• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Proof of the Soundness Theorem
Proof of the Soundness Theorem

... Soundness Theorem says that our natural deduction proofs represent a sound (or correct) system of reasoning. Formally, the Soundness Theorem states that: If Γ├ φ then Γ╞ φ. This says that for any set of premises, if you can prove φ from that set, then φ is truth-functionally entailed by that set. In ...
PPT
PPT

... Indirect proofs refer to proof by contrapositive or proof by contradiction which we introduce next . A contrapositive proof or proof by contrapositive for conditional proposition P  Q one makes use of the tautology (P Q)  (  Q   P). Since P  Q and  Q   P are logically equivalent we first g ...
Logical nihilism - University of Notre Dame
Logical nihilism - University of Notre Dame

... case of some general hypothesis, that hypothesis follows in its full generality. This often happens even when, as in the present case, the general phenomenon does not appear, even in hindsight, to be a “logical consequence” of its instance in any absolute sense. The disjunction property has further ...
Relevant Logic A Philosophical Examination of Inference Stephen Read February 21, 2012
Relevant Logic A Philosophical Examination of Inference Stephen Read February 21, 2012

... ular, to specify some meaning-connection between premises and conclusion which can act as a sieve on the classically valid inferences. The present approach, however, directly replaces the Classical Account with the Relevant Account, and extracts the notion of relevance from the new criterion for val ...
One Hundred Challenge Problems for Logical Formalizations of
One Hundred Challenge Problems for Logical Formalizations of

... of challenge problems specifically designed as a development problem set, i.e. to aid in the logical formalization of the commonsense knowledge necessary to correctly answer the questions. Our approach differs from that seen in COPA and WSC in two ways. First, we specify the questions and answers in ...
Discrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics

... A propositional variable (lowercase letters p, q, r) is a proposition. These variables model true/false statements. The negation of a proposition P, written ¬ P, is a proposition. The conjunction (and) of two propositions, written P ∧ Q, is a proposition. The disjunction (or) of two propositions, wr ...
ON PRESERVING 1. Introduction The
ON PRESERVING 1. Introduction The

... It’s consistency itself, or at least many accounts of it, which casts a shadow over our everyday logical doings. The way we have set things up, a set Γ of formulas is either consistent in a logic X, or it isn’t. But it doesn’t take much thought to see that such an all-or-nothing approach tramples so ...
Second-Order Logic of Paradox
Second-Order Logic of Paradox

... Truth values of compound formulas are derived from those of their subformulas by the familiar “truth tables” of Kleene’s (strong) 3-valued logic [9, §64], but whereas for Kleene (thinking of the “middle value” as truth-valuelessness) only the top value (True) is designated, for Priest the top two va ...
The semantics of propositional logic
The semantics of propositional logic

... a theorem is true under all valuations. Completeness says that any formula that is true under all valuations is a theorem. We are going to prove these two properties for our system of natural deduction and our system of valuations. ...
The substitutional theory of logical consequence
The substitutional theory of logical consequence

... The existence of substitutional counterexamples depends on the availability of suitable substitution instances in the language. Thus the completeness principle seems to make logical validity highly dependent on the language from which the substitution instances can be taken. In particular, if certai ...
6. Truth and Possible Worlds
6. Truth and Possible Worlds

... require everyone here to be a realist, but you should understand what the view says and see what it’s based on. Standard, classical logic assumes realism, so it makes sense to teach you about realism in this class. There are other logics that don’t assume realism, such as intuitionistic logic and pa ...
Section 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers Assume universe of
Section 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers Assume universe of

... let us assume that we know each person in the course. Consider the following statement: She/he is over 6 feet tall. This statement is not a proposition since we cannot say that it either true or false until we replace the variable (she/he) by a person’s name. The statement “She/he is over 6 feet tal ...
Variables In Real Life: A Jar Of Spare Change
Variables In Real Life: A Jar Of Spare Change

... (A*B*C) + (B*D) = x [alt. version of above] ...
POSSIBLE WORLDS SEMANTICS AND THE LIAR Reflections on a
POSSIBLE WORLDS SEMANTICS AND THE LIAR Reflections on a

... Now, Kaplan’s argument shows that the principle of plenitude is incompatible with assumptions commonly made in possible worlds semantics. Here is how the argument goes: (i) There is a set W of possible worlds and a set P rop of propositions. (ii) There is, for every subset X of W , a corresponding p ...
3.3 Inference
3.3 Inference

