that there are long periods of a kind of grotesque realism where it may not be possible to wash, get dressed or eat unaided. Although stories may depict this in a negative light, it could arguably be seen as a kind of carnivalised performance. Where the lack of following the rituals of daily life not only deviates from the norm, but exposes aspects of life that is averse to healthy living. Whereby, those who experience severe impairments may wear the mask of health to hide the effects of pain and suffering. For Foucault, the constructions of subjects such as the madman, the prisoner and the patient are regulated by exterior powers and are discursively constituted identities. In a similar way, Butler’s notion of the female highlights the difficulties of resistance when a subject is captured and constrained by discourse and social practice (Butler 1993:15). Just as Butler identifies how we learn to perform normative cultural expressions of gender (Butler 1990:25), it is also possible to identify how we perform the role of the healthy subject. In a study of male illness narratives of living with Multiple Sclerosis, for example, Riessman demonstrates how performances of gender and illness intersect (Riessman 2002:11). The social requirements of performing as a healthy subject may weigh heavily on those with severe illness as they are loaded with moral and social values which dictate ‘civilised’ ways of being. For those who feel obliged to pretend to be well, performance can be seen in acts of monotonous role play. For those for whom the performance of the healthy subject becomes impossible, the use of a proxy to fulfil this role may occur. Hyden (2008) discusses the problems of having an authorial voice in relation to people who have suffered an illness/accident. He notes the interaction between those who have lost or have no voice and a person who works as their supporting or ‘vicarious voice’, where the production of a self is made possible through another who acts as their storyteller. Hyden outlines how people with broken voices need a cohesive relationship with another person to reconstitute the self into an integral whole, as responsibility is shifted to the teller (Hyden 2008). The problems of giving a voice where one is absent must be acknowledged, but it is also important to consider how stories are never told but shared, through a collaboration of social and cultural knowledge. 76 This section has been concerned with a particular theoretical approach to narrative and as with other sections a kaleidoscopic view that highlights the importance of context has been created. Diagram 3 – The Dialogic Turn The act of storytelling represents a way to connect the discursive material and subjective contexts of life. The above diagram identifies a dialogic approach which focuses on the importance of context and the relationship between time and space. The dialogic relationship between self and other, between and within things, are brought together in a socio-cultural context that can be achieved through narration. Conclusion Foucault’s dispositif reveals how social systems produce layers of discursive relations. Institutional regulative laws and moral codes form the structures of truth within which a contested and severe illness is experienced. The mechanisms that control the body are, therefore, seen to be discursively governed. By situating how language inflects the constructions of the subject, the notion of ‘doing illness’ can be explored in terms of how it is possible to gain resistance and reconstitute sickness norms. However, when looking at a long term illness that defies medical and social understanding, it is important to not only examine language, but also take into account the corporeal site of a sick body and the material conditions of illness. Deleuze and Guattari’s concepts can, therefore, be used to facilitate a new materiality. Equally, theorising narrative offers a means to highlight the contextual and relational aspects of space and time in the storied self, which reveals how the subject is a political, social and cultural artefact made up of different and often internalised voices. 77 The metaphor of the kaleidoscope demonstrates how one slight turn can offer an alternative viewpoint. As with mechanisms of power which control technologies of the self, the formulation of subjectivity is rarely stationary. The complexities derived from multiple reflections show how control of the object/subject is merely suspended in momentary episodes where technologies of the self are woven within symmetrical socio-cultural patterns. Multiplicities of socio-cultural forms govern within particular political resolutions of power in time and space. Each turn of the kaleidoscope allows macroscopic and microscopic details to emerge, opening up the pathways between knowledge, truth and power. The kaleidoscopic enquiry enables us to examine genealogically the formations, discontinuities and complexities as multiple reflections, providing the opportunity to take a bio-psycho-social perspective, which incorporates the interactions of body, self and society. When taken together, the three turns of the kaleidoscope demonstrate how the intersection of the theories help us to understand the discursive, material and dialogic implications of living with severe ME. These aspects are embedded, embodied and inscribed in the acts of becoming diagnosed with a contested illness and living with the severe symptoms of a chronic illness such as ME. This final diagram is employed as a means to bring the three sections together. This kaleidoscope view is a way of making a particular judgement in motion; at a turn focus is made on power and its effects likewise with desire and the importance of context. This final diagram demonstrates all parts of reflections and effects upon the various parts, so that discourse can be viewed through the notion of an assemblage and a chronotope into a heterotopia. The prime rationale for employing this devise is to demonstrate how it keeps thing moving in and out of regularity just like the body and specifically for those living with a severe chronic illness. Diagram 4 – Kaleidoscopic View 78 The above kaleidoscopic views are brought together in order to show the reflective qualities of the conceptual theories within this paper. In particular the final diagram demonstrates the multivaried/faceted dimensions and the ever-shifting movements within and between the three approaches under discussion. Both Foucault and Deleuze & Guattari have referred to the use of diagrams. For Foucault the Panopticon diagram represented: a mechanism of power reduced to its ideal form; its functioning, abstracted from any obstacle, resistance or friction, must be represented as a pure architectural and optical system: it is in fact a figure of political technology that may and must be detached from any specific use (Foucault, 1977: 205) For Deleuze the notion of the abstract machine can be represented as diagrammatic where spaces of energy are not physical, corporeal or semiotic, therefore not having substance, function or form (Deleuze, 1977, 141). With isomorphic qualities which make connections to similar behaviours, concepts can interchange and the endogenous nature can be stablised into a particular understanding. As I have attempted to do on living with a severe chronic illness. To follow Deleuze notion that matter, objects, subjects and therein thought-patterns ‘constructs a real that is yet to come, a new type of reality’ (Deleuze & Guattari, 1977, 141-142). Deleuze alluded to the constant change and movement of energy and form. However, Bakhtin criticised visual forms as a means to represent concepts and ideas via schematic and symbolic forms. The argument being that in terms of communication there are no fixed unified ‘listeners’ and ‘understanders’ as it is inherently responsive to the moment, the meaning simultaneously activates a response (Bakhtin, 1986, 68). The diagrams are then to be seen as only an abstract account and cannot represent the whole in terms of the narrative. The spatial organisation of the kaleidoscope has been used as a composition for particular concepts. This concurs with the theorists within that power/desire matter/life relational/context is continuously unfolding. References Armstrong, D. (1995). "The Rise of Surveillance Medicine." Sociology of Health and Illness 17(3): 393-404. 79 Armstrong, D. (1997). Foucault and the Sociology of health and illness: a prismatic reading. In A. Petersen and R. Bunton (eds.) Foucault: Health and Medicine. London, Routledge. Atkinson, P. (1995). Medical Talk and Medical Work. London, Sage. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Texas, University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his World. Indiana, Bloominton. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, University of Texas Press. Barthes, R. (1977). Fragments d'un Discours Amoureux. Paris, A Ete Publie Dans La Collection. Bergson, H. ([1911] 1999). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Los Angeles, Green Integer. Bouchard, D. F. (ed.) (1977). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. New York, Cornell University Press. Bury, M. (1982). "Chronic Illness as Biographical Disruption." Sociology of Health and Illness 4(2): 167-182. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". London, Routledge. Butler, J. (2006). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London, Routledge. Conrad, P. (1992). "Medicalization and Social Control." Annual Review of Sociology 18: 209-232. Cooper, L. (1997). "Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and the Medical Encounter." Journal of Sociology of Health and Illness 19(2): 186-207. Cox, D. L. and Findley, L. J. (2000). "Severe and Very Severe Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Perceived Outcome Following an Out Patient Programme." Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 7(3): 33-47. Debord, G. ([1967] 2004). La Societe du Spectacle: Ken Knabb Translation. London, Rebel Press. DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive Scientific and Virtual Philosophy. London, Bloomsbury. Deleuze, G. (1969). The Logic of Sense. London, Bloomsbury. Deleuze, G. ([1968] 2004). Difference and Repetition. London, Continuum International Publishing Group. Deleuze, G. ([1986] 2006). Foucault. London, Bloomsbury. Deleuze, G. ([1990] 1995). Negotiations: 1972-1990. New York, Columbia University Press. 80 Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. ([1972] 2004). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London, The Athlone Press. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. ([1980] 2004). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London, Continuum International Publishing Group. Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. London, The Harvester Press. Foucault, M. (1980). The Confession of the Flesh. In C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York, Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1980). The Eye of Power. In C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York, Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York, Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzche, Genealogy, History. In P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault's Thought. London, Penguin Books. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, P. H. Hutton (eds.) Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Massachusetts, University of Massachusetts Press. Foucault, M. ([1961] 2001). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London, Routledge (first trans. into English 1967). Foucault, M. ([1963] 2003). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London, Routledge (first trans. into English 1973). Foucault, M. ([1966] 2002). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London, Routledge (first trans. into English 1970). Foucault, M. ([1967] 1984). "Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias." Architecture, Mouvement, Continuite 5: 1-9. Foucault, M. ([1970] 1990). The Order of Discourse. In R. Young (ed.) Untying the Text: A PostStructuralist Reader. London, Routledge. Foucault, M. ([1975] 1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London, Penguin Books (first trans. into English 1977). Foucault, M. ([1976] 1990). The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality Volume 1. London, Penguin Books. Foucault, M. ([1978-79] 2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. In M. Senellart, F. Ewald and A. Fontana (eds.) Michel Foucault The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College De France 1978-79. Paris, Palgrave Macmillan. 81 Foucault, M. ([1984] 1990). The care of the self: The History of Sexuality Volume 3. London, Penguin Books. Foucault, M. ([1984] 1992). The use of pleasure: The History of Sexuality Volume 2. London, Penguin Books. Foucault, M. ([1984] 1998). Different spaces (first presented as a lecture March 14 1967). In J. D. Faubion (ed.) Michel Foucault: Aesthetics: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 Volume 2. London, Penguin Books: 175-185. Fox, N. (2002). "Refraction 'health': Deleuze, Guattari and body-self." Health: An Interdiciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 6(3): 347-363. Fox, N. (2011). "The ill-health assemblabge: beyond the body-with-organs." Health Sociology Review 20(4): 359-371. Freud, S. ([1912-1938] 1984). On Metapsychology: The Theory of Psychoanalysis - Beyond the Pleaseure Principle the Ego and the Id and Other Works. London, Penguin Books. Genochio, B. (1995). Discourse, Discontinuity, Difference: the Question of Other Spaces. In S. Watson and K. Gibson. (eds.) Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford, Blackwell: 97-108. Gilson, E. C. (2013). The Ethics of Vilnerability: A Feminist Analysis of Social Life and Practice. London, Routledge. