Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Peptide synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Bioscience Reports, Vol. 6, No. 7, I986 Amino Acid Sequence of Rabbit Ventricular Myosin Light Chain-2" Identity with the Slow Skeletal Muscle Isoform John H. Collins, 1'3 Janet L. Theibert, 1 and Luciano Dalla Libera 2 Received July 16, 1986 KEY WORDS: myosin; light chain-2; ventricular; slow muscle; rabbit; sequence identity. Many studies have established a correlation of differences in the activities of various muscle types with differences in the expression of myosin isoforms. In this paper we report the sequence determination of myosin light chain-2 from rabbit slow skeletal (LC2s) and ventricular (LC2v) nmscles. We sequenced tryptic peptides from LC2v which account for all except a few terminal amino acid residues. The major part (87 residues) of the rabbit LC2s sequence, obtained from tryptic and cyanogen bromide (CNBr) peptides, was found to be identical to rabbit LC2v. Our results provide the first sequence information on LC2s from any species, and lend strong support to the hypothesis that LC2s and LC2v are identical. Comparisons of rabbit LC2v and LC2s with rabbit LC2f (from fast skeletal muscle), and also with chicken LC2f and LC2v, show clearly that LC2s and LC2v from mammalian and avian species are more closely related to each other than they are to LC2f isoforms from the same species. INTRODUCTION Myosin, the principle contractile protein in muscle cells, consists of two heavy chains (Mr ~ 220,000 each) and four light chains (Mr ~ 15,000-30,000 each). The light chains are divided into two classes: each myosin molecule contains two subunits each of the so-called "essential" light chains (LC 1) and "regulatory" light chains (LC2). The 1 Department of Biology, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13676, USA. 2 C.N.R. Unit for Muscle Biology and Physiopathology, Institute of General Pathology, University of Padova, Via Loredan 16, 35100 Padova, Italy. 3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. 655 0144-8463/86/0700-0655505.00/0 9 1986PlenumPublishingCorporation Cotlins, Theibert, and Dalia Libera 656 existence of isoforms of heavy chains and light chains in different muscle types is well established, and there is little doubt that the differences in these isoforms are responsible for the different activities of the various muscles. The study of the expression ofisoforms of myosin light chains in different muscles has been a subject of considerable interest ever since the existence of these subunits was firmly established about 17 years ago (Lowey et al., 1969). In recent years with the development of new techniques for directly isolating and characterizing the light chain genes themselves, this interest has intensified (for recent review, see Barton and Buckingham, 1985). The sequences around the thiol groups of rabbit and cat LCls were published a decade ago (Weeds, 1976), and Barton e~ at. (t985, i985a) are reportedly sequencing cDNA clones of the mouse LCls. To data there have been no other reports of slow skeletal muscle light chain sequences from any species. The sequence results reported here are consistent with the comigration of LC2s and gC2v in two dimensional gels and the similarity of their peptide maps (Dalla Libera, 1986), and give the strongest evidence to date that these two proteins are identical. We have obtained by far the most extensive sequence information available for any slow muscle light chain, as well as the only LC2s sequence. METHODS Normal adult rabbit LC2s from slow skeletal (soleus) muscle and LC2v from ventricular muscle were prepared as described by Dalla Libera et al. (1984). For cleavage at methionine