Document
... : Show that for all A M(P), every interpretation I: I |= P implies I |= A. Let us consider Herbrand interpretation IH = {A | A ground atom and I |= A}. Then, I |= P I |= A ← B1, ... , Bn for all A ← B1, ... , Bn ground(P) if I |= B1, ... , Bn then I |= A for all A ← B1, ... , Bn ground(P) ...
... : Show that for all A M(P), every interpretation I: I |= P implies I |= A. Let us consider Herbrand interpretation IH = {A | A ground atom and I |= A}. Then, I |= P I |= A ← B1, ... , Bn for all A ← B1, ... , Bn ground(P) if I |= B1, ... , Bn then I |= A for all A ← B1, ... , Bn ground(P) ...
full text (.pdf)
... multi-level breaks that are allowed. He showed that for any n ≥ 1, there exists a loop program with break m for m ≤ n that is not equivalent to any loop program with break m for m ≤ n − 1. Again, however, these results were formulated and proved at the first-order interpreted level, despite the fact ...
... multi-level breaks that are allowed. He showed that for any n ≥ 1, there exists a loop program with break m for m ≤ n that is not equivalent to any loop program with break m for m ≤ n − 1. Again, however, these results were formulated and proved at the first-order interpreted level, despite the fact ...
Curry-Howard Isomorphism - Department of information engineering
... After introducing natural deduction systems and Hilbert-style systems, the notes introduce in Chapter 7 Gentzen’s sequent calculus systems for propositional logic. Both classical and intuitionistic variants are introduced. In both cases a somewhat rare presentation—taken from Prawitz—with assumption ...
... After introducing natural deduction systems and Hilbert-style systems, the notes introduce in Chapter 7 Gentzen’s sequent calculus systems for propositional logic. Both classical and intuitionistic variants are introduced. In both cases a somewhat rare presentation—taken from Prawitz—with assumption ...
Linear Contextual Modal Type Theory
... of > this is no longer the case. Therefore, without a clear understanding of the nature of logic variables from a mathematical point of view, it seems hopeless to try to devise and design algorithms for equality in linear logic. In this paper we provide such an understanding by the means of linear c ...
... of > this is no longer the case. Therefore, without a clear understanding of the nature of logic variables from a mathematical point of view, it seems hopeless to try to devise and design algorithms for equality in linear logic. In this paper we provide such an understanding by the means of linear c ...
Modal logic and the approximation induction principle
... A context C[] denotes a formula containing one occurrence of []. The formula C[φ ] is obtained by replacing this occurrence of [] by the formula φ . It is well-known, and easy to see, that φ ⇒ ψ yields C[φ ] ⇒ C[ψ] for all contexts C[] over HML+ (here ϕ ⇒ ψ denotes that for any state s, s |= ϕ ⇒ s | ...
... A context C[] denotes a formula containing one occurrence of []. The formula C[φ ] is obtained by replacing this occurrence of [] by the formula φ . It is well-known, and easy to see, that φ ⇒ ψ yields C[φ ] ⇒ C[ψ] for all contexts C[] over HML+ (here ϕ ⇒ ψ denotes that for any state s, s |= ϕ ⇒ s | ...
Show
... 4. Logic. The minor premise in a syllogism. 5. Mathematics. a. The independent variable of a function. b. The amplitude of a complex number. 6. Computer Science. A value used to evaluate a procedure or subroutine. [Middle English, from Old French, from Latin arg¿mentum, from arguere, to make clear. ...
... 4. Logic. The minor premise in a syllogism. 5. Mathematics. a. The independent variable of a function. b. The amplitude of a complex number. 6. Computer Science. A value used to evaluate a procedure or subroutine. [Middle English, from Old French, from Latin arg¿mentum, from arguere, to make clear. ...
Maximal Introspection of Agents
... the environment in which the agents are situated as well as the agents’ firstorder beliefs about this environment. Condition (ii) simply says that all (firstorder) beliefs about the environment are correct. Agents might of course in some situations have false beliefs, but we do not consider such bel ...
... the environment in which the agents are situated as well as the agents’ firstorder beliefs about this environment. Condition (ii) simply says that all (firstorder) beliefs about the environment are correct. Agents might of course in some situations have false beliefs, but we do not consider such bel ...
Advanced Topics in Theoretical Computer Science
... M has finitely many transitions and the alphabet is finite, this conjunction is finite as well, and thus a formula of first order logic. ...
... M has finitely many transitions and the alphabet is finite, this conjunction is finite as well, and thus a formula of first order logic. ...
Transfinite progressions: A second look at completeness.
