
this PDF file
... in the ≤k ordering in every model. We feel that this notion of necessary approximation carries some interest given the pivotal role of the approximation (or ‘knowledge’) ordering in the semantics of programming languages. The main purpose of this paper is a simple one. We want to add one more doubli ...
... in the ≤k ordering in every model. We feel that this notion of necessary approximation carries some interest given the pivotal role of the approximation (or ‘knowledge’) ordering in the semantics of programming languages. The main purpose of this paper is a simple one. We want to add one more doubli ...
A HIGHER-ORDER FINE-GRAINED LOGIC FOR INTENSIONAL
... Abstract. This paper describes a higher-order logic with fine-grained intensionality (FIL). Unlike traditional Montogovian type theory, intensionality is treated as basic, rather than derived through possible worlds. This allows for fine-grained intensionality without impossible worlds. Possible wor ...
... Abstract. This paper describes a higher-order logic with fine-grained intensionality (FIL). Unlike traditional Montogovian type theory, intensionality is treated as basic, rather than derived through possible worlds. This allows for fine-grained intensionality without impossible worlds. Possible wor ...
Methods of Proof for Boolean Logic
... Proof of Q by contradiction: assume Q and derive a contradiction. ...
... Proof of Q by contradiction: assume Q and derive a contradiction. ...
ppt
... a logical system, can all other facts be derived using the laws of math/logic? Punch line: No! Any formal system breaks down; there are truths that can not be derived ...
... a logical system, can all other facts be derived using the laws of math/logic? Punch line: No! Any formal system breaks down; there are truths that can not be derived ...
Methods of Proof for Boolean Logic
... Proof of Q by contradiction: assume Q and derive a contradiction. ...
... Proof of Q by contradiction: assume Q and derive a contradiction. ...
chapter 16
... — A universal proof (or universal derivation) is an ordered list of sentences in which every sentence is either a premise or is derived from earlier lines (not within a completed subproof) using an inference rule. If we are able to prove Φ(xʹ) where xʹ does not appear free in any line above the univ ...
... — A universal proof (or universal derivation) is an ordered list of sentences in which every sentence is either a premise or is derived from earlier lines (not within a completed subproof) using an inference rule. If we are able to prove Φ(xʹ) where xʹ does not appear free in any line above the univ ...
Predicate Calculus pt. 2
... Predicate Calculus pt. 2 Exercises 7-10 from last time. Exercise 1 A set of propositional formulas T is called satisfiable iff there is an assignment of the occuring variables which makes all formulas in T true. The compactness theorem of propositional logic says: T is satisfiable iff every finite s ...
... Predicate Calculus pt. 2 Exercises 7-10 from last time. Exercise 1 A set of propositional formulas T is called satisfiable iff there is an assignment of the occuring variables which makes all formulas in T true. The compactness theorem of propositional logic says: T is satisfiable iff every finite s ...
slides - National Taiwan University
... |= is about semantics, rather than syntax For Σ = ∅, we have ∅ |= τ , simply written |= τ . It says every truth assignment satisfies τ . In this case, τ is a tautology. ...
... |= is about semantics, rather than syntax For Σ = ∅, we have ∅ |= τ , simply written |= τ . It says every truth assignment satisfies τ . In this case, τ is a tautology. ...
Propositional Logic
... • Somewhat mysterious to non-technical users • Algorithmically simple but more complex than perfect induction. • Not considered appropriate for general problem solving. ...
... • Somewhat mysterious to non-technical users • Algorithmically simple but more complex than perfect induction. • Not considered appropriate for general problem solving. ...
pdf - Consequently.org
... our language, atomic predicates pick out these properties, it seems that this is the sensible decision. There is nothing that ¬Gt does that couldn’t be done by an atomic predicate too. Similarly, we could take Ft ∨ Gt as an instance of Xt too. How can we give an account of this? A simple notation fo ...
... our language, atomic predicates pick out these properties, it seems that this is the sensible decision. There is nothing that ¬Gt does that couldn’t be done by an atomic predicate too. Similarly, we could take Ft ∨ Gt as an instance of Xt too. How can we give an account of this? A simple notation fo ...
CS3234 Logic and Formal Systems
... 6 A Consider an arbitrary propositional formula φ in which say n propositional atoms occur. Let us call these atoms p1 , . . . , pn . In order to construct a corresponding formula in predicate logic, we use the set of predicate symbols P = {IsTrue}, where IsTrue is a unary predicate, and the set ...
... 6 A Consider an arbitrary propositional formula φ in which say n propositional atoms occur. Let us call these atoms p1 , . . . , pn . In order to construct a corresponding formula in predicate logic, we use the set of predicate symbols P = {IsTrue}, where IsTrue is a unary predicate, and the set ...
Discrete Mathematics and Logic II. Formal Logic
... is often dened as "a branch of logic whose task is to develop non-formal standards, criteria, procedures for the analysis, interpretation, evaluation, criticism and construction of argumentation in everyday discourse." is used to reason about events in the human and social sciences Most reasoning f ...
... is often dened as "a branch of logic whose task is to develop non-formal standards, criteria, procedures for the analysis, interpretation, evaluation, criticism and construction of argumentation in everyday discourse." is used to reason about events in the human and social sciences Most reasoning f ...
A logical basis for quantum evolution and entanglement
... begins with a directed, acyclic graph, called a causal graph. The nodes of the graph represent events, while the edges represent flow of particles between events. The dynamics is represented by assigning to each edge an object in a monoidal category and each vertex a morphism with domain the tensor ...
