• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Full text
Full text

... unique subgroup of o r d e r (p - 1) in GF*(p ). Now we develop the proof by considering different c a s e s . Case 1. Let p = 2. If A is a generator of GF*(2 ), then X that A ...
43. Here is the picture: • • • • • • • • • • • • •
43. Here is the picture: • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Math 121. Lemmas for the symmetric function theorem This handout
Math 121. Lemmas for the symmetric function theorem This handout

... R were a field, we could say that R0 is a finite-dimensional R-vector space, and this was the key to using linear algebra in our earlier proofs that sums and products of quantities algebraic over a field are again algebraic over that field (ultimately using that a subspace of a finite-dimensional ve ...
2.1 Modules and Module Homomorphisms
2.1 Modules and Module Homomorphisms

... Then Axiom (i) holds, because each θ(a) is a group homomorphism, and Axioms (ii), (iii), (iv) hold because θ preserves addition, multiplication and identity elements respectively. ...
PDF
PDF

... theorem that the Jacobson radical is comprised of all left quasi-invertible elements. McCrimmon showed that expressed in homotopes we can instead say: x is quasi-invertible if 1 + x is quasi-invertible in every homotope of A. This gives the characterization: ...
Math 75 NOTES on finite fields C. Pomerance Suppose F is a finite
Math 75 NOTES on finite fields C. Pomerance Suppose F is a finite

Problem 1. Determine all groups of order 18. Proof. Assume G is a
Problem 1. Determine all groups of order 18. Proof. Assume G is a

PDF
PDF

... With the last two steps, one can define the inverse of a non-zero element x ∈ O by x x−1 := N (x) so that xx−1 = x−1 x = 1. Since x is arbitrary, O has no zero divisors. Upon checking that x−1 (xy) = y = (yx)x−1 , the non-associative algebra O is turned into a division algebra. Since N (x) ≥ 0 for a ...
Counterexamples in Algebra
Counterexamples in Algebra

... I = J = (0). Then I + J 6= R and R/I ∩ J ∼ = R/I × R/J. i=1 A Commutative Ring with Identity that is Noetherian but not Artinian. Z, k[x]. A Commutative Ring with Identity that is neither Noetherian nor Artinian. A the ring of algebraic integers, k[x1 , x2 , · · · ] the ring of polynomials in infini ...
H8
H8

Model Solutions
Model Solutions

THE RINGS WHICH ARE BOOLEAN II If we have a boolean algebra
THE RINGS WHICH ARE BOOLEAN II If we have a boolean algebra

... We would like to find whether the identity xp = x, for a given p, implies x2 = x, in a unitary ring of characteristic 2. Since it is an identity of a single variable, it suffices to consider one-generated (sub)rings, more precisely, we are going to construct the free one-generated ring of characteri ...
Algebra 2: Harjoitukset 2. A. Definition: Two fields are isomorphic if
Algebra 2: Harjoitukset 2. A. Definition: Two fields are isomorphic if

Problem Score 1 2 3 4 or 5 Total - Mathematics
Problem Score 1 2 3 4 or 5 Total - Mathematics

Fundamental Notions in Algebra – Exercise No. 10
Fundamental Notions in Algebra – Exercise No. 10

... / Ann(M ). Definition: We say that aQring R is a subdirect product of rings Rα , if there exists an embedding ι : R → Rα such that the composition πα ◦ ι : R → Rα is surjective for each α. 1. Let R be a ring. Show that the following conditions are equivalent: (a) R is semi-primitive; (b) R has a fai ...
Math 153: Course Summary
Math 153: Course Summary

... • When p is prime, the nonzero hours of Z/p form a group, with ∗ being multiplication. This group is called (Z/p)∗ . For instance 3 ∗ 5 = 4 in (Z/11)∗ because 3 ∗ 5 = 15, and then 15 = 4 in Z/11. In this case e = 1. Once a group is defined, one studies its structure. I’ll explain the (usually) first ...
Admission to Candidacy Examination in Algebra January 2011
Admission to Candidacy Examination in Algebra January 2011

OX(D) (or O(D)) for a Cartier divisor D on a scheme X (1) on
OX(D) (or O(D)) for a Cartier divisor D on a scheme X (1) on

... The construction of O(1) actually makes sense starting from any graded ring (so one denes O(1) not just for projective space), and what's essential is the notion of degree. But in full generality, I think that there is no map OX → O(1). See the dierences with OX (D) above. OPnk (H) ' OPnk (1) on p ...
MATH 521A: Abstract Algebra Homework 7 Solutions 1. Consider
MATH 521A: Abstract Algebra Homework 7 Solutions 1. Consider

... different ones, such as f (x) = (x + 2)(x + x + 1), and 10 ways of picking the square of one, such as f (x) = (x2 + 2)2 . Hence there are 45 + 10 = 55 answers to this question. 6. Factor x7 − x as a product of irreducibles in Z7 [x]. By Fermat’s Little Theorem, x7 ≡ x (mod 7), for all integer x. Hen ...
Garrett 03-30-2012 1 • Interlude: Calculus on spheres: invariant integrals, invariant
Garrett 03-30-2012 1 • Interlude: Calculus on spheres: invariant integrals, invariant

... Theorem: (instance of Schur’s Lemma) For a finite-dimensional irreducible representation V of a group G, any G-intertwining ϕ : V → V of V to itself is scalar. Proof: First, claim that the collection HomG (V, V ) of all Gintertwinings of finite-dimensional V to itself is a division ring. Indeed, giv ...
MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY — TENTH LECTURE The subject of
MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY — TENTH LECTURE The subject of

PDF
PDF

Group and Field 1 Group and Field
Group and Field 1 Group and Field

PDF
PDF

... Let K be a commutative unital ring (often a field) and A a K-module. Given a bilinear mapping b : A × A → A, we say (K, A, b) is a K-algebra. We usually write only A for the tuple (K, A, b). Remark 1. Many authors and applications insist on K as a field, or at least a local ring, or a semisimple rin ...
Check your skills
Check your skills

... 3. Adding and subtracting 4. Multiplying and dividing 5. Order of operations 6. Rounding and estimation ...
< 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 >

Modular representation theory

Modular representation theory is a branch of mathematics, and that part of representation theory that studies linear representations of finite groups over a field K of positive characteristic. As well as having applications to group theory, modular representations arisenaturally in other branches of mathematics, such as algebraic geometry, coding theory, combinatorics and number theory.Within finite group theory, character-theoretic results provedby Richard Brauer using modular representation theory playedan important role in early progress towards theclassification of finite simple groups, especially for simple groups whose characterization was not amenable to purely group-theoretic methods because their Sylow 2 subgroups were too small in an appropriate sense. Also, a general result on embedding of elements of order in finite groups called the Z* theorem, proved by George Glauberman using the theory developed by Brauer, was particularly useful in the classification program.If the characteristic of K does not divide the order of the group, G, then modular representations are completely reducible, as with ordinary(characteristic 0) representations, by virtue of Maschke's theorem. The proof of Maschke's theorem relies on being able to divide by the group order, which is not meaningful when the order of G is divisible by the characteristic of K. In that case, representations need not becompletely reducible, unlike the ordinary (and the coprime characteristic) case. Much of the discussion below implicitly assumesthat the field K is sufficiently large (for example, K algebraically closed suffices), otherwise some statements need refinement.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report