Download Cross-cultural training and cultural adjustment

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
SIETAR Europa Congress 2007
Can cross-cultural training
make matters worse?
Lessons to be learnt from an
empirical study of expatriate EFL
teachers in Taiwan
Wei Ju Liao
Robert Johnson
University of Bedfordshire
Outline
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Background
Cross-cultural
adjustment
Classroom
management
issues
Research findings
Possible
explanations
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
‘Culture shock’
training
Commonly used
approaches and tools
Problems and pitfalls
Essentialism and the
‘small culture’
paradigm
Recommendations
Background



Expatriate English teachers in Taiwan
Methodology
Hypothesis:
Expatriate English teachers’ previous cross-cultural
training is positively related to their adjustment:
i.
in the general environment
ii. in social interaction with host country nationals
iii. in the workplace
Cross-cultural adjustment

What is cross-cultural adjustment?

Is there an effective model for researching
cross-cultural adjustment?
The framework of international
adjustment
Black, Mendenhall & Oddou (1991)
Reported conflicts between East and
West in the classroom
In the East (CONFUCIAN)
Teaching
methods
In the West (SOCRATIC)
Teacher-centred
Student-centred
Focus on grammar and
vocabulary
Focus on using the language
Grammar Translation
Method
Communicative, interactive
teaching styles
Purpose of To pass examinations and get To be able to use the
learning
good marks
language for personal
interests
Roles
Teacher serves as role model, Teacher leads students to
transmits wisdom of the
take responsibility and find
ancients
their own truth
Based on Cortazzi & Jin, 1996; Li, 1998, 1999; Maley, 1986; Miklitz, 1996.
Research findings

Expected correlation groups



Teachers experiencing culture shock
Cross-cultural training matched with ‘homesick’,
‘talking about myself with others’ and Taiwanese
students’ lack of independence
Unexpected correlation groups



Language ability
Levels of culture-shock
Influence of students’ parents
Possible explanations

Misleading responses, either due to particular
situation or faults in the research design.

Taiwan makes foreign expatriates go crazy.

The training they received may have been badly
designed, clumsily delivered or pitched at the
wrong level.

The tone of the training may have been too
negative leading trainees to expect to have
difficulties – a self-fulfilling prophecy.
‘Culture shock’ training

What is it?

Time and resources

Participation

Delivery and quality control

Content
Commonly used approaches and tools








Facts about the place
‘Facts’ about the people
Dos and don’ts
Exploring stereotypes
The iceberg
The U-curve and the stages of
adaptation
Jolt activities, simulations and role
play
Cultural dimensions
Conventional
Innovative
Problems and pitfalls
Do some of these activities help to create an
impression of ‘polar opposites’ in the mind of the
trainee?
 Is there too much of an emphasis on the
negative, stressful aspects of crossing cultures?
 If this is the case, can it become a self-fulfilling
prophecy?
 Are we providing trainees with a useful toolkit, a
set of strategies or something else?

Essentialism and dualism
Essentialist view of culture
Non-essentialist view of culture
The world is divided into
mutually exclusive national
cultures. People in one culture
are essentially different from
people in another.
Cultures can flow, change,
intermingle, cut across and through
one another, regardless of national
frontiers, and have blurred
boundaries.
People’s behaviour is defined and People are influenced by or make use
constrained by the culture in
of a multiplicity of cultural forms.
which they live.
To communicate with someone
who is foreign or different we
must first understand the details
or stereotype of their culture.
To communicate with anyone who
belongs to a group with whom we are
unfamiliar, we have to understand
the complexity of who s/he is.
(Holliday, Hyde and Kullman, 2004)
The ‘small culture’ paradigm
‘Small culture’ vs ‘large culture’
 The slippery slope of Culturism: reductionism,
otherisation, cultural fundamentalism
 Small culture is:



Any social grouping from a neighbourhood to a work
group.
A dynamic, ongoing group process which operates in
changing circumstances to enable group members to
make sense of and operate meaningfully within those
circumstances.
(Holliday, 1999)
Recommendations






Institutional: training is not ‘the icing on the cake’
Personal: trainers must engage in pedagogical reflection
and professional development
Professional: international standards for cross-cultural
training?
Design: more effort needed in planning stage; more
consideration of pedagogical principles
Content: dynamic process not fixed product
Evaluation: a measure of effectiveness or a marketing
tool?
Questions to consider

What do you think of these research findings?

In your experience, does cross-cultural training
overemphasize the stressful aspects of crossing
cultures?

What can trainers do to avoid this kind of
negative effect?
Thank you very much

Wei Ju Liao
E-mail: [email protected]

Robert Johnson
E-mail: [email protected]