Hierarchical Introspective Logics
... Earlier the famous 4 Color Conjecture had yielded to an attack aided by computers. So the question that arose in my mind was that of whether or not there actually exists any mathematically interesting true mathematical assertion (such as, for example, perhaps the Riemann Hypothesis) which cannot be ...
... Earlier the famous 4 Color Conjecture had yielded to an attack aided by computers. So the question that arose in my mind was that of whether or not there actually exists any mathematically interesting true mathematical assertion (such as, for example, perhaps the Riemann Hypothesis) which cannot be ...
Document
... If P(x) is the statement “x has won a race” where the domain of discourse is all runners, then the universal quantification of P(x) is x P ( x ) , i.e., every runner has won a race. The negation of this statement is “it is not the case that every runner has won a race. Therefore there exists at l ...
... If P(x) is the statement “x has won a race” where the domain of discourse is all runners, then the universal quantification of P(x) is x P ( x ) , i.e., every runner has won a race. The negation of this statement is “it is not the case that every runner has won a race. Therefore there exists at l ...
An Introduction to Modal Logic VII The finite model property
... A normal modal logic Λ has the finite model property if and only if it has the finite frame property. Clearly the f.f.p. implies the f.m.p. On the other hand, suppose now that Λ has the f.m.p. and let ϕ∈ / Λ; by f.m.p., there is a finite model M where ϕ is not valid; consider M∼ , it is differentiat ...
... A normal modal logic Λ has the finite model property if and only if it has the finite frame property. Clearly the f.f.p. implies the f.m.p. On the other hand, suppose now that Λ has the f.m.p. and let ϕ∈ / Λ; by f.m.p., there is a finite model M where ϕ is not valid; consider M∼ , it is differentiat ...
1 LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE: A TURN IN STYLE KOSTA DO SEN
... and sentences of the form ‘if A, then B’, usually written with symbols as ‘A B’, or ‘A B’, or ‘A B’. The verbs ‘to imply’, ‘to follow from’, ‘to yield’ and ‘to give’ are all tied to implication (of course, ‘to follow from’ is converse to the others). ‘Entailment’ and ‘to entail’ are used pretty ...
... and sentences of the form ‘if A, then B’, usually written with symbols as ‘A B’, or ‘A B’, or ‘A B’. The verbs ‘to imply’, ‘to follow from’, ‘to yield’ and ‘to give’ are all tied to implication (of course, ‘to follow from’ is converse to the others). ‘Entailment’ and ‘to entail’ are used pretty ...
Answer Sets for Propositional Theories
... (ii) Γ1 is equivalent to Γ2 in the logic of here-and-there, and (iii) for each set X of atoms, Γ1X is equivalent to Γ2X in classical logic. The equivalence between (i) and (ii) is a generalization of the main result of [Lifschitz et al., 2001], and it is an immediate consequence of Lemma 4 from that ...
... (ii) Γ1 is equivalent to Γ2 in the logic of here-and-there, and (iii) for each set X of atoms, Γ1X is equivalent to Γ2X in classical logic. The equivalence between (i) and (ii) is a generalization of the main result of [Lifschitz et al., 2001], and it is an immediate consequence of Lemma 4 from that ...
Methods of Proofs Recall we discussed the following methods of
... An implication is trivially true when its conclusion is always true. A declared mathematical proposition whose truth value is unknown is called a conjecture. One of the main functions of a mathematician (and a computer scientist) is to decide the truth value of their claims (or someone else’s claims ...
... An implication is trivially true when its conclusion is always true. A declared mathematical proposition whose truth value is unknown is called a conjecture. One of the main functions of a mathematician (and a computer scientist) is to decide the truth value of their claims (or someone else’s claims ...
Computers and Logic/Boolean Operators
... Different and equal ways to represent this kind of logic Truth Tables ...
... Different and equal ways to represent this kind of logic Truth Tables ...
this PDF file
... situations (cf. Remark 4 below). Remark 1: 1. The axiom m.p is sometimes labelled “pseudo-modus/ponens” in order to distinguish it from the rule modus ponens. 2. The variable-sharing property (vsp) is the following: A logic S has the vsp if in any theorem of S of the form A → B, A and B share at lea ...
... situations (cf. Remark 4 below). Remark 1: 1. The axiom m.p is sometimes labelled “pseudo-modus/ponens” in order to distinguish it from the rule modus ponens. 2. The variable-sharing property (vsp) is the following: A logic S has the vsp if in any theorem of S of the form A → B, A and B share at lea ...