residues, 0.3 mg of LC2s was dissolved in 0.1 ml of 70~o formic acid, 0.024mg of CNBr (freshly dissolved in 70~o formic acid to a concentration of lmg/ml) was added, and digestion was allowed to take place overnight at room temperature in a closed tube. After digestion, the solution was diluted with 1 ml of water, dried under nitrogen, then dissolved in 0.20 ml of 70~o formic acid for application to HPLC. For tryptic digesuon, 0.3 mg of LC2s or LC2v was dissolved in 0.3 ml of 20 m M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.006 mg of trypsin, and digestion was allowed to take place for 2 hours at room temperature. 0.1 ml of glacial acetic acid was then added to stop the digestion, and this solution was used for H P L C . Preparative H P L C was performed on a system which consisted of a Waters U6K injector, two Waters M510 pumps, a Waters M680 controller, a Waters M480 variable wavelength absorbance detector and a Linear dual channel recorder. Separations were carried out by gradient elution on a 4.6" mm x 25 cm Vydac 218TP54 reverse phase column. For tryptic digests, Solvent A was 0.1 ~ TFA in water, and solvent B was 0.1 ~o TFA in acetonitrile:water (1 :I, v/v). For the CNBr digest, Solvent A was 20 m M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.9) in water, and solvent B was 2 0 m M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.9) in acetonitrile:water (1:1, v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min, and the absorbance was monitored at 214 nm or 220 nm. Peptide peaks were collected manually and used directly for amino acid analysis and sequencing. Amino acid compositions were determined by reverse phase H P L C analysis of their phenylthiocarbamyl (PTC) derivatives, using the Waters " P I C O - T a g " system (Cohen et al., 1986)_ Amino acid sequences were determined using an Applied Sequence Identityin Rabbit LC2v and LC2s 657 Biosystems Model 470A gas phase Protein Sequencer, essentially as described by Hewick et al. (1981). Phenylthiohydantoin (PTH) amino acids obtained from the sequencer were analyzed quantitatively by reverse phase H PLC, using a Waters NovaPak column and the gradient elution system described in Waters Associates Applications Brief # M3500. A Waters HPLC system including two M510 pumps, a M721 system controller, a WISP 710B autoinjector, a temperature control module, a M440 dual channel absorbance detector, and a M730 integrative recorder was used for both PTH and PTC amino acid analyses. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The tryptic digest of LC2v yielded peptides which accounted for most of the protein. When the HPLC fractions indicated in Figure 1 were sequenced, we obtained a continuous series of peptides (designated T1 to T13, in the order in which they occur in the sequence). Three of the fractions (T9 +T10, T8 + T l l , T5 + T13) contained mixtures, but we were able to sequence these simultaneously because the peptides in each pair were present in different yields. T1 to TI 3 account for all but an unknown few residues at the amino and carboxyl termini of LC2v. The order ofT1 to T13 within the sequence of LC2v was readily deduced (as shown in Figure 4) by homology with the known sequence (Collins, 1976; Matsuda et aI,, i977) of the rabbit fast sketetat muscle isoform LC2f. i' .2 100 f T6 f 1"11 f S J r ! Tg "r~O4j. T~ ,< TZ / / J "7" .1";2 ,L, J r .1 /i 50 1"7, t~ > s ! 0 ' - ' 2'0 . . . . . . . Time ,,, "-----~o 0 (rains) Fig. 1. HPLCof the trypticdigestof rabbit LC2v. A tryptic digest of LC2s (see Fig. 2) gave less extensive cleavage, and we obtained only peptides T8 to TI3 from the carboxyt terminai region of the protein. These six peptides were identical in HPLC elution volumes and amino acid sequences to their LC2v counterparts. We also obtained partial sequences of three (of the expected seven) Collins, Theibert, and Dalla Libera 658 i -I00 s a 4 ! 