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes of the Management of Spoiled Identity. London, Simon & Schuster Inc. Goffman, E. ([1959] 1969). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London, Penguin Books. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, Indiana University Press. Guise, J., Widdicombe, S. et al. (2007). "'What is it like to have ME?': The Discursive Construction of ME in Computer-mediated Communication and Face-to-face Interaction." Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 11(1): 87-108. Horton-Salway, M. (2004). "The Local Production of Knowledge: Disease Labels, Identitites and Category Entitlements in ME Support Group Talk." Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 8(3): 351-371. Hyden, L. (1997). "Illness and Narrative." Sociology of Health and Illness 19(1): 48-69. Hyden, L. (2008). Broken and Vicarious Voices in Narratives. In L. Hyden and J. Brockmeier (eds.) Health, Illness and Culture: Broken Narratives. London, Routledge. Johnson, P. (2012) Interpretations of Heterotopia. http://www.heterotopiastudies.com [accessed 05 April 2015]. 82 Heterotopian Studies. Lattie, E. G., Antoni, M. H., et al. (2013). "Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Symptom Severity: Stress Management Skills are Related to Lower Illness Burden." Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behaviour 1(4): 210-222. Lefebvre, H. ([1974] 1991). The Production of Space. Oxford, Blackwell. Lupton, D. (1994). Medicine as Culture: Illness, Disease and the Body in Western Societies. London, Sage. Mishler, E. G. (1984). The Discourse of Medicine: Dialetics of Medical Interviews. Norwood NJ, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Moss, P. and Dyck, I. (2003). Women, Body, Illness: Space and Identity in the Every Day Lives of Women with Chronic Illness. Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. Nettleton, S. (2006). "'I just want permission to be ill': Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms." Social Science and Medicine 62: 1167-1178. Nettleton, S. (2013). The Sociology of Health and Illness 3rd Edition. Cambridge, Polity Press. Osborne, T. (1994). On Anti-Medicine and Clinical Reason. In C. Jones and R. Porter (eds.) Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body. London, Routledge. Pheby, D. and Saffron, L. (2009). "Risk Factors for Severe ME/CFS." Biology and Medicine 1(4): 50-74. Price, J. and Shildrick, M. (1998). Uncertain Thoughts on the Dis/abled Body. In J. Price and M. Shildrick (eds.) Vital Signs. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press: 224-249. Proust, M. ([1913] 2014). The Complete Works of Marcel Proust. London, Delphi Classics. Riessman, C. K. (2002) Illness Narratives: Positioned Identities. Rose, N. (2007). The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford, Princeton University Press. Shildrick, M. (1997). Leakey Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio) Ethics. London, Routledge. Shildrick, M. (2009). Dangerous Discourses of Disability Subjectivity and Sexuality. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Soja, E. (1995). Heterotopologies: A Rememberance of Other Spacesin the Citadel-LA. In S. Watson and K. Gibson (eds.) Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford, Blackwell: 13-34. Spade, J. Z. and Valentine, C. G. (eds.) (2007). The Kaleidoscope of Gender: Prisms, Patterns, and Possibilities. London, Sage. 83 Stanley, L. (1987). "Biography as Microscope or Kaleidoscope? The Case of 'Power' in Hannah Cullwick's Relationship with Arthur Munby." Women's Studies International Forum 10(1): 19-31. Stanley, L. (1994). "Sisters Under the Skin? Oral Histories and auto/biographies." Oral History 22(2): 80-83. Tamboukou, M. (2003). Women, Education and the Self: A Foucauldian Perspective. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Turner, B. (1996). The Body & Society Second Edition. London, Sage. Sharon Gallagher has just completed her PhD titled: ‘ME and its Discontents: Life Stories and Photo-Elicited Diaries of a severe chronic illness’ (unpublished 2016). The thesis was concerned with the issues of living with long term impairments. In particular, her examination drew on the aspects of ‘doing’ and ‘being’ ill by focusing on the discursive, material and contextual acts of struggling and surviving with what has been termed a contested and can be experienced as a severe chronic illness. Sharon has been a member of Centre of Narrative Research (CNR) at the University of East London since 2002 and a member of the London MedSoc Group (2014). Her ‘Mentoring with (a) Difference’ group was specifically designed for disabled students to discuss social and academic issues (2007-8). Sharon has presented widely on her thesis and on the benefits of specialist mentoring nationally and internationally (Gallagher, 2007, Girt and Gallagher, 2009). Her major interests are impairments, disability, narrative, visual/art and medical sociology and making connections with Foucauldian and Deleuzian theories. She is currently developing ideas on inclusivity for disabled students at university. Contact details: Sharon Gallagher School of Social Sciences, University of East London 4-6 University way, London E16 2RD e-mail: [email protected] 84 Working the hyphens: reflections on doing psycho-social research in Bangladesh. Phoebe Beedell ABSTRACT Postcolonial critics remind us of our privileged positions and the political and ethical responsibilities we carry as researchers and authors. I am a white, British middle-class woman engaged in psycho-social research with professional NGO workers and social activists in Bangladesh. The question of how my identity and positionality plays out in the research and how I account for it is therefore acutely relevant. Cunliffe and Karunanayake (2013), and Fine (1994) offer the notion of hyphen-spaces to reflect upon influences that shape our engagement, affect our progress and colour our representations of the data, thus enabling us to recognize the taken-for granted as well the obvious forces at work. The hyphen is still a contested semantic device in psycho-social studies (Frosh, 2014) but ‘the real issue, as it has always been, is how to produce concepts that have explanatory power’ (Jefferson, 2008). Following Jefferson, I want to use the notion of hyphen spaces in this paper to explore the realities of doing qualitative research in a foreign country and as a framework from which to view other conceptual possibilities. Etherington points out that reflexivity-related dilemmas stem from our fear of being judged as narcissistic, lacking in self-awareness, or anxieties over public exposure. This paper purposefully includes some of the most awkward, embarrassing and emotionally demanding episodes in my research journey. Their inclusion will go some way towards explaining the intricacies, complexities and sheer messiness of the work we do, both emotionally and cognitively, as qualitative researchers. The schema of hyphen spaces is a useful heuristic tool that can assist us in mapping relationships between the researcher and the researched, but the complex realities of fieldwork and datagathering cannot always be so neatly accommodated. As Corbin Dwyer and Buckle propose, it is not ones particular status that is the ‘core ingredient’ of a prudent researcher but the ‘ability to be open, authentic, honest, deeply interested in the experience of ones research participants, and committed to accurately and adequately representing their experience’ (Corbin Dwyer and Buckle, 2009). Jessica Benjamin considers the notion of surrender ‘to the principle of reciprocal influence in interaction which makes possible both responsible action and freely given recognition’ (Benjamin, 2004) (p11). Whilst we may use a variety of tools in our attempts at reflexive practice I suggest that in ‘working the hyphens’ we also need to surrender to a good deal of discomfort and anxiety. 85 I want to know your story. And then I will tell it back to you in a new way. Tell it back to you in such a way that it has become mine, my own. Re-writing you, I write myself anew. I am still author, authority. I am still the colonizer, the speak subject, and you are now at the centre of my talk. hooks, b (1990, pp151-152) cited in Fine 1994. This declaration acts is a sharp reminder to qualitative social scientists like myself, of our privileged position as authors and ‘authorities’, and the political and ethical ramifications of our choices in our relationships with those who we place at the ‘centre of our talk’. – whether we refer to them our objects or subjects, informants, respondents or participants. Twenty-five years on from this oft-quoted reminder, and the multiple postcolonial, deconstructionist, poststructuralist and feminist entreaties and invitations that surround it, we as researchers, are still grappling with the implications and practical application of reflexivity to our own research projects. From the outset of my research journey, I have felt the words of postcolonial critics such as hooks and Spivak ringing in my ears. An entry in my research journal during my first semester as a PhD student reflects this sense of unease with my place in the research: I have been rather struggling, in thoughtful moments, when I try to rationalize what a white foreigner can possibly bring to the research encounter with developing-world participants, and whether or not it is exploitative and neo-colonial to think I can make pronouncements about their practices and psychic realities. (Field journal, Nov 2013) I have, I think, foregone the rather grandiose idea of ‘making pronouncements’, but the uncomfortable question of how identity and positionality plays out across the biography of the research and how we account for it remains. My recent experience of a discussion on reflexivity amongst a mixed group of sociologists at the BSA Bourdieu Study Group5 conference confirmed this enduring anxiety with the practice of reflexivity, but I found it both reassuring to know that I am not alone and that complacency has not (yet) set in. Issues of identity and positionality arise immediately when I say my doctoral research is a psychosocial study of professional NGO workers and social activists in Bangladesh. I often have to explain to interested Westerners that the ‘NGO workers’ I refer to are not the foreign expatriates ‘we’ send out to ‘do development’ in places like Bangladesh, but local, professionally-qualified people working within a variety of organizations concerned with generating knowledge, imparting skills, advocating and acting for social change in their own country. These polite enquiries marked one of the first departure points on my reflexive journey as they seemed to unwittingly expunge the ‘local’ development workers from the purview of academic research, suggesting a 5 British Sociological Association’s Bourdieu Study Group Conference, University of Bristol July 2016. 86 neo-colonial myopia at large, as if NGO were staffed only by ‘experts’ dispatched from the global north. My research participants (as I have chosen to call them, acknowledging the co-constructed nature of my narrative methodology) are well-resourced, well-educated people, far from the image of the subaltern painted by Spivak. The study is about how people involved in the development sector negotiate the ethical, moral and social dilemmas inherent in their work. I have conducted 57 biographical narrative and other semi-structured interviews, in English, with 37 men and women (equally), aged 25 to 65 over the course of eight months of fieldwork mostly in Dhaka, Bangladesh. My thesis focuses on the 24 younger participants aged 25 – 45 who represent a postLiberation war generation born after 1971. My participants occupy a particular middle ground between the top-down development initiatives of foreign aid donors and the bottom-up realities and concerns of the poor and ultra-poor beneficiaries. Reflexivity, as summarized by Etherington, means being aware ‘in the moment’, over time and at both concrete and abstract levels of what is influencing our internal responses and external actions in relation to our participants, our data and our topic. These influences shape our engagement with theoretical, institutional, cultural and personal constructs, affect our progress and colour our representations of the data. Being attuned to these influences means being able to recognize the taken-for granted as well the obvious forces at work. Reflexivity certainly supports us as we face ethical issues and attempt to address the power relationships operating within our research. Being transparent in documenting and taking account of our responses and actions invites audiences to make their own judgments on the validity and rigour of our findings (Etherington, 2004). Spivak challenges us to engage with our researchers in intimate and dialogical ways, but does not offer particularly practical advice or suggestions about how we actually go about (Kapoor, 2004). Cunliffe and Karunanayake following Fine (1994) offer the notion of hyphen-spaces to reflect upon Geetha Karunanayake’s experience as an academic researcher studying the lives of tea plantation workers in Sri Lanka, the country of her birth. While Spivak would describe this position as ‘native informant’, the notion of hyphen-spaces is perhaps more practically useful in helping to map our multiple identity positions and expose our subjectivity. Recognizing, and ‘working the hyphens’ as spaces of both identity convergence and divergence Fine argues, means exploring how our presence influences others, and how their presence influences and changes us. It means self consciously ‘unpacking notions of scientific neutrality, universal truths, and