
F - Teaching-WIKI
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
T - STI Innsbruck
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
F - Teaching-WIKI
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
... • Deduction = derivation of true statements (called conclusions) from statements that are assumed to be true (called premises) • Natural language is not precise, so the careless use of logic can lead to claims that false statements are true, or to claims that a statement is true, even tough its trut ...
Chapter 1, Part I: Propositional Logic
... In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the conclusion (or consequence). ...
... In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the conclusion (or consequence). ...
Extending modal logic
... Theorem: for frame classes K defined by universal Horn conditions x1...xn(φ1 ... φk → ψ) the following are equivalent: 1. K is modally definable 2. K is closed under bounded morphic images and disjoint unions 3. The Horn conditions can be written so that their left hand sides ...
... Theorem: for frame classes K defined by universal Horn conditions x1...xn(φ1 ... φk → ψ) the following are equivalent: 1. K is modally definable 2. K is closed under bounded morphic images and disjoint unions 3. The Horn conditions can be written so that their left hand sides ...
Intuitionistic Logic
... We would get classical logic out of this if we couldn’t have both p and ¬p false, or if we could get genealogy (the converse of heredity). This combination makes sense. If I have a proof of p, I have a disproof of any disproof of p. But being able to disprove the possibility of a disproof of p isn’ ...
... We would get classical logic out of this if we couldn’t have both p and ¬p false, or if we could get genealogy (the converse of heredity). This combination makes sense. If I have a proof of p, I have a disproof of any disproof of p. But being able to disprove the possibility of a disproof of p isn’ ...
Propositional Logic
... (Parentheses added for emphasis.) Example Original statement: If I live in College Park, then I live in Maryland. Inverse: If I don’t live in College Park, then I don’t live in Maryland. The inverse of an implication is equivalent to the converse! ...
... (Parentheses added for emphasis.) Example Original statement: If I live in College Park, then I live in Maryland. Inverse: If I don’t live in College Park, then I don’t live in Maryland. The inverse of an implication is equivalent to the converse! ...
Slides from 10/20/14
... Quantifiers are like logical operators in that they determine truth conditions for the statements they apply to. To do so, they work together with attached individual variables: small-case x, y, and z, which function like pronouns. ...
... Quantifiers are like logical operators in that they determine truth conditions for the statements they apply to. To do so, they work together with attached individual variables: small-case x, y, and z, which function like pronouns. ...
completeness theorem for a first order linear
... temporal logics. For example, some kinds of such logics with F and P operators over various classes of time ows were axiomatized in [9], while axiomatic systems for the rst order temporal logics with since and until over linear time and rationals were given in [16]. In the case of FOLTL (and simil ...
... temporal logics. For example, some kinds of such logics with F and P operators over various classes of time ows were axiomatized in [9], while axiomatic systems for the rst order temporal logics with since and until over linear time and rationals were given in [16]. In the case of FOLTL (and simil ...
pdf
... [9] showed that the validity (and satisfiability) problem for every modal logic between K and S4 is PSPACE-hard; and is PSPACE-complete for the modal logics K, T, and S4. He also showed that the satisfiability problem for S5 is NP-complete. What causes the gap between NP and PSPACE here? We show tha ...
... [9] showed that the validity (and satisfiability) problem for every modal logic between K and S4 is PSPACE-hard; and is PSPACE-complete for the modal logics K, T, and S4. He also showed that the satisfiability problem for S5 is NP-complete. What causes the gap between NP and PSPACE here? We show tha ...
Tactical and Strategic Challenges to Logic (KAIST
... This would be a good time to ask, “How do logicians think that the rational and practicable management of such systems should be brought about”? In shorter words, what is to be learned about these things from logic? The answer to date is “not much”. I’ll turn to that a section from now. First we’ll ...
... This would be a good time to ask, “How do logicians think that the rational and practicable management of such systems should be brought about”? In shorter words, what is to be learned about these things from logic? The answer to date is “not much”. I’ll turn to that a section from now. First we’ll ...
A Logic of Explicit Knowledge - Lehman College
... seems potentially useful. Then we should also have a calculus on reasons, allowing us to combine or reflect on reasons in a natural way. In fact, such a calculus already exists. Among the broad and somewhat amorphous family of things we might call reasons are mathematical proofs. Sergei Artemov has ...
... seems potentially useful. Then we should also have a calculus on reasons, allowing us to combine or reflect on reasons in a natural way. In fact, such a calculus already exists. Among the broad and somewhat amorphous family of things we might call reasons are mathematical proofs. Sergei Artemov has ...
slides - Computer and Information Science
... proposition by prefixing it with: It is true that . . . and seeing whether the result makes grammatical sense. • Atomic propositions. Intuitively, these are the set of smallest propositions. • Definition: An atomic proposition is one whose truth or falsity does not depend on the truth or falsity of ...
... proposition by prefixing it with: It is true that . . . and seeing whether the result makes grammatical sense. • Atomic propositions. Intuitively, these are the set of smallest propositions. • Definition: An atomic proposition is one whose truth or falsity does not depend on the truth or falsity of ...
Stephen Cook and Phuong Nguyen. Logical foundations of proof
... proofs in P. And a sort of converse to this last statement holds too since the theory T proves the soundness of P. Thus, in the language of the previous paragraph, the proof system P is not only complete, but efficiently so, with respect to the propositional translations of bounded theorems in T . A ...
