Download ppt

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Antiproton Decelerator wikipedia , lookup

ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup

Peter Kalmus wikipedia , lookup

Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup

DESY wikipedia , lookup

Antimatter wikipedia , lookup

Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup

ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup

Bruno Pontecorvo wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup

Neutrino wikipedia , lookup

Lepton wikipedia , lookup

Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz-violating neutrino oscillations wikipedia , lookup

Super-Kamiokande wikipedia , lookup

Neutrino oscillation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Neutrino
Future
Boris Kayser
Moriond
March 6, 2005
0
The discovery of
neutrino mass and mixing
Open questions about neutrinos and
their connections to other physics
Need for a coherent strategy
for getting answers
1
A year-long study of the future of
neutrino physics, sponsored by the
American Physical Society Divisions of
–
Nuclear Physics
Particles and Fields
Astrophysics
Physics of Beams
2
The APS Multi-Divisional
Neutrino Study
Over 200 Participants
Seven Working Groups
Organizing Committee (Four members from abroad):
Janet Conrad, Guido Drexlin, Belen Gavela, Takaaki
Kajita, Paul Langacker, Keith Olive, Bob Palmer, Georg
Raffelt, Hamish Robertson, Stan Wojcicki, Lincoln
Wolfenstein
Co-Chairpersons: Stuart Freedman, Boris Kayser
3
The aim: To develop a strategy for the U.S.
role in a global neutrino program.
The U.S. effort should complement, and
cooperate with, the efforts in Europe and Asia.
4
Our Main Report,
The Neutrino Matrix,
and the reports of the
Working Groups, may
be found at –
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
www.aps.org/neutrino
5
The Neutrino Scene
6
We do not know how many neutrino mass eigenstates
there are.
If the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND)
experiment is confirmed, there are more than 3.
Confirmation of LSND would show that our usual
assumptions about the neutrino spectrum and
neutrino mixing are wrong.
If LSND is not confirmed, nature may contain only 3
neutrinos.
Then, from the existing data, the neutrino spectrum
looks like —
7
Normal
Inverted
2
1
3
m2atm
(Mass)2
2
1
or
} m2sol
m2sol =~ 8 x 10–5 eV2,
} m2sol
m2atm
3
m2atm =~2.5 x 10–3 eV2
8
The Unitary Leptonic Mixing Matrix U
l (le  e, l  l  )
i
Ui
Detector
The component of i that creates l is called ,
the neutrino of flavor .
The  fraction of i is |Ui|2.
9
The spectrum, showing its approximate flavor content, is
sin213
2
3
}m
1
m2atm
or
(Mass)2
2
}m
1
2
sol
2
sol
m2atm
3
sin213
e [|Uei|2]
[|U i|2]
 [|Ui|2]
10
The Mixing Matrix
Atmospheric
1
0

