Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Investor-state dispute settlement wikipedia , lookup
Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup
Investment management wikipedia , lookup
Environmental, social and corporate governance wikipedia , lookup
Investment banking wikipedia , lookup
Negative gearing wikipedia , lookup
International investment agreement wikipedia , lookup
History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup
j.p.birchall P0194869/A/94 tma 1 8/3/94. (a) The lasting legacy of Keynes was that models of the economy can help with the understanding needed for better policy decisions. The model he developed related national output to several variables, but he singled out investment as the key because it was most prone to fluctuation. He suggested that these fluctuations were due to the irrational expectations of businessmen. Details of the model were summarised by Matthews and it became the basic explanation of the trade cycle and part of the post war economic consensus. National output is determined by aggregate demand in the economy which is the sum of consumption, investment and government expenditure adjusted for exports minus imports. It is important that these components of aggregate demand are separately identified because their levels depend on different decisions made by different groups of people with different motivations. Aggregate demand is often represented by economists by the letter e, and the summation of the other variables by the equation :e = c + i + g +(x-h) Keynes focused on investment, and investment fluctuations. In addition to goods and services which are directly consumed, the economy produces other types of goods which are used for production. These are often called capital goods, or investment goods, and include all the plant and machinery used by firms. Investment spending also includes expenditure on stocks of raw materials, part complete products and finished products awaiting sale. It is this private sector expenditure, represented by i, which tends to be erratic. Investment involves a commitment of scarce resources for the future and is likely to be difficult. This is not only because the future is unknown but also because there are always alternatives. For example, the resources could be saved or used for immediate pleasurable consumption. Investment levels change when these agonising decisions feed off mindless optimism or pessimism. Future expectations control motivation and expectations are subject to very individual perspectives and moods, and the reactions of consumers or competitors are never clear. In the end, Keynes suggested, the decision maker falls back onto 'gut feel' or, what he called 'animal spirits'. Harris has conclude that this proposition is unsatisfactory because the model itself gives us no insight into this most important cause of fluctuation, irrational psychology. The variable becomes exogenous, or outside of the model. He further suggests that a more appropriate explanation of investment decisions is that they are the result of detailed planning, investigation and appraisal. (b) The income/expenditure model can be represented diagrammatically. The first variable in the equation, consumption, c, depends on income level, y, and is an endogenous variable, one which is analysed within the model. Although the relationship between consumption and income can only be determined empirically, fig 1. assumes a theoretical linear function :- The diagram indicates that at any level of income, consumption can be determined. Thus, if national income is y consumption will be c . Consumption is only one of the variables in the model, and fig 2. indicates the other variables making up aggregate demand; investment, i, government expenditure, g, and exports minus imports, (x - h). These variables are independent of income and are be represented by constant increments over and above consumption. The vertical axis in fig 2. becomes aggregate demand in total not just consumption. The line representing a summation of the elements in aggregate demand is the line AB. Thus, at national income y , aggregate demand e 1 1 1 1 = c + i + g + (x - h). The discussion so far has related aggregate demand to the various elements of national income/expenditure, but the real concern is national output; output determines standard of living. It is fundamental to Keynes' model and much of economics that output must equal income. The way national income is measured by the summation of each incremental added value results in someone somewhere getting paid for everything that is produced. This payment could be in the form of wages or rent or profit, but in the money economy output is always paid for. If aggregate expenditure always equals national output and, thus, national income, a plot of e against y and q will be a 45 degree diagonal as CD in fig 3. At every point on the plot expenditure equals income and output, e = y = q , e = y = q etc. Demand equals supply. 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 Both figs 2 & 3. represent an infinity of possible positions for the economy. At any time it could be anywhere along the lines AB or CD. However, if we combine the two diagrams, which are both plots of demand against income, see fig 4., there is crucially only one point, X, where demand, income and output are identical. The model predicts that this is where the actual economy must be, the only place where there is equilibrium between the variables. It is easy to see that there must be an equilibrium if we consider a lower or higher position of the economy at X or X . At X the demand for goods and services resulting from national income y , would be e , thus exceeding supply, q ,and firms would be out of stock and losing potential sales and profit. We would expect an automatic increase in the supply of goods to move the economy equilibrium to the point X, and output to q . Similarly if the economy was at point X , with demand e , below the potential supply, q , we would expect high stocks and a cut back in output to avoid the excess cost associated with such disequilibrium. X is the only point where supply and demand are equal. A diagrammatic representation of fluctuations of output following changes in investment can be seen in fig 5. which is a development of fig.4. 1 2 1 1 1 x 2 2 2 1 An increase in investment, from i to i , would shift the aggregate demand line AB to EF. Consumption, moving inline with income, and government spending and exports and imports remaining the same. This is in line with the theory that investment is exogenous and would result in a constant increase at all points on the income axis. As investment increases total aggregate demand increases and it can be seen that a new equilibrium position for the economy would result at point Y with output at q . Similarly it follows that a decrease in investment would reduce national output. (c) Although the focus of the discussion has been investment, the full model for aggregate demand includes other variables:1 2 y e = c + i + g +(x-h) c is the representation of consumption expenditure which results from purchases of consumer goods and services by all of us during everyday life. The money we spend on food and leisure, clothing and household equipment, travel and gifts are all part of this type of expenditure. Consumption expenditure has been assumed to depend on income level. It is reasonable to argue that consumption is dependent on total money resources; that is wealth as well as income. Although this is possible the behavioural assumption Keynes concentrated on was the dependence of consumption on income alone. Governments spend money on both consumer goods and investment goods. Roads and schools are examples of investment goods and when governments purchase supplies for their employees they spend on consumer goods. This type of expenditure is represented by, g. It is important to note that this expenditure is included in aggregate demand because it is used to purchase goods and services. Governments are involved, also, in transfer payments which simply shift the purchasing power form one group of people to another, resulting in no net increase in aggregate demand. The economy also produces goods and services for export, and although these are not consumed in this country they are part of the national output. The reverse is true of imports. Thus, the final item in the equation is an adjustment for exports minus imports, (x - h). The expenditure model includes only those items to which money values can be assigned. This results in the exclusion of large areas of activity. Housework and self help of all kinds are not part of the model. The theory can be applied to examine the current emergence of the UK economy from recession. A recent article in the Financial Times identified an increase in exports as the driving force increasing national output, the variable (x - h) is increasing. The article also indicated that consumption is expected to rise following an increase in the level of orders. This is corroborated by a slowdown in the rate of job losses. However, the 'animal spirits' are still at work and the CBI survey points to declining intentions to invest, in spite of reporting general business optimism. The investment problem appears to be a fear that export demand may not be maintained in the future as the main export markets in Europe emerge more slowly from recession. There is also an indication in the article that destocking is slow. High stocks will deter firms from investing. Furthermore, 63% of firms are reporting operating below capacity. This is yet another factor which may be deterring investment. The article reporting the CBI survey illustrates succinctly the many factors which may cause a fluctuation in investment, and importantly suggests that the subjective fear of being unable to earn an adequate return on committed resources is the biggest constraint. 'Animal spirits' and investment fluctuations are still with us!