researcher dispassion’ (Fine, 1994) (p.71), part of the ‘critical task for qualitative researchers’ which brings to the surface ‘the identity relations that may occur between ourselves and our research participants’ (Cunliffe and Karunanayake, 2013) (p.365). It is at least a useful concept with which to begin to chart positionality and to support reflection on the processes of research, especially when gathering data through interviews. In psycho-social studies, the significance of the hyphen has been keenly debated between Lacanian-leaning psychoanalysts and more Kleinian-oriented researchers in an attempt to bring some definition to this nascent approach to the study of social processes. The former argued that the psychological and social are inseparable (Frosh, 2003, Frosh and Baraitser, 2008) much like a continuous line on a Moebius strip. The latter maintain a focus on the differences between the realms of ‘in here’ and ‘out there’(Jefferson, 2008). An alternate, relational view argues that the hyphen indicates not a ‘splitting or integration’, but ‘what is ‘‘other than’’ both, that is, what is different from either of the two milieus that generate it’ (Hoggett, 2008). These differing uses and 87 interpretations of the hyphen as signifying continuum, merger, junction, separator, disjunction, or an ‘other than’ third space is relevant to how we understand our identities as researchers in relation to our research participants. The hyphen is still a contested semantic device in psychosocial studies (Frosh, 2014) but Jefferson concluded ‘the real issue, as it has always been, is how to produce concepts that have explanatory power at both … levels without, thereby, eliminating the unique dimension of each level’ (Jefferson, 2008). Following Jefferson, that the issue at stake is an explanatory one, in this paper I want to use the notion of hyphen spaces to explore the realities of doing qualitative research in Bangladesh as a white, British middle-class woman. In doing so I will also use it as a framework from which to view other conceptual possibilities. Etherington points out that some of the dilemmas that arise out of our attempts to be reflexive researchers stem from our fear of being judged as narcissistic or lacking in self-awareness, and anxieties over public exposure and the wish to retain our privacy. This paper purposefully includes some of the most awkward, embarrassing and emotionally demanding episodes in my research journey, which are otherwise so easily airbrushed out of the reflexive accounting-for process. Their inclusion I believe will go some way towards explaining the intricacies, complexities and sheer messiness of the work we do, both emotionally and cognitively, as qualitative researchers. Cunliffe and Karunanayake set out a number of hyphen-spaces that broadly cover variables of location, values, subjectivities, emotionality and political engagement. These hyphen spaces are related to identities of insider-outsider; qualities of sameness-difference; the extent of emotional engagement-distance; and politically active-politically neutral stances. Leaving aside the last of these purely for reasons of brevity rather than importance, I will consider how these schematic categorizations can be ‘worked’ to illuminate my place in the research. 88 Working the hyphens Insider-outsider Ethnographers, anthropologists and researchers across the social sciences will be familiar with this pre-eminent oppositional and it the subject of differing definitions over time and discipline (Milligan, 2016). Cunliffe and Karunanayake are guided by Louis and Bartunek (1992), who considers a researcher who is not connected the research site and often only interested in generalizable knowledge is as having an ‘outsider’ identity, whereas a researcher with an ongoing relationship with the research site and an interest in the practical application of the knowledge generated is considered an ‘insider’. Banks (1998) developed further ways of thinking about the outsider-insider dimension in terms of acceptance by the community under study through congruence of values between researcher and researched. Researchers might be ‘indigenous’ or ‘alien’ to the context of research subjects; and either sensitive or indifferent to the values and customs of the community of respondents. Thus the ‘indigenous insider’, Banks contends, is not only a member of the community under study but is accepted by the research subjects because they are perceived as sharing experiences, knowledge, customs and values. ‘Alien outsiders’ it follows, are disconnected from the context and are perceived to have values and social customs that are at odds with those of the researched community. Two more categories spring from Banks’ writing: the ‘indigenous outsider’, who may share origins and cultural knowledge with the researched but are treated with suspicion because of their acculturation with values and social norms from outside the research site; and alien or ‘external insiders’ who originate from outside the research location but have been accepted by the community they are studying because they have adopted or acculturated to the same customs and values. My position within Bank’s taxonomy was perhaps closest to ‘external-insider’, but a number of authors, including Cunliffe and Karunanayake have sought to reconsider insider-outside-ness not as fixed but fluid, and highly contextualized socially, politically and culturally (Arthur, 2010, Katyal & King 2011; McNess et al 2013 as cited in Milligan). The fluidity and contextualized nature of my insider-outsider position was apparent in my first visits to Bangladesh in 2010. My partner at the time was managing a large ‘flagship’ project for DfID and was a respected and popular team leader. My partner’s status, to a large extent, provided me with easy & affordable access to the country, and a certain kudos with potential participants who knew of this connection. By the time the fieldwork began in early 2014 I had acquired the quasi-official, laughably gender-neutral title of ‘trailing spouse’ (Eyben, 2012). I had access to many of the privileged ‘spaces of aid’: a clean, safe and pleasant neighbourhood to live in, occasional transport in air-conditioned 4x4s, and access to the exclusive ‘international’ clubs of Dhaka that serve as places of cultural practice and inscription (through alcohol consumption, sporting and social activities) for the ‘international community’ (Smirl, 2015), and function as both cosmopolitan and colonial ‘contact zones’ (Conway, 2011). The ‘boss’s wife’ identity in this milieu, provided a certain amount of ‘insider’ access to the conversations of visiting experts and technical advisers and more usefully, opportunities to visit various development projects and meet NGO workers and social activists with a view to recruitment. Independently, I attended a variety of other events that could also be characterized as ‘contact zone’ events: policy dialogue seminars and workshops, presentations, including TedX Dhaka, and NGO gatherings. On these occasions I would sometimes feel uncomfortably like an interloping head-hunter, listening and observing carefully, before pouncing on potential participants in a rather ‘guerilla mode’ of 89 engagement that Moore-Gilbert, reviewing Spivak, notes is less easily(re)appropriated by the dominant hegemony (as cited in Kapoor, 2004, p.640). Altogether, these occasions not only provided me with valuable insight into the operational politics and rituals of development aid, but allowed me to engage with local NGO workers about their work and speak about my planned research. In the course of these conversations with potential participants and informal gatekeepers, I often shared my experience of development work during a ten-year sojourn in Southern Africa, which may have solidified my identity as an external-insider: new to Bangladesh, but with an understanding of the development scene and aid industry and a purpose which was clearly distinct from internal NGO appraisal and monitoring processes. My interest in the lives and concerns of professional development workers was almost always greeted with interest, respect and enthusiasm and my strategy of recruiting through personal contacts proved very fruitful. This external-insider position faltered seriously on only one occasion when a participant began to criticize her manager, a sociable and out-going British man. She expressed concern that I might be friends with this man and queried not only the confidentiality of what she was about to say, but also, I think, whether I would take personal offence at the criticism. I reiterated the confidentiality of the data and acknowledged that although the man was an acquaintance of mine, he was not a personal friend. In this way, her questioning enabled her to gauge the strength and nature of my ‘insider’ (knowledge and allegiances) and ‘external’ (professional) credentials. This is an example of how the already nuanced hyphen space of Banks’ ‘external-insider’ may contain further subtleties and variations that are perceived differently by each participant. The fluidity and contextualized nature of this identity was leveraged by potential participants on one occasion in a performative manner, beyond the research context, in a way that challenged my own sense of identity and values and served as a stark reminder of the ways in which colonial dominance endures and is reproduced. Being the object of spectacle in the ‘Third World’ will be familiar to many white travellers especially in less-visited rural areas, and development workers have the added hazard of expectation that their presence will bring some relief or salvation to the population. While accompanying my partner and his colleagues on working trips to regional and rural projects I would walk with them through fields and villages, often quite literally enacting the ‘trailing spouse’ identity. As the only white female in the party, I was always subject to the collective gaze of ‘the other’, becoming surrounded by curious children or approached by local women wanting to get a closer look. Through intermediaries, they would enquire about my marital and childbearing status and ask me into their houses. I began to refer to these moments, ironically, as ‘Princess Anne moments’6 since they embodied the image of the gracious white woman visiting poor brown people. These moments occurred when the dissonance between the social positions of ‘them’ and ‘us’ were at their most stark. No doubt my naming of these moments with a sense of black humour helps me to contain my shame, guilt, embarrassment and sense of helplessness at the enduring global inequalities of esteem, let alone material wealth that these moments embody. Such moments, I would argue, are a clear example of misrecognition, in the sense of the Princess Anne, daughter of Queen Elizabeth II, has been president and globe-trotting royal patron of Save the Children, an international development charity, since 1970. My childhood memories are suffused by images of her singular rich whiteness surrounded by the masses of poor brown-ness which regularly appeared on British children’s TV in the 70’s and into the 80’s, just as the era of celebrity development ‘ambassadors’ took off. 6 90 misattribution of qualities to a person or entity (James, 2015) and were to some extent expected and unavoidable given the geographical location. One particular occurrence of this form of misrecognition took place in the company of two potential research participants in Dhaka and served to inform them of my own sense of identity, values and approach. I was invited to attend a presentation event organized by an urban NGO working with street children accompanied by a female project officer of my own age and a young female intern. As we crawled for an hour through the Dhaka traffic, chatting to each other and on the phone, it became apparent that the expected ‘guest of honour’, the foreign donor’s delegate, may not be able to attend. We arrived at the appointed venue and it was clear that I was going to be the only foreigner, the only white person present. As we sat at the back of the room and listened to the speeches, my younger companion kindly translated in hushed whispers. The older woman with whom I had developed a warm and informal friendship, suddenly crossed over to me and asked if I would step in and present awards to the street children in the absence of the real ‘guest of honour’. In that moment, she and I both recognized the symbolic value of my white, female body and acknowledged the currency it had within the room - far in excess of any other attribute I might possess. With a grinding mix of self-conscious internal loathing and a rather British compulsion to be polite, I reluctantly agreed to perform this role. I duly took my place at the top table, delivered a three-minute impromptu speech on the value of art in society, gave out certificates and shook hands with the silent but beaming young artists. As the car crawled for another hour back through the traffic, my companions and I discussed the incident and it’s implications and contradictions with good humour and frankness. A fittingly ‘Princess Anne’ style group photo of this ritualized identity performance appeared in the English daily newspaper the following day. The incident was minor, but for me the mixture of organizational face-saving and the re-inscription of symbolic privilege was a strong reminder of the forces at work in this domain. I believe that my immediate and explicit reflexivity and discomfort with the ritualized ‘guest of honour’ performance supported the participants’ positioning of me as someone who was aware and affected by relations of power within the development sector and that I too was involved in the ongoing negotiation of ethical dilemmas. I was, in hooks words, ‘still the colonizer’, still the ‘outsider’ and my skin colour was the most visible and enduring marker of differentiation in that situation. Yet, being accepted by the potential research participants as ‘in’ on the game - accepting the social rules and expectations of the onlookers whilst also sharing the questioning acceptance of those customs and values with the potential participants - also marked me as a kind of ‘insider’. Both my companions subsequently introduced me to several other participants and agreed to become research participants themselves. Later, in interviews, they were able to speak openly and easily about the inconsistencies and challenges inherent in their development work. This incident demonstrates how the hyphen space insider-outsider can become folded in upon itself, stretching the limits of the dyadic metaphor to produce something that is perhaps ‘other than’ or at least has permeable, less stable and less easily drawn boundaries (Crossley et al., 2016). Locating one’s position in the hyphen space of insider-outsider involves acknowledging what is shared and what is not, and in that discourse, matters of sameness and difference constitute a further hyphen space to consider. 