Outline of Lecture 2 First Order Logic and Second Order Logic Basic
... Player I (spoiler) and II (duplicator): (i) In move 2n + 1 Player I picks an element a2n+1 ∈ A and Player II picks an element b2n+1 ∈ B. (ii) In move 2n Player I picks an element b2n ∈ B and Player II picks an element a2n ∈ A. (iii) Let A0 ⊆ A and B0 ⊆ B be the sets of elements chosen by the players ...
... Player I (spoiler) and II (duplicator): (i) In move 2n + 1 Player I picks an element a2n+1 ∈ A and Player II picks an element b2n+1 ∈ B. (ii) In move 2n Player I picks an element b2n ∈ B and Player II picks an element a2n ∈ A. (iii) Let A0 ⊆ A and B0 ⊆ B be the sets of elements chosen by the players ...
Belief Revision in non
... 3 Belief Revision in non-Classical Logics In this section, we describe our approach for defining belief revision operators for non-classical logics. This is based on the following components: i) a sound and complete classical logic axiomatisation of the semantics of the object logic L, ii) a domain- ...
... 3 Belief Revision in non-Classical Logics In this section, we describe our approach for defining belief revision operators for non-classical logics. This is based on the following components: i) a sound and complete classical logic axiomatisation of the semantics of the object logic L, ii) a domain- ...
Strong Completeness for Iteration
... A monad morphism from (T, η, µ) to (T 0 , η 0 , µ0 ) is a natural transformation ρ : T ⇒ T 0 which respects the monad structure meaning that: ρ ◦ η = η 0 and ρ ◦ µ = µ0 ◦ ρT 0 ◦ T ρ. Since ρ is natural the last equation is equivalent to ρ ◦ µ = µ0 ◦ T 0 ρ ◦ ρT . Monads and monad morphisms together f ...
... A monad morphism from (T, η, µ) to (T 0 , η 0 , µ0 ) is a natural transformation ρ : T ⇒ T 0 which respects the monad structure meaning that: ρ ◦ η = η 0 and ρ ◦ µ = µ0 ◦ ρT 0 ◦ T ρ. Since ρ is natural the last equation is equivalent to ρ ◦ µ = µ0 ◦ T 0 ρ ◦ ρT . Monads and monad morphisms together f ...
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO MODAL LOGIC Introduction Consider
... that it is autumn? Is it believed that it is autumn? Is it autumn now, or will it be autumn in the future? If I fly to Bombay, will it still be autumn? All these modifications of our initial assertion are called by logicians ‘modalities’, indicating the mode in which the statement is said to be true ...
... that it is autumn? Is it believed that it is autumn? Is it autumn now, or will it be autumn in the future? If I fly to Bombay, will it still be autumn? All these modifications of our initial assertion are called by logicians ‘modalities’, indicating the mode in which the statement is said to be true ...
Some Principles of Logic
... (inference of a general condition from a set of observed instances) • If the premises are true then the conclusion is probably but not necessarily true • The conclusion contains information not present, even implicitly, in the premises ...
... (inference of a general condition from a set of observed instances) • If the premises are true then the conclusion is probably but not necessarily true • The conclusion contains information not present, even implicitly, in the premises ...
Temporal Here and There - Computational Cognition Lab
... In [10], Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz introduced the so-called 0 semantics that subsumed many of the existing Logic Programming alternatives but without the syntactic restrictions made by previous approaches. The modelbased orientation of this semantics led to a paradigm suitable for const ...
... In [10], Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz introduced the so-called 0 semantics that subsumed many of the existing Logic Programming alternatives but without the syntactic restrictions made by previous approaches. The modelbased orientation of this semantics led to a paradigm suitable for const ...
pdf
... If a first-order formula X is valid, then X the there is an atomically closed tableau for F X. ...
... If a first-order formula X is valid, then X the there is an atomically closed tableau for F X. ...
1 Introduction 2 Formal logic
... informal mathematical reasoning precise. It has three main ingredients: • A formal language in which to express the mathematical statements we want to reason about. • A semantics that explains the meaning of statements in our formal language in informal terms. • A deductive system that establishes f ...
... informal mathematical reasoning precise. It has three main ingredients: • A formal language in which to express the mathematical statements we want to reason about. • A semantics that explains the meaning of statements in our formal language in informal terms. • A deductive system that establishes f ...
Predicate logic
... Definition: integer a is odd iff a = 2m + 1 for some integer m Let a, b ∈ Z s.t. a and b are odd. Then by definition of odd a = 2m + 1.m ∈ Z and b = 2n + 1.n ∈ Z So ab = (2m + 1)(2n + 1) = 4mn + 2m + 2n + 1 = 2(2mn + m + n) + 1 and since m, n ∈ Z it holds that (2mn + m + n) ∈ Z, so ab = 2k + 1 for s ...
... Definition: integer a is odd iff a = 2m + 1 for some integer m Let a, b ∈ Z s.t. a and b are odd. Then by definition of odd a = 2m + 1.m ∈ Z and b = 2n + 1.n ∈ Z So ab = (2m + 1)(2n + 1) = 4mn + 2m + 2n + 1 = 2(2mn + m + n) + 1 and since m, n ∈ Z it holds that (2mn + m + n) ∈ Z, so ab = 2k + 1 for s ...
Bounded Proofs and Step Frames - Università degli Studi di Milano
... members of Γ ). We need some care when replacing a logic L with an inference system Ax, because we want global consequence relation to be preserved, in the sense of Proposition 1(ii) below. To this aim, we need to use derivable rules: the rule (8) is derivable in a logic L iff {φ1 , . . . , φn } `L ...
... members of Γ ). We need some care when replacing a logic L with an inference system Ax, because we want global consequence relation to be preserved, in the sense of Proposition 1(ii) below. To this aim, we need to use derivable rules: the rule (8) is derivable in a logic L iff {φ1 , . . . , φn } `L ...