U  0 c23

0 s23
Cross-Mixing
0   c13
 
s23   0
i
c23 
s
e
 
 13
0 s13ei  c12
 
1
0  s12
0
c13 
 0
 
cij  cos ij
sij  sin ij
ei1 /2

  0
 0

12 ≈ sol ≈ 33°, 23 ≈ atm ≈ 36-54°, 13 <~12°
Solar
s12
c12
0
0
ei2 /2
0
0

0
1

0

0
1

Majorana CP
phases
 would lead to P( ) ≠ P( ). CP
But note the crucial role of s13  sin 13.
11
The Open Questions
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
12
Neutrinos and the New Paradigm
• What are the masses of the neutrinos?
• What is the pattern of mixing among
the different types of neutrinos?
• Are neutrinos their own antiparticles?
• Do neutrinos violate the symmetry CP?
13
Neutrinos and the Unexpected
• Are there “sterile” neutrinos?
• Do neutrinos have unexpected or
exotic properties?
• What can neutrinos tell us about the
models of new physics beyond the
Standard Model?
14
Neutrinos and the Cosmos
• What is the role of neutrinos in shaping
the universe?
• Is CP violation by neutrinos the key to
understanding the matter – antimatter
asymmetry of the universe?
• What can neutrinos reveal about the
deep interior of the earth and sun, and
about supernovae and other ultra high
energy astrophysical phenomena?
15
Recommendations for
Future Experiments
16
We recommend, as a high priority, that a
phased program of increasingly
sensitive searches for —
neutrinoless nuclear double beta decay
(0)
— be initiated as soon as possible.
17
Observation of 0 would establish that –
• Lepton number L is not conserved
• Neutrinos are Majorana particles (  =  )
• Nature (but not the Standard Model) contains
Majorana neutrino masses
• The origin of neutrino mass involves physics different
from that which gives masses to the charged leptons,
quarks, nucleons, humans, the earth, and galaxies.
Then neutrinos and their masses are very distinctive.
18
A General Argument Suggesting
Neutrinos Are Majorana Particles
The Standard Model (SM) is defined by the fields it
contains, its symmetries (notably Electroweak Isospin
Invariance), and its renormalizability.
Anything allowed by the symmetries occurs.
The SM contains no R field, only L, and no  mass.
This SM conserves the lepton number L defined by —
L[lepton] = – L[antilepton] = 1.
We now know that the neutrino does have mass.
19
If we try to preserve conservation of L, we
accommodate this mass by adding to the SM a Dirac, L
- conserving, mass term: mDLR.
To add the Dirac mass term, we had to add R to the SM.
Unlike L , R carries no Electroweak Isospin.
Thus, no SM symmetry prevents the occurrence of the
Majorana mass term mMRc R.
This mass term causes   . It does not conserve L.
There is now no conserved quantum number to
distinguish  from .
Thus,  = . We have Majorana neutrinos.
20
Lifetime [0  1/[m]2. A phased 0 program
addressing three possible m ranges:
Range
Spectrum
Required
(meV)
Covered
Mass
Status
100 – 500
Quasi Degenerate
200 kg
Close
20 – 50
Inverted
1 ton
“Proposed”
2–5
“Any”
100 tons
Future Tech.
In the first two stages, more than one experiment is
desirable, worldwide, both to permit confirmation and
to explore the underlying physics.
21
We recommend, as a high priority, a
comprehensive U.S. program to —
Complete our understanding of
neutrino mixing
 Determine the character of the
neutrino mass spectrum
 Search for CP violation among
neutrinos
22
Components of this Program
1. An expeditiously– deployed reactor experiment
with sensitivity down to
sin2213 = 0.01
2. A timely accelerator experiment with
comparable 13 sensitivity, and sensitivity to
the mass hierarchy through matter effects
3. A megawatt-class proton driver and neutrino
superbeam with an appropriate very large
detector capable of observing CP violation
23
In Pursuit of 13
Both CP violation and our ability to
tell whether the spectrum is normal or
inverted depend on 13.
If sin2213 < 0.01, a neutrino factory will be
needed to study both of these issues.
How may 13 be measured?
sin213
3
m2atm
(Mass)2
2
1
}m
2
sol
sin213 = Ue32 is the small e piece of 3.
3 is at one end of m2atm.
We need an experiment with L/E sensitive to
m2atm (L/E ~ 500 km/GeV) , and involving e.
25
Complementary Approaches
Reactor e disappearance while traveling L ~ 1.5
km. This process depends on 13 alone.
Accelerator   e while traveling L > Several
hundred km. This process depends on 13, 23,
the CP phase , and on whether the spectrum is
normal or inverted.
26
1. The Reactor Experiment
A relatively modest-scale reactor experiment can cleanly
determine whether sin2213 > 0.01,
and measure it if it is.
Sensitivity:
Experiment
sin2 213
Present CHOOZ bound
0.2
Double CHOOZ
0.03 (In ~ 2011)
Future “US” experiment
(Detectors at ~200 m
and ~ 1.5 km)
0.01
27
2. The Accelerator Experiment
Without a proton driver, an accelerator 
experiment can —
•Probe 13
•Probe 23
•Have some sensitivity to whether the mass
spectrum is normal or inverted
For 13:   e in T2K (Japan) and NOA (US)
For 23:   x
”
”
28
The Mass Spectrum:
or
?
Generically, grand unified models (GUTS) favor —
GUTS relate the Leptons to the Quarks.
is un-quark-like, and would probably involve a
lepton symmetry with no quark analogue.
29
How To Determine If The
Spectrum Is Normal Or Inverted
Exploit the fact that, in matter,
e
( )
e
( )
W
e
e
raises the effective mass of e, and lowers that of e.
This changes both the spectrum and the mixing angles.
30
Matter effects grow with energy E.
At superbeam energies, matter effects 
(—)
2
sin 2M =~ sin2 213 [ 1 (+—) S E ] .
6 GeV
Sign[m2(
) - m2(
)]
At oscillation maximum,
P( e)
P( e)
The effect is
{
{
>1 ;
<1 ;
30% ; E = 2 GeV (NOA)
10% ; E = 0.7 GeV (T2K)
31
Larger E is better.
But want L/E to correspond roughly to
the peak of the oscillation.
Therefore, larger E should be matched
by larger L.
Using larger L to determine whether the
spectrum is normal or inverted could be
a special contribution of the U.S. to the
global program.
32
3. The Proton Driver and Large
Detector
These facilities are needed if we are to be
able to determine whether the spectrum is
normal or inverted, and to observe CP
violation, for any sin2213 > (0.01 – 0.02).
33
Why would CP in  oscillation be interesting?
The most popular theory of why neutrinos are so light
is the —
See-Saw Mechanism

