* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca
Logic programming wikipedia , lookup
Knowledge representation and reasoning wikipedia , lookup
History of compiler construction wikipedia , lookup
Functional programming wikipedia , lookup
Abstraction (computer science) wikipedia , lookup
Reactive programming wikipedia , lookup
Structured programming wikipedia , lookup
Object-oriented programming wikipedia , lookup
Go (programming language) wikipedia , lookup
Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca Facultatea de Matematică şi Informatică Ciclul de studii: Masterat Domeniul: Informatica Programul de studii: Modelare si simulare - în limba engleză Limba de predare: Engleză SYLLABUS I. General data Code Subject MID1004 Formal Models in Programming Languages Semester 2 Hours: C+S+L 2+1+0 Name and surname MOTOGNA Simona Claudia Name and surname Category speciality Status compulsory II. Full status faculty members Scientific Didactic Chair title title Ph.D. Assoc.Pr Programming Languages of. and Methods Associated faculty members Scientific Institution title Type of position Type of activity C * S L Type of activity C S L III. Course objectives The goal of this course is to introduce students to fundamental ideas behind the design and analysis of modern programming languages. In the first part, we focus on the study of different approaches for specifying models for programming languages. We will study semantic analysis inside a compiler as a first formal model of the meaning associated with syntactical constructions, operational semantics for specifying how programs compute, and denotational semantics for specifying what programs compute. In the end, the students should be able to: - Explain the differences between informal and formal semantics of programming languages, and between the operational and denotational and axiomatic approaches to formal semantics. - Read a formal model for a small programming language, interpret it in informal terms, and predict how a given program will behave according to the semantic definition. - Carry out mathematical proofs of very simple properties of a language and particular programs, given a formal model of the language. IV. Course contents The course will be structured in three big chapters, starting with an introduction to formal methods in programming language specification. It will consist of: formal specification of syntactical constructions inside a compiler, and then operational and denotational models for programming languages. The course will propose models for language constructions, such as: types, expressions, statements, functions, subtyping, and for different types of languages: imperative, functional, logical, object-oriented. For different models the problem of semantic equivalence will be discussed. V. Bibliography 1. BAUER, F.L. - WOSSNER, H.: Algorithmic language and program development, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1982. 2. GRUNE, DICK - BAL, H. - JACOBS, C. - LANGENDOEN, K.: Modern Compiler Design, John Wiley, 2000 3. GUNTER, C. -Semantics of programming languages, MIT Press, 1992 4. Hennessy, M. - The Semantics of Programming Languages. Wiley, 1990 5. MOTOGNA, S. - Metode de proiectare a compilatoarelor, Ed. Albastra, 2006 6. Schmidt,D.A. - Denotational semantics: a methodology for language development, William C. Brown, 1986. 7.Winskel,G. - The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages: an introduction, MIT Press, 1993 VI. Thematic of didactic activities per weeks 1. Introduction – What is a formal method? Criteria for specifications. Specification methods [3,4] 2. Semantic analysis: Attribute grammars. [2,5] 3. L-attribute and S-attribute grammars. Attribute evaluator [2,5] 4. Manual methods [2,5] Operational semantics: 5. Transition systems. The idea of structural operational semantics [3,7] 6. Transition semantics of a simple imperative language. Language design options. [3,7] 7. Rule-based inductive definitions and proofs [3,7] 8. Functions. Call-by-name and call-by-value function application, semantics and typing. [3,7] 9. Data. Semantics and typing for products, sums, records, references. [3,7] 10. Subtyping. Record subtyping and simple object encoding. [3,7] 11. Semantic equivalence. Semantic equivalence of phrases in a simple imperative language, including the congruence property. Examples of equivalence and non-equivalence. [3,7] Denotational semantics: 12. Introduction to lambda-calculus [4,6] 13. Denotational interpretation of an imperative language. [4,6] 14. Differences between operational and denotational semantics [4,6] VII. Didactic methods used The course is based on the following methods: exposure, conversation, didactical proof, modeling. The seminar will focus on: algorithmization, discovery and case studies. VIII. Assessment The students will be asked to make a presentation of a paper from an additional reference and present it in public, during seminar hours. Also during the semester that have to work on a project that will implement one of the formal method presented in course for a mini-language they will specify. The final grade will be computed based on the following algorithm: - seminar activity 30% - project 40% - final exam 40% Foe academic year 2008-2009, see http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~motogna/FormalModels.html IX. Additional references 1. GIANNINI, P. - LONGO, G.: Effectively given domains and lambda-calculus semantics, Information and Control, 62(1984) no. 1, pp. 36-63. 2. HOARE, C.A.R. - LAUER, P.: Consistent and Complementary definitions of the semantics of programming languages, Acta Informatica, 1973 no.3, pp. 135-153. 3. LONGO, G.: Set-Theoretical models of Lambda-Calculus: Theories, Expansions, Isomorphisms, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 1983 no.24, pp. 153-188. Dean, Date, Chair head, Course responsible, Assoc.Prof. MOTOGNA Simona Claudia, Ph.D.