* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Habitat Loss and Fragmentation
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Extinction debt wikipedia , lookup
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Conservation biology wikipedia , lookup
Source–sink dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Natural environment wikipedia , lookup
Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup
Decline in amphibian populations wikipedia , lookup
Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Tropical Andes wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Operation Wallacea wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup
Map of remaining significant woodlands in Southern Ontario. Used to be all woodlands before settlers arrived. Map shows the distribution of converted natural areas in Southern Ontario to human uses (orange). In a 60 year period from 1861 to 1921 the forest cover of Carolinian Canada dropped from 77% to 19 %. In the same time frame, 70% of southern Ontario wetlands were lost. Since that point in time, there has been a slight recovery of forests in some parts of the area but overall the decline and degradation in natural habitats continue. Map shows the extent and distribution of parks and protected areas in Southern Ontario. The Process of Habitat Fragmentation (arrows show increasing fragmentation of habitat) Each new construction results in smaller, more scattered habitats. The outcome is population reduction and isolation for native species. Urban sprawl produces fragmentation and a loss of biodiversity on the planet Habitat Destruction, Loss, Degradation… At least 83% of the Earth’s land surface has been transformed by human activities (Sanderson et al. 2002) About 60% of Earth’s ecosystems are considered degraded or unsustainably used (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005) 98% of U.S. streams and rivers have been fragmented (see next lecture) by dams (Benke 1990) Habitat Destruction, Loss, Degradation… Habitat degradation – impacts that affect many, but not all species; some of which may be temporary Habitat destruction & loss – impacts that affect nearly all species; time scale for recovery is very long How do humans destroy and degrade habitats and ecosystems? E.g., agricultural activities, extraction activities, certain kinds of development These are often considered to be the most important direct threats to biodiversity, since they eliminate species, reduce population sizes, and reduce performance of individuals Habitat Destruction, Loss, Degradation… Loss of forest habitat in Borneo Image of shrinking forest cover on Borneo from www.planttreesaveplanet.com Rare species are especially vulnerable Small populations are especially prone to extinction E.g., Hawaii’s native bird species Half went extinct soon after the Polynesians arrived Image of extinct Hawai’i ’Ō’ō (Moho nobilis) from Wikipedia Half of the remaining species went extinct soon after Captain James Cook arrived Habitat Destruction, Loss, Degradation… Loss of ice from polar ice cap 1979 2003 Minimum sea ice concentration; 9% decline per decade Images from www.nasa.gov Biodiversity Hotspots Usually defined by species richness, endemism & threats Map from www.fao.org Biodiversity Hotspots Usually defined by species richness, endemism & threats These hotspots of biodiversity cover only ~1.5% of the Earth’s land; if they were destroyed ~1/3 of Earth’s species would go extinct Figure from Myers et al. (2000, Nature) Designing Nature Reserves Biodiversity can best be sustained by large reserves connected across the landscape and buffered from areas of intense human use. The Best Spatial Configurations for a Core Natural Area or Nature Reserves Larger blocks support larger and more stable populations and communities. 1 large area is better than an equal area composed of many smaller areas because there is less outside influence. The closer ecosystem fragments are to each other, the greater the chance populations will be able to use the entire area. Interconnected areas provide wildlife corridors and permit migration between larger blocks. Buffer zones protect fragmented ecosystems from outside influences. Extensive annual surveys began in the Ontario core areas in 1992 to monitor the Loggerhead Shrike population. During these surveys information on the number of pairs and single birds and their habitats is collected with the help of volunteers. As shown above, the number of shrikes in the province decreased substantially between 1992 (55 pairs) and 1997 (17 pairs). In 1998 the population rebounded slightly to 30 pairs, which is similar to numbers counted in 1995 and 1996. The Ontario population is currently at extreme risk of extirpation. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002604