Document
... Russell wrote to Gottlob Frege with news of his paradox on June 16, 1902. The paradox was of significance to Frege's logical work since, in effect, it showed that the axioms Frege was using to formalize his logic were inconsistent. Specifically, Frege's Rule V, which states that two sets are equal ...
... Russell wrote to Gottlob Frege with news of his paradox on June 16, 1902. The paradox was of significance to Frege's logical work since, in effect, it showed that the axioms Frege was using to formalize his logic were inconsistent. Specifically, Frege's Rule V, which states that two sets are equal ...
Default Logic (Reiter) - Department of Computing
... In both cases, given α we can derive γ. But there are differences: properties of material implication (‘reasoning by cases’, contrapositive, . . . ) do not hold for rules. ...
... In both cases, given α we can derive γ. But there are differences: properties of material implication (‘reasoning by cases’, contrapositive, . . . ) do not hold for rules. ...
on partially conservative sentences and interpretability
... NX. Let « be the least number s.t. Ro(0, «)orP,(0, «). Suppose Rt(0, n). Then not P,_,(ö, m) form < n. (We may assume that R0(k, m) implies not Rx(k, m).) Hence, by Lemma 3(i), A r- -, ¿'(a), whence y4 I- -, 6', which is impossible since $' £ X Thus 6 £ XV NX. ...
... NX. Let « be the least number s.t. Ro(0, «)orP,(0, «). Suppose Rt(0, n). Then not P,_,(ö, m) form < n. (We may assume that R0(k, m) implies not Rx(k, m).) Hence, by Lemma 3(i), A r- -, ¿'(a), whence y4 I- -, 6', which is impossible since $' £ X Thus 6 £ XV NX. ...
on the Complexity of Quantifier-Free Fixed-Size Bit-Vector
... Proof. In [10,15], the authors give a translation from quantifier-free Presburger arithmetic with bitwise operations (QFPAbit) to Sequential Circuits. We can adopt their approach in order to construct a translation for QF BV2!1 . The main difference between QFPAbit and QF BV2!1 is the fact that bit- ...
... Proof. In [10,15], the authors give a translation from quantifier-free Presburger arithmetic with bitwise operations (QFPAbit) to Sequential Circuits. We can adopt their approach in order to construct a translation for QF BV2!1 . The main difference between QFPAbit and QF BV2!1 is the fact that bit- ...
Belief closure: A semantics of common knowledge for
... so on ad infinitum. The significance of the common knowledge concept has come to be recognized by game theorists, mathematical economists, Artificial Intelligence as well as computer scientists, and philosophical logicians. In the hands of these researchers, it has led to numerous separate developme ...
... so on ad infinitum. The significance of the common knowledge concept has come to be recognized by game theorists, mathematical economists, Artificial Intelligence as well as computer scientists, and philosophical logicians. In the hands of these researchers, it has led to numerous separate developme ...
pdf
... e.g. for the rewrite system for the Hydra battle [Mos09, Fle07], since the terms one obtains are simpler in some specifiable sense. It turns out that in the present situation the crux is, as becomes clear from Kripke’s further remarks, that he considers the case where one chooses at each elimination ...
... e.g. for the rewrite system for the Hydra battle [Mos09, Fle07], since the terms one obtains are simpler in some specifiable sense. It turns out that in the present situation the crux is, as becomes clear from Kripke’s further remarks, that he considers the case where one chooses at each elimination ...
S5 knowledge without partitions
... and only if (ω) ⊆ E. This definition gives rise to a knowledge operator K on , which associates with each subset of states E the subset K(E) of the states in which the agent knows E. It is easy to verify that the knowledge operator K satisfies the following three properties: First, it preserves in ...
... and only if (ω) ⊆ E. This definition gives rise to a knowledge operator K on , which associates with each subset of states E the subset K(E) of the states in which the agent knows E. It is easy to verify that the knowledge operator K satisfies the following three properties: First, it preserves in ...
na.
... Cl (m). Notice that here we consider Cl (tJ) not a -(a.). One may see that ..A •s . is a pseudo-model for m, where s and e are defined below and e· is the retiexlve and transitive closure of B. The relation s is defined by DIs Da itt there is a g-consistent and complete theory T1 such that D1 T1 n C ...
... Cl (m). Notice that here we consider Cl (tJ) not a -(a.). One may see that ..A •s . is a pseudo-model for m, where s and e are defined below and e· is the retiexlve and transitive closure of B. The relation s is defined by DIs Da itt there is a g-consistent and complete theory T1 such that D1 T1 n C ...
pdf [local copy]
... Kripke’s claim is certainly not immediately clear. It is surely true that one can get more and more occurrences of descriptions for certain choices of the paraphrase. However, in many seemingly analogous cases we do have termination nevertheless, for example, for the rewrite system for the Hydra bat ...
... Kripke’s claim is certainly not immediately clear. It is surely true that one can get more and more occurrences of descriptions for certain choices of the paraphrase. However, in many seemingly analogous cases we do have termination nevertheless, for example, for the rewrite system for the Hydra bat ...
Programming with Classical Proofs
... natural numbers, in the style of Gödel’s System T, so as to come closer to “real” programming languages, since these all have primitive datatypes. We will present this system in Chapter 4. Furthermore, he has developed :: catch, which is an extension of Herbelin’s IQCMP -calculus with catch and thr ...
... natural numbers, in the style of Gödel’s System T, so as to come closer to “real” programming languages, since these all have primitive datatypes. We will present this system in Chapter 4. Furthermore, he has developed :: catch, which is an extension of Herbelin’s IQCMP -calculus with catch and thr ...
Syllogistic Logic with Complements
... sentences in our fragment, with the additional property that each node is either an element of Γ or comes from its parent(s) by an application of one of the rules for the fragment listed in Figure 1. Γ ` S means that there is a proof tree T for over Γ whose root is labeled S. We attached names to th ...
... sentences in our fragment, with the additional property that each node is either an element of Γ or comes from its parent(s) by an application of one of the rules for the fragment listed in Figure 1. Γ ` S means that there is a proof tree T for over Γ whose root is labeled S. We attached names to th ...
Classical first-order predicate logic This is a powerful extension of
... A formula with free variables is neither true nor false in a structure M , because the free variables have no meaning in M . It’s like asking ‘is x = 7 true?’ We get stuck trying to evaluate a predicate formula in a structure in the same way as a propositional one, because the structure does not fix ...
... A formula with free variables is neither true nor false in a structure M , because the free variables have no meaning in M . It’s like asking ‘is x = 7 true?’ We get stuck trying to evaluate a predicate formula in a structure in the same way as a propositional one, because the structure does not fix ...