91 Sameness-difference In social science research contexts, sameness and difference is usually understood in terms of demographic and identity characteristics of age, gender, ethnicity, sexuality or class; and in terms of the extent of shared life experiences between researchers and the researched. Cunliffe and Karunanayake (2013) insist that the task of collecting data entails the ‘ongoing negotiation of meaning’ in relationships that are based on both sameness and difference. In this section I will explore the hyphen space of sameness-difference through examples that relate to the medium of communication, education and educational values and gender that are relevant to this negotiation of meaning. The extent and nature of my sameness or difference in relation to my participants became fully apparent in the interview encounter which was firmly bounded by the limitations of language. Without proficiency in Bangla I was only able to interview participants in English. This limitation served as an imperfect but pragmatic proxy for a certain level of education and professional status, the ‘middle-class-ness’ of the people I wanted to study. English is also the lingua-franca of the international development sector in which the participants operate. Recruiting through personal and social contacts and snowballing though mostly peer-level intermediaries, my interviewees were self-selecting and almost all were confident and fluent English speakers. Many had been educated in English-medium schools and universities, and most were as fluent as any mother-tongue speaker, albeit speaking an indigenized version of English – ‘Banglish’ as one person joked – to which I had to become attuned. At least one participant was more comfortable speaking in English than Bangla, and admitted her local language skills were poor and sometimes interfered with her direct work with beneficiaries. The two or three participants who were less fluent spoke about how their lack of confidence with English sometimes impinged upon their work, creating anxieties in their relations with foreigners. In interviews, I offered a translation of the key concept of ‘ethical dilemmas’ (noitik shangkot) which yielded useful discussions and opportunities for mutual clarifications as part of the ‘ongoing negotiation of meaning’. Therefore the ‘language issue’ became an explicit part of many of the research conversations. The limitations of language did impede the progress of a small number of interviews but in these encounters the lack of shared vocabulary was tackled and usually overcome by simply allowing extra time to negotiate and secure a sense of mutual understanding. Mixing gender pronouns was a common and confusing error, and grammatical errors of tense sometimes hampered communication. During these interviews, it was necessary for me to re-cap or paraphrase to check with the participants that I had correctly grasped the material facts and meaning of what they were describing. Occasionally, participants dried up or left sentences incomplete. As an experienced researcher having interviewed a wide range of people in the UK I did not find these silences and pauses intimidating, but I had to work hard, to think in the moment and judge if, and at what point I might offer a word that seemed to me to be on the tip of their tongue. Was it a useful interjection? Was it a word they might have used themselves? Most often, the response to my interjections would be a gratifying ‘yes, yes’ or ‘exactly, exactly’. On the few occasions I got it wrong, or misunderstood, we would continue the negotiation until, on most occasions, we reached a level of communication and shared meaning that seemed satisfactory. On one occasion when I used the word ‘cynicism’ the participant whipped out her smart phone to look up a translation. In all these interactions, the qualities of sameness and difference were present in the language we used, and were a constantly shifting dynamic between interviewer and interviewee. 92 Some participants made use of my difference, as embodied in my language and culture, in order to achieve a kind of sameness, echoing the convolutions present in the ‘Princess Anne moments’. At least two of the participants acknowledged that being part of the research was a useful opportunity to practice their English language skills and to ‘build capacity’ as one said, another was explicit in wanting to engage in a form of intellectual discourse rarely available to him. Some, including the latter case assumed a sameness when there was difference, and I too assumed difference where there was sameness. I was a little surprised to find that all but one of the participants had Masters level degrees, and two of the older cohort had PhD’s themselves. As the life stories of the participants unfolded, it became clear not only that I shared this particular form of cultural capital with my research subjects but it was recognized and highly valued by them. Being attached to a London University also had some currency, lending respectability, credence, and validity to my position as researcher and to the study. It was clear that as researcher and researched, we shared a (more or less) common language and a common set of values in relation to education and academia. Other aspects of our shared cultural capital and common (colonial) histories were expressed, for instance, in references to cricket which was used more than once as analogy by participants. Despite these similarities, there was adequate room for difference and misrecognition to emerge, which tended towards an over-estimation of my Westernised knowledge and, on odd occasions an underestimation of my local knowledge. Once, I was asked by a participant if I knew anything about the 1971 Liberation War and the birth of Bangladesh. I felt mildly affronted (as if I hadn’t done any background research!) and suddenly an ‘outsider’ - demonstrating how positionality can alter suddenly within a single encounter. More often, a participant made assumptions about my knowledge of Western academic institutions, literature or culture. Being attuned to these moments helped me understand the ways in which these forms of cultural capital are accumulated, valued and invoked by the participants. For instance, S, one of the wealthiest participants, who had been educated abroad, assumed I was familiar with the prestigious university he attended, as he dropped the institution’s name into his narrative. Feeling a little ignorant and inadequate, and because the reference was immaterial to the conversation, I said nothing and chose to ‘pass’ (Skeggs and Loveday, 2012) as a member of the same cultural and social class as the participant. In doing so surrendered to his positioning of me. Later, I ‘Googled’ the institution he mentioned, and discovering it’s top-class reputation I was better able to understand the easy sense of entitlement he displayed and the distinctiveness of the identity he projected. I felt uneasy and embarrassed by my deception and inauthentic response to S and this may have emboldened me in my later interactions. During my interview with participant O, he quoted Victor Hugo and drew on the figure of Sisyphus in Greek mythology to help explain his attitude to his work. At this point my understanding of the participant’s meaning was crucial, and I had to admit, rather shamefully, to my ignorance of this particular mythological character, quietly blaming my sub-standard 1970’s education. At the time, I felt I had punctured O’s image of me as a culturally rich, well-educated sophisticate – ‘a lady of your stature’ as he put it. Later I reflected that my failure to live up to the standard that O had ascribed to me – an idealized view of my cultural difference in itself – may have reflected the way in which O felt socially isolated, rather disappointed with his life and frustrated with his work. The hopes he spoke about, for a life characterized by enlightened intellectual endeavour were disrupted in much the same way as his attempts at having an erudite conversation with me. I felt I had let him down, but he responded with characteristic introjection, taking this failure or rupture of sympathetic sameness 93 upon himself. To his self-deprecating ‘I guess you are already bored.’ I replied with an honest ‘No, no, I am fascinated’ and there followed an exchange in which we both struggled to reestablish the stability of the relationship. I felt he was concerned with being a ‘good’ research subject whilst I was anxiously trying to hold this most chaotic of interviews together and to fulfill my role as a ‘good’ listener. Performance anxiety on the part of research subjects (as well as researchers themselves) is not uncommon in my experience of qualitative research in the UK. It is not unusual, particularly in free ranging or open ended interviews for some participants to ask ‘Am I making sense?’ ‘Is this useful?’ or ‘Is this what you want?’. But these sorts of comments were more widespread amongst the Bangladeshi participants I interviewed, perhaps due to their over-estimation of my status, but also I believe, an unfamiliarity with the nature of the interview itself. This points to another dimension of sameness and difference that has to be negotiated in the interview setting. The expectations of the interviewee of the interview process itself may not match the metatheoretical approach (objectivist, subjective or intersubjective) of the interviewer. All the participants in this study spoke about their experiences of schooling in primary, secondary and tertiary education and described a system that leans heavily toward a didactic and objectivist approach to knowledge production. This may explain why some participants took time to grasp the subjective and intersubjective nature of these biographical interviews as co-created narratives, unique to the encounter. The sameness-difference in the way the research was perceived can be interleaved with the way gender sameness-difference played out across the interviews. On the whole, the women gave me far more of their time and were more forthcoming in our conversations than most of the men. Female participants seemed generally quicker to grasp the open-ended nature of the biographical interview and easily took up the opportunity to tell me the details of their family background, education and career and their thoughts and feelings. My field notes after interviews with the women are dotted with references to them as ‘definitely chatty’, ‘needing little encouragement’, ‘warm’ and ‘engaged’, ‘amiable’, ‘very expressive’ but also ‘serious and intense’, ‘tough’ and ‘a political live-wire’. While it was initially more difficult to recruit women, and arrange interview times, they were much more easily available for second interviews, suggesting that they had more to say, more stories to tell and were comfortable not just with me, but with the nature of the research. With many of the men in the study, I often felt I had to work harder to elicit more than just a ‘told story’ – a series of verifiable facts (Wengraf and Chamberlayne, 2006) - as opposed to the ‘lived life’ of experience and feeling. By contrast, my field notes after interviews with men contain descriptions of the encounters as ‘formal at first’, ‘slightly awkward at first’, ‘eventually relaxed and forthcoming’, ‘didn’t expand on much’, ‘jolly but shy’. One male participant began very formally by announcing his name, place of birth and the minutiae of his school grades. Two other men gave me a brief summary of their whole lives and careers in under 15 minutes before coming to a grinding halt. These kinds of interviews would tend to require more probing, more specific but still open questions to elicit stories and clarification of my interest in thoughts and feelings as much as facts. As a woman doing research from a qualitative feminist tradition, in a highly patriarchal society, I anticipated that my gender would colour the way in which the data was generated. The hesitant beginnings of the male participants meant I had to work harder to build rapport, based on qualities of sameness across the intransient difference of gender. 