• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Part 1
Part 1

... computability, which at the time was usually studied using Turing machines  McCarthy thought that symbolic lists was a more natural model of computation than Turing machines Common Lisp is the ANSI standard Lisp specification All LISP structures, including code and data, have uniform structure  Ca ...
unit 8 - WordPress.com
unit 8 - WordPress.com

Hugs (Haskell)
Hugs (Haskell)

... input and output, etc.—don’t we need those things? ...
Programming paradigms.
Programming paradigms.

...  Java: Imperative, object-oriented, and concurrent programming with static types and garbage collection  Scheme: Lexically scoped, applicative-style recursive programming with dynamic types  Standard ML: Practical functional programming with strict (eager) evaluation and polymorphic type inferenc ...
Haskell Summary Functions • A function takes 1 or more parameter
Haskell Summary Functions • A function takes 1 or more parameter

... Also, functions have precedence over all other operators. Hence, we write f a (b+1) to mean f (a, b + 1); otherwise (f a b) + 1 is understood. Operator identifiers use only a set of special characters: !, #, $, %, &, *, +, ., /, <, =, >, ?, @, \, ^, |, -, ~ . Operators can also be used as functions: ...
Haskell - CIS @ UPenn
Haskell - CIS @ UPenn

... Add, subtract, and multiply are type (Num a) => a -> a -> a Divide is type (Fractional a) => a -> a -> a Exponentiation is type (Num a, Integral b) => a -> b -> a They have type (Integral a) => a -> Bool ...
Chapter 15 Functional Programming
Chapter 15 Functional Programming

... x is zero and 1/x otherwise. If all arguments to the if functions are evaluated at the time of the call, division by zero cannot be prevented. ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

02/06
02/06

...  A reader macro is a definition of a single character, which is expanded into its Lisp definition  An example of a reader macro is an apostrophe character, which is expanded into a call to QUOTE ...
doc
doc

... languages. As a metric, lines of code can turn into a syntax issue. The authors comment, “The syntax issue is a subjective one, but we note, for example, that many of languages used in this experiment have relatively heavy-weight “begin…end” constructions, whereas Haskell uses a convenient ‘’layout’ ...
20100222 F# Let the fun begin – part 1
20100222 F# Let the fun begin – part 1

... http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/geek-of-the-week/don-syme-geekof-the-week/ ...
Lambda-Lifting in Quadratic Time
Lambda-Lifting in Quadratic Time

... partial evaluators and that operates in cubic time. In this article, we show how to reduce this complexity to quadratic time, and we present a flow-sensitive lambda-lifter that also works in quadratic time. Lambda-lifting transforms a block-structured program into a set of recursive equations, one f ...
Functional Programming www.AssignmentPoint.com In computer
Functional Programming www.AssignmentPoint.com In computer

... In the 1970s, ML was created by Robin Milner at the University of Edinburgh, and David Turner initially developed the language SASL at the University of St. Andrews and later the language Miranda at the University of Kent. Also in Edinburgh in the 1970s, Burstall and Darlington developed the functi ...
Hello, World!
Hello, World!

... All newer languages are gaining functional and concurrent features Older languages, such as Java, are also trying to integrate these features ...
slides
slides

presentation - Queaso Systems nv
presentation - Queaso Systems nv

... Advantages of having no mutable variables • Referential transparancy A reference always refers to the same value o Mathematically sound • Implicit parallellism o Order of execution can be chosen, both at compile and run time o Synchronisation: locking issues when dependencies ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... Functional programming languages are carefully designed to support problem solving. There are many features in these languages which help the user to design clear, concise, abstract, modular, correct and reusable solutions to problems. The functional Style of Programming allows the formulation of so ...
Chapter 14a  - McGraw Hill Higher Education
Chapter 14a - McGraw Hill Higher Education

... Eager evaluation = evaluating arguments at the beginning of the call. – Advantage: efficiency Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. ...
Chapter 7: Functional Programming Languages
Chapter 7: Functional Programming Languages

... • the function f : in the imperative language, it is always an explicitly defined function symbol; in the functional language, it can be any expression (for instance, a lambda abstract or an application). Thus the evaluation of f is not simply a look-up in the function table. But we can just replac ...
A Tutorial Introduction to the Lambda Calculus
A Tutorial Introduction to the Lambda Calculus

... developed in order to study some mathematical properties of effectively computable functions, this formalism has provided a strong theoretical foundation for the family of functional programming languages. We show how to perform some arithmetical computations using the λ calculus and how to define r ...
(slides)
(slides)

Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... Pro: behavior of functions defined by the values of input arguments only (no side-effects via global/static variables) Cons: function composition is (considered to be) stateless Cons: programmers prefer imperative programming constructs such as statement sequencing, while functional languages emphas ...
Lecture Notes
Lecture Notes

... Standard distribution, library support, new language features, development tools, use in industry, influence on other languages, etc. ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... To understand a function, you need examine only the function itself A function can use other functions, and of course you need to know what those functions are supposed to compute (but nothing about how they do it) In addition, functions can be called in any order, including in parallel ...
Functional Programming
Functional Programming

... To understand a function, you need examine only the function itself A function can use other functions, and of course you need to know what those functions are supposed to compute (but nothing about how they do it) In addition, functions can be called in any order, including in parallel ...
< 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Closure (computer programming)

In programming languages, closures (also lexical closures or function closures) are a technique for implementing lexically scoped name binding in languages with first-class functions. Operationally, a closure is a record storing a function together with an environment: a mapping associating each free variable of the function (variables that are used locally, but defined in an enclosing scope) with the value or storage location to which the name was bound when the closure was created. A closure—unlike a plain function—allows the function to access those captured variables through the closure's reference to them, even when the function is invoked outside their scope.Example. The following program fragment defines a higher-order function startAt with a parameter x and a nested function incrementBy. The nested function incrementBy has access to x, because incrementBy is in the lexical scope of x, even though x is not local to incrementBy. The function startAt returns a closure containing the function incrementBy, which adds the y value to the x value, and a reference to the variable x from this invocation of startAt, so incrementBy will know where to find it once invoked:function startAt(x) function incrementBy(y) return x + y return incrementByvariable closure1 = startAt(1)variable closure2 = startAt(5)Note that, as startAt returns a function, the variables closure1 and closure2 are of function type. Invoking closure1(3) will return 4, while invoking closure2(3) will return 8. While closure1 and closure2 refer to the same function incrementBy, the associated environments differ, and invoking the closures will bind the name x to two distinct variables with different values in the two invocations, thus evaluating the function to different results.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report