Download Slide 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

0 wikipedia , lookup

Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup

Bernoulli number wikipedia , lookup

Parity of zero wikipedia , lookup

Exponentiation wikipedia , lookup

Division by zero wikipedia , lookup

0.999... wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
In mathematics, a rational number is any number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction p/q of two integers, with the denominator q not
equal to zero.[1]Since q may be equal to 1, every integer is a rational number. The set of all rational numbers is usually denoted by a
boldface Q (or blackboard bold
, Unicode ℚ); it was thus named in 1895 by Peano after quoziente, Italian for "quotient".
The decimal expansion of a rational number always either terminates after a finite number of digits or begins to repeat the same finite sequence of digits
over and over. Moreover, any repeating or terminating decimal represents a rational number. These statements hold true not just for base 10, but also
for binary,hexadecimal, or any other integer base.
A real number that is not rational is called irrational. Irrational numbers include √2, π, e, and φ. The decimal expansion of an irrational number continues
without repeating. Since the set of rational numbers is countable, and the set of real numbers is uncountable, almost all real numbers are irrational.[1]
The rational numbers can be formally defined as the equivalence classes of the quotient set (Z × (Z \ {0})) / ~, where the cartesian product Z × (Z \ {0}) is
the set of all ordered pairs (m,n) where m and n are integers, n is not 0 (n ≠ 0), and "~" is the equivalence relation defined by (m1,n1) ~ (m2,n2) if, and
only if, m1n2 − m2n1 = 0.
In abstract algebra, the rational numbers together with certain operations of addition and multiplication form a field. This is the archetypical field
of characteristic zero, and is the field of fractions for the ring of integers. Finite extensions of Q are called algebraic number fields, and the algebraic
closure of Q is the field of algebraic numbers.[2]
In mathematical analysis, the rational numbers form a dense subset of the real numbers. The real numbers can be constructed from the rational
numbers bycompletion, using Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts, or infinite decimals.
Zero divided by any other integer equals zero, therefore zero is a rational number (but division by zero is undefined).
In mathematics, a real number is a value that represents a quantity along a continuous line. The real numbers include all the rational numbers,
such as the integer −5 and the fraction 4/3, and all the irrational numbers such as √2 (1.41421356… the square root of two, an
irrational algebraic number) and π (3.14159265…, a transcendental number). Real numbers can be thought of as points on an infinitely
longline called the number line or real line, where the points corresponding to integers are equally spaced. Any real number can be determined
by a possibly infinite decimal representation such as that of 8.632, where each consecutive digit is measured in units one tenth the size of the
previous one. The real line can be thought of as a part of the complex plane, and complex numbers include real numbers.
Real numbers can be thought of as points on an infinitely long number line.
These descriptions of the real numbers are not sufficiently rigorous by the modern standards of pure mathematics. The discovery of a suitably
rigorous definition of the real numbers – indeed, the realization that a better definition was needed – was one of the most important
developments of 19th century mathematics. The currently standard axiomatic definition is that real numbers form the
unique Archimedean complete totally ordered field (R ; + ; · ; <), up to an isomorphism,[1]whereas popular constructive definitions of real
numbers include declaring them as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers, Dedekind cuts, or certain infinite "decimal
representations", together with precise interpretations for the arithmetic operations and the order relation. These definitions are equivalent in the
realm of classical mathematics.
The reals are uncountable; that is: while both the set of all natural numbers and the set of all real numbers are infinite sets, there can be no oneto-one function from the real numbers to the natural numbers: the cardinality of the set of all real numbers (denoted and called cardinality of
the continuum) is strictly greater than the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers (denoted
). The statement that there is no subset of the
reals with cardinality strictly greater than
and strictly smaller than is known as the continuum hypothesis. It is known to be neither
provable nor refutable using the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the standard foundation of modern mathematics, provided ZF set
theory is consistent.