• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Chapter 2 Introduction to Finite Field
Chapter 2 Introduction to Finite Field

... element in E has order p. If there is a another prime divisor p1 of |F | with p 6= p1 . Then the Cauchy’s Theorem (or Sylow theorem) gives a nonzero element b ∈ F with p1 b = 0, contradicting every nonzero element having order p. We conclude that n = |F | = pm for some m ≥ 1. Corollary 2.2 (Isomorph ...
Why is addition of fractions defined the way it is? Two reasons
Why is addition of fractions defined the way it is? Two reasons

A NOTE ON DERIVATIONS OF COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAS 1199
A NOTE ON DERIVATIONS OF COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAS 1199

8. Check that I ∩ J contains 0, is closed under addition and is closed
8. Check that I ∩ J contains 0, is closed under addition and is closed

... be surjective, and we get the required isomorphism. [Note that surjectivity means that for every pair (b mod m, c mod n) there exists an integer a (unique up to multiples of mn, in fact), which reduces to b mod m and to c mod n. This is exactly Chinese Remainder Theorem.] ...
MTE-06 Abstract Algebra
MTE-06 Abstract Algebra

M3_End_of_Module_Review_files/M3 End of Module Review
M3_End_of_Module_Review_files/M3 End of Module Review

... c. The!store!ordered!small!posters!and!large!posters!to!promote!their!opening.!!8!times!as!many!small! posters!were!ordered!as!large!posters.!!If!there!were!13!large!posters,!how!many!more!small!posters! were!ordered!than!large!posters?! ...
Lecture 7
Lecture 7

... extensions of the prime field Zp . ‚ Let E1 “ Zp pαq so E1 – Zp rxs{xf y where f “ irrpα, Zp q. n ‚ Since every element of E1 is a root of xp ´ x, it follows that f is a factor n xp ´ x. n ‚ E2 contains all the roots of xp ´ x and hence all the roots of f . ‚ E2 must contain a subfield which is isom ...
A row-reduced form for column
A row-reduced form for column

PDF
PDF

... Proof. As we have seen, ab ≤ a ∧ b in the 2 above. Now, suppose c ≤ a ∧ b. Then c ≤ a and c ≤ b, so c = c2 ≤ cb ≤ ab. So ab is the greatest lower bound of a and b, i.e., ab = a ∧ b. This also means that ba = b ∧ a = a ∧ b = ab. 7. In fact, a locale is a quantale if we define · := ∧. Conversely, a q ...
Some Notes on Compact Lie Groups
Some Notes on Compact Lie Groups

... have x · y = y · x and |x|2 = xx = xx = 4i=1 (xi )2 . In particular, a non-zero element x has the inverse x/|x|2 . Thus H is a field. It has R = {x1 } and C = {x1 + ix2 } as subfields. Note that Hn can be regarded as a complex vector space, where the scalar multiplication is the multiplication from ...
MATH882201 – Problem Set I (1) Let I be a directed set and {G i}i∈I
MATH882201 – Problem Set I (1) Let I be a directed set and {G i}i∈I

Algebra_Aug_2008
Algebra_Aug_2008

... d = 1. One can now calculate B 3 and see it is I precisely when t = −1. More elegantly, the eigenvalues of A are cuberoots of unity, and the only way 2 of them add to a rational number is that the sum of the complex ones are −1, and the sum of 1 and 1 is 2. But in the latter case, the Jordan canonic ...
PH Kropholler Olympia Talelli
PH Kropholler Olympia Talelli

... Remark. In the same spirit, Theorem 2 can be applied to hyperbolic groups by taking X to be the Rips complex; according to results of Gromov [2], every hyperbolic group admits an action on a finite-dimensional contractible simplicial complex with finite stabilisers. This is of interest since it is n ...
NAP PROBLEM SET #1, SOLUTIONS 1. We follow the procedure in
NAP PROBLEM SET #1, SOLUTIONS 1. We follow the procedure in

Algebra 1 : Fourth homework — due Monday, October 24 Do the
Algebra 1 : Fourth homework — due Monday, October 24 Do the

