
Knowledge Representation: Logic
... Example: Natural language when used to define first order logic. Let us consider the sentence: The sentence „It is true that John is tall” means the same as „John is tall” Quotation marks indicate the use of metalanguage, the word „true” as well. Thus, whole the utterance belongs to the metametalang ...
... Example: Natural language when used to define first order logic. Let us consider the sentence: The sentence „It is true that John is tall” means the same as „John is tall” Quotation marks indicate the use of metalanguage, the word „true” as well. Thus, whole the utterance belongs to the metametalang ...
Least and greatest fixed points in linear logic
... Exponentials As shown above, µMALL= can be encoded using exponentials and second-order quantifiers. But at first-order, exponentials and fixed points are incomparable. We could add exponentials in further work, but conjecture that the essential observations done in this work would stay the same. Non ...
... Exponentials As shown above, µMALL= can be encoded using exponentials and second-order quantifiers. But at first-order, exponentials and fixed points are incomparable. We could add exponentials in further work, but conjecture that the essential observations done in this work would stay the same. Non ...
Logic and Resolution
... Consider the formula ∀x∃y∃zP (f (y, z), x) Given the structure S , this formula is clearly true Note, however, that this would not be the case if we had, for instance, interpreted P as ‘less than’ ...
... Consider the formula ∀x∃y∃zP (f (y, z), x) Given the structure S , this formula is clearly true Note, however, that this would not be the case if we had, for instance, interpreted P as ‘less than’ ...
Problem Set 3
... In each of the following, you will be given a list of first-order predicates and functions along with an English sentence. In each case, write a statement in first-order logic that expresses the indicated sentence. Your statement may use any first-order construct (equality, connectives, quantifiers, ...
... In each of the following, you will be given a list of first-order predicates and functions along with an English sentence. In each case, write a statement in first-order logic that expresses the indicated sentence. Your statement may use any first-order construct (equality, connectives, quantifiers, ...
Document
... two-valued logic – every sentence is either true or false some sentences are minimal – no proper part which is also a sentence others – can be taken apart into smaller parts we can build larger sentences from smaller ones by using connectives ...
... two-valued logic – every sentence is either true or false some sentences are minimal – no proper part which is also a sentence others – can be taken apart into smaller parts we can build larger sentences from smaller ones by using connectives ...
propositions and connectives propositions and connectives
... propositions names: p, q, r, …, p0, p1, p2, … a name for false : ...
... propositions names: p, q, r, …, p0, p1, p2, … a name for false : ...
Jacques Herbrand (1908 - 1931) Principal writings in logic
... œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) expresses the existence, for any p and q, of interpretations that make ES(A,p) true, and give the constant c the value q. If the theory is a true theory of arithmetic, then œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) is true. Claim. œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) is not derivable in the theory. Proof. If so, so is œx∑zı(x,x,z). ...
... œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) expresses the existence, for any p and q, of interpretations that make ES(A,p) true, and give the constant c the value q. If the theory is a true theory of arithmetic, then œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) is true. Claim. œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) is not derivable in the theory. Proof. If so, so is œx∑zı(x,x,z). ...
Document
... quantifiers, predicates and logical connectives. A valid argument for predicate logic need not be a tautology. The meaning and the structure of the quantifiers and predicates determines the interpretation and the validity of the arguments Basic approach to prove arguments: ...
... quantifiers, predicates and logical connectives. A valid argument for predicate logic need not be a tautology. The meaning and the structure of the quantifiers and predicates determines the interpretation and the validity of the arguments Basic approach to prove arguments: ...
PARADOX AND INTUITION
... which is independent of the specification of domain, and the juxtaposition of symbols cannot force the interpretation of any of its predicate-letters as a relation with a nondenumerable field. Some connections between the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem and problems of ontological reduction are discussed i ...
... which is independent of the specification of domain, and the juxtaposition of symbols cannot force the interpretation of any of its predicate-letters as a relation with a nondenumerable field. Some connections between the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem and problems of ontological reduction are discussed i ...
PDF
... In this entry, we show that the deduction theorem below holds for intuitionistic propositional logic. We use the axiom system provided in this entry. Theorem 1. If ∆, A `i B, where ∆ is a set of wff ’s of the intuitionistic propositional logic, then ∆ `i A → B. The proof is very similar to that of t ...
... In this entry, we show that the deduction theorem below holds for intuitionistic propositional logic. We use the axiom system provided in this entry. Theorem 1. If ∆, A `i B, where ∆ is a set of wff ’s of the intuitionistic propositional logic, then ∆ `i A → B. The proof is very similar to that of t ...
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs - UTH e
... In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the conclusion (or consequence). ...
... In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the conclusion (or consequence). ...
T - UTH e
... In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the conclusion (or consequence). ...
... In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the conclusion (or consequence). ...
Notes5
... In this part of the course we consider logic. Logic is used in many places in computer science including digital circuit design, relational databases, automata theory and computability, and artificial intelligence. We start with propositional logic, using symbols to stand for things that can be eith ...
... In this part of the course we consider logic. Logic is used in many places in computer science including digital circuit design, relational databases, automata theory and computability, and artificial intelligence. We start with propositional logic, using symbols to stand for things that can be eith ...