... more than one possible answer to this question. In this case, our intuition was probably based on thinking about what an even number is, and realizing that the definition itself is essentiallly symbolic. (You may argue that an even number is just twice another number, and you would be right. Apparent ...
Suszko`s Thesis, Inferential Many-Valuedness, and the
Suszko`s Thesis, Inferential Many-Valuedness, and the

... This approach may be viewed as taking 'true' and 'false' to be predicates that give rise to contrary instead of contradictory pairs of sentence. As such, the pair 'true' versus 'false' is reflected by the contrary pairs 'designated' versus 'antidesignated' and 'accepted' versus 'rejected'. Admitting ...
Formal logic
Formal logic

... But how and why can we conclude that this last sentence follows from the previous two premises? Or, more generally, how can we determine whether a formula ϕ is a valid consequence of a set of formulas {ϕ1 , . . . , ϕn }? Modern logic offers two possible ways, that used to be fused in the time of syl ...
FIRST DEGREE ENTAILMENT, SYMMETRY AND PARADOX
FIRST DEGREE ENTAILMENT, SYMMETRY AND PARADOX

... formula to a given truth value 0 or 1, so does ρ′ . It is a straightforward induction on the complexity of formulas that this then extends to all of the formulas in the language: for any formula A, if Aρ0 then Aρ′ 0 too, and if Aρ1 then Aρ′ 1 too. The evaluations ρ and ρ′ may still differ, because ρ ...
CA 208 Logic - DCU School of Computing
CA 208 Logic - DCU School of Computing

... A = Kate is a CA2 student, B = Kate does Formal Languages P: If Kate is a CA2 student, then Kate does Formal Languages. Kate is a CA2 student. C: Kate does Formal Languages. ...
Examples of Natural Deduction
Examples of Natural Deduction

... • But in the logic problems I am using terms that include a negation: – cannot be wearing ...
No Syllogisms for the Numerical Syllogistic
No Syllogisms for the Numerical Syllogistic

... and wish these results to be as general as possible, our presentation will be in some respects rather abstract. However, we shall never stray far from the intuitions developed in Section 1. We begin with some very general notions. Let L be any formal language, understood as a set of L-formulas for w ...
Solutions to assignment 5
Solutions to assignment 5

... The only case where R is an equivalence relation is (c). Noting that we have a R b if either both a and b are even or if both a and b are odd, it follows that the equivalence class containing an even integer is the set of all even integers, while the equivalence class containing an odd integer is th ...
Natural deduction for predicate logic
Natural deduction for predicate logic

... This suggests that to prove a formula of the form ∀xφ, we can prove φ with some arbitrary but fresh variable x0 substituted for x. That is, we want to prove the formula φ[x0 /x]. On the previous slide, we used n as a fresh variable, but in our formal proofs, we adopt the convention of using subscri ...
• Propositional definite clauses ctd • Monotone functions and power
• Propositional definite clauses ctd • Monotone functions and power

... Complexity of Inference The algorithm as given above can be made more efficient. Suppose the number of atoms is a, and the number of clauses is c. The loop is executed at most a times. Inside the loop, for each clause, we have at most a checks to do – make these constant time checks – plus constant ...
Slide 1
Slide 1

... contradictions, equivalence, and logical proofs is no different for fuzzy sets; the results, however, can differ considerably from those in classical logic. If the truth values for the simple propositions of a fuzzy logic compound proposition are strictly true (1) or false (0), the results follow id ...
< 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 32 >

Argument

In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion. The general form of an argument in a natural language is that of premises (typically in the form of propositions, statements or sentences) in support of a claim: the conclusion. The structure of some arguments can also be set out in a formal language, and formally defined ""arguments"" can be made independently of natural language arguments, as in math, logic, and computer science.In a typical deductive argument, the premises are meant to provide a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion, while in an inductive argument, they are thought to provide reasons supporting the conclusion's probable truth. The standards for evaluating non-deductive arguments may rest on different or additional criteria than truth, for example, the persuasiveness of so-called ""indispensability claims"" in transcendental arguments, the quality of hypotheses in retroduction, or even the disclosure of new possibilities for thinking and acting.The standards and criteria used in evaluating arguments and their forms of reasoning are studied in logic. Ways of formulating arguments effectively are studied in rhetoric (see also: argumentation theory). An argument in a formal language shows the logical form of the symbolically represented or natural language arguments obtained by its interpretations.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report