... begins with a directed, acyclic graph, called a causal graph. The nodes of the graph represent events, while the edges represent flow of particles between events. The dynamics is represented by assigning to each edge an object in a monoidal category and each vertex a morphism with domain the tensor ...
Natural Deduction Proof System
... • Natural Deduction tries to follow the natural style of reasoning. Most of the proof consists of forward reasoning, i.e. deriving conclusions, deriving new conclusions from these conclusions, etc. Occasionally hypotheses are introduced or dropped. • A derivation is a tree where the nodes are the ru ...
... • Natural Deduction tries to follow the natural style of reasoning. Most of the proof consists of forward reasoning, i.e. deriving conclusions, deriving new conclusions from these conclusions, etc. Occasionally hypotheses are introduced or dropped. • A derivation is a tree where the nodes are the ru ...
Logical Consequence by Patricia Blanchette Basic Question (BQ
... Model theory is about truth and interpretation. Within model theory, we represent the concept of logical consequence by talking about model theoretic consequence. Very roughly speaking, we say that “B is a model theoretic consequence of A in formal system S” means that in S whenever B is true, A is ...
... Model theory is about truth and interpretation. Within model theory, we represent the concept of logical consequence by talking about model theoretic consequence. Very roughly speaking, we say that “B is a model theoretic consequence of A in formal system S” means that in S whenever B is true, A is ...
the role of logic in teaching, learning and analyzing proof
... as proof is crucial, that is, which proofs have a right to play a role in understanding mathematical knowledge. The next two sections approach proof with respect to its relation to argumentation, its nature and conceptions. These issues are informing the didactic choices of the logic course and they ...
... as proof is crucial, that is, which proofs have a right to play a role in understanding mathematical knowledge. The next two sections approach proof with respect to its relation to argumentation, its nature and conceptions. These issues are informing the didactic choices of the logic course and they ...
Propositional Logic
... Why study propositional logic? • A formal mathematical “language” for precise reasoning. • Start with propositions. • Add other constructs like negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication etc. • All of these are based on ideas we use daily to reason about things. ...
... Why study propositional logic? • A formal mathematical “language” for precise reasoning. • Start with propositions. • Add other constructs like negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication etc. • All of these are based on ideas we use daily to reason about things. ...
term 1 - Teaching-WIKI
... • Propositional logic assumes the world contains facts that are either true or false. • In propositional logic the smallest atoms represent whole propositions (propositions are atomic) – Propositional logic does not capture the internal structure of the propositions – It is not possible to work with ...
... • Propositional logic assumes the world contains facts that are either true or false. • In propositional logic the smallest atoms represent whole propositions (propositions are atomic) – Propositional logic does not capture the internal structure of the propositions – It is not possible to work with ...
A writeup on the State Assignments using the example given in class
... somehow make an assignment that results in groups of 1’s being next to each other. One solution is to simply try all possible assignments and then pick the one that results in the least amount of logic. However, this is not practical when there are more than a handful of states. A more practical app ...
... somehow make an assignment that results in groups of 1’s being next to each other. One solution is to simply try all possible assignments and then pick the one that results in the least amount of logic. However, this is not practical when there are more than a handful of states. A more practical app ...
Tautologies Arguments Logical Implication
... A derivation (or proof ) in an axiom system AX is a sequence of formulas C1 , . . . , C N ; each formula Ck is either an axiom in AX or follows from previous formulas using an inference rule in AX: ...
... A derivation (or proof ) in an axiom system AX is a sequence of formulas C1 , . . . , C N ; each formula Ck is either an axiom in AX or follows from previous formulas using an inference rule in AX: ...
Document
... methods used to construct valid arguments. An argument is a related sequence of statements to demonstrate the truth of an assertion ...
... methods used to construct valid arguments. An argument is a related sequence of statements to demonstrate the truth of an assertion ...
Logic is a discipline that studies the principles and methods used in
... Letters are used to denote propositions. The most frequently used letters are p, q, r, s ...
... Letters are used to denote propositions. The most frequently used letters are p, q, r, s ...
HW 12
... 4. The difference between two sets A and B is the set of all objects that belong to set A but not to B. This is written as A \ B a. Provide a definitional axiom for A \ B (use a 2-place function symbol diff(x,y)) b. Construct a formal proof that shows that for any sets A, B, and C: A (B \ C) = (A ...
... 4. The difference between two sets A and B is the set of all objects that belong to set A but not to B. This is written as A \ B a. Provide a definitional axiom for A \ B (use a 2-place function symbol diff(x,y)) b. Construct a formal proof that shows that for any sets A, B, and C: A (B \ C) = (A ...
ON PRESERVING 1. Introduction The
... entirely about sets. So we shall have to replace the arbitrary conclusion α with the entire set of conclusions which might correctly be drawn from Γ. We even have an attractive name for that set—the theory generated by Γ or the deductive closure of Γ. In formal terms this is C` (Γ) = {α|Γ ` α} Now t ...
... entirely about sets. So we shall have to replace the arbitrary conclusion α with the entire set of conclusions which might correctly be drawn from Γ. We even have an attractive name for that set—the theory generated by Γ or the deductive closure of Γ. In formal terms this is C` (Γ) = {α|Γ ` α} Now t ...
deductive system
... There is also a stronger notion of deductive equivalence: D1 is (strongly) deductively equivalent to D2 exactly when ∆ `D1 A ...
... There is also a stronger notion of deductive equivalence: D1 is (strongly) deductively equivalent to D2 exactly when ∆ `D1 A ...