![Continuum Hypothesis, Axiom of Choice, and Non-Cantorian Theory](http://s1.studyres.com/store/data/008899464_1-c4ea9f6ddc68c8e2ced832d291d3f5a2-300x300.png)
A Note on Bootstrapping Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic
... given an alternative definition of IS21 . They also gave an improved treatment of polynomial time functionals, introduced new powerful theories using lambda calculus, strengthened the feasibility results for IS21 , and reproved the ‘main theorem’ for S21 as a corollary of their results for IS21 . Th ...
... given an alternative definition of IS21 . They also gave an improved treatment of polynomial time functionals, introduced new powerful theories using lambda calculus, strengthened the feasibility results for IS21 , and reproved the ‘main theorem’ for S21 as a corollary of their results for IS21 . Th ...
The Axiom of Choice
... the choices in a “finite amount of time”? So we need an axiom for this. Interestingly, there are several statements that turn out to be logically equivalent to the axiom of choice, although they do not appear to be the same at all. I think this is partly why the axiom of choice shows up so often. Le ...
... the choices in a “finite amount of time”? So we need an axiom for this. Interestingly, there are several statements that turn out to be logically equivalent to the axiom of choice, although they do not appear to be the same at all. I think this is partly why the axiom of choice shows up so often. Le ...
ch1_Logic_and_proofs
... If P(x) is a propositional function, then each pair of propositions in a) and b) below have the same truth values: a) ~(x P(x)) and x: ~P(x) "It is not true that for every x, P(x) holds" is equivalent to "There exists an x for which P(x) is not true" ...
... If P(x) is a propositional function, then each pair of propositions in a) and b) below have the same truth values: a) ~(x P(x)) and x: ~P(x) "It is not true that for every x, P(x) holds" is equivalent to "There exists an x for which P(x) is not true" ...
Semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic
... Note that if S has a smallest element p0 then validity under V is equivalent to p0 A, due to this property. Remark 3.2 An intuitive reading of the above is to think of S as the set of possible worlds and the relation p A as A is true in world p. The judgement p ≤ q indicates that q is accessible ...
... Note that if S has a smallest element p0 then validity under V is equivalent to p0 A, due to this property. Remark 3.2 An intuitive reading of the above is to think of S as the set of possible worlds and the relation p A as A is true in world p. The judgement p ≤ q indicates that q is accessible ...
A(x)
... Inference rules: MP (modus ponens), E (general quantifier elimination), I (existential quantifier insertion) Theorem: Proof: ...
... Inference rules: MP (modus ponens), E (general quantifier elimination), I (existential quantifier insertion) Theorem: Proof: ...
A(x)
... Inference rules: MP (modus ponens), E (general quantifier elimination), I (existential quantifier insertion) Theorem: Proof: ...
... Inference rules: MP (modus ponens), E (general quantifier elimination), I (existential quantifier insertion) Theorem: Proof: ...
On Perfect Introspection with Quantifying-in
... knowledge about themselves. In other words, while such agents may have incomplete beliefs about the world, they always have complete knowledge about their own beliefs by way of their ability to introspect. Thus it seems that the beliefs of a perfectly introspective agent should be completely determi ...
... knowledge about themselves. In other words, while such agents may have incomplete beliefs about the world, they always have complete knowledge about their own beliefs by way of their ability to introspect. Thus it seems that the beliefs of a perfectly introspective agent should be completely determi ...
Remarks on Second-Order Consequence
... A large amount of set-theoretical propositions which are known to be independent of the usual set theory ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel with the axiom of choice) are precisely about the contents of the power set operation. The most discussed among these is Cantor's Continuum Hypothesis (CH) according to whic ...
... A large amount of set-theoretical propositions which are known to be independent of the usual set theory ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel with the axiom of choice) are precisely about the contents of the power set operation. The most discussed among these is Cantor's Continuum Hypothesis (CH) according to whic ...
