* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Interpersonal Relationships Paper PSYCH 555 Interpersonal
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Incest taboo wikipedia , lookup
History of attachment theory wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Unpopularity wikipedia , lookup
Human bonding wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Group cohesiveness wikipedia , lookup
Relationship counseling wikipedia , lookup
Relational aggression wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Internet relationship wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
Caring in intimate relationships wikipedia , lookup
Intimate relationship wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal Relationships Paper PSYCH 555 Interpersonal Relationships By building communication linkages among individuals, interpersonal relations improve social psychology. Interpersonal relationships seek to bring people together without any intent or choice but only based on the feeling being attached to the other individual. Being familiar with others, having alike attributes and having mutual understanding are factors that bring about attraction but it is interdependence, attachment, and belonging that aim to create stronger ties and closeness. Cognitive theories offer reasons why individuals though not drawn toward another may feel bad or may display antisocial behavior towards the same. Interpersonal relationships affect individual attitudes while creating linkages of intimacy or aggression. Interpersonal Relationships Defined An interpersonal relationship refers to associations made by encounters or communication made by talking with others. Interpersonal relationships are a system and a process that is established through communication (Dwyer, 2000). As a system, an interpersonal relationship involves interconnecting linkages influenced by constant change. As a procedure, on the other hand, an interpersonal relationship is continues to change, constantly altering itself, delimitating itself and re-inventing itself throughout history. Finally, as a branch of social psychology, interpersonal relationships aim to determine the causes why these relationships are present. There are two types of interpersonal relationships; circumstantial and chosen ones (Dwyer, 2000). In the circumstance type, these relationships people developed unintentionally (e.g. being classmates) while relationship by choices are built when people knowingly find ways to build relationships with others (e.g. by befriending others). In both types, though, it is required that participants give others the opportunity to get to know you and build trust with them. Trust creates an open atmosphere where individuals can share anything about themselves to one another making the relationship grow. Selfdisclosure involves the intentional act of providing information about oneself that others would not have known unless divulged. Hence, interpersonal attraction is a prerequisite in order to develop interpersonal relationships between partners. Interpersonal relationships are built by going through certain stages. The first stage is called pre-interaction. This is realized by utilizing passive strategy to attain information from a third party. The next stage is referred to as initiation. This is the stage where a person works actively to disclose himself so that the other person gets to know him. After such presentation or disclosure, the person makes up his mind whether or not to continue with the relationship. The next stage is called the exploration stage. In this stage, the ones involve trade off knowledge about each other making them more close to one another. After the exploration stage, comes the intensification stage. In this stage, more interaction occurs between two people. This involves frequent physical contact and intimate conversation that produce about interdependence and self-confirmation. The last stage is intimacy. This is characterized the closeness partners have with one another thru nonverbal communication and frequent physical contact. Such intimacy leads to acceptance and interdependence where partners are assured their ideas are not disregarded and they can rely on one another when they need someone to support them (Dwyer, 2000). Interpersonal relationships, however, may end if partners take actions that confute against norms. These actions include separation, loss of fervor, personality difference, or conflicts. The Concept of Familiarity, Similarity, and Reciprocity Related to Attraction Being familiar with others, having alike attributes and having mutual understanding each possesses different outcomes on the basics of being near to another individual. These terms are used to refer to the companionship an individual possesses on another, weighing similarities and differences to build certain levels of confidence and dependence. Each of these terms influences individuals in building feelings of solace, welfare and reliability. Familiarity Familiarity is the concept particularly improved by closeness. The more individuals keep in touch with one another the more they understand and get to know one another (Fiske, 2010). This concept recognizes what partners share in common, which includes their predictable conduct. Shared attributes lead to feeling safe in the presence of the other (Fiske, 2010). As encounters that take place between individuals become more frequent, the more they become familiar with one another (Fiske, 2010). This in turn intensifies the likelihood of attachment. Similarity Having alike attributes is another concept that brings vivid influence on attachment. It refers to knowing similar attitudes, ideals and character which partners possess (Luo & Zhang, 2009). Familiarity and similarity differ in ways such that familiarity involves frequency of encounters while similarity involves likeness. Similarity promotes feelings of uniformity and welfare between individuals since the idea is to bring about unity or harmony (Luo & Zhang, 2009). Similarity leads to balance among individuals as well as among groups (Fiske, 2010). Individuals are inclined to keep company with certain individuals who share the same behaviors and thoughts as them, establishing healthier relationship with one another (Luo & Zhang, 2009). Reciprocity Also referred as mutuality, reciprocity influences attraction such that it shows the desire of individuals to become favorable individuals (Luo & Zhang, 2009). Attraction through reciprocity is influenced primarily by the supposition that if an individual is recognized and favored it makes the other to give back the recognition they want. Similar practice is profitable for each other because it would provide favorable feedback to one another. Such compliment enables individuals to form stronger ties and fulfill the individual’s need to be favorable (Fiske, 2010). Reciprocity also acknowledges certain reward theories, or the concept that individuals feel rewarded by being liked, or a certain level of recognition. Individuals who practice reciprocity has the chance to experience mutuality with those they are associated with (Fiske, 2010). The same attachment is developed through friendship and inseparable ties. The Concepts of Interdependence, Attachment, and