• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CONSENSUS MORALITY
CONSENSUS MORALITY

... If one seriously maintains the view of cultural relativism, one must be prepared to tolerate all cultural differences. If one state endorses piracy (as some in history have), then one must grant piracy the same moral status as a doctrine of antipiracy. Or consider the dramatic example of crime preve ...
ethics
ethics

... that in fact are accepted,  normative ethics attempts to establish which moral views are justifiable and thus ought to be accepted. ...
Lesson 1 Introduction - SUNY Maritime College
Lesson 1 Introduction - SUNY Maritime College

... Become aware of the kinds of moral conflicts you may face Improves your ability to reason about certain circumstances Helps you choose wisely when confronted with a moral crisis Helps clarify the core values of the Military profession ...
West`s Legal Environment of Business 6th Ed.
West`s Legal Environment of Business 6th Ed.

... o Enron: Off-The-Books Transactions. o Moved losses from one ‘shell’ to another. o Transferred debts to partnerships in ...
Week 2
Week 2

... Justice is concerned with past events. Justice should be individualistic – punishment and reward should be for the individual, not the group. Week 2, PHIL2 ...
Griffin entry
Griffin entry

... selecting the option with the greatest net aggregate well-being. This is not a very good decision procedure for agents like us, who often lack reliable information, decent information-gathering skills, time and who are affected by biases and weakness of will. Beings like us better satisfy the criter ...
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master title style

... Utilitarian And Kantian Ethics Utilitarian approaches to ethics hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences Actions are desirable if they lead to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences Problems with utilitarianism include me ...
ppt檔案
ppt檔案

... Among contemporary philosophers Peter Singer is the leading advocate for including animals in consequential calculations of pleasure and pain, and for ending the tyranny of humans over animals. The animal liberation movement is not saying that all lives are of equal worth or that all interests of hu ...
meta-ethics - WordPress.com
meta-ethics - WordPress.com

... The Important aspect of ethics is to determine what makes things right or wrong. So we want an ethical theory to be able to simplify morality. A theory’s principles must provide a compelling explanation of why certain things are good or right while others are bad or wrong. Therefore, any adequate et ...
FREE Sample Here
FREE Sample Here

... As mentioned previously, ethical systems are not moral decisions as such; rather, they provide the guidelines or principles to make moral decisions. When there is no agreement concerning the accepted facts in a certain case, it is confusing to bring in moral arguments before resolving the factual is ...
Relativism - A Level Philosophy
Relativism - A Level Philosophy

... – Science: discovers how the one, physical world is – Ethics: what would explain ethical ‘mistakes’ or getting the correct answer? ...
Relativism
Relativism

... – Science: discovers how the one, physical world is – Ethics: what would explain ethical ‘mistakes’ or getting the correct answer? ...
Chapter 2 - Test Bank 1
Chapter 2 - Test Bank 1

... As mentioned previously, ethical systems are not moral decisions as such; rather, they provide the guidelines or principles to make moral decisions. When there is no agreement concerning the accepted facts in a certain case, it is confusing to bring in moral arguments before resolving the factual is ...
Minimal Ethics
Minimal Ethics

... spontaneous convictions (whether it is hedonistic utilitarianism, the morality of categorical duty, or the ethics of virtue), the author varies the scenarios of the initial experiments in such a way as to lead us to express contradictory convictions. On one occasion we are utilitarian when, in a pi ...
Phil 206 2007 - UKZN: Philosophy
Phil 206 2007 - UKZN: Philosophy

... Answer one of the following questions: 1. Critically discuss Kant’s view that there could not be an imperative that commands us “to do what will make us happy” (pp. 81-82 of the Groundwork). 2. Kant says that it might not be possible to identify a single unambiguous example of a moral action. a) Exp ...
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism

... 5. The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society; that is, if the moral code of a society says that a certain action is right, then that action is right, at least within that society. 6. It is mere arrogance for us to try to judge the conduct of other peoples. We should ad ...
hong kong baptist university
hong kong baptist university

... g. Professional Ethics ...
Psychological Egoism - David Kelsey`s Philosophy Home Page
Psychological Egoism - David Kelsey`s Philosophy Home Page

... It is a theory of psychological facts, not a prescription of ethical ideals. So psychological egoism tells us that we just do pursue our own self interest because this is how human psychological motivation works. ...
Ethics
Ethics

... Some conduct is allowed – some not. Balance competing values. Compliance – no further action Formal punishment of illegal conduct. ...
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions - Clydeview Academy Humanities
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions - Clydeview Academy Humanities

... Grounded in the highest form of good will. To have good will is to perform one’s duty and not by considering the consequences. It is good-in-itself. Good-will fostered by a human being acting rationally- using reason. Importance of intention motive is reason not action, eliminating any notion of emo ...
Cultural Relativism Slides
Cultural Relativism Slides

... • Cultural relativism: there are differences and norms from among cultures • Ethical relativism: there is no objective standard or test among the moral standards among cultures. There are no universal or objective standards of conduct. • Rachels: cultural relativism = ethical relativism ...
Virtue Theory - Moraine Park Technical College
Virtue Theory - Moraine Park Technical College

...  Compassion ...
The motivation to be ethical
The motivation to be ethical

... patients in treatment decisions in a meaningful way, with due consideration being given to the patient’s needs, desires and abilities and safeguarding the privacy of the patient. (Of course the dentist retains the autonomy to ensure that he or she will continue to make a living!) Ethics will always ...
Ethics “Moral Philosophy”
Ethics “Moral Philosophy”

... Not concerned with gratifying immediate desires ...
clinical drug development perspectives on the ethics of human
clinical drug development perspectives on the ethics of human

... creation of benefits for many justifies the sacrifice of the few. Every experiment, no matter how important or valuable, requires the express voluntary consent of the individual. The right of individuals to control their bodies trumps the interest of others in obtaining knowledge or benefits from th ...
< 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 48 >

Consequentialism



Consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories holding that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct. Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right act (or omission from acting) is one that will produce a good outcome, or consequence. In an extreme form, the idea of consequentialism is commonly encapsulated in the English saying, ""the ends justify the means"", meaning that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of achieving it is acceptable.Consequentialism is usually contrasted with deontological ethics (or deontology), in that deontology, in which rules and moral duty are central, derives the rightness or wrongness of one's conduct from the character of the behaviour itself rather than the outcomes of the conduct. It is also contrasted with virtue ethics, which focuses on the character of the agent rather than on the nature or consequences of the act (or omission) itself, and pragmatic ethics which treats morality like science: advancing socially over the course of many lifetimes, such that any moral criterion is subject to revision. Consequentialist theories differ in how they define moral goods.Some argue that consequentialist and deontological theories are not necessarily mutually exclusive. For example, T. M. Scanlon advances the idea that human rights, which are commonly considered a ""deontological"" concept, can only be justified with reference to the consequences of having those rights. Similarly, Robert Nozick argues for a theory that is mostly consequentialist, but incorporates inviolable ""side-constraints"" which restrict the sort of actions agents are permitted to do.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report