4 s J ,7" / / I r m T6 .1 T~i'- T13~ ,,," 50 TI2- j~ Tg J i o ID > o "" 2-~ . . . . ' ~0 4'o Time (rains} Fig.2. HPLCof the tryptic digest of rabbit LC2s. CNBr peptides of LC2s, purified as shown in Figure 3. This provided further evidence that LC2v and LC2s are identical, and also confirmed the order of several of the tryptic peptides (T1-T2-T3-T4 and T6-T7-T8). The results of the sequence analyses of the LC2v and LC2s peptides, and their assembly into a continuous protein sequence by homology with rabbit LC2f, are summarized in Figure 4. We have established the identities of 87 amino acid residues, -I00 J I I r i I I # ,I i "T, #i i -50 o- 0.! iF f I ,4 o Time ~ n i n ~ ) Fig. 3. HPLC of the CNBr digest rabbit LC2s, of Sequence Identity in Rabbit LC2v and LC2s 659 - - A - - LC2f: LC2v. LC2s: PKKAKRRAAE66SSNVFSMFDGTQ IQEFKE / N' " ' ' " ' "E "" . ' ~ /' 1. m 9 9 = , ~ 9 9 9 . CBI L~f: LC~: TI C~ 35 k~ 45 50 AFTVIDONR]]611DKEDLRDT,PP~AM6RLNV "'" IM''" "l"'F" CB3 X Y Z -Y 70 55 "'"L" "IV " ' -X T5 -Z I~ 80 85 ~) I NFTVFLTMFBE~,LK .... ' ............ / I" " ' " ' ~ 75 CB4T6 95 LC2f: LC2v: "'1"' T4 KNEELDAMMKEASBP .... I'E'I'/''P TSa ""N" T3 - - - C - LC2f: LC2v" LC2s: T2 6ADPEDVI I00 105 110 115 120 T6AFKVLDPEBKBTIKKQFLEE '''''ET'LN'''/'F'''''I'VL'IRDYVR/~ T7 T8 T9 TIO TII LC2f, ---F-~ 6 , 125 130 135 I~ 145 150 L L T t O C l ) R F S Q E E I K N N WII A F P P l } V B GN V l ) U~%: M. LC2s: ' ' = = ' ' ' '/ CB6 T12 . . . A['/' ' HI}' " llO' F ' ' ' ' ' ' ' T' ' L" CB7 II 155 LC2f: LC2v: LC2s: I~ I~ YKNICYVITHBI)~IKDQE ''I'LVHI''''EE'I 1' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " " I TI3 Fig. 4. Amino acid sequences of rabbit myosin LC2 from fast skeletal muscle (LC2f), ventricular muscle (LC2v) and slow skeletal muscle (LC2s). Tryptic and CNBr peptide sequences of LC2v (T1 to T13, T5a) and LC2s (T8 to T13, CB2, CB3, CBS) were aligned by homology with the LC2f sequence. Dashed lines above the sequences indicate predicted helices A through H, and the coordinates of the predicted calcium binding site at residues 36-47 are also shown (Collins, 1976). representing more than half of the total sequences of LC2s and LC2v. Most of the 40 sequence differences between rabbit LC2f and LC2s/v are conservative and yield no obvious clues as to how they might affect the three-dimensional structures or functional properties of these proteins. It is interesting to note however, that 28 (70 ~o) of these differences are located in the carboxy terminal half of the molecule. This is probably a reflection of the need to conserve the calcium-binding site near the amino terminus (Collins, 1976). Also noteworthy is the lack of Cys thiol groups in LC2s/v, in agreement with an earlier observation by Weeds (1976). The sequence (not shown in Figure 4) we obtained for the amino terminal 4 residues of T1 of LC2v was Ala-Ala-(Gly/Pro)-(Gly/Ala)-, with Glu not detectable because of a high background peak. This indicates that there is heterogeneity in the sequence of rabbit LC2v. This is not surprising, since two major isoforms of chicken LC2v were previously demonstrated by sequence analysis (Matsuda et al., 1981). A major dissimilarity between the rabbit and chicken proteins is that sequence differences between the two isoforms of chicken LC2v are scattered all along the polypeptide 660 Collins, Theibert, and Dalla Libera 5 IO 15 2O 25 ,A 3O CLC2.f: P K R A ~ I R R A A E G - S S N V F S M F D Q T Q I QEFKE RLC2s: N . . . . . . . CLC2vA: ' ' ' " ' K R I - ' " A N " ' ' CL~---"vB: KV --A. . .... 