Download http://www

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Criticism of Islamism wikipedia , lookup

Islam and Mormonism wikipedia , lookup

Dhimmi wikipedia , lookup

Schools of Islamic theology wikipedia , lookup

Islamic schools and branches wikipedia , lookup

Islam in the United Kingdom wikipedia , lookup

Islam and war wikipedia , lookup

Islam and other religions wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
http://www.understanding-islam.com/related/text.asp?type=question&qid=1111
Title:
Does Jerusalem belong to the Muslims?
Question:
Little seems to raise Muslim ire more than the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Jews say that all of
Palestine belongs to them, as it was theirs when God established them in that land thousands
of years ago. The Muslims say that the Jews have incurred God's wrath and that they no
longer deserve this land. Jerusalem is a holy city for both religions, as well as Christianity.
Could the possession of Jerusalem solely in Muslim hands be supported by any material
in the sources of Islam? Further, in your opinion, would "jihad" against Israel launched
by Muslim states be justified given the conditions of most Palestinians in Israel?
Answer:
Please bear in mind that my answer that follows is given only from a religious (Islamic)
perspective. I am neither a politician nor a socio-political analyst and, therefore, would refrain
from entering into spheres, which do not relate to my field of study.
Before answering your specific question, I would first like to reiterate that the general sociopolitical and religious domination enjoyed by the Jews and the Muslims during their respective
times, according to the Qur'an as well as the Bible, was because of God's promise of special
favors with Abraham (pbuh) for his progeny. This promise came to pass first through the
religious and political domination of the Israelites over a significant portion of the civilized
world. The Israelites were allowed to maintain this domination and rule the corners of the
earth till the time that they remained loyal to their covenant with the Almighty. However,
when the Israelites ultimately proved themselves unworthy of the great blessings of the
Almighty and fulfilling the responsibilities that these blessings entailed, God took His favors
away from that nation and transferred them to the other chain of the Abrahamic seed - The
Ishmaelites. At this point the religious and political leadership of the world was shifted to the
Ishmaelites. Exactly like their predecessors, the Ishmaelites were subject to the same Divine
laws, which had governed the Israelites.
Keeping this brief introduction of the background in perspective, it should be understood that
Palestine was conquered both by the Jews and the Muslims, during their respective times, as
a part of God's promise to Abraham (pbuh)[1] and his descendents. First, this land was
granted to the progeny of Isaac (pbuh) and it remained with them till they deserved, in God's
absolute judgment, to maintain this possession. However, when the Israelites persisted in
their transgressions, their right of sovereignty over the land ended before the time of Jesus
Christ (pbuh). Subsequently, after their further rejection of the Prophet (pbuh), the
domination over the land was transferred to the progeny of Ishmael - the elder son of
Abraham (pbuh). However, after over a thousand years of absolute sovereignty over the
land, the Muslims, like their Jewish counterparts, due to their own transgressions and due to
their turning their back upon the directives of God, were also subject to the same Law of God,
which had taken away the possession of Palestine from the Jews.
The Qur'an unequivocally tells us that the downfall of a nation - whether Jews or the Muslims
- is subject strictly to the same Divine rules. The Qur'an says:
Indeed God never alters the position of [favors that he bestows upon] a nation, unless they
alter it themselves. (Al-Ra`d 13: 11)
The foregoing explanation should adequately clarify that:
1. The possession of any part of the world is not the birth-right of any one or the other
group;
2. The domination which the Jews and the Muslims enjoyed over a significant part of the
world, in general, and Palestine, in particular, was the result of God's promise to
Abraham (pbuh) of granting rule to the pious among his descendents;
3. The removal of the Jews as well as the Muslims from the position of dominating the
world, in general, and Palestine, in particular, was in accordance with the same Divine
rules.
Keeping these points in mind, let us now turn to your specific comments and questions. You
write:
Little seems to raise Muslim ire more than the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Though it is quite true that Muslims are greatly irritated and angered by the way that the
Arab-Israel conflict is shaping up, yet in my honest opinion, it would have benefited the
Muslims more had they considered the situation in the perspective of the Divine law according
to which they were initially granted a great rule and, later on, deprived from it. This analysis
would not only have given them an insight into one of the unalterable laws of the Almighty,
but would also have highlighted clues for correcting the situation.
You write:
The Jews say that all of Palestine belongs to them, as it was theirs when God established
them in that land thousands of years ago.
None of God's blessings in the life of this world are unconditional. It is only as long as a
nation fulfills its part of the covenant that God allows the nation to prosper and enjoy His
extra-ordinary blessings in this world. Thus, the Jews, because of their transgressions, were
deprived of the possession of Palestine even before the advent of the Christ (pbuh).
You write:
The Muslims say that the Jews have incurred God's wrath and that they no longer deserve
this land.
This is quite correct. However, the Muslims should also have the courage of seeing their own
faces in the same mirror, which they present the Jews. The Muslims are also subject to the
same Divine law, which had taken the possession of Palestine from the Jews.
You write:
Jerusalem is a holy city for both religions, as well as Christianity.
I fully agree with this point. I would strongly advocate that in view of this fact, Jerusalem
should be recognized as the city of all the Abrahamic creeds.
You write:
Could the possession of Jerusalem solely in Muslim hands be supported by any material in the
sources of Islam?
No. The sole possession of the Muslims over Jerusalem, like that of their predecessors is a
historical reality, not an unconditional right for all times to come. It should, however, be
remembered that even during the times of Muslim domination, the Jews and the Christians
were never forced to evacuate the holy city, but, on the contrary, their religious rights were
protected and secured by the Law.
You write:
Further, in your opinion, would "jihaad" against Israel launched by Muslim states be justified
given the conditions of most Palestinians in Israel?
Muslims should try to realize the importance that Jerusalem has for the Jews. Whether we
acknowledge it or not, Jerusalem has the same spiritual significance for the Jews which
Mekkah enjoys in the eyes of the Muslims. This realization should prompt the Muslims to
reconsider their stance about demanding the complete evacuation of Palestine. Furthermore,
even if the Muslims feel deprived of their right of possession of Palestine, they should realize
that under the present state of affairs, subject to the Divine rules, the Muslims are no longer
in a position to resort to aggression for the reclamation of their rights. This is precisely the
situation, which has prompted the Muslims to resort to such actions in the name of Jihad,
which are not even remotely acceptable to Islam. Thus, even if the Muslims are bent upon
reclaiming their right, then they are left with no other option, but to concentrate on rebuilding
their nation and, thereby, bring themselves back on the road to material prosperity as well as
rendering themselves deserving of God's favors, as a nation.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Moiz Amjad
October 17, 2001
[1]
Genesis 12: 7.
Discussion
1. Discuss the role of God and Abraham and actions of Jews and Muslims in the issue of land in
Palestine.
2. How does Amiad use the Qur’an to prove specific points or arguments? Give examples.
3. What side does Amiad choose as the rightful owners of land?
4. In your opinion, whose land is it? Explain.
5. Is it possible for Jerusalem and / Palestine to be “shared”? Why or why not?
6. Will the Middle East issue ever be resolved?