• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Database System Concepts
Database System Concepts

... Failures may leave database in an inconsistent state with partial updates carried out  Example: Transfer of funds from one account to another should either complete or not happen at all  Concurrent access by multiple users  Uncontrolled concurrent accesses can lead to inconsistencies  Example: T ...
Database System Concepts - Department of Systems Engineering
Database System Concepts - Department of Systems Engineering

... Failures may leave database in an inconsistent state with partial updates carried out  Example: Transfer of funds from one account to another should either complete or not happen at all  Concurrent access by multiple users  Uncontrolled concurrent accesses can lead to inconsistencies  Example: T ...
Discovering Robust Knowledge from Databases that Change
Discovering Robust Knowledge from Databases that Change

... address the issue of database changes.  This paper formalizes the notion of robustness of a rule r in a given db state d as  The robustness estimation approach estimates probabilities of rule invalidating transactions in a relational db environment. This approach decomposes the probability of a tr ...
CS206 --- Electronic Commerce
CS206 --- Electronic Commerce

... Isolation Level Is Personal Choice Your choice, e.g., run serializable, affects only how you see the database, not how others see it. Example: If Joe Runs serializable, but Sally doesn’t, then Sally might see no prices for Joe’s Bar.  i.e., it looks to Sally as if she ran in the middle of Joe’s ...
Database Projects in Visual Studio
Database Projects in Visual Studio

...  Entity containing all of the MSSQL database and instance objects, such as tables, views, etc  DAC provides: ...
TPC Benchmarks
TPC Benchmarks

... Verify that all changes within a transaction commit or abort. ...
Practical Database Design and Tuning
Practical Database Design and Tuning

... attributes from two or more tables are frequently needed together. →For the given set of tables, there may be alternative design choices, all of which achieve 3NF or BCNF. One may be replaced by the other. →A relation of the form R(K, A, B, C, D, …) that is in BCNF can be stored into multiple tables ...
Preventing Transaction Logs From Filling Up
Preventing Transaction Logs From Filling Up

... essential to keeping the database in working order. Not only does the database need to be backed up but the accompanying transaction log needs to be backed up as well. Failure to back up the transaction log can cause the database to become inoperable due to the file growing too large. This document ...
17_backup
17_backup

... • Mirroring is the practice of replicating transactions onto two different storage systems as they occur • Some DBMS will automatically implement mirroring • Can also be implemented at the application level – Create two connection objects to different DB – Execute each Update/Insert/Delete against b ...
Performance evaluation of parallel transaction processing in shared
Performance evaluation of parallel transaction processing in shared

... Manipulation Language) statements submitted to the back-end system may originate directly from the end-user (ad-hoc queries) or from application programs running on workstations or mainframes. Some database machines (e.g. EDS) support the management of application programs (consisting of multiple DM ...
Logical Design of Audit Information in Relational Databases
Logical Design of Audit Information in Relational Databases

... mechanisms to achieve these objectives. In addition to the actual recording of all events that take place in the database, a logical structure needs to be imposed on audit data. An audit trail requires mechanisms for a complete reconstruction of every action taken against the database [BJOR75, BONY8 ...
Chapter 17
Chapter 17

... The Incorrect Summary Problem ...
Database System Architectures
Database System Architectures

... Implementation Issues for Distributed Databases Atomicity needed even for transactions that update data at multiple sites The two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is used to ensure atomicity Basic idea: each site executes transaction until just before commit, and the leaves final decision to a coordinat ...
cs440outline - Computer Science Home
cs440outline - Computer Science Home

... and the concept of data independence. b) Describe the theories including functional dependencies and normalization and their consequences in database design. c) Analyze major data models including the entity-relationship, the relational, and objectoriented models. d) Explain top-down database planni ...
part 1 - Faculty
part 1 - Faculty

...  Commit protocols are used to ensure atomicity across sites  a transaction which executes at multiple sites must either be committed at all the sites, or aborted at all the sites.  not acceptable to have a transaction committed at one site and aborted at another ...
Distributed Database Systems
Distributed Database Systems

... funcuonal again) to see if any transactions were in progress at the time of the failure. If there was such a transaction, all operations in that transacUon that were executed prior to the crash are "undone", so that the database is returned to the (consistent) state it was in at the time the transac ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... – Transaction log backup is created on the primary server – File is copied to the secondary server • Log is restored on the secondary server – NORECOVERY (database remains offline) – STANDBY (database is read-only) ...
download
download

... Media failures that affect datafiles can be divided into two categories: read errors and write errors. In a read error, Oracle discovers it cannot read a datafile and an operating system error is returned to the application, along with an Oracle error indicating that the file cannot be found, cannot ...
No Slide Title
No Slide Title

... • Network management systems – Few operators, some hotspot network nodes ...
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases
Chapter 19: Distributed Databases

... A network is said to be partitioned when it has been split into two or more subsystems that lack any connection between them – Note: a subsystem may consist of a single node ...
Database - UTRGV Faculty Web
Database - UTRGV Faculty Web

... The GUI wizard (similar to Access) Choose the name of the fields Set the type of the fields Set possible constraints (“allow nulls”) Define the primary key Define possible foreign keys ...
Database Systems
Database Systems

... • Distributed databases make it possible for transaction to access data at several sites • Final COMMIT is issued after all sites have committed their parts of transaction • Requires that each DP’s transaction log entry be written before database fragment updated • DO-UNDO-REDO protocol with write-a ...
Here - NYU Computer Science Department
Here - NYU Computer Science Department

... • The payroll department can see salaries but cannot see diseases. • The health department can see diseases but cannot see salaries.  Users may prefer to look at different aspects of the information. ...
Database
Database

... • data warehouse, OLAP - analysis, decision making • real-time, active databases - industrial processes • deductive databases - combination of inference and ...
Chapter 14: Concurrency Control
Chapter 14: Concurrency Control

...  The value of Q that Ti is producing was needed previously, and the system assumed that that value would never be produced.  Hence, the write operation is rejected, and Ti is rolled back. ...
< 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report