• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Flashback Transaction Query
Flashback Transaction Query

... Provides a way to audit the rows of a table and retrieve information about the transactions that changed the rows. Retrieve all committed versions of the rows that exist or ever existed between the time the query was issued and a point in time in the past Use the transaction ID to perform transactio ...
Skew-aware automatic database partitioning in shared - H
Skew-aware automatic database partitioning in shared - H

... the performance difference increases with larger cluster sizes: at 64 partitions, the impact is approximately 2×. This is because singlepartition transactions in H-Store execute to completion in a single thread, and thus do not incur the overhead of traditional concurrency control schemes [24]. For ...
SSSS - Computer Science
SSSS - Computer Science

... Transaction Transparency: A user can run an arbitrary transaction that updates data at any number of sites, and the transaction behaves exactly like a local transaction and atomicity is maintained. ...
Creating A Back-Up & Recovery Plan
Creating A Back-Up & Recovery Plan

... point where the database finishes. Backs up all tables, indexes, system tables and the database object in those tables ...
Enterprise Application Ingetration
Enterprise Application Ingetration

... ODBC is more a standard than a product, that Microsoft created a few years ago. It’s a CLI that simplifies database access from Windows (as well as a few other OS) by allowing a developer to make a single API call that works with most relational databases, along with a few that don’t follow the rela ...
Generate database change script
Generate database change script

... (Data Definition Language) scripts with commands of updates. Visual Paradigm is capable in updating database, or just to generate the DDL required, by comparing differences between the design, which is the ERD(s), and the database, and to generate the DDL scripts accordingly. In addition to generati ...
Abstract - The number of open source database management
Abstract - The number of open source database management

... assessment of database systems. Considering the number of database performance assessment benchmarks available, it is quite a daunting task to subject each database system under consideration to all the available benchmark tests and tools and then make a comparison of the results. [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. S ...
lock-X
lock-X

...  The participation constraint specifies whether the existence of an entity depends on its being related to another entity via the relationship type.  The constraint specifies the minimum number of relationship instances that each entity can participate in.  There are two types of participation co ...
XA Transaction and Its implementation on IDS through JDBC
XA Transaction and Its implementation on IDS through JDBC

... transfer money between his checking and savings accounts, both databases have to participate in the transaction or the bank risks losing track of some money. Does XA transaction is needed even if the application uses a single database? The problem is that most developers think, "Well, my application ...
Modification of the Database – Deletion
Modification of the Database – Deletion

... deduct from one account and credit to another ...
SQL Server AlwaysOn
SQL Server AlwaysOn

... • Further scale out read workloads across (possibly geo-distributed) replicas • Use readable secondaries despite network failures (important in geo-distributed ...
slides
slides

... + Lua is mature and very stable – critical core code is not expanding. + Most databases realistically require a service outage when a stored procedure is added or modified, and that change isn’t transactional. + VHAD requires more dynamic behavior there, because anything that compromises even a sing ...
the shortest path algorithm performance comparison in graph and
the shortest path algorithm performance comparison in graph and

... transportation network data. Many of them provide navigation models which permit managing networks and perform network operations [5]. Many researchers have been working with such systems and there are many examples and applications of databasebased routing systems in the traffic and transportation ...
as a PDF
as a PDF

... and returns this pointer to the transaction. There is also an overloaded C++ delete operator for removing objects. ...
Introduction to DB
Introduction to DB

... ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan See www.db-book.com for conditions on re-use ...
Oracle Database Administration - 331 IT
Oracle Database Administration - 331 IT

... everything you need to build/maintain a relational DB ...
Data Synchronization Between Two Securent Databases
Data Synchronization Between Two Securent Databases

... Enter SYS user of second site: Enter password of SYS user of second site: Enter SECURENT user: This SQL script creates streams admin user, sets up the streams for 2Way replication between two databases and start the replication. Following processes will be occurred internally during execution of th ...
slides18-stm
slides18-stm

... is in the IO monad is baked in to the language. There is no need to mark anything in the type system because IO is everywhere.  In Haskell, the programmer can choose when to live in the IO monad and when to live in the realm of pure functional programming.  Interesting perspective: It is not Haske ...
David  Walker
David Walker

...  There is a lot of research going on in the compiler and architecture communities to optimize STM.  This work typically assumes transactions are smallish and have low contention. If these assumptions are wrong, performance can degrade drastically.  We need more experience with “real” workloads an ...
Relational Database Design
Relational Database Design