CA 208 Logic - DCU School of Computing
... A = Kate is a CA2 student, B = Kate does Logic P: If Kate is a CA2 student, then Kate does Logic. Kate is a CA2 student. C: Kate does Logic. Is that a valid inference? YES!!!! ...
... A = Kate is a CA2 student, B = Kate does Logic P: If Kate is a CA2 student, then Kate does Logic. Kate is a CA2 student. C: Kate does Logic. Is that a valid inference? YES!!!! ...
Review - Gerry O nolan
... basis of a solution to Goodman's so-called new riddle of induction. As Stove points out, once the idea that inductive inferences gain their strength from any purely formal characteristics is rejected, the force of Goodman's argument is diminished greatly, and perhaps entirely (78, 132). However, one ...
... basis of a solution to Goodman's so-called new riddle of induction. As Stove points out, once the idea that inductive inferences gain their strength from any purely formal characteristics is rejected, the force of Goodman's argument is diminished greatly, and perhaps entirely (78, 132). However, one ...
.pdf
... third is in terms of substitution that does avoid such capture 6]. This article explores the relation between these three formalizations. In Sect. 2, we present Church's rst-order logic F1 2] and de ne two dierent notions of substitution as well as the rst formalization of (1), called Leibniz. ...
... third is in terms of substitution that does avoid such capture 6]. This article explores the relation between these three formalizations. In Sect. 2, we present Church's rst-order logic F1 2] and de ne two dierent notions of substitution as well as the rst formalization of (1), called Leibniz. ...
Logic and Existential Commitment
... premises are true. To understand logical consequence we must understand how it is possible for sentences to have truth-values other than the ones they actually have. If the conclusion of an invalid argument is Bill Clinton is a human we must think that this sentence could (logically) be false. How c ...
... premises are true. To understand logical consequence we must understand how it is possible for sentences to have truth-values other than the ones they actually have. If the conclusion of an invalid argument is Bill Clinton is a human we must think that this sentence could (logically) be false. How c ...
Chapter 2, Logic
... gave rise to a good deal of debate among logicians. For sometimes we assert universal generalisations without any commitment to existence. For instance if we explained ‘unicorn’ by saying ‘Unicorn’ means ’quadruped mammal resembling a horse but with a single horn projecting from the middle of its fo ...
... gave rise to a good deal of debate among logicians. For sometimes we assert universal generalisations without any commitment to existence. For instance if we explained ‘unicorn’ by saying ‘Unicorn’ means ’quadruped mammal resembling a horse but with a single horn projecting from the middle of its fo ...
The Decision Problem for Standard Classes
... assume that each atom of B is in one of the following forms: xi = xj,f(xi1, ..., xi) xj, or p(xi1, ... 9, xin). For example, instead of 3x3y(fgx # y) we may consider the logically equivalent formula 3x3y3z(gx = z A fz # y). But then if B is consistent in propositional logic with identity then a. has ...
... assume that each atom of B is in one of the following forms: xi = xj,f(xi1, ..., xi) xj, or p(xi1, ... 9, xin). For example, instead of 3x3y(fgx # y) we may consider the logically equivalent formula 3x3y3z(gx = z A fz # y). But then if B is consistent in propositional logic with identity then a. has ...
Section 1.3 Predicate Logic 1 real number x there exists a real
... the German logician Gottlob Frege (1848-1925), considered to be the most important logician of the 19th century. Predicate logic with its quantifiers and predicates is the logical basis for today’s mathematics. It was Frege’s belief (misguided as it turned out) that all mathematics could be derived ...
... the German logician Gottlob Frege (1848-1925), considered to be the most important logician of the 19th century. Predicate logic with its quantifiers and predicates is the logical basis for today’s mathematics. It was Frege’s belief (misguided as it turned out) that all mathematics could be derived ...
Curry`s paradox, Lukasiewicz, and Field
... As I remarked before, in the original three-valued framework it would be better to say that there are still just two values that a proposition can take, truth and falsity: we are simply explicitly marking the (supposed) possibility that a proposition might not (yet) get to determinately have one of ...
... As I remarked before, in the original three-valued framework it would be better to say that there are still just two values that a proposition can take, truth and falsity: we are simply explicitly marking the (supposed) possibility that a proposition might not (yet) get to determinately have one of ...