Definability in Boolean bunched logic
... A property P of BBI-models is said to be definable if there exists a formula A such that for all BBI-models M , A is valid in M ⇐⇒ M ∈ P. We’ll consider properties that feature in various models of separation logic. To show a property is definable, just exhibit the defining ...
... A property P of BBI-models is said to be definable if there exists a formula A such that for all BBI-models M , A is valid in M ⇐⇒ M ∈ P. We’ll consider properties that feature in various models of separation logic. To show a property is definable, just exhibit the defining ...
slides - Computer and Information Science
... (FLOWS - First-order Logic Ontology for Web-Services) • One way to do this is to use logic. ...
... (FLOWS - First-order Logic Ontology for Web-Services) • One way to do this is to use logic. ...
Chapter 5 Predicate Logic
... We can use this latter interpretation of H to treat another predicate logic formula: (∀x)H(x, x). Here there is still only one quantifier and no connectives, but there is more than one quantified variable. The interpretation is that both arguments must be the same. This expression is true if H can p ...
... We can use this latter interpretation of H to treat another predicate logic formula: (∀x)H(x, x). Here there is still only one quantifier and no connectives, but there is more than one quantified variable. The interpretation is that both arguments must be the same. This expression is true if H can p ...
How to tell the truth without knowing what you are talking about
... describing what you may not know? The answer is positive provided that the reasoning, from the accepted set of premises to the conclusions, is correct. The problem of verifying whether a reasoning is correct is one of the aims of logic since Aristotle. In particular, modern logic, that is logic sinc ...
... describing what you may not know? The answer is positive provided that the reasoning, from the accepted set of premises to the conclusions, is correct. The problem of verifying whether a reasoning is correct is one of the aims of logic since Aristotle. In particular, modern logic, that is logic sinc ...
Transfinite progressions: A second look at completeness.
... Ü1. Iterated Gödelian extensions of theories. The idea of iterating ad infinitum the operation of extending a theory T by adding as a new axiom a Gödel sentence for T , or equivalently a formalization of “T is consistent”, thus obtaining an infinite sequence of theories, arose naturally when Gödel’ ...
... Ü1. Iterated Gödelian extensions of theories. The idea of iterating ad infinitum the operation of extending a theory T by adding as a new axiom a Gödel sentence for T , or equivalently a formalization of “T is consistent”, thus obtaining an infinite sequence of theories, arose naturally when Gödel’ ...
Axiomatic Systems
... If there is a model for an axiomatic system, then the system is called consistent. Otherwise, the system is inconsistent. In order to prove that a system is consistent, all we need to do is come up with a model: a definition of the undefined terms where the axioms are all true. In order to prove tha ...
... If there is a model for an axiomatic system, then the system is called consistent. Otherwise, the system is inconsistent. In order to prove that a system is consistent, all we need to do is come up with a model: a definition of the undefined terms where the axioms are all true. In order to prove tha ...
Mathematical Logic Fall 2004 Professor R. Moosa Contents
... There is a dichotomy in logic. Given a statement (theorem/axiom/whatever), there is the syntax of the statement (what is written down on the board) and the semantics (what the statement really means). In some sense, we want to study the abstract semantics, but it is usually much easier to study the ...
... There is a dichotomy in logic. Given a statement (theorem/axiom/whatever), there is the syntax of the statement (what is written down on the board) and the semantics (what the statement really means). In some sense, we want to study the abstract semantics, but it is usually much easier to study the ...
PPTX
... • Identify and eliminate irrelevant information • Identify and focus on critical information • Step back from the problem frequently to think about assumptions you might have wrong or other approaches you could take. • If you don’t know whether the argument is valid or not, alternate between • tryin ...
... • Identify and eliminate irrelevant information • Identify and focus on critical information • Step back from the problem frequently to think about assumptions you might have wrong or other approaches you could take. • If you don’t know whether the argument is valid or not, alternate between • tryin ...