• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
SOME ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS REPRESENTATIONS OF
SOME ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS REPRESENTATIONS OF

SOME ALGEBRAIC DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTIONS
SOME ALGEBRAIC DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTIONS

... We have used a special case of a result of Kaplansky, and we will also need Kaplansky’s result in the proof of Munshi’s theorem. Theorem 29 (Kaplansky). Let R be an integral domain. Then the intersection I of the non-zero prime ideals in R[x] is zero. Let K be the field of fractions of R. We need a ...
Solutions Sheet 7
Solutions Sheet 7

... x ∈ X possesses an affine open neighborhood U ⊂ X such that OX (U ) is noetherian. Then we already know that U has only finitely many irreducible components. It thus suffices to show that for any irreducible component Z of X the intersection Z ∩ U is either empty or an irreducbile component of U . S ...
Rationality of the quotient of P2 by finite group of automorphisms
Rationality of the quotient of P2 by finite group of automorphisms

Noncommutative geometry on trees and buildings
Noncommutative geometry on trees and buildings

... be expressed in terms of the inverse of the classical Dirac operator D, so that the Riemannian geometry is entirely encoded by the data (A, H, D) of the algebra of smooth functions (a dense subalgebra of the C ∗ -algebra of continuous functions), the Hilbert space of square integrable spinor section ...
security engineering - University of Sydney
security engineering - University of Sydney

... The strength of Diffie-Hellman is based upon two issues: – given p, g, ga, it is difficult to calculate a (the discrete logarithm problem) – given p, g, ga, gb it is difficult to calculate gab (the Diffie-Hellman problem) – we know that DL → DH but it is not known if DH → DL ...
Contents Lattices and Quasialgebras Helena Albuquerque 5
Contents Lattices and Quasialgebras Helena Albuquerque 5

GROUPS WITH FINITELY MANY COUNTABLE MODELS Dejan Ilić
GROUPS WITH FINITELY MANY COUNTABLE MODELS Dejan Ilić

Application of the graded Posner theorem
Application of the graded Posner theorem

Notes from a mini-course on Group Theory for
Notes from a mini-course on Group Theory for

... theory, such groups are regarded as “the same”. An important class of problems in group theory is to classify groups satisfying given conditions up to isomorphism (“classification problems”). Exercise 2.11. Let G be a group, and g ∈ G. Show that the map G → G given by a 7→ gag −1 (called the conjuga ...
model theory and differential algebra - Math Berkeley
model theory and differential algebra - Math Berkeley

quotient rings of a ring and a subring which have a common right ideal
quotient rings of a ring and a subring which have a common right ideal

... Let S be a ring and let A be a right ideal of S. The idealizer of A in S, denoted 1(A), is the largest subring of S containing A as a two-sided ideal. Armendariz and Fisher [1] have shown that with various assumptions on A, S being semiprime right (left) Goldie is equivalent to 1(A) being semiprime ...
Finite Fields
Finite Fields

... • the integers (Z, +, ∗) form an integral domain but not a field; • the rationals (Q, +, ∗), reals (R, +, ∗) and complex numbers (C, +, ∗) form fields; • the set of 2 × 2 matrices with real entries forms a non-commutative ring with identity w.r.t. matrix addition and multiplication. • the group Zn w ...
lecture notes as PDF
lecture notes as PDF

... • the integers (Z, +, ∗) form an integral domain but not a field; • the rationals (Q, +, ∗), reals (R, +, ∗) and complex numbers (C, +, ∗) form fields; • the set of 2 × 2 matrices with real entries forms a non-commutative ring with identity w.r.t. matrix addition and multiplication. • the group Zn w ...
Enumerating large orbits and direct condensation
Enumerating large orbits and direct condensation

POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS 1
POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS 1

... It’s possible that x has some irreducibles from R that we can factor out of it. If so, we do factor these irreducibles from R out, using Lemma 10. This leaves a primitive polynomial. Then a primitive polynomial factors only into polynomials of smaller positive degree. Thus, what we’ve done so far is ...
Notes in ring theory - University of Leeds
Notes in ring theory - University of Leeds

Optimal strategies in the average consensus problem
Optimal strategies in the average consensus problem

... our matrices to be nonnegative, even though it will appear that the optimal matrices are. Observe now that the fact that the element in position i, j of the matrix I + K is different from zero, means that the system i needs to know exactly the state of the system j in order to compute its feedback a ...
SOME TOPICS IN ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS Institute of Numerical
SOME TOPICS IN ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS Institute of Numerical

Solutions
Solutions

Math 850 Algebra - San Francisco State University
Math 850 Algebra - San Francisco State University

Joint Reductions, Tight Closure, and the Briancon
Joint Reductions, Tight Closure, and the Briancon

Document
Document

... She did a brilliant exhibition, first tapping it in 4, 4, then giving me a hasty glance and doing it in 2, 2, 2, 2, before coming for her nut. It is astonishing that Star learned to count up to 8 with no difficulty, and of her own accord ...
THE NUMERICAL FACTORS OF ∆n(f,g)
THE NUMERICAL FACTORS OF ∆n(f,g)

Sums of Fractions and Finiteness of Monodromy
Sums of Fractions and Finiteness of Monodromy

... (we refer to this as the “dihedral case”), or else (λ, µ, ν) ∈ the finite list in Table 1 below. Remark. Again, though the statement of the theorem is purely (elementary) number theoretic, the proof uses the finiteness of a certain group Γ in GL2 (C). It would be interesting to find a purely number ...
< 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 27 >

Modular representation theory

Modular representation theory is a branch of mathematics, and that part of representation theory that studies linear representations of finite groups over a field K of positive characteristic. As well as having applications to group theory, modular representations arisenaturally in other branches of mathematics, such as algebraic geometry, coding theory, combinatorics and number theory.Within finite group theory, character-theoretic results provedby Richard Brauer using modular representation theory playedan important role in early progress towards theclassification of finite simple groups, especially for simple groups whose characterization was not amenable to purely group-theoretic methods because their Sylow 2 subgroups were too small in an appropriate sense. Also, a general result on embedding of elements of order in finite groups called the Z* theorem, proved by George Glauberman using the theory developed by Brauer, was particularly useful in the classification program.If the characteristic of K does not divide the order of the group, G, then modular representations are completely reducible, as with ordinary(characteristic 0) representations, by virtue of Maschke's theorem. The proof of Maschke's theorem relies on being able to divide by the group order, which is not meaningful when the order of G is divisible by the characteristic of K. In that case, representations need not becompletely reducible, unlike the ordinary (and the coprime characteristic) case. Much of the discussion below implicitly assumesthat the field K is sufficiently large (for example, K algebraically closed suffices), otherwise some statements need refinement.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report