94 Emotional engagement-distance Closely associated with the notion of rapport is the idea of empathy. Gair draws attention to the links between social work practice and qualitative research methods, particularly feminist and grounded theory approaches that regard empathy as critical to their practice. She reviews the approaches of sociologists, philosophers, researchers and methodologists who hold empathy to be at the root of our understandings of everyday lived experiences and who advocate it’s role in creating the conditions in which the person or subject feels heard, accepted and understood. Conversely, as Gair notes, authors such as Lather (2009), Watson and Shields (1996) have argued for the de-reification of empathy and criticized the logic of sameness on which it is based. These critiques do not so much argue against empathy but call for ‘a kind of a gap - a casting of doubt on our ‘capacity to know’ - to enable researchers to listen without the presumption of mutuality, or the existence of ‘common wounds’, implied by empathy. An example of the value of traversing the hyphen of emotional engagement-distance came through my relationship with M, with whom my sense of empathy was based on ‘knowing’ and ‘not knowing’. My empathetic response was both immediate, ‘in the moment’ and more long lasting. I was introduced to M during a trip with my partner to the regional project office of a sub-contracted NGO. My field notes record M as beginning our first interview quite formally, sitting with pen and notebook on her lap as if prepared for a job interview. I noted she was ‘obliging and interested in my topic, happy to help though perhaps a bit apprehensive, perhaps making an effort with her English pronunciation’. I felt very conscious of being the ‘big boss’s ‘wife’ in this situation and attempted to distance myself from this identity by making clear assurances of confidentiality and anonymity. After about five minutes of recording she asked if her ‘talking’ was ok and in response to my affirmations and encouragements began to relax. In the course of this biographical interview, M told me a tragic story about the suicide of one of her friends, due in part to social inequalities, which had helped propel M into her work for social change. M became tearful at the recollection and I also began to well up, knowing the pain of bereavement and feeling empathy with the injustice. We paused, laughed a little at our own emotionality perhaps as an aid to recovering the ‘formality’ of the interview and continued. M told me she was having trouble finding a suitable marriage partner and how this was troubling her family and affecting her choices about where to work – in the NGO’s regional office where she was doing rewarding work, or nearer her family home where she could be introduced to potential grooms. M had confided in me about other difficult workplaces issues and I felt a keen sense of obligation to offer her some support. I found myself thinking about her situation and her friend’s suicide for several days and mulled over her marriage dilemma for weeks afterwards, wondering how things would turn out. My feelings of helplessness for her manifest in private fantasies of introducing her to one of my male participants, and it took some time to come to a more appropriate, emotionally-distant position, accepting the ‘not knowing’ of how I might help, or how she might feel about these familial constraints. By this stage of the research, I had heard many stories of womens careers and personal flourishing being circumscribed by gender norms and gendered violence. I had listened to several accounts of personal experiences of loss, harm or discrimination that were motivating these women to work in the development sector. Gair, (2012), in her consideration of empathy and researcher positioning brings attention to three overlapping phases of empathetic listening as theorized by Stein (1917/1989 cited in Gair 2012). The arc of my emotional engagement with M and her testimony echoes these phases. Firstly the emergence of the experience though objective and thoughtful listening and a process of ‘tuning in’ which draws on understanding and 95 imagination; secondly, a deeper accommodation of the data that connects with the emotional and subjective response of the listener; and finally, the reemergence of objective insights informed by these subjective responses (p.139). Following this model, ‘working the hyphen’ between emotional engagement and emotional distance became a dynamic process over time. Through this process I came to a far deeper understanding of how, in a profoundly patriarchal society, making a ‘good’ marriage confers on women high levels of social respectability, which then functions to protect female development workers from social opprobrium as they work to challenge these very gender norms, often driven by their own experience of injustice or loss. This reflexivity helped to strengthen my understanding of the multiple ways in which gender, and specifically gender discrimination, dominates the everyday lives of these development workers. Conclusion By establishing the identity of ‘researcher’, focusing on the scope and purpose of the study, boundaries are constructed by researchers both implicitly and explicitly. But these boundaries are subject to change and the negotiation of different positionings and the mutual influences between researcher and participants. It is at these blurred edges that we begin to question our place and purpose. (Cunliffe and Karunanayake, 2013) (citing Clandinin, 2006 and Mutua-Kombo, 2009). In many ways the course of my research interleaves with the topic of the research itself. My efforts have been directed towards exploring the participants’ reflexivity, reflexively and acting ethically whilst researching the ethical activities of others. At the same time I am critiquing the domination of neo-liberal ideologies and neo-colonial tendencies of the aid and development sector whilst being closely imputed in it’s structures, power relations and practices. Writing about others I am indeed writing myself ‘anew’. The act of doing a PhD is a process of shifting identity: from ‘employee’ to ‘student’ to ‘Doctor’ and my progress through the arc of a PhD programme is but one aspect of the biographical nature of my research. The schema of hyphen spaces is a useful heuristic tool that can assist us in mapping positionality and examining relationships between the researcher and the researched, but the complex realities of fieldwork relationships and the processes of data-gathering cannot always be neatly accommodated as distinct points on a spectrum or spectrums. Cunliffe and Karunanayake emphasized the ‘fluid and agentic nature of researcher-respondent identities’ and these dynamics operate both inside and well beyond the interview. In this study, more so than in other UK-based research I have conducted, I was aware of how the participants were agentic in positioning me, individually and as a whole, and how this made an impression upon the data. My initial anxieties about exploitation and neo-colonialism quite rightly heightened my awareness of ‘self’ and ‘other’ and I believe, contributed to conditions that enabled participants to become active agents in the telling of their stories. To study, appreciate and effectively represent the experience of research participants, as Corbin Dwyer and Buckle propose, it is not ones particular status that is the ‘core ingredient’ of a prudent researcher but the ‘ability to be open, authentic, honest, deeply interested in the experience of ones research participants, and committed to accurately and adequately representing their experience’ (Corbin Dwyer and Buckle, 2009). Jessica Benjamin in her psychoanalytic discussion of an intersubjective view of ‘thirdness’ considers the notion of surrender ‘to the principle of reciprocal influence in interaction which makes possible both responsible action and freely given recognition’ (Benjamin, 2004) (p11). Whilst we may use a variety of tools, such as the notion of hyphen spaces to assist us, I would suggest that we also 96 need to surrender to a certain amount, perhaps a good deal, of discomfort and anxiety in our attempts at reflexive practice. BANKS, J. A. 1998. The Lives and Values of Researchers: Implications for Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-17. BENJAMIN, J. 2004. Beyond Doer and Done to: An intersubjective View of Thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5 - 46. CONWAY, J. 2011. Cosmopolitan or Colonial? The World Social Forum as ‘contact zone’. Third World Quarterly, 32, 217 - 236. CORBIN DWYER, S. & BUCKLE, J. 2009. The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Oustider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 54 - 63. CROSSLEY, M., ARTHUR, L. & MCNESS, E. 2016. Revisiting Insider-Outsider Research in Comparative and International Education, Symposium Books. CUNLIFFE, A. L. & KARUNANAYAKE, G. 2013. Woking Within Hyphen-Spaces in Ethnographic Research: Implications for Research Identities and Practices. Organisational Research Methods, 16, 364-392. ETHERINGTON, K. 2004. Research methods: Reflexivities-roots, meanings, dilemmas. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4, 46-47. EYBEN, R. 2012. Fellow Travellers in Development. Third World Quarterly, 33, 1405-1421. FINE, M. 1994. Working the hyphens; Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In: DENZIN, N. K. & LINCLON, Y. S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. FROSH, S. 2003. Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is a critical approach emerging? Human Relations, 56, 1545 - 1567. FROSH, S. 2014. The Nature of the Psychosocial: Debates from Studies in the Psychosocial. Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 8, 159 - 169. FROSH, S. & BARAITSER, L. 2008. Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 13, 346 - 365. GAIR, S. 2012. Feeling Their Stories: Contemplating Empathy, Insider/Outsider Positionings, and Enriching Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 134 - 143. HOGGETT, P. 2008. What's in a hyphen? Reconstructing Psychosocial Studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 13, 379 - 384. JAMES, D. 2015. How Bourdieu bites back: recognising misrecognition in education and educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45, 97-112. JEFFERSON, T. 2008. What is “The Psychosocial”? A Response to Frosh and Baraitser. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 13, 366 - 373. KAPOOR, I. 2004. Hyper‐self‐reflexive development? Spivak on representing the Third World ‘Other’, Third World Quarterly, 24, 627 - 647. LOUIS, M. R. & BARTUNEK, J. M. 1992. Insider/Ousider research teams. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 101-110. MILLIGAN, L. 2016. Insider-Oustider-Inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. In: CROSSLEY, M., ARTHUR, L. & MCNESS, E. (eds.) Revisiting Insider-Outsider Research in Comparative and International Education. Symposium Books. SKEGGS, B. & LOVEDAY, V. 2012. Struggles for value: value practices, injustice, judgment, affect and the idea of class. The British Journal of Sociology, 63, 472-490. 97 SMIRL, L. 2015. Spaces of Aid, How Cars, Compounds and Hotels Shape Humanitarianism, London, Zed Books. WENGRAF, T. & CHAMBERLAYNE, P. 2006. Interviewing for life histories, lived situations and personal experience: the biographical-narrative- interpretive method (BNIM). . Short Guide to BNIM interviewing, Available @[email protected]. Phoebe Beedell is a PhD scholarship holder with the University of East London. She originally trained in graphic design and spent the 1990’s living in Lesotho and Zimbabwe working in development communications on AIDS prevention and reproductive health campaigns. After completing a Masters in Development Studies at Bristol University, she worked as a community engagement trainer and facilitator before joining the Centre of Psycho-Social Studies at the University of the West of England as a researcher. Phoebe has undertaken qualitative research on major ESRC projects including ‘Negotiating Ethical Dilemmas in Contested Communities’ and ‘Identities, Educational Choice and the White Urban Middle Class’ in the Identities and Social Action programme; and more recently on Paired Peers, a longitudinal study on the role HE plays in social mobility. She has published articles on motivation, class, positionality and a book chapter on psychosocial research methodology. Phoebe is intending to use Augusto Boals’s participatory theatre techniques as a means of disseminating her doctoral research and engaging non-academic audiences in further meaningful and productive dialogue. Contact details: Phoebe Boedell, School of Social Sciences, University of East London 4-6 University way, London E16 2RD e-mail: [email protected] 98 Review Article 99 100 Social Movements: Theories & Practices: A Critical Review of the Literature John Haworth Theories: Structuralisms, Interactionisms & Globalisms. In this paper, I shall attempt to situate my research in recent debates about social movements. These have mainly concerned the level of the social formation and the geographical level at which the emergence of social movements can be explained. I shall be mainly concerned with the recent work of Tarrow (2012), the so-called insurgent encounters of Juris & Khasnabish (2013) and the studies of the World Social Forum of Conway (2013). Structuralisms: Political Processes & Critical Realisms. In his recent work, the veteran social movement theorist Tarrow (2012; 06-28) describes what seems to be a critical realist, or what he calls a “dynamics of contention” approach to social movements, which he developed in an earlier volume with his colleagues McAdam & Tilly (Tarrow, McAdam & Tilly, 2001). In an excellent historical survey of theories of social movements, Tilly distinguishes between the economic approaches of Marxists such as Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky and Gramsci and of new social movement theorists such as Touraine, Melucci and Offe, and the political approaches of Weber, Michels and Skocpol, resource mobilisation theorists such as Piven & Cloward, and the most recent political process theorists such as Tarrow, McAdam & Tilly (2001), and, even more recently, writers such as della