... than an extension by n-reflection, unless the same formula is used to define the axioms of T in both extensions. (This is a consequence of the fact, which will emerge below, that definitions φ and of the axioms of T can be chosen so that T + REF0 (φ) proves the consistency of T + REFn ().) In the ca ...
... than an extension by n-reflection, unless the same formula is used to define the axioms of T in both extensions. (This is a consequence of the fact, which will emerge below, that definitions φ and of the axioms of T can be chosen so that T + REF0 (φ) proves the consistency of T + REFn ().) In the ca ...
MMConceptualComputationalRemainder
... the maximum of the set of common divisors of the two numbers, and a set of numbers has only one maximum. I have shown my students this proof many times, but they almost never reproduce it on an examination. ...
... the maximum of the set of common divisors of the two numbers, and a set of numbers has only one maximum. I have shown my students this proof many times, but they almost never reproduce it on an examination. ...
Logical Omniscience As Infeasibility - boris
... theory. Both postulates can be justified by the assumption that agents are rational reasoners. Working with normal modal logics yields the possibility of using the semantics of Kripke models, which have proved to be a convenient and intuitively clear tool for reasoning about knowledge, based on the ...
... theory. Both postulates can be justified by the assumption that agents are rational reasoners. Working with normal modal logics yields the possibility of using the semantics of Kripke models, which have proved to be a convenient and intuitively clear tool for reasoning about knowledge, based on the ...
The Logic of Atomic Sentences
... We are told that b is to the right of c. So c must be to the left of b, since right of & left of are inverses of each other. And since b = d, c is left of d by the Indiscernibility of Identicals. But we are also told that d is left of e, and consequently c is to the left of e, by the textbftransitiv ...
... We are told that b is to the right of c. So c must be to the left of b, since right of & left of are inverses of each other. And since b = d, c is left of d by the Indiscernibility of Identicals. But we are also told that d is left of e, and consequently c is to the left of e, by the textbftransitiv ...
2015Khan-What is Math-anOverview-IJMCS-2015
... 3. Axioms or postulates; 4. Theorems and their proofs. We now discuss each of them as follow. UNDEFINED TERMS: To build a mathematical system based on logic, the mathematician begins by using some words to express their ideas, such as `number' or a `point'. These words are undefined and are sometime ...
... 3. Axioms or postulates; 4. Theorems and their proofs. We now discuss each of them as follow. UNDEFINED TERMS: To build a mathematical system based on logic, the mathematician begins by using some words to express their ideas, such as `number' or a `point'. These words are undefined and are sometime ...
Digital Logic and the Control Unit
... functional representation. Note that F2 is 1 if and only if two of X, Y, and Z are 1. Given this, we can give a functional description of the function as F2 = XY + XZ + YZ. As the student might suspect, neither the pattern of 0’s and 1’s for F1 nor that for F2 were arbitrarily selected. The real ...
... functional representation. Note that F2 is 1 if and only if two of X, Y, and Z are 1. Given this, we can give a functional description of the function as F2 = XY + XZ + YZ. As the student might suspect, neither the pattern of 0’s and 1’s for F1 nor that for F2 were arbitrarily selected. The real ...
Refinement Modal Logic
... equipped with may-transitions and must-transitions. A must-transition is available in every component that implements the modal specification, while a may-transition need not be. This is close to our definition of refinement, as it also is some kind of submodel quantifier, but the two notions are in ...
... equipped with may-transitions and must-transitions. A must-transition is available in every component that implements the modal specification, while a may-transition need not be. This is close to our definition of refinement, as it also is some kind of submodel quantifier, but the two notions are in ...
Introduction to Logic
... be exchanged. The intuition might have been that they “essentially mean the same”. In a more abstract, and later formulation, one would say that “not to affect a proposition” is “not to change its truth value” – either both are were false or both are true. Thus one obtains the idea that Two statemen ...
... be exchanged. The intuition might have been that they “essentially mean the same”. In a more abstract, and later formulation, one would say that “not to affect a proposition” is “not to change its truth value” – either both are were false or both are true. Thus one obtains the idea that Two statemen ...
notes
... a command c and a postcondition Q the weakest liberal precondition is the weakest assertion P such that {P } c {Q} is a valid triple. Here, “weakest” means that any other valid precondition implies P . That is, P most accurately describes input states for which c either does not terminate or ends up ...
... a command c and a postcondition Q the weakest liberal precondition is the weakest assertion P such that {P } c {Q} is a valid triple. Here, “weakest” means that any other valid precondition implies P . That is, P most accurately describes input states for which c either does not terminate or ends up ...