Download Supreme-Court

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Separation of powers in Singapore wikipedia, lookup

Supreme Court of India wikipedia, lookup

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union wikipedia, lookup

1988 Malaysian constitutional crisis wikipedia, lookup

Supreme Court of Pakistan wikipedia, lookup

United States constitutional law wikipedia, lookup

R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2) wikipedia, lookup

Constitutional Court of Thailand wikipedia, lookup

Judicial review in the United States wikipedia, lookup

Separation of powers under the United States Constitution wikipedia, lookup

Judicial review in English law wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
The Judicial Process
How the Supreme Court decides which
cases to hear
• SC year lasts October – July, and they will hear
c. 100 cases
– Lower court may send a case to the SC (a writ of
certiorari)
– Petitioned to hear serious constitutional issue
• SC will choose if they want to accept the case
How the Supreme Court reaches a
decision
Stage 1)
• Lawyers for each side present a brief (written statement
with legal arguments, facts and precedents)
• Amicus Curiae (friends of the court) briefs may be
submitted by other groups with an interest in the case (PGs
or gov. depts)
– 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger (should A Action continue?) the SC
admitted they were heavily influenced by AC from influential
groups (e.g. Armed forces)
Stage 2)
• Date set for oral arguments
– Each side has 30 mins to summarise their point
– Judges may interrupt to ask questions/challenge
Stage 3)
• Justices meet to discuss the case
• Vote
– All votes have equal weight
– Unanimous decision not required
Stage 4)
• Opinion will then be written that will explain the
decision to the general public and provide a guide
to lower courts considering smaller cases
• If judges are split – then a majority decision will
be written, with the minority explaining their
points of disagreement in a dissenting opinion
The role of Law Clerks
• Play a very important role
• They can write the first draft of the opinion to
be presented by the Justice they work for
• Huge responsibility (they may not have had
any previous legal experience
• Many clerks have successful legal careers –
some have risen to become SC Justices.
Judicial Review
The power of the Supreme Court to declare acts of
Congress, or actions of the executive – or acts of state
governments – unconstitutional, and thereby null and
void.
• FF’s declared that the judiciary was ‘beyond
comparison the weakest of the 3 departments of
power’ (the SC did not even have its own building until
1935)
• However, SC’s decisions have had a powerful impact
since the beginning
– 1793 – SC ruled that a citizen had the right to sue a state,
thus leading to the 11th Amendment.
– A constitutional amendment was needed to overturn a
decision of the SC (an early indication of the Court’s
power).
Marbury v. Madison - 1803
• Established that the Court had the power of Judicial
Review
• 1801 President Adams appointed 42 new justices who
shared his views, and they were all confirmed by the
Senate
• 4 of them did not receive their letters of appointment,
and Adams ordered his Secretary of State (Madison) to
not deliver them.
• One of them applied to the SC to enforce his
appointment
• SC’s decision to declare Section 13 of the Judiciary Act
unconstitutional established that they had the right to
decide the precise meaning of the Constitution in
relation to specific cases.
Your Task
Give examples of the importance of Judicial
Review in :
• Interpreting the Constitution
• Becoming a political institution (W. Bush v.
Gore)
• Quasi-legislative power
Homework
Notes:
• Constitutional Basis for the court’s actions
• Judicial Restraint (and where practised)
• Judicial Activism (and where practised)