* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lee Strasberg - Public Schools of Robeson County
Theatre of France wikipedia , lookup
Meta-reference wikipedia , lookup
Improvisational theatre wikipedia , lookup
Medieval theatre wikipedia , lookup
English Renaissance theatre wikipedia , lookup
Theatre of the Oppressed wikipedia , lookup
Theater (structure) wikipedia , lookup
Voice acting in Japan wikipedia , lookup
Stanislavski's system wikipedia , lookup
Lee Strasberg Lee Strasberg an American actor, director, and one of the best-known acting teachers in American theater and film.[1] He cofounded, with director Harold Clurman, the Group Theatre in 1931, which was "America’s first true theatrical collective".[2] In 1951, he became director of the non-profit Actors Studio, in New York City, considered "the nation's most prestigious acting school".[3] He was the chief proponent of "Method acting" from the 1920s until his death in 1982.[4] Acting historian Jeremy Butler wrote, "The one man most responsible for 'the Method' becoming the dominant technique of screen acting in the United States was Lee Strasberg: popularizer of the term 'the Method'." He refined, synthesized, and eventually disseminated the teachings of Stanislavski to his Actors Studio students. [5] From his base in New York, he trained several generations of theatre and film's most illustrious talents, including Anne Bancroft, Dustin Hoffman, Montgomery Clift, James Dean, Marilyn Monroe, Julie Harris, Paul Newman, Patricia Neal, Sally Field, Jane Fonda, Franchot Tone, Gene Wilder, Geraldine Page, Ellen Burstyn, Al Pacino and director Elia Kazan[citation needed]. Strasberg explained his "Method" through his class lectures and writings: "The two areas of discovery that were of primary importance in my work at the Actors Studio and in my private classes where improvisation and 'affective memory,'... the process of contacting one’s memories of emotions in order to channel them into a role... It is finally by using these techniques that the actor can express the appropriate emotions demanded of the character" [5] Although Marlon Brando also studied "Method" acting, but under Stella Adler, Elia Kazan directed him in A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) and On the Waterfront (1954,) where he came to epitomize "Method" acting in the public’s mind. Kazan also directed another student, James Dean, in East of Eden (1955), for which Kazan and Dean were nominated for Academy Awards. Dean once wrote that Actors Studio was "the greatest school of the theater [and] the best thing that can happen to an actor." [6] In more recent years, directors like Sidney Lumet have intentionally used actors skilled in Strasberg's "Method", such as Al Pacino, Paul Newman, Dustin Hoffman and Anne Bancroft. "As a teacher and acting theorist, Strasberg revolutionized American actor training," writes author Milly Barranger. "Strasberg demanded great discipline of his actors as well as great depths of psychological truthfulness."[7] Elia Kazan, in his autobiography, wrote, "He carried with him the aura of a prophet, a magician, a witch doctor, a psychoanalyst, and a feared father of a Jewish home. . . He was the force that held the thirty-odd members of the theatre together, and made them 'permanent.'" [8] :61 Today, Ellen Burstyn, Al Pacino, and Harvey Keitel lead this nonprofit studio dedicated to the development of actors, playwrights, and directors. Acting director and teacher Group Theater He gained a reputation with the Theater Guild of New York and helped form the Group Theater in New York in 1931.[12] There, he created a technique which became known as "the Method" or "method acting." His teaching style owed much to the Russian director, Stanislavsky, whose book, An Actor Prepares, dealt with the psychology of interpretation in acting. He began by directing, but his time was gradually taken up by the training of actors. Called "America’s first true theatrical collective," the Lab immediately offered a few tuition-free scholarships for its three-year program to "promising students." [13] Widely considered America's finest acting ensemble during the 1930s, "the Group Theatre," wrote Publishers Weekly, "with its self-defined mission to reconnect theater to the world of ideas and actions, staged plays that confronted social and moral issues... with members Harold Clurman, Lee Strasberg, Stella and Luther Adler, Clifford Odets, Elia Kazan and an ill-assorted band of idealistic actors living hand to mouth are seen welded in a collective of creativity that was also a tangle of jealousies, love affairs and explosive feuds." [9] Playwright Arthur Miller said "the Group Theatre was unique and probably will never be repeated. For awhile it was literally the voice of Depression America."