Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Insulin and Metabolic Pathways y in Endometrial Cancer Marc J. Gunter, PhD Reader/Associate Professor Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Imperial College, London International Variation in Age-Standardized Endometrial Cancer Incidence Rates,, 2012 Globocan, 2012 Obesity and Cancer Risk Renehan et al., 2008 Trends in Overweight and Obesity 80% Proportion overwe eight 70% 60% Canada 50% England USA Spain 40% Austria Italy Australia 30% France Korea 20% 1970 1980 1990 Year 2000 2010 2020 WHO, 2010 Obesity and Endometrial Cancer: Mechanisms Exposures Mechanisms Diet Growth factors Insulin resistance Adipokines Inflammation ? Biomarkers Endpoint Physical activity Obesity Steroid hormones IGF-1 Insulin Leptin Estrogen IGFBP 3 IGFBP-3 C P tid C-Peptide CRP P Progesterone t Free IGF-I HbA1c TNF-α SHBG Endometrial Cancer Insulin and IGF-I Signalling Experimental E i t l data d t support a cancerpromoting effect of insulin and IGF-I Are circulating levels of insulin and IGF-I associated i t d with ith future endometrial cancer risk? Women’s Health Initiative • Case-Cohort Study of Insulin/IGF-I Axis in WHI-OS (93,676 postmenopausal women; 77 months of follow-up): follow up): – – – – Breast Cancer (900 cases) (Gunter et al., JNCI, 101(1):48-60) C l Colorectal t lC Cancer (500 cases)) (Gunter et al., Cancer Res, 68(1):329-37) Endometrial Cancer (300 cases) (Gunter et al., CEBP, 17(1):921-9) Representative Sub-cohort (900 subjects) – Prospectively assess the association of insulin/IGF-axis components p with these cancers while controlling g for endogenous g estrogen levels. – Fasting insulin insulin, glucose glucose, Total IGF-I IGF I, Free IGF IGF-II, IGFBP IGFBP-3 3, estradiol Circulating Insulin, Free IGF-I, Estradiol and Endometrial do et a Ca Cancer ce Risk s in tthe e Women’s o e s Health ea t Initiative P<0.001 RR P=0.02 Hazard Ratio Oestradiol Ptrend = 0.01 0 01 IGF-I Ptrend = 0.10 P=0.01 Quartile of Serologic Factor Quartile of Serologic Parameter Metabolic Subtypes in Obesity Not all obesity is the same-is this relevant for cancer? Metabolically-defined Obesity Subtypes and E d Endometrial ti lC Cancer Ri Risk k WHI +EPIC (950 cases, 950 controls) BMI<25 + HOMA Q1-2 BMI<25 + HOMA Q4 BMI>25 + HOMA Q1-2 BMI>25 + HOMA Q4 Insulin and IGF-I and Endometrial Cancer • Significant positive association between fasting insulin levels and endometrial cancer risk – Ri Risk k estimates ti t generally ll unaffected ff t d b by adjustment dj t t ffor BMI BMI, estradiol, t di l free f IGF suggesting independent pathway – Generallyy consistent with data from other cohort studies ((EPIC,, NYUWHS)) – Insulin resistance in the absence of obesity may be a significant risk factor for endometrial cancer • Free IGF-I levels inversely related to endometrial cancer risk – Unexpected but consistent with cross-sectional data • What is going on at the tissue level? – Lack of data on expression of insulin/IGF pathways in different endometrial tissues (normal, malignant) – Serum versus local levels? Circulating IGF-I is regulated by GH and mainly hepatic in origin; Uterine IGF-I regulated by estrogen Molecular Pathologic Study of Insulin/IGF Signaling • Normal Endometrium (hysterectomy samples) • • Premenopausal women (n=80) Postmenopausal women (n=56) • Hyperplasias (n=67) • ( , ) Endometrioid Adenocarcinomas (n=1,230) • • • • Stage I (n=78) Stage II (n=408) Stage III (n=598) Stage IV (n=146) • FFPE, fresh frozen tissue, serum, risk factor data • BRTE (NCI); Albert Einstein College of Medicine (New York); Hammersmith, Charing Cross Hospitals, (London); GOG-0210 Insulin and IGF-I Signalling 1. Comparison of expression across endometrial tissues 2. Impact of EC Risk factors 3. Understand circulating versus local levels IR-IGF-P Receptor Secretory Proliferative Insulin Receptor Secretory Proliferative