Download Nieuwe antikankergenees middelen die de huid treffen

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DERMATOLOGIE EN VENEREOLOGIE | VOLUME 23 | NUMMER 04 | April 2013
Nieuwe antikankergenees­
middelen die de huid treffen
S. Segaert
Literatuur
1. Johnston JB, et al. Targeting the EGFR pathway for cancer
therapy. Curr Med Chem 2006;13:3483-92.
2. Segaert S, Cutsem E Van. Clinical signs, pathophysiology
and management of skin toxicity during therapy with
epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Ann Oncol
2005;16:1425-33.
3. Busam KJ, et al. Cutaneous side-effects in cancer patients
treated with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:1169-76.
4. Robert C, et al. Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors
and blocking antibodies. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:491-500.
5. Galimont-Collen AFS, et al. Classification and management of skin, hair, nail and mucosal side-effects of epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. Eur J Cancer
2007;43:845-51.
6. Melichar B, Nemcova I. Eye complications of cetuximab
therapy. Eur J Cancer Care 2007;5:439-43.
7. Lacouture ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to
EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6:803-12.
8. Ocvirk J, Rebersek M. Management of cutaneous side effects
of cetuximab therapy with vitamin K1 cream. Radiol Oncol
2008;42:215-24.
9. Segaert S, et al. The management of skin reactions in cancer
patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor targeted
therapies.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2005;3:599-606.
10. Segaert S, Cutsem E Van. Clinical management of EGFRI
dermatologic toxicities: the European perspective. Oncology
2007;11Suppl5:22-6.
11. Perez-Soler R, et al. HER1/EGFR inhibitor-associated rash:
future directions for management and investigation outcomes from the HER1/EGFR inhibitor rash management
forum. Oncologist 2005;10:345-56.
12. Lynch TJ, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitorassociated cutaneous toxicities: an evolving paradigm in
clinical management. Oncologist 2007;12:610-21.
13. Scope A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of topical
pimecrolimus for cetuximab-associated acnelike eruption. J
Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:614-20.
14. Scope A, et al. Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximabassociated acne-like eruption. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5390-6.
15. Jatoi et al. Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor
receptor-induced skin rashes. Results of a placebo-controlled
trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Cancer
2008;113:847-53.
16. Lacouture ME, et al. Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with
panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-emptive skin
treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in
patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol
2010;28:1351-7.
17. Luu M, et al. Photosensitive rash due to the epidermal
growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib. Photodermatol
Photoimmunol Photomed 2007;23:42‑5.
18. Segaert S: Management of skin toxicity of epidermal growth
factor receptor inhibitors. Targ Oncol 2008;3:245-51.
19. Heidary N, et al. Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an
update. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:545-70.
20.Lacouture ME, et al. Hand-foot skin reaction in cancer
patients treated with the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib
and sunitinib. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1955-61.
21. Yang CH, et al. Hand-foot skin reaction in patients treated
with sorafenib: a clinicopathological study of cutaneous
manifestations due to multitargeted kinase inhibitor therapy.
Br J Dermatol 2008;158:592-6.
22. Robert C, et al. Dermatologic symptoms associated with
the multikinase-inhibitor sorafenib. J Am Acad Dermatol
2009;60:299-305.
23. Lacouture ME, et al. Evolving strategies for the management
of hand-foot skin reaction associated with the multitargeted kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib. Oncologist
2008;13:1001-11.
24. Valeyrie L, et al. Adverse cutaneous reactions to imatinib
(STI571) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias:
a prospective study of 54 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol
2003;48:201-6.
25. Sankhala K, et al. The emerging safety profile of mTOR
inhibitors, a novel class of anticancer agents. Targ Oncology
2009;4:135-142.
26.Mahe E, et al. Cutaneous adverse events in renal transplant
recipients receiving sirolimus-based therapy. Transplantation
2005;79:476-482.
27. Mahe E, et al. Acne in recipients of renal transplantation
treated with sirolimus: Clinical, microbiologic, histologic,
therapeutic, and pathogenic aspects. J Am Acad Dermatol
2006;55:139-142.
28.Kunzle N, et al. Sirolimus-induced acneiform eruption.
Dermatology 2005;211:366-9.
29.Raymond E, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of escalated
doses of weekly intravenous infusions of CCI-779, a novel
mTOR inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol
2004;22:2336-47.
30.O’Donnell A, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced solid
tumors. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1588-95.
31. Mita MM, et al. Phase I trial of the novel mammalian
target of rapamycin inhibitor deforolimus (AP23573;
MK-8669) administered intravenously daily for 5 days every
2 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin
Oncol 2008;26:361-7.