Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetic clock wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Is there evidence for rapid evolution in a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment? Sofia van Moorsel*1, Terhi Hahl1, Debra Zuppinger-Dingley1, Philippine Vergeer2, Joop Ouborg3 and Bernhard Schmid1 1 Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Switzerland 2 Wageningen University, the Netherlands 3 Radboud Unversity Nijmegen, the Netherlands PREVIOUS RESULTS Plant communities with high species diversity are more productive than those with lower diversity. This positive effect of biodiversity generally increases over time. Additionally, mixture types demonstrated stronger biodiversity effects than monoculture types (Figure 1B). For the first time we have evidence for rapid evolution in grassland ecosystems. B Selection history 9 2.0 Monoculture Mixture Biodiversity effects Net effects Complementary effects Sampling effects 8 1.5 Community biomass (g) Recent studies have shown grassland plants surviving for eight years in mixed species communities have been selected for better performance in mixed communities (mixture types) in contrast to plants selected in monocultures (monoculture types), and vice versa (Figure 1A). A Biodiversity effects (g/pot) BACKGROUND 7 6 B Mixture types performed better in species mixtures due to an increase in complementarity effects via selection for trait divergence between species in mixtures. 1.0 0.5 5 Figure 1. A Plants selected over eight years in mixtures produced greater biomass in new test mixtures in contrast to plants selected in monocultures, as indicated by the difference in slopes. This stronger biodiversity effect in mixture types appeared to be a general trend for both cuttings and seedlings and functional group combinations. (Zuppinger - Dingley et al., 2014 in Nature) 4 Monoculture Mixture Planted community 0.0 Monoculture Mixture Selection History EXPERIMENT OUTLOOK In a glasshouse experiment (see photos) we tested: Samples from monoculture and mixture type plants are currently being sequenced in order to determine differences in methylation patterns and SNP’s. 1 Selection for increased combining ability in mixtures, and for increased complementarity between species of mixture types and monoculture types. 2 Genetic and epigenetic differences between monoculture and mixture types of the same species. I assembled two-species mixtures and monocultures of nine European grassland species in pots each with four competing plants. After 20 weeks of growth, I harvested the aboveground biomass of all the individuals and measured phenotypic traits in order to assess their complementarity. The leaf samples for the subsequent genetic and epigenetic analysis were collected after 10 weeks of growth and frozen at -80° C. Acknowledgments SNF grant for funding, Tobias Vogler, Daniel Trujillo, Matthias Furler, Dorde Topalovic, Niels Wagemaker, URPP GCB, ESF Congenomics Network *Corresponding author: Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, [email protected] To test for genetic and epigenetic differences we make use of a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RBBS) technique that enables us to screen both genetic and epigenetic variation in a cost-efficient and highly detailed way. We expect first results in the beginning of 2016.