* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Supreme-Court
Separation of powers in Singapore wikipedia , lookup
Supreme Court of India wikipedia , lookup
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union wikipedia , lookup
1988 Malaysian constitutional crisis wikipedia , lookup
Supreme Court of Pakistan wikipedia , lookup
United States constitutional law wikipedia , lookup
R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2) wikipedia , lookup
Constitutional Court of Thailand wikipedia , lookup
Judicial review in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Separation of powers under the United States Constitution wikipedia , lookup
The Judicial Process How the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear • SC year lasts October – July, and they will hear c. 100 cases – Lower court may send a case to the SC (a writ of certiorari) – Petitioned to hear serious constitutional issue • SC will choose if they want to accept the case How the Supreme Court reaches a decision Stage 1) • Lawyers for each side present a brief (written statement with legal arguments, facts and precedents) • Amicus Curiae (friends of the court) briefs may be submitted by other groups with an interest in the case (PGs or gov. depts) – 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger (should A Action continue?) the SC admitted they were heavily influenced by AC from influential groups (e.g. Armed forces) Stage 2) • Date set for oral arguments – Each side has 30 mins to summarise their point – Judges may interrupt to ask questions/challenge Stage 3) • Justices meet to discuss the case • Vote – All votes have equal weight – Unanimous decision not required Stage 4) • Opinion will then be written that will explain the decision to the general public and provide a guide to lower courts considering smaller cases • If judges are split – then a majority decision will be written, with the minority explaining their points of disagreement in a dissenting opinion The role of Law Clerks • Play a very important role • They can write the first draft of the opinion to be presented by the Justice they work for • Huge responsibility (they may not have had any previous legal experience • Many clerks have successful legal careers – some have risen to become SC Justices. Judicial Review The power of the Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress, or actions of the executive – or acts of state governments – unconstitutional, and thereby null and void. • FF’s declared that the judiciary was ‘beyond comparison the weakest of the 3 departments of power’ (the SC did not even have its own building until 1935) • However, SC’s decisions have had a powerful impact since the beginning – 1793 – SC ruled that a citizen had the right to sue a state, thus leading to the 11th Amendment. – A constitutional amendment was needed to overturn a decision of the SC (an early indication of the Court’s power). Marbury v. Madison - 1803 • Established that the Court had the power of Judicial Review • 1801 President Adams appointed 42 new justices who shared his views, and they were all confirmed by the Senate • 4 of them did not receive their letters of appointment, and Adams ordered his Secretary of State (Madison) to not deliver them. • One of them applied to the SC to enforce his appointment • SC’s decision to declare Section 13 of the Judiciary Act unconstitutional established that they had the right to decide the precise meaning of the Constitution in relation to specific cases. Your Task Give examples of the importance of Judicial Review in : • Interpreting the Constitution • Becoming a political institution (W. Bush v. Gore) • Quasi-legislative power Homework Notes: • Constitutional Basis for the court’s actions • Judicial Restraint (and where practised) • Judicial Activism (and where practised)