Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Part 3 Uncertainty and Strategy © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Chapter 5 Uncertainty © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Probability Probability of an event happening; relative frequency with which an event occurs 3 Probability of “heads” coming up on flip of fair coin is ½. That is, when coin is flipped many times, we can expect “heads” to come up in approximately one-half of flips. Expected Value 4 Expected value of game with a number of uncertain outcomes: size of prize that player will win on average. On a single flip of a coin, Jones pays Smith $1 (X1 = +$1) if a tail comes up and Smith will pay Jones $1 (X2 = -$1) if a head comes up, the expected value of game for both players is 1 1 1 1 X 1 X 2 ( $1) ( $1) 0. 2 2 2 2 Expected Value If game changes so that, from Smith’s point of view, X1 = $10, and X2 = -$1, expected value for Smith would be: 1 1 1 1 X 1 X 2 ($10) ( $1) $4.50. 2 2 2 2 5 Because Smith would stand to win $4.50 on average, she might be willing to pay Jones up to this amount to play. Fair games are games that cost precisely their expected value. Risk Aversion 6 When people face risky but fair situations, they will usually choose not to participate. Risk aversion is tendency for people to refuse to accept fair games. Swiss mathematician Daniel Bernoulli theorized that not only the monetary payoff of a game matters to people; expected utility from the game’s prizes also affects people’s willingness to play. Diminishing Marginal Utility 7 Bernoulli assumed that utility associated with payoffs in risky situation increases less rapidly than dollar value of payoffs. Extra (marginal) utility obtained from winning an extra dollar in prize money is assumed to decline as additional dollars are won. Diminishing Marginal Utility Fig. 5.1 reflects diminishing marginal utility; shows utility associated with possible prizes (or incomes) from $0 to $50,000. Concave shape of curve reflects assumed diminishing marginal utility. 8 Gain in utility due to increased income from $1000 to $2000 exceeds gain from $49,000 to $50,000. Graphical Analysis of Risk Aversion Figure 5-1 shows person with three options. Contender may: 9 retain current income level ($35,000) without taking any risk; take fair bet with 50-50 chance of winning or losing $5,000; take fair bet with a 50-50 chance of winning or losing $15,000. FIGURE 5-1: Risk Aversion Utility U 0 10 20 30 33 35 40 50 Income (thousands of dollars) A graphical Analysis of Risk Aversion Current $35,000 provides utility of U3. Utility of $5,000 bet is average of utility of $40,000 (if player wins) and utility of $30,000 (if player loses). 11 Average utility is U2 < U3. The utility (U1 < U2) of the $5000 bet is average of utility of winning ($50,000) and losing ($20,000). FIGURE 5-1: Risk Aversion Utility U U3 U2 U1 0 12 20 30 33 35 40 50 Income (thousands of dollars) Willingness to Pay to Avoid Risk With risk aversion and equal expected values ($35,000 for three options in Figure 5-1), contender will prefer riskfree incomes to risky incomes that offer less utility. 13 Figure 5-1,risk-free income of $33,000 provides same utility as $5,000 gamble. Player would pay up to $2,000 to avoid taking risk. Methods of Reducing Risk: Insurance 14 Figure 5-2 shows motive for buying insurance. Assume that during next year person with $10,000 current income faces 50 percent chance of incurring $4,000 in unexpected medical bills. Without insurance, person’s utility would be U1--utility of average of $6000 and $10,000. FIGURE 5-2: Insurance Reduces Risk Utility U U1 0 15 20 25 35 Income (thousands of dollars) Fair Insurance Fair insurance: premium equals expected value of loss. 16 Figure 5-2, fair insurance would cost $7,500--expected value of what insurance companies would have to pay each year in health claims. Would guarantee income of $27,500--yield utility of U2 FIGURE 15.2: Insurance Reduces Risk Utility U U2 U1 0 17 20 25 27.5 35 Income (thousands of dollars) Unfair Insurance 18 Since insurance companies have costs beyond paying benefits, they can not sell insurance at actuarially fair premiums. Figure 5-2: client would be willing to pay up to $10,000 for health insurance since $25,000 of risk-free income yields as much utility (U1) as going without any insurance. $12,000 premium would reduce utility to U 0. FIGURE 5-2: Insurance Reduces Risk Utility U U2 U1 U0 0 19 20 23 25 27.5 35 Income (thousands of dollars) Uninsurable Risks Some risks so unique or difficult to evaluate that insurers unable to set premium rates--risks become uninsurable. If events so infrequent or unpredictable (such as wars, “Acts of God” etc.) insurers have no basis for establishing premiums. 20 Methods of Reducing Risk: Diversification Diversification: economic version of “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.” Diversification spreads risk among several options rather than choosing only one. 21 Suitably spreading risk may increase utility above that obtain by a single transaction. Diversification Figure 5-3 shows income utility for individual with current income of $35,000 who must invest $15,000 in risky assets. Assume only two such assets: shares of company A or company B stock 22 Each company’s stock costs $1, but value will increase to $2 if company does well during next year. Diversification 23 If either company does poorly, its stock will be worthless. Each company has a 50-50 chance of doing well. If A and B are unrelated to one another, holding both stocks will reduce investor’s risks. Diversification Investing in 15,000 shares of company A yields a 50 percent chance of having $50,000 and a 50 percent chance of having $20,000. 