... Chapter 4: Relational Database Design Information Technology Department Bryar Hassan (MSc Eng.) [email protected] ...
III. Current Trends - UCL Computer Science
III. Current Trends - UCL Computer Science

... • Common SQL API :allows client applications to be written that do not need to know vendor of DBMS they are accessing. • Common database protocol: enables DBMS from one vendor to communicate directly with DBMS from another vendor without need for a gateway. •Common network protocol: allows communica ...
Database Tutorial
Database Tutorial

... Red = Required Syntax Green = Optional Syntax Brown = Values you provide ...
APPENDIX BB Database Administration Document Template
APPENDIX BB Database Administration Document Template

... including scheduled jobs, tuning, replication, data retention, etc. Reminder: Click the show/hide icon on your tool bar to view examples of the required input. ...
Document
Document

... If a transaction fails before reaching COMMIT, there is no need to make any recovery Redo of operations is needed, if a system crash occurs after COMMIT, but before all changes are recorded in the database on disk Then the operations have to be redone from the log file (that is already on disk) to t ...
Chapter 09 Review Questions (Word)
Chapter 09 Review Questions (Word)

... Changes in database structure may introduce errors that do not become apparent for long periods of time. Documentation provides a record of changes to assist the investigation into the cause of database errors. Further, documentation of database changes can be used to determine the structure of the ...
< 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 64 >

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has been also increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and especially in software transactional memory (STM) for achieving serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, which was originally defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity. In a CO compliant schedule the chronological order of commitment events of transactions is compatible with the precedence order of the respective transactions. CO is a broad special case of conflict serializability, and effective means (reliable, high-performance, distributed, and scalable) to achieve global serializability (modular serializability) across any collection of database systems that possibly use different concurrency control mechanisms (CO also makes each system serializability compliant, if not already).Each not-CO-compliant database system is augmented with a CO component (the commitment order coordinator—COCO) which orders the commitment events for CO compliance, with neither data-access nor any other transaction operation interference. As such CO provides a low overhead, general solution for global serializability (and distributed serializability), instrumental for global concurrency control (and distributed concurrency control) of multi database systems and other transactional objects, possibly highly distributed (e.g., within cloud computing, grid computing, and networks of smartphones). An atomic commitment protocol (ACP; of any type) is a fundamental part of the solution, utilized to break global cycles in the conflict (precedence, serializability) graph. CO is the most general property (a necessary condition) that guarantees global serializability, if the database systems involved do not share concurrency control information beyond atomic commitment protocol (unmodified) messages, and have no knowledge whether transactions are global or local (the database systems are autonomous). Thus CO (with its variants) is the only general technique that does not require the typically costly distribution of local concurrency control information (e.g., local precedence relations, locks, timestamps, or tickets). It generalizes the popular strong strict two-phase locking (SS2PL) property, which in conjunction with the two-phase commit protocol (2PC) is the de facto standard to achieve global serializability across (SS2PL based) database systems. As a result CO compliant database systems (with any, different concurrency control types) can transparently join such SS2PL based solutions for global serializability.In addition, locking based global deadlocks are resolved automatically in a CO based multi-database environment, an important side-benefit (including the special case of a completely SS2PL based environment; a previously unnoticed fact for SS2PL).Furthermore, strict commitment ordering (SCO; Raz 1991c), the intersection of Strictness and CO, provides better performance (shorter average transaction completion time and resulting better transaction throughput) than SS2PL whenever read-write conflicts are present (identical blocking behavior for write-read and write-write conflicts; comparable locking overhead). The advantage of SCO is especially significant during lock contention. Strictness allows both SS2PL and SCO to use the same effective database recovery mechanisms.Two major generalizing variants of CO exist, extended CO (ECO; Raz 1993a) and multi-version CO (MVCO; Raz 1993b). They as well provide global serializability without local concurrency control information distribution, can be combined with any relevant concurrency control, and allow optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. Both use additional information for relaxing CO constraints and achieving better concurrency and performance. Vote ordering (VO or Generalized CO (GCO); Raz 2009) is a container schedule set (property) and technique for CO and all its variants. Local VO is a necessary condition for guaranteeing global serializability, if the atomic commitment protocol (ACP) participants do not share concurrency control information (have the generalized autonomy property). CO and its variants inter-operate transparently, guaranteeing global serializability and automatic global deadlock resolution also together in a mixed, heterogeneous environment with different variants.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report