[9] Actors Studio In 1947, Elia Kazan, Robert Lewis, and Cheryl Crawford, also members of the Group Theatre, started the Actors Studio as a non-profit workshop for professional and aspiring actors to concentrate on their craft away from the pressures of the commercial theatre. [12] Strasberg assumed leadership of the studio in 1951 as its artistic director. "As a teacher and acting theorist, he revolutionized American actor training and engaged such remarkable performers as Kim Hunter, Marilyn Monroe, Julie Harris, Paul Newman, Geraldine Page, Ellen Burstyn, and Al Pacino." [7] Since its inception the Studio has been a nonprofit educational corporation chartered by the state of New York, and has been supported entirely by contributions and benefits."[3] Strasberg stated in 1959, "We have here the possibility of creating a kind of theatre that would be a shining medal for our country."[3] UCLA acting teacher Robert Hethmon writes, "The Actors Studio is a refuge. Its privacy is guarded ferociously against the casual intruder, the seeker of curiousities, and the exploiter...The Studio helps actors to meet the enemy within....and contributes greatly to Strasberg's utterly pragmatic views on training the actor and solving his problems.... and is kept deliberately modest in its circumstances, its essence being the private room where Lee Strasberg and some talented actors can work." [3]:Intro Admission to the Actors Studio was usually by audition with more than a thousand actors auditioning each year and the directors usually conferring membership on only five or six each year.[3] "The Studio was, and is sui generis," said Elia Kazan, proudly. Beginning in a small, private way,with a strictly off-limits-to-outsiders policy, the Studio quickly earned a high reputation in theatre cricles. "It became the place to be, the forum where all the most promising and unconventional young actors were being cultivated by sharp young directors..."[14] Teaching methods and philosophy In describing his teaching philosophy, Strasberg wrote, "The two areas of discovery that were of primary importance in my work at the Actors Studio and in my private classes where improvisation and affective memory. It is finally by using these techniques that the actor can express the appropriate emotions demanded of the character" [5] Improvisation and "affective memory" Strasberg explained the importance of improvisation and the central concept of "affective memory:" the "process of contacting one’s memories of emotions in order to channel them into a role." Affective memory originated with Stanislavski, was nurtured by Richard Boleslavski, Strasberg’s teacher at the American Laboratory Theatre in the 1920s, and was further refined by Strasberg. Acting historian Jeremy Butler writes, "Strasberg divides "affective memory" into the recall of sensations (sights, sounds, smells, and so on) and that of feelings (horror, sadness, pleasure, and so on.) The actor, he explains, uses the former, his or her sense memory, to stimulate the latter, his or her emotional memory, which can then be used in the context of a particular character." The Method, Strasberg states, is "the procedure by which the actor can use his "affective memory" to create a reality on stage." [5] According to Don Bigsby, in The Cambridge History of American Theatre, "Strasberg was a scientist of acting, fascinated by the mysteries of the actor’s quest for true emotion. And in a technique called affective memory, … Strasberg believed he had found a reliable aid for achieving it. … What Strasberg prized about the technique was that the actor would be using true emotion – his own reawakened real-life feelings – to color and deepen his performance. . . Maintaining that the technique was the surest way of achieving the style of psychological realism the Group was searching for, Strasberg placed it as the foundation of his work."[19] The purpose of "affective memory" is to release emotions on stage. Strasberg states: "The basic idea of affective memory is not emotional recall but that the actor’s emotion on the stage should never be really real. It always should be only remembered emotion. An emotion that happens right now spontaneously is out of control – you don’t know what’s going to happen from it, and the actor can’t always maintain and repeat it. Remembered emotion is something that the actor can create and repeat: without that the thing is hectic." [20] For Strasberg, affective memory is the basic element of the actor’s reality. In particular, it draws out the emotions from the past that are ingrained in one’s mind and body: "The emotional value of the experience may have changed. However, by attempting a lot of affective memories, the actor gradually obtains a stock of memories that are permanent and become easier to invoke as he continues to use them. … The significance lies in the fact that the actor becomes emotionally available, prepared to respond instantly and expressively with feelings and passions."