• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
MATH1022 ANSWERS TO TUTORIAL EXERCISES III 1. G is closed
MATH1022 ANSWERS TO TUTORIAL EXERCISES III 1. G is closed

... order 12. They are non-abelian since in T ET , for example, the products of the rotation through 2π/3 fixing A, and which takes B to C to D and back to B, and that through 2π/3 fixing B, and which takes A to C to D and back to A, are different half-turns depending on which order they are performed, ...
Q4 Syllabus
Q4 Syllabus

... Honors Algebra II ...
Polynomials over finite fields
Polynomials over finite fields

... Size of a finite field Theorem 1.1 The cardinality of F is pn where n = [F : Fp] and Fp denotes the prime subfield of F. Proof. The prime subfield Fp of F is isomorphic to the field Z/pZ of integers mod p. Since the field F is an n-dimensional vector space over Fp for some finite n, it is set-isomo ...
Math 323. Midterm Exam. February 27, 2014. Time: 75 minutes. (1
Math 323. Midterm Exam. February 27, 2014. Time: 75 minutes. (1

... so c = d = 0. Similarly, since x commutes with j, we get b = 0. (2) [5] Let R be a commutative ring with 1. Prove that if there exists a prime ideal P of R that contains no zero divisors, then R is an integral domain. Solution: Suppose R had zero divisors, say ab = 0 with a, b 6= 0. Then consider R/ ...
Explanation via surplus structure.
Explanation via surplus structure.

... • what is lost by choosing a representation? • what kind of epistemic commitment is it to choose a ...
Solutions - UBC Math
Solutions - UBC Math

Math 331: hw 7 Solutions 5.1.4 Show that, under congruence
Math 331: hw 7 Solutions 5.1.4 Show that, under congruence

Math 322, Fall Term 2011 Final Exam
Math 322, Fall Term 2011 Final Exam

... (b) Let R = Z[i] be the ring of Euclidean integers. In the polynomial ring R[X] the prime elements are the same as irreducible elements. (c) If a group of order 25 acts on a set X, then there is an element x ∈ X such that its orbit has 8 elements. (d) The number of conjugacy classes in Sn is equal t ...
F08 Exam 1
F08 Exam 1

... [1] Define a ring homomorphism. Define an ideal. Prove that the kernel of a ring homomorphism is an ideal. ...
Groups
Groups

... • Associative: a(bc) = (ab)c • Identity:  1  G, 1a = a1 = a, aG • Inverse:  a-1  G, a-1a = aa-1 = 1,  a  G ...
PDF
PDF

ALGEBRAIC D-MODULES
ALGEBRAIC D-MODULES

... Alexander Braverman (Brown), Fridays 12-1:30, Math 507, starting 01/23 ...
ALGEBRAIC  NUMBER  THEORY
ALGEBRAIC NUMBER THEORY

... there must√be a sign change in between. For the second, we can write z = reiθ and then reiθ/2 is a square root. Now if K is an extension of R of finite odd degree, it must equal R (for there is a primitive element α, and its minimal polynomial is of odd degree and so has a root in R, so R[α] ∼ = R. L ...
Galois` Theorem on Finite Fields
Galois` Theorem on Finite Fields

... a 0 for addition, a 1 for multiplication, you can divide consistently, etc. When the number of elements of the field is n, a non-negative integer, it is called finite. If n is a prime then addition and multiplication modulo p defines a field, denoted GF(p). Thus in GF(3), 2 × 2 = 2 + 2 = 1 since 4 ( ...
Proof Without Words: Alternating Sum of an Even Number of
Proof Without Words: Alternating Sum of an Even Number of

... MATHEMATICS MAGAZINE ...
PDF
PDF

please click here
please click here

< 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27

Modular representation theory

Modular representation theory is a branch of mathematics, and that part of representation theory that studies linear representations of finite groups over a field K of positive characteristic. As well as having applications to group theory, modular representations arisenaturally in other branches of mathematics, such as algebraic geometry, coding theory, combinatorics and number theory.Within finite group theory, character-theoretic results provedby Richard Brauer using modular representation theory playedan important role in early progress towards theclassification of finite simple groups, especially for simple groups whose characterization was not amenable to purely group-theoretic methods because their Sylow 2 subgroups were too small in an appropriate sense. Also, a general result on embedding of elements of order in finite groups called the Z* theorem, proved by George Glauberman using the theory developed by Brauer, was particularly useful in the classification program.If the characteristic of K does not divide the order of the group, G, then modular representations are completely reducible, as with ordinary(characteristic 0) representations, by virtue of Maschke's theorem. The proof of Maschke's theorem relies on being able to divide by the group order, which is not meaningful when the order of G is divisible by the characteristic of K. In that case, representations need not becompletely reducible, unlike the ordinary (and the coprime characteristic) case. Much of the discussion below implicitly assumesthat the field K is sufficiently large (for example, K algebraically closed suffices), otherwise some statements need refinement.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report