Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Schuster et al., J Biol Phys 34:1–17 (2008) Hadas Zur Computational Game Theory Project 2012 Introduction Game Theory and Biochemistry Game Theory and Biophysics Discussion My Project: HGT Game  Based on assumption that biological systems are optimized during evolution  In line with Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest  Traditional optimization is insufficient for understanding biological evolution  Evolution is nearly always co-evolution By evolving towards optimal properties Organisms change their environment This, in turn, affects the optimum Which involves, for e.g. competing organisms  Organisms competing against each other can be considered as players in the sense of game theory  Prisoner's Dilemma: T > R > P > S  Snowdrift Game: T > R > S > P  This changes the situation fundamentally and leads to persistence of cooperation  Two drivers caught in a blizzard and trapped on either side of a snowdrift  They can either start shovelling (cooperate) or remain in the car (defect)  If both cooperate, they have the benefit b of getting home while sharing the labour c. Thus, R = b - c/2  If both defect, they do not get anywhere and P = 0  If only one shovels, they both get home but defector avoids the labour cost and gets T = b, whereas the cooperator gets S = b – c  If costs are high (2b > c > b > 0), these payoffs recover the Prisoner's Dilemma  By contrast, if b > c > 0, the payoffs generate the snowdrift game, in which the best action depends on the co-player.  This leads to stable coexistence of cooperators and defectors  ESS is a generalization of NE  A strategy played by a population is evolutionarily stable if it cannot be invaded by a rare mutant playing another strategy  Note that these strategies can be mixed  Each ESS is a Nash equilibrium, but not vice versa  The only ESS of the snowdrift game is mixed.  The only ESS of the PD is the pure strategy of “defecting”  When two species compete for the same substrate, a typical game- theoretical situation arises  Fitness of either organism depends not only on its own strategy (pathway usage ) but also on the other because both strategies affect the common substrate pool  Dynamics of 2 competing populations choosing between 2 different pathways can be described: S, substrate concentration, v, input rate of substrate, y, ATPover-substrate yield, N, population density, J, rate of substrate consumption, and d, death rate. c denotes the proportionality constant connecting growth rate with ATP formation rate.  The question arises as to what the relevant payoff is  A payoff matrix with order relation T > R > P > S can be established  Thus, the conditions for a Prisoner’s Dilemma are fulfilled  Although it would be best for both players to opt for respiration (a cooperative strategy), they are tempted to switch to respiro-fermentation(a selfish strategy, PD)  As this applies to both, they end up both using the selfish strategy  This is the NE and ESS of the game  Assuming that one tree is taller by h, this gives it an advantage in productivity of p  The dashed straight lines have the slope p/h, i.e., they depict the gain in productivity by growing taller.  The solid straight lines represent the net effect.  The evolutionarily stable height, h*, is reached when this net effect is 0 due to investing more into supporting structures, i.e., when the straight line is horizontal.  Clearly, h* is larger than the optimal height, hopt  We have discussed several examples of relevant applications of game theory to biochemistry and biophysics  A difficult issue in the study of optimality properties of biological organisms is to find the relevant optimization principle  The trade-off between rate and yield of ATP production on the basis of evolutionary game theory reveals that paradoxically users’ tendency to maximize their fitness actually results in a decrease of their fitness  The rationality of microorganisms does not stem from reason but from a “choice” of strategies, which can be treated by the same mathematical methods as a deliberate choice by rational beings  An interesting question is whether also interactions between proteins, genes and/or other structures on the molecular level can be described by game theory Three major steps: 1. Initiation: Properties of the 5’UTR, folding energy, ATG context 2. Elongation: The speed is related to concentrations of tRNA molecules (but also to additional features) ... 3. Termination  Codon usage bias refers to differences in the frequency of occurrence of synonymous codons in coding DNA.  A codon is a series of three nucleotides (triplets) that encodes a specific amino acid residue in a polypeptide chain or for the termination of translation (stop codons)  There are 64 different codons (61 codons encoding for amino acids plus 3 stop codons) but only 20 different translated amino acids  HGT, a process in which one organism incorporates genetic material from another without being its offspring  HGT is a major force in bacterial evolution  Bacteria are under a strong selection to optimize their growth rate by improving features related to their codon usage  A recent study showed these two forces are coupled: (1) codon bias of transferred genes has a strong influence on the probability that they will become fixed in the new genome and (2) frequent HGTs may increase the similarity in tRNA pools of organisms within the same community