Porta, Haug & Teune (2013). So what’s so excellent about this historical survey? Almost uniquely among writers on this political process tradition, Tarrow has made some attempt to relate his approach to economic process approaches, such as Marxism. Many of my earlier attempts to read Tarrow’s articles led me to adopt the slogan “writing like Sidney Tarrow” to represent a talent for making something which should be interesting seem boring, since there was no explanation of what was supposed to have caused political opportunities, and of how these opportunities were related to larger scale social events, such as the coming of new systems of regulation such as neo-liberalism. From this point of view, these political process theories can be seen as developing a relatively autonomous political level of the social formation, as theorised by Poulantzas (Jessop, 1985). These political process theories can be seen as excellent developments of Poulantzas’s theories, 101 but, for all his considerations on Marxism, Tarrow makes no recognition of this. Rather, political process theories treat political opportunities and processes not as relatively, but as completely, autonomous of the economic level. This is particularly seen in Tarrow’s treatment of the works of his new social movement theory adversary Touraine (Tarrow, 2012: 18-20). Here, Touraine considers the most abstract level of societies, or historicities, to be dominated by the activities of social movements contesting existing social formations. The activities of political parties in attempting to regulate existing social formations exist at a more concrete level, which Touraine calls the institutional system. Here, Touraine develops an indispensable theoretical context for the more empirical work of the political process theorists, but this seems to be lost on Tarrow, who accuses Touraine of “declaring”, presumably without adequate empirical evidence, that these theoretical levels existed, and who describes later writers as having avoided being “smitten with Tourainian abstractions”. Later in his article, Tarrow (2012: 22-26) starts to come to terms with this problem. Benton & Craib (2011: 126-127) explain how the critical realist philosopher Bhaskar (1998) organised scientific disciplines into a hierarchy of causalities, such that each discipline was relatively autonomous of the one below it in the hierarchy. The question for critical realism is then how to identify the systems of causality which lead to the exercise of this relative autonomy. Previously, Benton & Craib (2011: 124-125) explain that Bhaskar sees these systems as what he calls mechanisms, which act within each discipline to determine whether and how this relative autonomy will work. Thus, Smith (1998: 299), commenting on earlier work by Bhaskar (1979), describes these mechanisms as “the way in which the structure of an object can, within definite conditions, generate an observable event”. Unfortunately, neither Benton & Craib nor Smith specify in any more detail what these mechanisms are, but it would appear that Bhaskar’s theories have enormous potential for developing what has always been a bit of a vague concept of relative autonomy, and that the task of a critical realist social science is to identify and understand these mechanisms at each level of the social formation. Tarrow doesn’t mention Bhaskar or critical realism, but he does recognise (2012: 22-23) the emergence of a so-called “mechanism-and-process approach to social action” in recent decades, associated with writers such as Snow et al. (1986) and Soule (1997, 1999, 2004). Tarrow, McAdam & Tilly (2001) then took up these approaches to apply them to the social sciences, and to identify three specific mechanisms operating in social movements. These are the environmental, such as population growth and resource depletion, the relational, such as the formation of political alliances, and the dispositional, such as the perception or attribution of opportunities or threats. 102 Interactionisms: Subjectivities, Paradigms, Knowledges, Technologies. If we’re to develop a critical realist theory of social movements, then, what we have to do is to identify the mechanisms within each discipline, which may lead to social events. As I’ve explained above, these are not the disciplines themselves, but the mechanisms within each discipline, but Tarrow seems to confuse the mechanisms with the disciplines themselves. As Benton used to say when he was my undergraduate tutor, one way we may attempt to solve this problem is by turning to the French Marxist philosopher Louis Althusser. Althusser seems to have strangely disappeared from Benton’s most recent writings and also turned out to be Algerian, but whereas Bhaskar developed a hierarchy of scientific disciplines, Benton (1984) explains how Althusser attempted to solve the problems of the relationships between bases and superstructures in Marxism by developing a hierarchy of levels of the social formation characterised by relatively autonomous practices. Althusser identified these levels as the economic, political and ideological, and, if Bhaskar’s hierarchy ended with the social sciences (Benton & Craib, 2011: 127), Althusser’s hierarchy can be seen as applying Bhaskar’s theories to the social sciences, and, as they say, taking things to the next level. As I mentioned above (Jessop, 1985), the structuralist political theorist Poulantzas, a follower of Althusser, can be seen as having developed a regional theory of relatively autonomous political practices at the political level, and, from this point of view, Tarrow’s political process theories, far from being inconsistent with Marxism, can be seen as contributions to a debate started by Poulantzas. The levels or mechanisms identified by Tarrow are the environmental, the relational and the dispositional, and he goes on to apply these to an understanding of the causes of the American Civil War (Tarrow, 2012: 23-24), just as I once did to the collapse of the USSR (Haworth, 2011). In another piece of writing (Haworth, 2012), I identified an ecological level of the social formation prior to the economic level, which would be somewhere at the top of his hierarchy of scientific disciplines. In the piece on the USSR, I developed an interactionist and individual or psychological level relatively autonomous of the ideological level to explain the roles of individuals such as Gorbachev or Yeltsin. Of course, the type of situation, which Tarrow sees as having caused the American Civil War, is what Althusser would have called an overdetermination of contradictions, or what Poulantzas would have called an organic crisis of the social formation; a series of crises at the ecological, economic, political, ideological, interactionist and psychological levels arising at the same time. The question for social movement theories seems to be one of which of these levels is dominant or decisive; what types of political alliances to develop, how to conduct an ideological struggle, how to develop a democratic movement and the role of heroic individuals. Interactionisms & Political Process Theories If Tarrow has understood the role of critical realism in understanding organic crises of the social formation, then other writers have increasingly emphasised the role of the interactionist levels. Thus, Jasper (2012) seems to take up some of the criticisms of political process theories raised by writers such as Bevington & Dixon that these theories, as developed by writers such as Tilly, concentrated on so-called political opportunity structures without considering strategies of resistance on the part of social movements and thus lacked relevance for actual social movement members. Jasper claims to have discerned some movement in favour of these strategies by 103 recent writers under the influence of theorists such as Foucault, but it’s not easy to see where exactly this influence is, either in the writings he mentions or in the contributions to his volume. From a more theoretical point of view, della Porta (2014), in a comparative study of the democratisations in eastern Europe in 1989 and in North Africa in 2011, documents a shift in studies of democratisation from the structuralism of writers as far back as Lipset (1959), Moore (1966) and Stephens (1992) to what she calls the transitologies of more recent writers such as Karl (1990), O’Donnell & Schmitter (1986), Collier (1999) and Linz & Stepan (1996). But it turns out that even these are only concerned with the strategic choices of political elites. As for social movements, della Porta mentions the critical realist approaches of writers such as Tilly, McAdam & Tarrow (2001), although without identifying them as such, and her own work with Rucht (Della & Porta & Rucht, 2013). Della Porta goes on to identify from her data four systems of democratisation, one of which, eventful democratisation, especially involves social movements. Here, she appears to develop another critical realist approach involving (2014: 17) relational, affective and cognitive mechanisms, without really explaining what these are or how they relate to the mechanisms developed by writers such as Tarrow. Nonetheless, della Porta (2014: 16) claims to be “breaking with essentialist, deterministic and structuralist understandings” and stressing “temporality, contextualisation and agency”. Interactionisms & Ethnographies: Complexities & Actor-Network Theories. But if these writers are taking things to the next level, then a new dimension in interactionist social movement theories has been opened up by Juris & Khasnabish (2013: 01-38). The authors begin with an ethnographic study of a meeting of the Zapatista movement in Mexico, which they see as the start of modern global justice movements, and go on to suggest that the writings of critical realists such as McAdam (1996), Snow (1986) and Tarrow (1998) reflect (2013: 06) “an underlying acceptance of capitalist modernity, liberal democracy and individualism”, while these transnational social movements are (2013: 07) “more ephemeral, rhizomatic and dynamic than most conventional social movement analyses allow”. The authors go on (2013: 10-15) to survey some structuralist social movement theories, such as the resource mobilisation theories of Smith, Chatfield & Pagnucco (1997) and the international relations theories of Keck & Sikkink (1998). These were seen as being focused on formal NGOs and transnational social movement organisations. The authors see Tarrow (2005), della Porta (2005; 2007) and Reitan (2007) as having used political process theories to study social movements such as the European Social Forum of 2002. But these theories are seen as having left out the interactionist dimensions, political tensions, cultural struggles and struggles over knowledge production. Finally, the authors mention social network theories, such as those of Castells (1997) and Hardt & Negri (2005), where a networked world power or Empire is confronted by a networked world resistance or Multitude. The authors contrast these traditional structuralist theories with an emerging interactionist and ethnographic tradition in social movement studies. Here, Cunningham (1999) carried out ethnographic research on so-called sanctuary activists in Arizona and Tsing (2005) on transnational forest activists in Indonesia. Juris (2008) set out to develop the theories of Castells by studying the use of technologies by North American social movements, and Khasnabish (2008) studied the influence of the Zapatista movement on these northern movements. 104 More interesting here seems to be the development of new interactionist theories. Thus, complexity theories, such as that of Escobar (2008), emphasise the (2013: 13) “recursive selfgeneration of complex adaptive systems through myriad micro-level interactions” and the “critical role of social movements as producers of insurgent knowledges”. Also, actor-network theories, such as those of Routledge (2008), develop an (2013: 13-14) “analysis of the shifting patterns of connection, association and translation within the People’s Global Action Network based on ethnographic fieldwork in Bangladesh”, which “resonates with the critical role of practice, culture and power within networked spaces of transnational encounter”. Actor-network theories are explained in slightly more detail by Feigenbaum, Frenzel & McCurdy (2013: 18-19). These “provide a method of thinking how interdependencies between people, groups and objects emerge and function” and “are particularly useful for thinking about how human and non-human actors are always enmeshed”. The authors go on to explain how these theories have come in for criticism for failing to recognise power relations, but that some new socalled post-ANT theories “make explicit the ways in which power and difference are performed and played out in many everyday associations”. From this point of view, it’s interesting to see that Juris & Khasnabish (2013: 14) mention that Routledge (2008) “argues that power differentials and intentionalities are central to shaping the contours of network associations”. Interactionisms & Ethnographies: New Dimensions of Social Movements. Juris & Khasnabish (2013: 15-19) go on to identify what appear to be new dimensions of social movements, which lend themselves to interactionist or ethnographic research. These dimensions the authors very impressively describe as emerging subjectivities, discrepant paradigms, transformational knowledges and subversive technologies. These emerging subjectivities appear to involve antagonisms between new social identities. Thus, Hardt & Negri (2000; 2005) suggest that new technologies under neo-liberalism have developed a networked world power or Empire or confronted by a networked world resistance or Multitude. This Multitude is characterised by a so-called collective “no” to