24 Yields a utility level of U1. If person invests in 7,500 shares of each company, faces four possible outcomes shown in Table 5-1. FIGURE 5-3: Diversification Reduces Risk Utility U U1 0 25 20 35 50 Income (thousands of dollars) TABLE 5-1: Possible Outcomes from Investing in Two Companies Company A’s Performance 26 Poor Good Company B’s Performance Poor Good $20,000 $35,000 35,000 50,000 Diversification Each of four outcomes is equally likely; with half of cases, investor ends up with original $35,000. 27 Diversification strategy, while it still has an expected value of $35,000, has less risk. Figure 5-3, point C represent when B does poorly and D represent when B does well. Point E, (the average of C and D) results from diversification and yields utility U2 > U1. FIGURE 5-3: Diversification Reduces Risk Utility D U2 U1 U E C 0 28 20 35 50 Income (thousands of dollars) Attributes of Options Specification of underlying transaction Definition of period during which option may be exercised Price of option 29 Value of Underlying Transaction Affects Option Value Because transaction that underlies an option will occur in the future, underlying transaction’s value subject to many uncertainties. The value of underlying transaction in option has two general dimensions 30 Expected value of transaction Variability of value of transaction. Duration of Option Affects Its Value The longer an option lasts, the more valuable it is. Intuitively, more time you have to take advantage of flexibility an option offers, more likely it is that you will want to do so. 31 Investors’ Market Options 32 Figure 5-4 shows simplified illustration of market options open to a would-be investor in financial assets. Points on figure represent options available. For example, point A represents a risk-free asset such as money in a checking account. Asset B represents relatively risky stock. All other points on Figure 5-4 represent risks and returns associated with assets that investors might buy. FIGURE 5-4: Market Options for Investors Market Line Annual return C B A Risk 33 Investors’ Market Options 34 Investors like high annual returns but dislike risk, so they will choose to hold combinations of these available assets that lie on their “northwest” periphery. By mixing various risky assets with risk-free asset (A), they can choose any point along the line AC. Market line: shows possible combinations of annual returns and risk that investors can achieve by taking advantage of what market the offers. Choices by Individual Investors 35 The market line in Figure 5-4 provides a constraint on the options that financial markets provide to individual investors. These investors then choose among the available options on the basis of their own attitudes toward risk. This process is illustrated in Figure 5-5. Choices by Individual Investors 36 The figure shows a typical indifference curve for three different types of investors. The three investors illustrated in Figure 5-5 have different attitudes toward risk. Investor I has a very low tolerance for risk. He will opt for mix of investments that include a lot of the risk-free option (point L). Choices by Individual Investors 37 Investor II has a moderate toleration for risk. She will opt for a combination of assets that are reasonably representative of the overall market (M). Finally, investor III is a real speculator. She will accept a risky combination of assets (N) – more risky than the overall market. FIGURE 5-5: Choices by Individual Investors UIII UII Annual return Market Line N UI M L A Risk 38 The Economics of Information A Utility-Maximizing Model 39 The basic model is shown in Figure 5-6 where an individual is assumed to face two possible outcomes (sometimes called states of the world), but he or she does not know what outcome will occur. The person’s consumption in the two states is denoted C1 and C2, and possible values are recorded in the axes. FIGURE 5-6: Utility Maximization under Uncertainty Certainty line C2 C2E E B C2A D U2 A U1 CE1 40 CA1 C1 A Utility-Maximizing Model At point A, the individual has considerably more consumption in state 1 than in state 2. 41 This person might be willing to give up some consumption in state 1 to consume more in state 2. This might we accomplished by paying an insurance premium in state 1 in order to increase consumption in state 2 (when things go wrong). A Utility-Maximizing Model For example, if the terms at which insurance can be bought are reflected in the slope of the line AE, this person could increase utility from U1 to U2 by purchasing complete insurance and moving to point E. 42 Buying complete insurance has allowed this person to obtain CE1 (which equals CE2) with certainty. FIGURE 5-6: Utility Maximization under Uncertainty Certainty line C2 C2E E B C2A D U2 A U1 C1E 43 C1A C1 Balancing the Gains and Costs of Information Another way to improve his or her situation would be to gather additional information. 44 Consumption will decrease in the good outcome but increase in the bad outcome. The issue is whether acquiring information will raise utility above U1. Point B, for example, represents a utility-improving investment, but point D is a poor investment in information. Information Differences among Economic Actors The level of information that an individual acquires will depend on how much the information costs. There are reasons to believe that information costs may differ significantly among individuals. 45 Sellers or large-scale repeat buyers of a good may have greater access to information than first-time buyers.