* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download doc ANTH 202 First 2 lectures
Survey
Document related concepts
Western culture wikipedia , lookup
Social Bonding and Nurture Kinship wikipedia , lookup
Political economy in anthropology wikipedia , lookup
Civilization wikipedia , lookup
Cultural relativism wikipedia , lookup
Human variability wikipedia , lookup
Cultural ecology wikipedia , lookup
Social anthropology wikipedia , lookup
Culture-historical archaeology wikipedia , lookup
American anthropology wikipedia , lookup
Popular culture studies wikipedia , lookup
Culture and positive psychology wikipedia , lookup
Intercultural competence wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural differences in decision-making wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
September 8th and 10th Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Culture and Human Societies (part 1&2) -Anthropologists have long argued that the human condition is distinguished from other living species by culture. Culture—(same definition) sets of learned behaviors Raymond Williams: -wrote a books about Keywords -Culture is one of the two or three most complicated words in the English language. -Mid 18th century: “civilization” emerges -culture and civilization complicate each other -“cultured”appreciation of music etc. -culture is a process of human development -often used in plural of cultures: within one nation there could be many cultures; it’s often used as a label or a means of identification (it ahs multiple meanings) Key Characteristics of human culture: -highly dynamic -it is learned (everything learned from people around you) -shared (other ppl teaching, celebrating it perhaps, basically it involves a lot people) -patterned (through time a culture develops patterns, like USA and individualism and freedom; or the West in general, when at 18 you have complete freedom) it is the key metaphor -adaptive: constructed and adapted generation to generation based on any kind of factor (like droughts) -symbolic: verbally (alphabet) or non-verbally (flags, golden arches…) Key Metaphor: the Chinese 5 element theory, where everything can be classified into those 5 theories, thus the whole culture revolves around life being classified in fives -West has Capitalism as the key metaphor -economy where market and commodity is most important -consumer is important and key to the whole process -patterning (?) -Tension in culture arises often between patterning and it being adaptive; one is stable, the other often changes and adapts. -Anthropology developed in the early 19th and late 20th century; early anthropologists wrote typologies Typology: -Classification system based on (in culture) forms of human society -not accepted today -new cultures and their differences were referenced as being “lack of..” or the culture being somehow deficient of something -Western society became the yardstick for all the other cultures -hypothesized that other cultures were evolutionary behind and that if given enough time they would reach the same potential as the West Typology in Anthropology: -Evolutionary Typologies (like the three ages-stone, bronze, iron(?)) (relates to cultures getting to the same place west did) Christian j. Thomsen -archeologist -The three ages (as mentioned above); named after the particular raw material most used or discovered -Bracteates (money of the old times) were developed from the earlier Roman coins Lewis Henry Morgan - wrote about the Native Tribal History/Typography - Specialist (or concentrated on) in the ethnical periods - 1877 Ancient Society (the table where all cultures were placed into a specific section): - - - Civilization: +phonetic alphabet; writing -Upper: iron ore, tools -Middle: plants and animals domesticated; brick and stone used -Lower: pottery being developed Barbarism: -Upper: bow and arrow -Middle: fishing, use of fire -Lower: origins of human race Savagery civilization development could only go in one way and that is up ^ -Typographies and typologies justified European conquest people needed to be civilized -Typology served an idealistic purpose although it didn’t actually fully describe the society nor accurately; only placed it on a scale Social Structural Types: -British functionals anthropology: 1920s-70s -challenged unilineal evolutionism -the focus was on social structure (relations between people and how society functioned; how they held economies and politics, or kinship matters) -Radcliff-Brown, Fortes, Evans-Pritchard 9all wrote typographies, although they were a bit more in depth) -had broader categories, like “centralized” government which wouldn’t be put together with a culture who’s government was “uncentralized” etc. -pg. 67 Franz Boas: -didn’t like typologies at all -studied First nations in Canada and the west coast -particular histories of particular cultures and groups -Historical Particularism: study of cultures in its own historical context - used to combat ideas about “race” -people, practices, ideas, moved across social boundaries (historical knowledge necessary) ”cultural borrowing” -societies and cultures were 9are) quite open to outside influences -Any particular association of linguistic or cultural practices Map 3.2: division of cultures and how they got diffused -typologies were no longer evolutionary -deemphasized differences -highlighted how other people peoples do have history and social culture Changes after the World War II: -End of European colonial empires -civil right movements in US (women and blacks) -created for Westerners new experiences of the non-Western “other” -had to stop using unillineal models and “othering” -non westerns weren’t savages or barbarians; non-western anthropologists finally surfaced Cold War: (’48-’89) World Countries classification: 1st “developed” 2nd “communist” 3rd “underdeveloped” -this classification still could be taken negatively and fails to take in history Sally Moore: 21st Century: Comparative study of processes (example: Human rights, UN watching, others following processes and watched how they were implemented) -structural functionalsits might have been quite rigid, unilineal only further showed that societies are dynamic and do change; they overlooked the issues of change: “simple” societies could be as dynamic as any other and function -Unilineal abandoned because: -ethnocentric -1) it passed n opinions and stereotypes which often didn’t exactly fit -2) didn’t permit to understand the mechanism of change Ethnocentrism: -The opinion that one’s own way of life is natural or correct, and, indeed, the only true way of being fully human (no longer a valid approach) _ex: “I eat normal good” -How to study societies without being ethnocentric? Clifford Geertz (1926-2006): -wrote The Interpretation of Cultures (’73) -father of symbolic anthropology -holistic and meaningful interpretation of cultures -Thick Description: a description of a human behavior that explains not just the behavior, bit its context as well, such that the behavior becomes meaningful to an outsider (very interpretative) (aka identical movements could have different meaning) -Thin description: -description of the obvious behavior going on without context -Human experience is inherently ambiguous and as such must be interpreted Cultural Relativism: -understanding another culture in its own terms sympathetically enough so that the culture appears to be a coherent and meaningful design for living -origin from Kant -crucial to understanding the context -without context human behavior cannot be understood -does not require us to abandon every value our society has taught us. It does discourage the easy solution of refusing to consider alternatives from the outset - moral decisions more “difficult because a lot of things need to be taken into account. Nancy Scheper-Hughes: -Medical Anthropology (Death Without Weeping) extreme poverty: delayed attachment towards children -may appear cruel , but it makes sense in the context of their culture -cultures are not isolated, they can change based on political, economic, or whatever factors -Anthropology must be ethically grounded -certain obligation to speak up -CR: dialogue between cultures Morally Wrong Encounters? -Should they just study or take a stand? …morals come from culture… Guatemala: -1960-96: Civil War (most bloody in history of guatemala) - 200000 people murdered/disappeared -90% violence committed by state -genocide and rape against indigenous Mayan people -violence still hasn’t diminished -“Femicide”-increased in recent years -step away from simple explanations