Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Canada’s Place in the International Political Economy January 14 Summary: What is Canada’s place in the world? In the global hierarchy of nations, between the rich and powerful (also resource and energy consuming) and the poor and/or developing countries, where is Canada situated? The debate: This week we’re looking at one of the longstanding debates in Canadian Political Economy. The readings for this week present different positions in the debate over the nature of the Canadian economy and the strength of the Canadian economy. Dependency Theory Has the Canadian economy been historically weak, dependent and underdeveloped? Stanford: “a hewer of wood and pumper of oil” Watkins: “the most neo-colonial country in the world” “the richest dependent developed industrialized country” he refers to the “surrender of Canadian sovereignty for the glory of American capitalism” Silent Surrender Levitt: 1970: “Present-day Canada may be described as the world’s richest underdeveloped country.” “a rich, industrialized, underdeveloped country” “structural underdevelopment” “Laurier declared that the twentieth century belongs to Canada. By the middle of the century it had become clear that Canada belongs to the United States.” “The instrument by which the Canadian economy has been recolonized…is that of direct foreign investment – more specifically U.S. direct investment.” Hewer of Wood, Pumper of Oil Stanford: “Resources have naturally played a central role in Canada’s economic history. Our development has been largely shaped by successive resource booms: first furs, fish, timber, and agricultural goods, and later minerals and energy. These natural riches were harvested for export to our more advanced trading partners (first colonial Britain, then America). The resulting incomes paid for the importation of the more sophisticated manufactures needed on our farms and in our cities.” “Analyzing this historical pattern, Harold Innis and other Canadian political-economists worried that Canada’s role as a hewer of wood and drawer of water would constrict our prospects, leaving us perpetually dependent on wealthier metropoles to purchase and then transform our resources.” Diversification, then Retreat Stanford argues that over most of the 20th century, Canada was diversifying its economy and becoming less reliant upon natural resource products. Canada was successfully escaping from its resource pigeon-hole, until approximately 1999. Marxist Critique Or, has the Canadian economy developed a rich, advanced capitalist economy that is typical of the advanced capitalist world? Has it been a diversified, fully developed economic success story (in capitalist terms, at least)? Critique of the Dependency Approach Kellogg points out that foreign ownership of the Canadian economy peaked in the early 1970s. There has been a recent but relatively minor upsurge in recent years. Foreign ownership in Canada has not caused underdevelopment. Canada has a diversified economy, that shares the profile of an advanced capitalist country. Canada, in fact, becomes an important source of FDI abroad. Marxist Approach Kellogg: “That is where a renewed Canadian political economy has to begin, with a focus on class relations inside Canada rather than economic relations between Canada and the United States.” Canada: On the Edge of Empire Canada: On the Edge of Empire Canada was formed as an outpost of first the French then the British Empires Canada shares a border with the United States, the dominant global power of the 20th century and beyond Canada: Shaped by Empire Canada’s relationship with Britain and the United States has shaped the Canadian economy and the Canadian identity. There have always been debates in Canada about the advantages and disadvantages of these close relationships with the global power. When did Canada become an independent country? The British Identity For many English-speaking Canadians, our ties to Britain defined the Canadian identity. “A British subject I was born, a British subject I will die” John A. Macdonald during the election campaign of 1891 “the empire on which the sun never sets” The Flag Debate In the mid-1960s when the federal government considered the adoption of a new flag to replace the Union Jack and the Red Ensign, it was highly controversial and divisive. Far from all Canadians were enthusiastic about the new flag and it faced much opposition within the House of Commons and from the public. Canada’s Red Ensign The Flag Debate The red maple leaf was one proposal amid many. For more information, including a range of alternative proposals, see: http://scaa.usask.ca/gallery/flagdisplay/index.htm For more information see the CBC video archives: http://archives.cbc.ca/IDD-1-73-80/politics_economy/canada_flag/ Canada’s Oath of Citizenship I swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen. The Outward Orientation of the Canadian Economy Canada’s economic development has often been portrayed as the exploitation of various natural resource products (or staples) for foreign markets fish, furs, lumber, wheat, minerals, oil and natural gas From the British to the American Empire British and US investment in Canada Canada’s Export Market: From the UK to the USA Year Canadian exports to UK as % of exports to USA 1886 1896 1906 1916 1926 1936 1946 1956 1966 1975 109% 166% 151% 225% 102% 119% 67% 29% 19% 9% Source: McBride, Stephen. 2001. Paradigm Shift. Halifax: Fernwood. Canada and the US "The Americans are our best friends whether we like it or not." - Robert Thompson Population Distribution Reciprocity British North America and the United States had a Reciprocity Treaty 1854-1866. External influence on Confederation After Britain’s repeal of the Corn Laws and the end of the Reciprocity Treaty with the US, Canada was without a trading partner. Fear of American military power, the Fenian raids and the rivalry over the western portion of the continent were factors leading to Confederation in Canada. Second World War During the Second World War, Canadian and American defence policy and production for the war effort were highly integrated. Ogdensburg Agreement 1940 created Permanent Joint Board on Defence Hyde Park Declaration 1941 Globalization or Continentalization? For Canada, increasing globalization has often appeared to involve greater integration with the United States (rather than integration with the rest of the globe). Canada: An American Colony? “Canada moved from colony to nation to colony” - Harold Innis, 1949 American ownership of the Canadian economy, particularly in manufacturing and resources, grew over most the 20th century (until the 1970s). Conclusion: External Influence Canadian politics, economics and culture have always been shaped by the external environment, but particularly by our relations with Britain and the US. Our relations with these countries have been a cause for celebration for some and for concern for other Canadians. There has been an on-going debate about the desirability and possibility of greater Canadian independence in foreign and domestic policy, economics and culture. Conclusion: State Response In general, the Canadian state has pursued three different goals: managing, maintaining and increasing our relations with the US, while seeking to broaden our foreign relations through contacts with other countries and through multilateral institutions, and maintaining or increasing the scope (or at least appearance) of Canadian policy independence and distinctive Canadian cultural development.