[20] Private moments Strasberg’s also devised the teaching concept of "private moment," where the actor lives out their private moments before a classroom audience. Private moment is the literal performance of an activity that one does in private. According to Doug Moston, it was developed by Strasberg in 1956 and 1957 "to aid actors in creating the ability to behave in a truly private fashion while being observed by an audience." … Working from private experience, the actor is free, as Strasberg put it, ‘to sit before us, to smell an aroma, and not to do anything physical, but to focus only on what you’re doing with your concentration..’" [20] Methods of teaching Strasberg demanded great discipline of his actors as well as great depths of psychological truthfulness. He once explained his approach in this way: "The human being who acts is the human being who lives. That is a terrifying circumstance. Essentially the actor acts a fiction, a dream; in life the stimuli to which we respond are always real. The actor must constantly respond to stimuli that are imaginary. And yet this must happen not only just as it happens in life, but actually more fully and more expressively. Although the actor can do things in life quite easily, when he has to do the same thing on the stage under fictitious conditions he has difficulty because he is not equipped as a human being merely to playact at imitating life. He must somehow believe. He must somehow be able to convince himself of the rightness of what he is doing in order to do things fully on the stage." [7] Classroom settings Kazan also described his classes: "At his classes in the technique of acting, Lee laid down the rules, supervised the first exercises. These were largely concerned with the actor’s arousing his inner temperament. The essential and rather simple technique, which has since then been complicated by teachers of acting who seek to make the Method more recondite for their commercial advantage, consists of recalling the circumstances, physical and personal, surrounding an intensely emotional experience in the actor’s past. It is the same as when we accidentally hear a tune we may have heard at a stormy or an ecstatic moment in our lives, and find, to our surprise, that we are reexperiencing the emotion we felt then, feeling ecstasy again or rage and the impulse to kill. The actor becomes aware that he has emotional resources; that he can awaken, by this self-stimulation, a great number of very intense feelings; and that these emotions are the materials of his art. "Lee taught his actors to launch their work on every scene by taking a minute to remember the details surrounding the emotional experience in their lives that would correspond to the emotion of the scene they were about to play. 'Take a minute!' became the watchword of that summer, the phrase heard most often, just as this particular kind of inner concentration became the trademark of Lee’s own work when he directed a production. His actors often appeared to be in a state of self-hypnosis." [8]:61 Legacy Influence on American films "Whether directly influenced by Strasberg or not," wrote acting author Pamela Wojcik, "the new male stars all to some degree or other adapted Method techniques to support their identification as rebels. . . He recreates romance as a drama of male neuroticism and also invests his characterization “with an unprecedented aura of verisimilitude." [17] Acting teacher and author Alison Hodge explains: "Seemingly spontaneous, intuitive, brooding, 'private,' lit with potent vibrations from an inner life of conflict and contradiction, their work exemplified the style of heightened naturalism which (whether Brando agrees or not) Lee Strasberg devoted his life to exploring and promoting." [20] Pamela Wojcik adds, "Because of their tendency to substitute their personal feelings for those of the characters they were playing, Actors Studio performers were well suited to become Hollywood stars. . . In short, Lee Strasberg transformed a socialistic, egalitarian theory of acting into a celebrity-making machine."[17] "It does not matter who 'invented' Marlon Brando," writes Hodge, "or how regularly or faithfully he, Dean, or Clift attended the Studio or studied the Method at the feet of Lee Strasberg. In their signature roles – the most influential performances in the history of American films – these three performers revealed new kinds of body language and new ways of delivering dialogue. In the pauses between words, in the language 'spoken' by their eyes and faces, they gave psychological realism an unprecedented charge. Verbally inarticulate, they were eloquent 'speakers' of emotion. Far less protective of their masculinity than earlier film actors, they enacted emotionally wounded and vulnerable outsiders struggling for self-understanding, and their work shimmered with a mercurial neuroticism. . . . The Method-trained performers in films of the fifties added an enhanced verbal and gesture naturalism and a more vivid inner life." [20] In 1966, Strasberg established the "Actors Studio West" in Los Angeles and in 1969, he began the Lee Strasberg Theatre and Film Institute in New York and Los Angeles.[23] Today, co-presidents Ellen Burstyn, Al Pacino, and Harvey Keitel lead this nonprofit studio dedicated to the development of actors, playwrights, and directors. In 1974, at the suggestion of his former student Al Pacino, Strasberg acted in a key supporting role alongside Pacino in Godfather II and again in the 1979 film, And Justice for All.[24]