Belonging Related to Intimacy Interdependence, attachment, and belonging together are all associated with intimacy. Interdependence enables individuals to create an environment that aim to promote true trust and create the atmosphere for true trust to start and make a relationship thrive. Individuals also have a need to be accepted in a group, to feel that they are affiliated and they belong. Interdependence To develop interdependence, individuals need to show control and trust, both of which are significant in relation to core social motives. In turn, this interdependence, trust and interaction develop closeness in a relationship. Each individual’s attitudes or actions influence partners in a relationship. It is the interdependence theory that provides an elaboration regarding the emotional encounter and the patterns of reliability offered by an intimate relationship. The attraction stage and the beginning stage permit relationships with its interdependence to thrive. Attachment The relationship between two individuals or between an individual and a group is produced by an attachment or bond. Just as childhood create inseparable ties between a child and his or her caregivers and the same encounter helps a growing child to experience separation from their caregivers. These encounters enable children to gain insights about themselves and their relationships (Fiske, 2010, p. 329). Thus the attachment theory claims that the stability which has been formed during the internal working models of relationships will influence their relationships and remain fixed as they enter the adult stage (Fiske, 2010). Belonging The need to belong is met when a person enters a relationship, which may refer not only to romantic relationships but also to friendships and interpersonal relationships. Belonging, as well as interdependence and attachment, are important in building closer relationships. Once intimacy is achieved, the feeling of attachment and belonging set in. This is essential for individuals to live happy social lives. Cognitive Theories Related to Aggression and Antisocial Behavior Hostility or aggression is an attitude that decreases the attachment for an individual, thus creating unfriendly perceptions. The same behavior can either be physical or verbal where a person intentionally inflicts harm to another individual (Fiske, 2010). The persons who practice aggression are often quick to be offended or frustrated so as to keep one’s self-esteem or self-presentation up. Cognitive theories give individuals insights why they display hostility towards others. Social Learning Theory Social learning theory teaches a person the ways and conditions where aggression can be practiced and evaded. This is accomplished by forming self –punishments. In the social learning theory it is also known that aggression is a product of emulating and observing another individual’s character (Fiske, 2010). This manifests when individuals practice the same behavior they have seen or observed in others, in real life, movies, or TV shows or cartoon. Individuals’ minds are likely to create pictures of such behavior that leads to repetition of the same behavior in their future encounters (Fiske, 2010). However, the same observed behavior may not be appropriately practiced unless truly comprehended. Hence “No knowledge can be gained from observing others unless individuals listen carefully and comprehend the important qualities for the modeled behavior” (Kretchmar, 2008, p.3). The observer must understand accurately what kind of behavior he is seeing and must be able to recall the observed conduct appropriately. This aggression is then emulated when reward is a direct result or when the same responses happen at will (Fiske, 2010). Self-rewards or sanctions work with volitional responses to dwindle incidence of aggression and to keep an individual’s moral up. Script Theory The script theory, on the other hand, shows lessons how aggressive behavior comes from programs or resources. The script theory directs the practice of aggression and upholds solid patterns of hostility in individuals and family members (Fiske, 2010). By sight or observation, the individual forms his or her own model of aggression. The aggressive behavior is then exercised real-time or mentally until it is imprinted and becomes easily accessed in the future where it is perceived to be normal or appropriate conduct (Fiske, 2010). Seeing violent presentations in print or picture provide most of the hostility that gets imprinted mentally at a young age. Display or performance of aggressive behavior at a young age means the individual will show hostile acts throughout his or her lives (Fiske, 2010). While media is the primary source where such hostility is known, it can also be derived or known from the social class, family, or inherited family traits. Cognitive Neo-Aggression Theory Cognitive neo-aggression theory explains the reasons why individuals behave aggressively. The cognitive neo-aggression theory explains how individuals are affiliated to aggressive cues, including primitive feelings associated to conflicts or flights with more complicated cognitive and emotional responses (Fiske, 2010). It is learned that individuals can access and display behaviors and insights from the past and utilize the same whenever necessary. A common or unfavorable circumstance could either create feelings of fear or impulses of hostility or escape (Fiske, 2010). Each individual varies on the degree of his aggressiveness. While others perform more aggression after viewing violence on media or seeing weapons, others tend to emulate hostile behavior that make them more angry or thrilled to be aggressive afterwards (Fiske, 2010). As individuals’ learning varies in extent and intensity, the same applies to learning about aggression: learning about the latter evokes insights that may cause individuals to inflict harm to others. Conclusion Interpersonal relationships help people to create linkages based on attraction or anger. Interpersonal relationships are systems and processes that bring individuals together by situation or by choice. People are brought together or attracted to each other by being more exposed with another person, sharing common qualities with another, or through a natural yearning to be found favorable by others. Inter-reliability, attachment, and the need to belong in a social group influences closeness and the process of building close relationships. Cognitive theories discuss the process, the conditions and the reasons why individuals show aggression and what they learn thru observation. Finally, interpersonal relationships do not cease to exist to establish rapport with other people based on influences from within an individual or from the society that surrounds him. References Dwyer, D. (2000). Interpersonal Relationships. (Routledge Modular Psychology) Fiske, S.T. (2010). Social beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Kretchmar, J. (2008). Social Learning Theory. In, Social Learning Theory—Research Starters Education. 1(1), 12. Great Neck Publishing. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Luo, S., & Zhang, G. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 933-964. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.