6~ . CLC2v~: ''' ''' 5O ~ I N ' ' ' ' ' ' F ' ' ' N ' ' ' D ' ' " ' L ' ' V ' ' IM ..... ' F ' ' ' A ' ' ' D .... L''L'" Y Z -Y -X 65 70 KNEELDAN IDE' IDE' L E0 RL~s: '''" CI.C~vA: ' ' ' " CLC~vB: 45 AFTVIDQNRD6111)XDDLRETFAANGRLNV l CLC~f: . . . . . . . E'A''''''' T B. . . . . 40 CLC~f: RL~s: E'T -Z 75 80 85 90 I K E A S 6 P I NFTVFL TMFBEKLK I'' 'P'''''''''' ''''"'' I'''P''''' ...... ''''' ' V [~ I00 F-- 105 II0 115 120 CLC2f: G A D P E I I V I M G A F K V L D P D G K B S I K K S F L E E RLC~s: " A ' ' "ET'LN'''VF''E''' V L ' A I ) YVR ' CLCZvA: , 'A'''ET'LN'''VF''E .... L'$AYIK' CL(~vB: T I HI AO --F Cl.~f: RLC2s: CLCL~'A: CIZL~vB: cl.~f: RLC2s: Cl.l~:~:l: CLCZv@: C I~ 130 LLTTQCDRFTPEEI N'T' ';IE''SKD'" R'N''EB''SQE''DQ'F II 155 IGo YKNICYVITHBEI) "''LVHI "''LVHV CY ..... ..... 135 140 145 KNMWAAFPPDVAGNVI) DQ'F''' .... . . . . . . . 150 T''L' 5''L" N 165 KEBE E" E'D Fig. 5. Comparison of amino acid sequences of myosin LC2 from chicken fast skeletal muscle (CLC2f), rabbit slow skeletal muscle (RLC2s) and the two isoforms (CLC2vA and CLC2vB) of chicken ventricular muscle. Residues in CLC2vB are shown only where they differ from those in CLC2vA. The sequence of RLC2s was assembled from peptide sequences shown in Figure 4, assuming rabbit LC2s and LC2v to be identical. Dashed lines above the sequences indicate predicted helices A through H, and the coordinates of the predicted calcium binding site at residues 36-47 are shown (Collins, 1976). chains (see Fig. 5), while the heterogeneity in rabbit LC2v seems to be confined to the amino terminal region. A comparison (see Fig. 5) of rabbit LC2s/v with chicken LC2f (Matsuda et al., 1977a) and LC2v (Matsuda et al., 1981) shows clearly that, despite species differences, the slow skeletal muscle isoform of LC2 is much more closely related to the ventricular than to the fast skeletal muscle isoform. Over the span of residues 13 to 164, there are 43 sequence differences between chicken LC2f and chicken LC2vA, 41 differences between rabbit LC2s and chicken LC2f, and only 16 differences between rabbit LC2s and chicken LC2vA. It is evident from these results that the divergence of avian and mammalian species is a more recent evolutionary event than the divergence of fast and slow skeletal muscles. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by a grant (to J.H.C.) from the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and by institutional funds from the C.N.R. Unit for Muscle Biology and Physiopathology, Padova (to L.D.L.). Sequence Identity in Rabbit LC2v and LC2s 661 REFERENCES Barton, P. J. R., and Buckingham, M. E. (1985). Biochem. J. 231:249-261. Barton, P. J. R., Robert, B., Fiszman, M. Y., Leader, D. P., and Buckingham, M. E. (1985). J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 6:461-475. Barton, P. J. R., Cohen, A., Robert, B., Fiszman, M. Y., Bonhomme, F., Guenet, J.-L., Leader, D. P., and Buckingham, M. E. (1985). J. Biol. Chem. 260:8578-8584. Cohen, S. A., Bidlingmeyer, B. A., and Tarvin, T. L. (1986). Nature 330:769-770. Collins, J. H. (1976). Nature 259:699. Dalla Libera, L. (1986). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 83:751-756. Dalla Libera, L., Betto, R., Lodolo, R., and Carraro, U. (1984). J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 6:411-421. Hewick, R. M., Hunkapillar, M. W., Hood, L. E., and Dreyer, W. J. (1981). J. Biol. Chem. 256:7990-7997. Lowey, S., Slayter, H. S., Weeds, A. G., and Baker, H. (1969). J. Molec. Biol. 42:1-29. Matsuda, G., Malta, T., Suzuyama, Y., Setoguchi, M., and Umegane, T. (1977). J. Biochem. 81:809-81I. Matsuda, G., Suzuyama, Y., Malta, T., and Umegane, T. (1977a). FEBS Lert. 84:53-56. Matsuda, G., Maita, T., Kato, Y., Chen, J., and Umegane, T. (1981). FEBS Lett. 135:232-236. Weeds, A. G. (1976). Eur. J. Biochem. 66:157-173.