Elements of Finite Model Theory
... reach a fixed-point, either in a monotone or inflationary semantics. Monotone inductive definitions always give rise to a relational operator which determines a least fixed-point (LFP), whereas inflationary inductive definitions reach a fixedpoint determined by a non-decreasing sequence of relations ...
... reach a fixed-point, either in a monotone or inflationary semantics. Monotone inductive definitions always give rise to a relational operator which determines a least fixed-point (LFP), whereas inflationary inductive definitions reach a fixedpoint determined by a non-decreasing sequence of relations ...
Normal modal logics (Syntactic characterisations)
... Note: For those looking at the book by Chellas. The definition of a system of modal logic used by Chellas is very slightly different. Chellas’s definition (2.11, p46) requires only that the set of formulas is closed under propositional consequence (RPL, or equivalently, contains all tautologies PL a ...
... Note: For those looking at the book by Chellas. The definition of a system of modal logic used by Chellas is very slightly different. Chellas’s definition (2.11, p46) requires only that the set of formulas is closed under propositional consequence (RPL, or equivalently, contains all tautologies PL a ...
Unification in Propositional Logic
... By exploiting the above mentioned effect of transformations of the kind (θaA)∗ on Kripke models, one can show that a carefully built iteration θA of substitutions of the kind θaA can in fact always act as the contraction transformation of a contractible A∗ (that is, either such θA unifies A and cons ...
... By exploiting the above mentioned effect of transformations of the kind (θaA)∗ on Kripke models, one can show that a carefully built iteration θA of substitutions of the kind θaA can in fact always act as the contraction transformation of a contractible A∗ (that is, either such θA unifies A and cons ...
Turner`s Logic of Universal Causation, Propositional Logic, and
... Turner’s Logic of Universal Causation, Propositional Logic, and Logic Programming Jianmin Ji1 and Fangzhen Lin2 ...
... Turner’s Logic of Universal Causation, Propositional Logic, and Logic Programming Jianmin Ji1 and Fangzhen Lin2 ...
.pdf
... In [2], Church proves that the following formulation of one-half of Leibniz’s characterization of equality holds in pure predicate calculus F1: Definition 1. Substitution of equals for equals: If S results from R by substitution of Q for P at one or more places in R (not necessarily at all occurrenc ...
... In [2], Church proves that the following formulation of one-half of Leibniz’s characterization of equality holds in pure predicate calculus F1: Definition 1. Substitution of equals for equals: If S results from R by substitution of Q for P at one or more places in R (not necessarily at all occurrenc ...
Propositional and Predicate Logic - IX
... We say that a model A agrees with an entry P, if P is T ϕ and A |= ϕ or if P is F ϕ and A |= ¬ϕ, i.e. A 6|= ϕ. Moreover, A agrees with a branch V if A agrees with every entry on V . Lemma Let A be a model of a theory T of a language L that agrees with the root entry R in a tableau τ = ∪τn from T . T ...
... We say that a model A agrees with an entry P, if P is T ϕ and A |= ϕ or if P is F ϕ and A |= ¬ϕ, i.e. A 6|= ϕ. Moreover, A agrees with a branch V if A agrees with every entry on V . Lemma Let A be a model of a theory T of a language L that agrees with the root entry R in a tableau τ = ∪τn from T . T ...
Is `structure` a clear notion? - University of Illinois at Chicago
... notion of a formal system. But it is a crucial one9 and one that is often overlooked by non-logicians. From the standpoint of formalization, fixing the vocabulary is a first step, singling out the ‘primitive concepts’. Considerable reflection from both mathematical and philosophical standpoints may ...
... notion of a formal system. But it is a crucial one9 and one that is often overlooked by non-logicians. From the standpoint of formalization, fixing the vocabulary is a first step, singling out the ‘primitive concepts’. Considerable reflection from both mathematical and philosophical standpoints may ...
mj cresswell
... everything w i l l b e 0 . A n d he thought th is was false because even i f everything now existing will always be 0 it does not follow that always it will be that everything then existing is 0 . But you don't have to interpret BF that way. (See Cresswell 1990, p.96) You can interpret v as ranging ...
... everything w i l l b e 0 . A n d he thought th is was false because even i f everything now existing will always be 0 it does not follow that always it will be that everything then existing is 0 . But you don't have to interpret BF that way. (See Cresswell 1990, p.96) You can interpret v as ranging ...