Insulin Receptor Expression in Endometrial Tissues P <0.001 40 35 Tra anscripts TranscriptsX -6 -6 1010 X 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Tiss e TType Tissue pe Secretory Proliferative *Normalized to 18s rRNA CAH Type I-II EC Type III-IV EC Role of Sex Hormone and Insulin/IGF Axes in Endometrial Cancer Prognosis • Nested cohort study of 900 stage II-IV EA patients recruited to GOG0210 •Serum (obtained prior to surgery) •Insulin, IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-1, -3 •Estrogens, Progesterone, SHBG • Fresh Frozen Tissue •Gene expression (mRNA)-IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-3, IR, IGF-IR,, ER,, PR,, Akt,, PTEN •Tumor Microarrays •Immunohistochemical expression of IGF-IR, IR, Phospho-IGF-IR, Phospho-Akt, PTEN, ER, PR Insulin, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and Progression og ess o Free ee Su Survival a in GOG GOG-0210 0 0 (287 recurrences to date) RR Hazard Ratio Oestradiol Ptrend = 0.01 0 01 P<0.001 Quartile of Serologic Factor Quartile of Serologic Parameter IGF-I Ptrend = 0.10 Multivariate model includes age, stage, grade, BMI Metabolite Profiling and Endometrial Cancer •Hyperinsulinemia is associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer suggesting this pathway is important for endometrial tumorigenesis but: • Complex relationship with IGF-I for both risk and prognosis • Predictive value of hyperinsulinemia is likely not high (common) • Are there biochemical pathways specific for endometrial cancer development that increase a woman’s risk? • Example: Panel of 4 amino acids (Leu, Val, Phe, Ile) shown to be predictive of DM-II risk beyond traditional risk factors and insulin resistance (Wang et al., Nat Med. 2011; 17(4):448–453) • Case-control ((n=250)) study y of metabolomic p profiling g and endometrial cancer reported significant association with stearic acid and acylcarnitines (Gaudet et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 97(9):3216-23) Metabolomic Profiling and Endometrial Cancer Risk •To investigate the association of metabolomic proflies with endometrial cancer • Profile 1 1,500 500 incident cases and 1 1,500 500 matched controls (2 (2-stage stage design) • E2C2: NHS, EPIC, CPS-II, NYUWHS, MEC • Metabolomic platform at Broad Institute (>600 characterised metabolites; unannotated peak data) • Proportion of cases/controls with existing hormonal data (insulin, IGF-I, steroid hormones) •To T assess the th association i ti off endometrial d t i l cancer risk i k ffactors t with ith metabolite profiles • • • • Anthropometric parameters Genetic loci Hormone profiles Ethnicity •To explore the extent to which metabolites explain the association of endometrial cancer with its risk factors (mediation analyses) INTERCEPT Weight loss Serum markers • Insulin/IGF • Inflammation • Metabolomics Tissue markers k • Cancer associated molecular or morphological changes in tissue Collaboration with Professor Jane Wardle (UCL); CR-UK Funded INTERCEPT ~300 obese subjects enrolled Blood, urine, stool, colon biopsies banked Endometrial Tissue? Intensive Weight Loss (VLCD) General Dietary Advice (10-20%) (1-2%) 9-12 months Blood, urine, stool, colon biopsies banked (i) Insulin/IGF/mTOR (ii) Metabolomic Profiling Acknowledgements/Collaborators Imperial College Others: Elio Riboli Hector Keun Melissa Merritt Maria Kyrgiou Hani Gabra Herbert Yu ((University y of Hawaii)) JoAnn Manson (Harvard) Garnet Anderson (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) M k Sherman Mark Sh (NCI) Louise Brinton (NCI) Hannah Yang (NCI) Mia Gaudet (ACS) Jane Wardle (UCL) Immaculata DeVivo (Harvard) Sara Olson (MSKCC) Anne Zelenuich-Jacquotte (NYU) Albert Einstein College of Medicine Howard Strickler Gloria Huang Tom Rohan Xiaonan Xue Gloria Ho Mark Einstein Funding Sources Grants R01-CA93881 (H. Strickler); R01-CA133010 (M. Gunter); CRUK; OCA(M. Gunter)