Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DERMATOLOGIE EN VENEREOLOGIE | VOLUME 23 | NUMMER 04 | April 2013 Nieuwe antikankergenees middelen die de huid treffen S. Segaert Literatuur 1. Johnston JB, et al. Targeting the EGFR pathway for cancer therapy. Curr Med Chem 2006;13:3483-92. 2. Segaert S, Cutsem E Van. Clinical signs, pathophysiology and management of skin toxicity during therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1425-33. 3. Busam KJ, et al. Cutaneous side-effects in cancer patients treated with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:1169-76. 4. Robert C, et al. Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors and blocking antibodies. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:491-500. 5. Galimont-Collen AFS, et al. Classification and management of skin, hair, nail and mucosal side-effects of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:845-51. 6. Melichar B, Nemcova I. Eye complications of cetuximab therapy. Eur J Cancer Care 2007;5:439-43. 7. Lacouture ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6:803-12. 8. Ocvirk J, Rebersek M. Management of cutaneous side effects of cetuximab therapy with vitamin K1 cream. Radiol Oncol 2008;42:215-24. 9. Segaert S, et al. The management of skin reactions in cancer patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapies. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2005;3:599-606. 10. Segaert S, Cutsem E Van. Clinical management of EGFRI dermatologic toxicities: the European perspective. Oncology 2007;11Suppl5:22-6. 11. Perez-Soler R, et al. HER1/EGFR inhibitor-associated rash: future directions for management and investigation outcomes from the HER1/EGFR inhibitor rash management forum. Oncologist 2005;10:345-56. 12. Lynch TJ, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitorassociated cutaneous toxicities: an evolving paradigm in clinical management. Oncologist 2007;12:610-21. 13. Scope A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of topical pimecrolimus for cetuximab-associated acnelike eruption. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:614-20. 14. Scope A, et al. Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximabassociated acne-like eruption. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5390-6. 15. Jatoi et al. Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor receptor-induced skin rashes. Results of a placebo-controlled trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Cancer 2008;113:847-53. 16. Lacouture ME, et al. Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-emptive skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1351-7. 17. Luu M, et al. Photosensitive rash due to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2007;23:42‑5. 18. Segaert S: Management of skin toxicity of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Targ Oncol 2008;3:245-51. 19. Heidary N, et al. Chemotherapeutic agents and the skin: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:545-70. 20.Lacouture ME, et al. Hand-foot skin reaction in cancer patients treated with the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1955-61. 21. Yang CH, et al. Hand-foot skin reaction in patients treated with sorafenib: a clinicopathological study of cutaneous manifestations due to multitargeted kinase inhibitor therapy. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:592-6. 22. Robert C, et al. Dermatologic symptoms associated with the multikinase-inhibitor sorafenib. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;60:299-305. 23. Lacouture ME, et al. Evolving strategies for the management of hand-foot skin reaction associated with the multitargeted kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib. Oncologist 2008;13:1001-11. 24. Valeyrie L, et al. Adverse cutaneous reactions to imatinib (STI571) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias: a prospective study of 54 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:201-6. 25. Sankhala K, et al. The emerging safety profile of mTOR inhibitors, a novel class of anticancer agents. Targ Oncology 2009;4:135-142. 26.Mahe E, et al. Cutaneous adverse events in renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based therapy. Transplantation 2005;79:476-482. 27. Mahe E, et al. Acne in recipients of renal transplantation treated with sirolimus: Clinical, microbiologic, histologic, therapeutic, and pathogenic aspects. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:139-142. 28.Kunzle N, et al. Sirolimus-induced acneiform eruption. Dermatology 2005;211:366-9. 29.Raymond E, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of escalated doses of weekly intravenous infusions of CCI-779, a novel mTOR inhibitor, in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2336-47. 30.O’Donnell A, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1588-95. 31. Mita MM, et al. Phase I trial of the novel mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor deforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 2 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:361-7.