neo-liberalism, but is fragmented by many “yeses” to a variety of alternatives. Zibechi (2010) develops this by identifying a variety of social movements in Latin America building a (2013: 16) “new politics of autonomy and self-management, while reaching our horizontally to develop new forms of regional and transnational co-ordination”. Finally, Deleuze & Guattari (1987) develop the idea of social movements as rhizomes, or almost infinitely flexible bouncy castle-type structures, requiring us to (2013: 15) “do away with fixed lines and linearities”. Discrepant paradigms take up the type of distinction made by the critical international relations writer Cox (Hobden & Jones, 2008: 151) between problem-solving and critical theories. Here, critical realist or political process theorists such as Tarrow (1998) are seen as setting out to solve the political problems of neo-liberalism by restricting their analyses to the political level, while critical social movement theories would identify more basic causes of these problems at the economic and increasingly ecological levels. Transformational knowledges appear to suggest that one of the tasks of researchers is to understand systems of knowledge among social movements, which supplement that of academic researchers. Thus, the authors (2013: 18) “specifically attempt to understand the work of subjects deeply invested in reimagining and reconstructing their worlds as they resist the violence of the neo-liberal order”. What much of this seems to involve is the understanding of social 105 movement practices in the global South, and the authors mention the work of Conway (2005), whose work on southern epistemologies I’ll look at in the next section. Subversive technologies involve the use of new technologies by social movements. Juris (2012) famously distinguished between logics of aggregation involving the use of e-mail lists and socalled listservs and logics of networking involving the use of networking media such as Facebook or Twitter. What seems to be subversive about these technologies is that they allow social movement members to use logics of aggregation to develop online communities and to use logics of networking to develop ready access to these communities, thus, in Hardt & Negri’s (2005) terms, to develop something of an organised multitude to confront an organised empire. Here, the authors seem to open up possibilities for discourse or conversation analysis in recognising that the technologies are (2013: 19) “infused with questions of epistemologies, power and subjectivities”, and involve “innovative forms of collaborative practice” and “new modes of collectively producing and distributing knowledge”. This use of new technologies by social movements is the subject of a study by the one-time structuralist network society theorist Castells (2012). Here, Castells develops his network society theories by applying them to the social movements of 2011 in Tunisia, Iceland, Egypt, Spain and the United States. Castells (2012: 04) sets out to “suggest some hypotheses on the nature and perspectives of networked social movements, with the hope of identifying the new paths of social change in our time, and to stimulate a debate on the practical and political implications of these hypotheses”. Interactionisms & Ethnographies: Participatory & Militant Ethnographies. The authors identify four types of ethnographic research to investigate these new dimensions of social movements. First, they explain how Hale (2006) distinguishes between activist research and cultural critique. Here, activist research (2013: 22) “refers to a collaborative method involving explicit alignment with a group in struggle”, while a cultural critique involves a more subtle “political alignment through the content of the knowledge produced”. Also, the authors note that Mathers & Novelli (2007: 230) have suggested that neo-liberalism has led to a “more general process of re-engagement among academics”, the most radical example of which is participatory action research, which involves the (2013: 24) “collective design and implementation of research between a researcher and an organisation or community of stakeholders”. Finally, militant ethnographies involve not so much the participation of researched communities in research, but rather the participation of the researchers in the activities of these communities. Here, Juris (2007; 2008) has suggested that (2013: 24) “the only way to truly grasp the concrete logic of activist networking is to become an active practitioner”, becoming “directly involved in a particularly involved in a particular struggle through activities such as organising actions and events, facilitating meetings, staking out and supporting positions during discussions and debates, and risking one’s body during mass actions”. I don’t quite know the health and safety implications of this, but it is said to lead to a “deeper cognitive understanding” and provides a “sense of the embodied emotions generated by activist practice”. 106 Critical Realisms & Ethnographies Thus, participatory action research develops a new dimension in qualitative research and seems to solve the old problem whereby researchers design a piece of research and then have to find somebody to observe or interview. With this type of research, researchers find somebody to observe or interview and then consult the researched communities about the type of research, which the community wants them to carry out. However militant this research, what these authors are distancing themselves from is not more traditional ethnographies, but rather the more empiricist approaches of critical realist or political process theories. As for more traditional ethnographies, these approaches have in common with them a distinction between common sense and science, a concern for the actor’s point of view, a concern with building theories from observations, and a danger of using common sense as a resource rather than a topic. From a critical realist point of view, these types of ethnographies exist (Benton & Craib, 2011: 125-126) at an actual or concrete rather than real or abstract level. They thus fail to identify underlying structures, from which we can discern patterns, and make more detailed observations, of social interaction. Globalisms: Trans-Modernities & Post-Colonialisms. If these writers have stressed the interactionist dimensions of social movements, then others have stressed the global dimensions. Thus, Moghadam (2013) emphasises the transnationalisation of social movements under conditions of neo-liberal globalisation and of new technologies. Moghadam (2013: 01-19) starts out with dependency and world system theories and notices how these have been played out in neo-liberal globalisation and in its global resistance movements; on the right, the global Islamist movement, and, on the left, the global justice movement with its World and regional Social Forums. Moghadam goes on to describe the influence of new technologies on these movements, and then identifies them, along with a global feminist movement, as (2013: 14) “among the most prominent and visible of contemporary social movements”. Moghadam (2013: 13) also suggests that transnational social movements have dated from the rise of capitalism in the 18th century, and that these three movements are the successors of other which have existed throughout this period of time. Perhaps more interestingly, Conway (2013) reports on ten years of fieldwork with the World Social Forum to develop understandings of open spaces, civil societies, autonomisms and feminisms. The open spaces she sees as dominated by what she calls autonomist movements, which have pushed the others, such as feminist and so-called subaltern movements to the edges of the forum. The discourses of the forum she sees as a so-called civil society discourse, derived from Gramsci and Habermas, at the expense of subaltern discourses. Autonomism she sees as a discourse of white activists from the global North, concerned with horizontal, pre-figurative and utopian ideas. Finally, feminism she sees as the most sustained and articulate body of ideas confronting the dominant discourses of the forum. Conway thus sees the forum as dominated by rationalist discourses from the global North, in opposition to feminism and to what she calls post-colonial discourses. These discourses, which she goes so far as to call epistemologies, are associated with writers such as Mignolo (2002) and Escobar (2004), who see them as a constitutive outside of modernity; in other words, ideas relied on but left out of modernist epistemologies. According to Mignolo (2002), inclusive political 107 theories are not possible on the basis of western traditions, and solutions to problems of coloniality are not to be found within these traditions. According to Escobar (2004), these discourses have been suppressed by modernity, but expose western cosmologies as arising from a specific cultural rationality which has projected itself as universal. Conway’s writings can be considered emancipatory in two senses. First, she follows deliberative democrats such as Young (1996) in calling into question theories of modernism and rationalism. Second, her writings are in a similar tradition to those of Juris & Khasnabish (2013) in calling into question established ways of thinking about social movements. Certainly, her research methods of interviews with key figures, leaders and activists, speeches, presentations and texts written by leaders, texts produced by movement activists in each political current, interviews, conversations, encounters and observations are as vague as those as those of Juris & Khasnabish, and are suspiciously concerned with leaders and key figures. Having said this, one thing I have gained from Conway’s book, with its concerns about edges and outsides, is that, for all the concerns of ethnomethodologists with the achievements of their subjects, they have no clear means of investigating what these subjects don’t achieve. Thus, Conway leaves ethnomethodologies looking like some sort of detailed studies of rationalist northern conversations, and conversational structures looking not universal, but the specialist structures of the social life of North America and Western Europe. Unfortunately, ethnomethodologists haven’t helped themselves by not studying other societies, identifying conversational structures on a global scale and identifying the structures common to all rationalities. Conclusions: Critical Realisms, Interactionisms & Globalisms. I’ve thus identified three recent traditions of social movement theories. If political process theories can be understood as being a part of a critical realist tradition, then it has much to offer in explaining periods of social movement activities and periods of social changes. What we’re then looking for are the systems or mechanisms by which relative autonomies are exercised at each level of the social formation. The more interactionist approaches of Juris & Khasnabish will perhaps help in identifying some of these mechanisms and in drawing our attention to the importance of the interactionist practices of social movements and ethnographies in social movement studies. Finally, the global approaches of Moghadam and of Conway remind us of the scale and diversity, not only of social movements but also of rationalities and knowledges under neo-liberal globalisation, and of the challenges of developing research methods to study all of these. 108 References Benton, Ted (1984): The Rise & Fall of Structural Marxism: Althusser & His Influence: Macmillan. Benton, Ted & Craib, Ian (2011): Philosophy of social science: the philosophical foundations of social thought: 2nd ed.: Palgrave. Bhaskar, Roy (1979/1998) Possibility of Naturalism: a Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences: 3rd ed: Routledge. Castells, Manuel (2012): Networks of outrage and hope social movements in the Internet age: Polity. Conway, Janet (2013): Edges of global justice: The World Social Forum and its 'others': Routledge. Della Porta, Donatella & Rucht, Dieter (2013): “Power & Democracy in Social Movements: An Introduction”: in Meeting democracy: power and deliberation in global justice movements / eds. Donatella della Porta & Dieter Rucht: CUP: 01-22. Della Porta, Donatella (2014): Mobilising for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011: OUP. Feigenbaum, Anna; Frenzel, Fabian & McCurdy, Patrick (2013): Protest camps: Zed. Haworth, John (2011) “What Do You Think Were the Main Causes of the Collapse of the Communist System in Eastern Europe?” London Metropolitan University: M.A. European Studies: GIP024: Contemporary East Central Europe: Spring 2011. Haworth, John (2012) “How Do Green Approaches to International Political Economy Differ from Those of Neo-Liberals and Marxists?” London Metropolitan University: M.A. European Studies: GIP008: Contemporary International Political Economy: Autumn 2011. Hobden, Stephen & Jones, Richard Wyn (2008): “Marxist Theories of International Relations” in Globalisation of World Politics: 4th ed. / eds. John Baylis, Steve Smith & Patricia Owens: 2008. Jasper, James M. (2012): “Introduction: From Political Opportunity Structures to Strategic Intervention” in Contention in context: political opportunities and the emergence of protest / eds. Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper: Routledge: 01-36. Juris, Jeffrey S. & Khasnabish, Alex (2013): “Introduction: Ethnography & Activism within Networked Spaces of Transnational Encounter” in Insurgent encounters: transnational activism, ethnography, and the political / eds. Jeffrey S. Juris and Alex Khasnabish: Duke: 2013: 01-38. Jessop, Bob (1985): Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory & Political Strategy: Macmillan. Moghadam, Valentine M. (2013): Globalization and social movements: Islamism, feminism, and the global justice movement: Rowman. Smith, Mark J. (1998): Social Science in Question: Sage. 109 Tarrow, Sidney G. (2012): Strangers at the gates: movements and states in contentious politics: CUP. Tarrow, Sidney G., McAdam, Doug & Tilly, Charles (2001): Dynamics of Contention: CUP. I'm now 60 years old and just studying for my Ph.D. after a lifetime of obsessive compulsive disorder and high functioning autism, which were only diagnosed and treated in the last few years. I probably didn't realise until recently, but my interest in social movements comes from feeling excluded from mainstream society because of these conditions, and my interest in ethnomethodology comes from being one of those who couldn't understand the rules which everybody else followed. If you're interested in supporting me, either in my research interests or in understanding the roles in society of people with mental health problems, please get in touch with me at [email protected]". 110 Publication news from UEL PhD Alumni and Alumnae 2015-2016 111 112 a) Selected Books Refugees and the Meaning of Home Cypriot Narratives of Loss, Longing and Daily Life in London By Helen Taylor, 2015 This book explores the meaning of home for Cypriot refugees living in London since their island was torn apart by war. Taking an innovative approach, it looks at how spaces, time, social networks and sensory experiences come together as home is constructed. It places refugee narratives at its centre to reveal the agency of those forced to migrate. A glimpse in the book at: http://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9781137553324#reviews Reviews Helen Taylor has written a thoughtful analysis of stories of home, narrated by Turkish and Greek Cypriot refugees living in London with little or no hope of returning to their pre-partition villages. Rich with insights into the individual and communal struggles of Cypriot refugees to make sense of their circumstances, Refugees and the Meaning of Home proposes new ways of thinking about place, nostalgia, and home culture. While the topic of 'home' is central to the field of forced migration and refugee studies, Taylor's book addressing spatial, temporal, material and relational aspects of 'home' provides a comprehensive and thorough treatment of the theoretical underpinnings and the debates in the field. Anita Fabos, Clark University, USA Transcending the immediate setting of the Cypriot refugees from 1974, but drawing on their narratives after four decades of exile, Helen Taylor's book is a nuanced, compassionate and rich ethnography of the universal preoccupation with the meaning of home and, especially, the loss of home for forcibly displaced people. Recognising the multiple, complex, and often contradictory spatial, temporal, material and relational meanings which refugees ascribe to home, Refugees and the Meaning of Home. Cypriot Narratives of Loss, Longing and Daily Life in London is an innovative and subtle exploration of the way forced displacement impacts upon the making, unmaking and remaking of home for protracted refugees. Roger Zetter, University of Oxford, UK Dr Helen Taylor received her PhD in 2009 at the University of East London, UK under the supervision of Professor Phil Marfleet and is a Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Research on Migration, Refugees and Belonging at UEL. She has published in the fields of refugee studies, migration and narrative. 113 Islamic Traditions of Refuge in the Crises of Iraq and Syria by Tahir Zaman, 2015 This book considers positions refugees take relative to the state, humanitarian actors and faith-based organisations in the humanitarian field. Attention is drawn to refugee agency as they negotiate circumstances of considerable constraint demonstrating relational dimensions of religious practice and experience. A glimpse in the book at: http://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9781137550057#reviews Reviews This fine study breaks new ground, examining how forced migrants mobilize religious ideas and institutions to help meet challenges of survival and long-term exile. Tahir Zaman tells us something new and important about Islamic traditions in a region affected by huge refugee movements. Philip Marfleet, University of East London, UK This is an impressive work which reminds us to turn our gaze to those left behind when mass forced migration grabs headlines. Tahir Zaman does an admirable job of exploring the networks of self-reliance, the traditions of hospitality, and the notions of refuge and sanctuary among those hosting refugees in Syria and in the Middle East region as a whole. Dawn Chatty, University of Oxford, UK Dr Tahir Zaman received his PhD in 2012 at the University of East London, UK under the supervision of Professor Phil Marfleet and is a visiting research fellow at the Center for Research on Migration, Refugees & Belonging (CMRB) at UEL, and a Senior Teaching Fellow at SOAS, University of London, UK. His research is primarily focused on the social and cultural lives of displaced people in the Middle East. 114 The Play of Politcal Culture, Emotion and Identity. by Candida Yates Offering a uniquely 'psycho-cultural' take on the emotional dynamics of UK political culture this book uses theories and research in psychoanalysis, cultural and media studies and political sociology. It explores the cultural and emotional processes that shape our relationship to politics in a media age, referencing Joanna Lumley to Nigel Farage. A glimpse in the book, at: http://www.palgrave.com/in/book/9780230302525#aboutAuthors Reviews Through a psychoanalytic critique of the anxieties, fantasies and obsessions that characterise today's intensely emotional political culture, Candida Yates' new book makes a powerful case for the argument that Psychosocial Studies is the new Cultural Studies.' Sasha Roseneil, Professor of Sociology and Social Theory, Birkbeck, University of London, UK. 'Whether she is discussing the political manifestations of a contemporary crisis in masculinity and fatherhood, postmodern feminism, nostalgia, narcissism, play, or therapy culture, Yates's psychoanalytic lens illuminates, in a nuanced fashion all too rare today, both regressive social trends toward mastery and progressive, creative potentials for change. This book is essential reading for anyone wishing to understand the complex interplay of fantasy, emotion, identity, media, and politics in the era of neoliberalism.' Lynne Layton, Harvard Medical School, USA Dr. Candida Yates is Professor of Communication in the Faculty of Media and Communication at Bournemouth University, UK. She is a Director of the Media and Inner World research network and has published widely on the psycho-cultural dynamics of politics, emotion and popular culture. She received her PhD in 2004 at the University of East London, UK under the supervision of Professor Corinne Squire 115 b) Selected Edited Collections Bourdieu: The Next Generation The Development of Bourdieu's Intellectual Heritage in Contemporary UK Sociology Edited by Jenny Thatcher, Nicola Ingram, Ciaran Burke, Jessie Abrahams, 2016 This book will give unique insight into how a new generation of Bourdieusian researchers apply Bourdieu to contemporary issues. It will provide a discussion of the working mechanisms of thinking through and/or with Bourdieu when analysing data. In ea, individual authors discuss and reflect upon their own research and the ways in which they put Bourdieu to work. The aim of this book is not to just to provide examples of the development of Bourdieusian research, but for each author to reflect on the ways in which they came across Bourdieu’s work, why it speaks to them (including a reflexive consideration of their own background), and the way in which it is thus useful in their thinking. A glimpse in the book at : https://www.book2look.com/embed/9781317436232 Reviews 'The development of Bourdieu's intellectual heritage in UK sociology' is a wonderful, exhilarating read, full of innovative ideas and new ways of thinking about perennial social concerns from social mobility to migration. Its wide-ranging, fascinating insights into how Bourdieu's thinking can be developed for the 21st century breathe fresh life into established social theories. It is a 'must-read' not only for those trying to make sense of Bourdieu but for everyone interested in wider philosophical and political issues of inequality, identity and the role of the state. Diane Reay, Professor of Education, Cambridge University, UK This book is a truly refreshing and accessible account of Bourdieu’s work; it breaks with the traditional jargon filled sociological work of the past whilst still managing to discuss highly complex ideas. The authors each strike a delicate balance between discussing research, theory and personal experience. I would recommend this book to all students with an interest in inequality and Bourdieusian sociology. Annabel Wilson, PhD Student, Cardiff University, UK Dr Jenny Thatcher received her PhD at the University of East London in 2016 under the supervision of Professor Derek Robbins. Her thesis focused on Polish migration and the education market in the UK in which she used a Bourdieusian framework. She is a co-founder and co-convenor of the BSA Bourdieu Study Group and member of the Early Career Researcher editorial board for The Sociological Review. 116 Cartographies of Differences: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Edited by Ulrike M. Vieten and Gill Valentine This volume investigates the process of learning how to live with individual and group differences in the twenty-first century and examines the ambivalences of contemporary cosmopolitanism. Engaging with the concept of ‘critical cartography’, it emphasizes the structural impact of localities on the experiences of those living with difference, while trying to develop an account of the countermappings that follow spatial and social transformations in today’s world. The contributors focus on visual, normative and cultural embodiments of difference, examining dynamic conflicts at local sites that are connected by the processes of Europeanization and globalization. The collection explores a wide range of topics, including conflicting claims of sexual minorities and conservative Christians, the relationship between national identity and cosmopolitanism, and the ways that cross-cultural communication and bilingualism can help us to understand the complex nature of belonging. The authors come from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds and all contribute to a vernacular reading of cosmopolitanism and transnationalism, aimed at opening up new avenues of research into living with difference. Dr Ulrike Vieten received her PhD in 2008 for the thesis, Situated Cosmopolitanisms: the notion of the Other in discourses on cosmopolitanism in Britain and Germany, the University of East London (UEL),under the supervision of Professor Nira Yuval-Davis. She is a Research Fellow at the Institute for the Study of Conflict, Transformation and Social Justice at Queen’s University, Belfast. Her work engages theoretically and empirically with the (de-)construction of racialised, classed and gendered group boundaries, particularly in the context of nationalism, cosmopolitanism and the shifting axes of difference and otherness. 117 b) Selected Articles and Chapters in Books Alzeer, Gergana. 2016. ‘Types and dynamics of gendered space: a case of Emirati female learners in a single-gender context’. Gender and Education, on-line first, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1205183 Barbagallo, Camille. 2016. ‘Feminist Demands and the Contradictions of Choice: Work and Childcare in Neoliberal Britain’ Feminist Review, Special Edition: Women, Work and Value. Barbagallo, Camille. 2016. ‘24-hour Nurseries: The Never-ending Story of Care and Work’ IN: Jensen, T., Garrett, R., and Voela., A (eds.) We Need to Talk About Family: Essays on the family, (popular) culture and neoliberalism, Newcastle : Cambridge Scholars. Barbagallo, Camille. 2015. ‘Leaving Home: Slavery and the Politics of Reproduction’, Viewpoint, Issue 5: Nov 2015. Bramal, Rebecca. 2016. Austerity, special issue in New Formations, 87. Esin, Cigdem, 2016. Telling stories in the picture: Constituting processual and relational narratives in research with young British Muslim women in East London. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Fathi, Masi and Halvorsrud, K., 2016. Special Issue: Citizenship, Class and Belonging under Coalition Government. Journal of Citizenship Studies. Hakak, Y. and Fathi, Masi, 2016. Keeping the Ties, Saving the communities: Muslim Parenting in the West. Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies. Fathi, Masi and Hakak, Y., 2015. Muslim parenting in the west: a review. Sociology Compass. Nigianni, Chrysanthi. 2015. ‘Bodies in Sympathy for Just One Night’ in Léopold Lambert (eds.) The Body. New York: Punctum. Pitcher, Ben. 2016. ‘Race, Debt and the Welfare State’. New Formations, 87 : 47-63. Pitcher, Ben. 2016. 'Belonging to a different landscape: repurposing nationalist affects', Sociological Research Online 21(1). Yeh, Diana. 2015. ‘Utopia beyond Cosmopolitanism: A Translocal View of Li Yuan-chia’. (Ed.), Viewpoint: A Retrospective of Li Yuan-chia (pp. 15-69) Taipei: Taipei Fine Arts Museum. Yeh, Diana. 2015.. Staging China, Excising the Chinese: Lady Precious Stream and the Darker Side of Chinoiserie. Witchard, A. (Ed.), British Modernism and Chinoiserie, pp. 177-198. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 118 University of East London Docklands Campus University Way London E16 2RD University of East London Stratford Campus Water Lane Stratford E15 4LZ Crossing www.uel.ac.uk Conceptual Bounda 119 © University of East London 2016 120