Download Features of Modal Auxiliaries

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup

Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup

Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup

Proto-Indo-European verbs wikipedia , lookup

Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup

Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup

Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup

Inflection wikipedia , lookup

French grammar wikipedia , lookup

Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup

Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup

Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup

Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup

Germanic weak verb wikipedia , lookup

Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup

English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup

Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup

Germanic strong verb wikipedia , lookup

Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Hungarian verbs wikipedia , lookup

Latin conjugation wikipedia , lookup

Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Spanish verbs wikipedia , lookup

Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup

Kagoshima verb conjugations wikipedia , lookup

Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup

Ancient Greek verbs wikipedia , lookup

Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup

Basque verbs wikipedia , lookup

Dutch grammar wikipedia , lookup

Finnish verb conjugation wikipedia , lookup

German verbs wikipedia , lookup

Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup

English verbs wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Features of Modal Auxiliaries
Modal auxiliaries are as follows:
CAN, COULD, MAY, MIGHT, WILL, WOULD, SHALL, SHOULD, MUST
Characteristic features:
(1) They are always (finite1) verbs.
Table 1
The classification of ‘verbs’ according their morphology (Budai 1986:21)
VERBS
FULL VERBS
AUXILIARY VERBS
Finites
Non-Finites
Anomalous2 Finites
Present Tense
V-ø and V-s
Past Tense
V-ed
Imperative Mood form
V-ø
Infinitives
am, is, are, was, were
have, has, had
do, does, did,
used (to),
SHALL, WILL, SHOULD,
WOULD, CAN, COULD,
MAY, MIGHT, MUST,
ought (to), need, dare
1
Gerunds
Participles
Present Participle
Past Participle
(1) Verbs proper, which have tenses and refer to numbers and persons.
(2) A finite verb form is capable of forming the negative by adding –n’t and of expressing questions by
inversion. (Chalker and Weiner 1998:26)
2
‘different from what is normal, regular or expected’ (OALD8)
The parts of speech in the sentence:
He might have been being questioned by the police.
Noun
being
Definite Article
been
Preposition
have
questioned by
the
police.
Past Participle
might
Present Participle (of
auxiliary of passive
voice)
Bare Infitive (of
auxitliary of perfectivity)
He
Past Participle (of
auxiliary expressing
continuous aspect
Verb proper
(modal auxiliary
The analysis of a sentence
Personal Pronoun
Table 2
(2) They can only be operators from a syntactic point of view. (The first auxiliary
of the verb phrase.)
Table 3
Sentence structure analysed in the traditional way (Biber [et al.] 1999 and Quirk [et al.] 1985)
SENTENCE
SUBJECT
PREDICATE
AUXILIARY/AUXILIARIES
AUX 1
PREDICATION
AUX 2
AUX 3
AUX 4
have
been
being
OPERATOR
He
might
questioned by the police.
(3) They have neither to-infinitive nor bare infinitive nor –ing forms.
(4) They have no –s forms.
(5) They are always followed by a bare infinitive.
(6) They help to construct inversion (questions/interrogation and special syntactic
constructions) and negation.
(7) They turn up in short questions, question tags and answers.
(8) They have contracted forms (-n’t), except for may.
(9) Meaning: Modal verbs pertain to our experience of actuality, possibility, and
necessity. (Gibbs 1994:159) It can have a deontic function.
(10)
The indication of mood is limited, it is only the indicative and
subjunctive mood forms which can be used.
(11)
They can only denote present tense except for reported speech.
Sources:
Biber [et al.] 1999
Biber, Douglas [et al.]. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow : Longman, 1999. xxviii, 1204
p. ; 24 cm
ISBN 0-582-23725-4
Budai 1986
Budai László. English syntax : theory and practice. 2. kiad. Budapest : Tankönyvkiadó, 1986. 640 p. : ill. ; 20
cm (Tanuljunk nyelveket!, ISSN 0133-1094) ISBN 963-17-9558-6
Chalker and Weiner 1998
Chalker, Sylvia and Weiner, Edmund. The Oxford dictionary of English grammar. Reissued with corrections.
Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1998, © 1994. x, 448 p. ; … cm (Oxford paperback reference, ISSN ---)
ISBN 0-19-280087-6
Gibbs 1994
Gibbs, Raymond W. The poetics of mind : figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press, 1994. ix, 527 p. ; 22.6 cm
ISBN 0-521-42992-7 ppb
OALD8
Hornby, A[lbert] S[idney]. Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English. 8th edition. Managing editor
Joanna Turnbull. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. xii, 1796, 32, 64, 46 p. : ill. ; … cm
ISBN 978-0-19-479902-7
Quirk [et al.] 1985
Quirk, Randolph [et al.]. A grammar of contemporary English. 11th impression. Harlow : Longman, 1985. xii,
1120 p. ; 23.5 cm
ISBN 0-582-52444-x