Download A framework to improve biodiversity and livelihoods outcomes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Michael ‘t Sas-Rolfes
11 January 2016 | Geneva
A framework to improve biodiversity and livelihood outcomes
Michael ‘t Sas-Rolfes, IUCN SULi
Lessons from assessed case studies
Analytical framework
Four types of factors:
① Species-level
② Governance
③ Supply Chain
④ End-market
Species-level factors
Species resilience to harvest
Affected by biological and non-biological factors
(e.g. growth rates; method of harvesting)
Accessibility
The question of farming (wild versus intensive systems)
Governance factors
Property rights
What type?
Strong or weak?
Policy settings
Bans versus enabling legislation
CITES
Broader governance context
Institutions (harmonized or in conflict)
Supply-chain factors
Production costs and scale
Affordability?
Most effective land use?
Stockpiling
Pros and cons
Role of communities
Producer co-operatives
Concentration of market power
Pros and cons
Intermediary monopoly problems (e.g. ivory)
End-market factors
Market size
Price and volume factors
Demand elasticity (sensitivity to prices)
Consumer preferences
Genuine versus synthetic
Wild versus farmed
Abundant versus rare
Legal versus illegal
Shifting consumer preferences
The Bottom Line
Most species are subject to a unique combination of factors or circumstances
This is true even within a species
Avoid over-simplification
In relation to policy: one size does not fit all!