Very
heavy
neutrino
}
{
Familiar
light
neutrino
N
The heavy neutrinos N would have been made in the
hot Big Bang.
34
If neutrino oscillation violates CP, then quite likely
so does N decay.
Then, in the early universe, we would have had
different rates for the CP-mirror-image decays –
Nl +…
and
N  l+ + …
This would have led to unequal numbers of leptons
and antileptons (Leptogenesis).
Perhaps this was the original source of the present
preponderance of Matter over Antimatter in the
universe.
35
The Difference a
Proton Driver Can
Make
36
The spectral hierarchy without a proton driver
(Feldman)
37
The spectral hierarchy with a proton driver
(Feldman)
38
CP violation without a proton driver
“… one cannot demonstrate CP violation for any delta
without a proton driver.”
(Feldman)
“Without a proton driver, one cannot make a 3 sigma CP
discovery.”
(Shaevitz)
39
CP violation with a proton driver
90% CL
contours
for 5 yr 
+ 5 yr 
running
(BNL)
40
We recommend the development of
a solar neutrino experiment capable
of measuring the energy spectrum of
neutrinos from the primary pp
fusion process in the sun.
 Confirm the Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein
explanation of solar neutrino behavior
 Test, at last, whether the pp fusion chain is the
only source of solar energy
41
Funding of U.S. Particle Physics
In the U.S., funds for science are tight.
The proposed fiscal-year 2006 budget contained some
bad news (BTeV, …).
But it also contained good news.
Language concerning future neutrino physics was
very positive.
42
New Initiatives
Robin Staffin, DOE
Some medium-scale experiments that might be considered
(not an exhaustive list)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A reactor-based neutrino experiment to measure 13
An off-axis accelerator-based neutrino experiment for 13 and to
resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy
A high intensity neutrino beam for neutrino CP-violation
experiments
A neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment to probe the
Majorana nature of neutrinos
An underground experiment to search for direct evidence of dark
matter
A ground-based dark energy experiment
…
43
Conclusion
We have a very rich opportunity to do exciting
physics.
Neutrino physics has connections to —
Cosmology, astrophysics, nuclear physics, the
origin of mass, the relation between matter and
antimatter, the symmetries of nature, physics at
energies where the forces of nature become
unified, …
With our new-found ability to study neutrinos, they
will be an important part of our quest for
understanding of the physical world.
44
Backup Slides
45
’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’20
KATRIN
Construction
Existing Program
HE  Astro Construction
Super-K +
R&D
K2K+T2K
Constr.
SNO
Running
KamLAND
Reactor
Running
7Be
Solar
Constr.
US Participation
Running
Running
Running
Running
US Based
Signal?
MiniBooNE
MINOS
Running
Running
Green < $10M/yr
Orange $40M -$100M/yr
Blue
Red
$10M - $40M/yr
> $100M/yr
New Experiments
New Experiments
’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’20
200 kg 
R&D Construction
No Signal?
R&D Constr.
1 ton 
pp Solar
R&D
Reactor
R&D
Long Baseline
Cross Sections
Running
R&D
Construction
Constr.
Running
Running
Running
Construction
Running
Construction/Running
Green < $10M/yr
Orange $40M -$100M/yr
Blue
Red
$10M - $40M/yr
> $100M/yr
Facilities
Facilities
’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ’14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 ’20
Proton driver
Multipurpose
Detector
UG Lab
 Factory
R&D
Construction
Running
sin 2 213  0.01?
R&D
R&D
Const.
Construction
R&D
Green < $10M/yr
Orange $40M -$100M/yr
Construction
Running
Running
R&D
Blue
Red
$10M - $40M/yr
> $100M/yr
cos213sin223
sin213
cos213cos223
3
m2atm
(Mass)2
2
1
}m
2
sol
e disappearance depends on sin2213.
  e depends on sin2213sin223 .
 disappearance depends essentially on sin223cos223.
49
An Important Observation
Future experiments that we feel are
particularly important rely on suitable
underground facilities. Having these
facilities will be crucial.
50
Looking Ahead
A neutrino factory or beta beam is the ultimate tool
in neutrino physics. It may be the only way to
study CP violation and other issues. Substantial
R&D is needed if such a facility is to be possible
in the long term.
51