Formal logic
... If I V (ϕ) = 1 then it is said that V is a model of ϕ, or that V satisfies ϕ; it is a “world” in which ϕ is true. A formula is said to be valid if it is true under all circumstances, that is, if every valuation is a model of ϕ: ϕ is valid if I V (ϕ) = 1 for all valuations V . For instance, it is ea ...
... If I V (ϕ) = 1 then it is said that V is a model of ϕ, or that V satisfies ϕ; it is a “world” in which ϕ is true. A formula is said to be valid if it is true under all circumstances, that is, if every valuation is a model of ϕ: ϕ is valid if I V (ϕ) = 1 for all valuations V . For instance, it is ea ...
Proof Theory - Andrew.cmu.edu
... I will assume the reader is familiar with the language of first-order logic. Contemporary logic textbooks often present formal calculi for first-order logic with a long list of axioms and a few simple rules, but these are generally not very convenient for modeling deductive arguments or studying the ...
... I will assume the reader is familiar with the language of first-order logic. Contemporary logic textbooks often present formal calculi for first-order logic with a long list of axioms and a few simple rules, but these are generally not very convenient for modeling deductive arguments or studying the ...
Bilattices In Logic Programming
... 1. hx1 , x2 i ≤t hy1 , y2 i provided x1 ≤1 y1 and y2 ≤2 x2 ; 2. hx1 , x2 i ≤k hy1 , y2 i provided x1 ≤1 y1 and x2 ≤2 y2 . Proposition 5 If L1 and L2 are lattices (with tops and bottoms), L1 ¯ L2 is an interlaced bilattice. Further, if L1 = L2 then the operation given by ¬hx, yi = hy, xi satisfies th ...
... 1. hx1 , x2 i ≤t hy1 , y2 i provided x1 ≤1 y1 and y2 ≤2 x2 ; 2. hx1 , x2 i ≤k hy1 , y2 i provided x1 ≤1 y1 and x2 ≤2 y2 . Proposition 5 If L1 and L2 are lattices (with tops and bottoms), L1 ¯ L2 is an interlaced bilattice. Further, if L1 = L2 then the operation given by ¬hx, yi = hy, xi satisfies th ...
Autoepistemic Logic and Introspective Circumscription
... introspection, but in a very different way. Just as McCarthy's original "minimizing" form of circumscription, it is not really a nonmonotonic logic, but rather a syntactic transformation of classical formulas. Introspective circumscription is not restricted to the propositional case--its definition ...
... introspection, but in a very different way. Just as McCarthy's original "minimizing" form of circumscription, it is not really a nonmonotonic logic, but rather a syntactic transformation of classical formulas. Introspective circumscription is not restricted to the propositional case--its definition ...
Logic and Proof - Collaboratory for Advanced Computing and
... From K. H. Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill) Chapter 1 ...
... From K. H. Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill) Chapter 1 ...
10a
... • Valid sentence: true in all worlds under all interpretations • If an implication sentence can be shown to be valid, then, given its premise, its consequent can be derived • Different logics make different commitments about what the world is made of and the kind of beliefs we can have • Proposition ...
... • Valid sentence: true in all worlds under all interpretations • If an implication sentence can be shown to be valid, then, given its premise, its consequent can be derived • Different logics make different commitments about what the world is made of and the kind of beliefs we can have • Proposition ...
Conditional and Indirect Proofs
... • A tautology will follow from any premises whatever. • This is because the negation of a tautology is a contradiction, so if we use IP by assuming the negation of a tautology, we can derive a contradiction independently of other premises. This is why this process is called a zeropremise deduction. ...
... • A tautology will follow from any premises whatever. • This is because the negation of a tautology is a contradiction, so if we use IP by assuming the negation of a tautology, we can derive a contradiction independently of other premises. This is why this process is called a zeropremise deduction. ...
Structural Multi-type Sequent Calculus for Inquisitive Logic
... the entailment relation of questions is a type of dependency relation considered in dependence logic. Inquisitive logic was axiomatized in [6], and this axiomatization is not closed under uniform substitution, which is a hurdle for a smooth proof-theoretic treatment for inquisitive logic. In [22], a ...
... the entailment relation of questions is a type of dependency relation considered in dependence logic. Inquisitive logic was axiomatized in [6], and this axiomatization is not closed under uniform substitution, which is a hurdle for a smooth proof-theoretic treatment for inquisitive logic. In [22], a ...
PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC 1 Propositional Logic - Glasnost!
... of the second argument does not follow from its premise. To explain the difference between the two arguments precisely – in the first argument, if the premise is indeed true, then the conclusion cannot be false. On the other hand, even if the premise in the second argument is true, there is no guara ...
... of the second argument does not follow from its premise. To explain the difference between the two arguments precisely – in the first argument, if the premise is indeed true, then the conclusion cannot be false. On the other hand, even if the premise in the second argument is true, there is no guara ...
characterization of classes of frames in modal language
... a propositional letter assigns a set of moments of time in that the letter is satisfied (true). Besides classical propositional connectives (¬, ∨, ∧, →, ↔) we will have temporal operators that are defined on hW,
... a propositional letter assigns a set of moments of time in that the letter is satisfied (true). Besides classical propositional connectives (¬, ∨, ∧, →, ↔) we will have temporal operators that are defined on hW,
T - STI Innsbruck
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
02_Artificial_Intelligence-PropositionalLogic
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even though its tru ...
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even though its tru ...