11. Integral domains Consider the polynomial equation x2 − 5x +6=0
11. Integral domains Consider the polynomial equation x2 − 5x +6=0

Here
Here

... The second of these is easy — acb0 d0 = ab0 cd0 = a0 bcd0 = a0 bc0 d = a0 c0 bd. For the first, we have that adb0 d0 = ab0 dd0 = a0 bdd0 = a0 d0 bd, and bcb0 d0 = bb0 cd0 = bb0 c0 d = b0 c0 bd, and adding these gives the required equation. 17. State and prove the factor theorem for the polynomial r ...
Exercises 5 5.1. Let A be an abelian group. Set A ∗ = HomZ(A,Q/Z
Exercises 5 5.1. Let A be an abelian group. Set A ∗ = HomZ(A,Q/Z

... 5.4. An algebra A over a field K is called a division algebra, if A is a division ring. Give an example of noncommutative division algebra over R. 5.5. Let K be a field, and A a K-linear space with a basis {xi }i∈I . Show that a bilinear map A × A → A, (a, b) 7→ a · b makes A an algebra (not necessa ...
Math 403A assignment 7. Due Friday, March 8, 2013. Chapter 12
Math 403A assignment 7. Due Friday, March 8, 2013. Chapter 12

... We can write each polynomial k(x) ∈ Z[x] as af (x), where f (x) is primitive and a is the g.c.d. of the coefficients of k(x). Let J be an ideal in Z[x] such that J ∩ Z = (0) and such that if k(x) lies in J, then so does the associated primitive polynomial f (x). We will show in class that such an id ...
SHIMURA CURVES LECTURE 5: THE ADELIC PERSPECTIVE
SHIMURA CURVES LECTURE 5: THE ADELIC PERSPECTIVE

DERIVATIONS IN ALGEBRAS OF OPERATOR
DERIVATIONS IN ALGEBRAS OF OPERATOR

PDF
PDF

... Definition 1. Let V be an irreducible algebraic variety (we assume it to be integral and quasi-projective) over a field K with characteristic zero. We regard V as a topological space with the usual Zariski topology. 1. A subset A ⊂ V (K) is said to be of type C1 if there is a closed subset W ⊂ V , w ...
Lecture 6 1 Some Properties of Finite Fields
Lecture 6 1 Some Properties of Finite Fields

... Let F be a finite field. Then, we claim that |F | = pt for some prime p and some positive integer t. Let us see why this is true. First of all, define the characteristic of a ring R to be the smallest integer n such that for all α ∈ R, n · α = 0 (if such an n exists). For a field F , the characteris ...
poster
poster

Wedderburn`s Theorem on Division Rings: A finite division ring is a
Wedderburn`s Theorem on Division Rings: A finite division ring is a

< 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

Modular representation theory

Modular representation theory is a branch of mathematics, and that part of representation theory that studies linear representations of finite groups over a field K of positive characteristic. As well as having applications to group theory, modular representations arisenaturally in other branches of mathematics, such as algebraic geometry, coding theory, combinatorics and number theory.Within finite group theory, character-theoretic results provedby Richard Brauer using modular representation theory playedan important role in early progress towards theclassification of finite simple groups, especially for simple groups whose characterization was not amenable to purely group-theoretic methods because their Sylow 2 subgroups were too small in an appropriate sense. Also, a general result on embedding of elements of order in finite groups called the Z* theorem, proved by George Glauberman using the theory developed by Brauer, was particularly useful in the classification program.If the characteristic of K does not divide the order of the group, G, then modular representations are completely reducible, as with ordinary(characteristic 0) representations, by virtue of Maschke's theorem. The proof of Maschke's theorem relies on being able to divide by the group order, which is not meaningful when the order of G is divisible by the characteristic of K. In that case, representations need not becompletely reducible, unlike the ordinary (and the coprime characteristic) case. Much of the discussion below implicitly assumesthat the field K is sufficiently large (for example, K algebraically closed suffices), otherwise some statements need refinement.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report