... proofs in P. And a sort of converse to this last statement holds too since the theory T proves the soundness of P. Thus, in the language of the previous paragraph, the proof system P is not only complete, but efficiently so, with respect to the propositional translations of bounded theorems in T . A ...
Logic - UNM Computer Science
... is to think whether the argument we make are logical. The development of proof techniques proceeds the discipline of logic. Proof techniques were developed by ancient Greek mathematicians, and can be traced to as early as the Thales Theorem by Thales, who lives 624BC - 546BC. Logic was first studied ...
... is to think whether the argument we make are logical. The development of proof techniques proceeds the discipline of logic. Proof techniques were developed by ancient Greek mathematicians, and can be traced to as early as the Thales Theorem by Thales, who lives 624BC - 546BC. Logic was first studied ...
Practice Problem Set 1
... P M1 (f −1 (b1 ), f −1 (b2 ), . . . f −1 (bk )). It can be shown that if M1 and M2 are isomorphic Σ-structures, then for every first-order logic sentence φ on the signature Σ, M1 |= φ iff M2 |= φ. Now consider Σ = {=}, i.e., the signature containing only the equality predicate. We wish to show that ...
... P M1 (f −1 (b1 ), f −1 (b2 ), . . . f −1 (bk )). It can be shown that if M1 and M2 are isomorphic Σ-structures, then for every first-order logic sentence φ on the signature Σ, M1 |= φ iff M2 |= φ. Now consider Σ = {=}, i.e., the signature containing only the equality predicate. We wish to show that ...
Propositional Calculus
... Some Cuyahoga River water is not pure. (the horizontal line is short for therefore.) The argument is valid. A valid (correct, sound) argument is one in which it would be contradictory for the premises to be true but the conclusion false. Propositional Calculus ...
... Some Cuyahoga River water is not pure. (the horizontal line is short for therefore.) The argument is valid. A valid (correct, sound) argument is one in which it would be contradictory for the premises to be true but the conclusion false. Propositional Calculus ...
Completeness through Flatness in Two
... of a model should be a full square. The theory of such relativized squares may be both decidable and nicely axiomatizable (cf. Marx et alii [15] for some examples). For the axiomatizability problem, a different solution was found by Gabbay (cf. [3]); by introducing so-called irreflexivity rules, var ...
... of a model should be a full square. The theory of such relativized squares may be both decidable and nicely axiomatizable (cf. Marx et alii [15] for some examples). For the axiomatizability problem, a different solution was found by Gabbay (cf. [3]); by introducing so-called irreflexivity rules, var ...
A Note on Naive Set Theory in LP
... natural paraconsistent expansion of classical predicate logic. It leaves all things in predicate logic as they are, except to allow that sentences could be both true and false. In particular, in any consistent fragment of its domain, LP acts identically to the classical predicate calculus. The resul ...
... natural paraconsistent expansion of classical predicate logic. It leaves all things in predicate logic as they are, except to allow that sentences could be both true and false. In particular, in any consistent fragment of its domain, LP acts identically to the classical predicate calculus. The resul ...
Two Marks with Answer: all units 1. Describe the Four Categories
... Independencies Embodied In A Given Joint Probability Distribution Over A Set Of Variables. Nodes Can Represent Any Kind Of Variable, Be It A Measured Parameter, A Latent Variable Or A Hypothesis. They Are Not Restricted To Representing Random Variables; Which Forms The "Bayesian” Aspect Of A Bayesia ...
... Independencies Embodied In A Given Joint Probability Distribution Over A Set Of Variables. Nodes Can Represent Any Kind Of Variable, Be It A Measured Parameter, A Latent Variable Or A Hypothesis. They Are Not Restricted To Representing Random Variables; Which Forms The "Bayesian” Aspect Of A Bayesia ...
Propositional Logic: Why? soning Starts with George Boole around 1850
... Here we are talking about general properties (also called predicates) and individuals of a domain of discourse who may or may not have those properties Instead of introducing names for complete propositions -like in propositional logic- we introduce: • names for the properties or predicates, • names ...
... Here we are talking about general properties (also called predicates) and individuals of a domain of discourse who may or may not have those properties Instead of introducing names for complete propositions -like in propositional logic- we introduce: • names for the properties or predicates, • names ...
Lecture 9. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness
... some set of sentences ∆ is consistent or not. Usually if the answer is YES, the easiest way to show it is to show that ∆ has a model (by giving a model and showing, if it isn’t obvious, that all of the sentences in ∆ hold in the model.) And if the answer is NO, usually the easiest way to show it is ...
... some set of sentences ∆ is consistent or not. Usually if the answer is YES, the easiest way to show it is to show that ∆ has a model (by giving a model and showing, if it isn’t obvious, that all of the sentences in ∆ hold in the model.) And if the answer is NO, usually the easiest way to show it is ...
Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to
... of the wider context in which they might be embedded. It was only recently established [1] that propositional theories are indeed equivalent (in a strong sense) to logic programs. The present paper extends this result with the following contributions. (i) We present an alternative reduction method w ...
... of the wider context in which they might be embedded. It was only recently established [1] that propositional theories are indeed equivalent (in a strong sense) to logic programs. The present paper extends this result with the following contributions. (i) We present an alternative reduction method w ...