• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
distributed database
distributed database

... The DBMaker distributed database environment builds on the traditional client/server architecture, effectively linking multiple client applications and multiple database servers. Client applications process user requests and display the results, and the database servers handle data management. Each ...
ODA X6-2 Model Family Business White Paper-2
ODA X6-2 Model Family Business White Paper-2

... system, storage management, and database software, through appliance patch bundles. It eliminates the guesswork of mixing and matching patches for various elements of the hardware and software stack. This reduces human error and ultimately results in less planned downtime and higher system reliabili ...
Control and Monitor Facilities for Multi-User Access
Control and Monitor Facilities for Multi-User Access

... messages of the job. In some cases a wro is sent to the console if the event being recorded is of system-wide nature. The second way significant system events are recorded is via the System Management Facility (SMF)_ SMF record types have been aSSigned to M UDBACF that contain the data necessary for ...
(PPT, 514KB)
(PPT, 514KB)

... companies, specialized database administrators maintain databases, run reports, and may work on code that runs on the databases themselves (rather than in the client application). ...
PostgreSQL for Oracle DBA
PostgreSQL for Oracle DBA

... PostgreSQL is not an Oracle database Oracle and PostgreSQL are both superb databases, their relation is not like Red Hat and CentOS Do not expect equivalents for all of the Oracle RDBMS features in PostgreSQL Don't hesitate to be impressed by PostgreSQL broad range of data types PostgreSQL has exten ...
HPE Vertica 7.1.x Concepts Guide
HPE Vertica 7.1.x Concepts Guide

... data integrity. If more than K nodes in the database fail, some of the data in the database may become unavailable. In that case, the database is considered unsafe and automatically shuts down. It is possible for an HP Vertica database to have more than K nodes fail and still continue running safely ...
Kapitel 13
Kapitel 13

... ST  ACA: Sei h  ST und ti,tjh (i  j). (ST) wj(x)
Backup_and_Recovery
Backup_and_Recovery

... at 2:00 A.M. and then took an incremental image copy at the same time the following three mornings. The full image copy plus all three incremental image copies need to be applied to recover the tablespace. If the same column of the same row was updated on Tuesday to "A", Wednesday to "B", and Thursd ...
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design

...  Either test Ri for BCNF with respect to the restriction of F to Ri (that is, all FDs in F+ that contain only attributes from Ri)  or use the original set of dependencies F that hold on R, but with the following test: – for every set of attributes   Ri, check that + (the attribute closure of ) ...
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design

... for each functional dependency f in F+ apply reflexivity and augmentation rules on f add the resulting functional dependencies to F+ for each pair of functional dependencies f1and f2 in F+ if f1 and f2 can be combined using transitivity then add the resulting functional dependency to F+ until F+ doe ...
(A) R - VUB STAR lab
(A) R - VUB STAR lab

... for each functional dependency f in F+ apply reflexivity and augmentation rules on f add the resulting functional dependencies to F+ for each pair of functional dependencies f1and f2 in F+ if f1 and f2 can be combined using transitivity then add the resulting functional dependency to F+ until F+ doe ...
(A) R
(A) R

...  Either test Ri for BCNF with respect to the restriction of F to Ri (that is, all FDs in F+ that contain only attributes from Ri)  or use the original set of dependencies F that hold on R, but with the following test: – for every set of attributes   Ri, check that + (the attribute closure of ) ...
(A) R
(A) R

...  Either test Ri for BCNF with respect to the restriction of F to Ri (that is, all FDs in F+ that contain only attributes from Ri)  or use the original set of dependencies F that hold on R, but with the following test: – for every set of attributes   Ri, check that + (the attribute closure of ) ...
Database Tuning Principles
Database Tuning Principles

... database products. In many cases, it exemplifies the design trade-offs by crisp experiments using all three of the most popular products (IBM's DB2, Oracle's Oracle, and Microsoft's SQLServer). As such, it makes interesting reading for an established user as well as the novice. The book draws heavil ...
Kapitel 13
Kapitel 13

... Definition 8.3 (Strictness): A schedule s is strict if the following holds for all ti, tj  trans(s): for all pi(x)  op(ti), p=r or p=w, if wj(x) < pi(x) then aj < pi(x) or cj < pi(x). ST denotes the class of all strict schedules. Definition 8.5 (Rigorousness): A schedule s is rigorous if the follo ...
Improving high availability in WebSphere Commerce using DB2 HADR
Improving high availability in WebSphere Commerce using DB2 HADR

... You can group resources together in TSA. Once grouped, all relationships among the members of the group are established, such as location relationships, start and stop relationships, and so on. ...
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design

... practice unless they pertain to only one relation  If it is sufficient to test only those dependencies on each individual ...
Flashback PPT
Flashback PPT

... Too confusing.. I don’t have time to figure it out ...
Introducing Data Definition Language (DDL) for IMS Metadata #17764
Introducing Data Definition Language (DDL) for IMS Metadata #17764

... IMS Support – zGrowth Washington System Center ...
Database Slicing on Relational Databases
Database Slicing on Relational Databases

... We defined database slicing, which means selecting a small piece of data from the records or tables stored in the database, where each element of the slice is related directly or indirectly to the slicing criterion and this small piece might be an independent part of the database. The slicing criter ...
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design

...  Either test Ri for BCNF with respect to the restriction of F to Ri (that is, all FDs in F+ that contain only attributes from Ri)  or use the original set of dependencies F that hold on R, but with the following test: – for every set of attributes   Ri, check that + (the attribute closure of ) ...
Comparing Oracle and SQL Server What is a database?
Comparing Oracle and SQL Server What is a database?

... Oracle supports always full Isolation Model • Only committed data visible to other users • Allows repeatable reads ...
Zephyr: Live Migration in Shared Nothing Databases for Elastic
Zephyr: Live Migration in Shared Nothing Databases for Elastic

... Strict 2PL  Transactions are locally serializable Pages transferred only once ◦ No Tdest  Tsource conflict dependency ...
overview talk - UCSB Computer Science
overview talk - UCSB Computer Science

... Strict 2PL  Transactions are locally serializable Pages transferred only once ◦ No Tdest  Tsource conflict dependency ...
Distributed Database Management Systems
Distributed Database Management Systems

... produce ASG': (10+10)∗tuple access cost transfer ASG' to the sites of EMP: (10+10)∗tuple transfer cost produce EMP': (10+10) ∗tuple access cost∗2 ...
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report