* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 3000_2013_2fg
Survey
Document related concepts
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Inbreeding avoidance wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup
Viral phylodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Group selection wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
you did about this well introducing the Bayesian posterior probability of your exam grade! more on mice • • • • Darwin’s finches outstanding example want to continue with this because we have looked at 2 mice studies so far that have inferred gene regions associated with color, and have assumed selection Darwin’s postulates: the trait is variable, the trait is heritable...do we find out that survival is variable, and associated with inheritance of trait? lets make sure it is what we think it is! science isn’t always complicated recurring themes • • • • how can a population better utilize available resource? (some digestive enzyme) how can individuals better camouflage themselves? (fur or skin coloration) how does an individual maximize probability of offspring? (sperm motility) you can start to generate hypotheses for what could be ‘useful’ and then we recognize why some patterns recur • • • phylogenetics and biogeography previous slide uses phylogeny of genes unrelated to coat color to assess probability that coat color changes happen independently biogeography: the study of how and why organisms are distributed the way they are phylogeny can help us see whether species distributions represent descent from common ancestral range or population sticklebacks, redux development of pelvic spines in marine populations concomitant reduction in armoring in freshwater populations genes responsible • formation of lateral bony plates: QTL mapping led to ecdysoplasin (Eda) gene - involved with development of adult integument and teeth in vertebrates • Eda LOW homozygotes have few lateral plates vs. EdaHIGH homozygotes • alleles different enough that they have probably both existed for are you a geneious? • • • informatics software makes it easier than ever to explore what sequence data exist, what they look like, how they are related to one another free version can do a lot; has tutorial for basic exploration and bioinformatics on wiki you might choose to explore allelic variation, diversity of a population or species, etc. (do so systematically, with purpose...) intron variation between two allele types (some heterozygotes) high Eda alleles low Eda alleles “marine” types show up repeatedly in freshwater invasions; selection returns population to less-armored phenotype agriculture • human activities and behaviors have led to domestication of animals for meat and milk, crops for efficient nutrition • know what the “green revolution” is? • agriculture is a dramatic force of selection dairy consumption (lactose tolerance, lactase persistence) more frequent in groups with cultural tendency to drink milk nature.com signature of selection • molecular evolution: analysis of how DNA sequences evolve in response to selection (and demographic) forces on phenotypes (populations) • allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium provide clues to the history of a genome region dna: site frequencies and polymorphism acctggctcgac gtctggctcaac acctagctcaat acctagcccaac acttggctcagc acttggcttaac acttggctcagc acttggctcagc • how many segregating sites? • how many are unique? • how many found in 2 individuals? • how many in 3, 4? • average # differences between sequences calculate ∏ and why acctggctcgac gtctggctcaac acctagctcaat acctagcccaac acttggctcagc acttggcttaac acttggctcagc acttggctcagc • eventually gets us to estimating the population size, with assumptions... • here, 3.03 is proportional to the number of individuals reproducing times the mutation rate (π=xNµ) thus (N=π/xµ) how does that work? • briefly consider that there are N individuals in a population • there is a rate µ at which a mutation arises at a locus • if N individuals reproduce successfully, we can expect Nµ new mutations in next generation • diversity is scaled by the number of copies of a locus in a reproductive event, e.g. there are 2 maternal and 2 paternal alleles that can have a mutation for a nuclear diploid locus... x=4, so that π = 4Nµ diversity at a locus • however, we often find that our estimates of population size are far lower than the number we can count!! failure of theory? • main cause of drift (coming after exam 1) is variance in reproductive success (spatial, temporal, and individual variance) • the effective population size accounts for changes in population size, gender ratio, better nest sites, other causes for some individuals contributing disproportionately to next generation Effective population • Several definitions, but Ne=N/(variance) works, where N is how many individuals • If average individual has 1 offspring, most basic assumption is variance of 1 (normal distribution), so Ne=N • If variance high, Ne (and diversity) goes down can also partition the data • first codon position, second position, third position... • in protein-coding regions, most variation is ‘silent’ or ‘synonymous’ • why? • π is math equivalent to heterozygosity proportion of • patterns to be explored in this diversity individual s • more diversity in tropical species than polar? heterozyg • lower diversity following introduction? ous at a Things in Athens, Georgia Procambarus clarkii, Town Spring, π = 0.0 Notropis lutipinnis, Oconee River, π = 2.1 signature of selection (time passes) width = length of homologous linked segments around allele we expect a classic signature of “selective sweep” when rare mutation quickly increases in frequency would require strong selection one 2004 study estimated up to 19% more offspring surviving to maturity Bersaglieri, T. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 1111–1120 (2004). Nucleotide variation of studied regions on maize chromosome 10 Tian F et al. PNAS 2009;106:9979-9986 ©2009 by National Academy of Sciences blueridgeimpressions.wordpress.com resistance - ability to prevent damage (herbivore, herbicide, toxin, pathogen) tolerance - measure of fitness following damage you should be expecting this answer by now! • • • • pathways to resistance glyphosate attacks a highly conserved enzyme, EPSPS, involved in amino acid construction Monsanto developed transgenic crops that were glyphosate-resistant; spray crops and only weeds die? 1. some species have single amino acid difference in EPSPS that render glyphosate useless 2. others have duplicated the EPSPS region and thus produce more of this enzyme than glyphosate can block! • • • • • • interesting interpretation Bt is a toxin made by Bacillus thuringiensis; makes insects that eat crops sick spraying Bt on crops, or using transgenic crops that produce Bt, reduces insect damage but can insects evolve resistance? we would predict so text (p244) notes that maintaining non-Bt refuges limits evolution of resistance because resistance is costly (where there is no toxin, resistant insects have lower fitness than non-resistant insects) seems to be working; now it is law why wouldn’t (or would) same approach work for antibiotic resistance? contemporary problem 39 • atlantic cod - Gadus morhua • we’re fishing the last 0.01% of this population... • fisheries are large uncontrolled experiments in evolution • rules put in place for what can be caught, where, what size, what species • rules can change, may be ignored • average 4-year-old cod is 10-15cm shorter now than 30 years ago: net size selected against fast growth • heritability for rate of growth ~0.6 • if reproductive capacity proportional to body size, population is now smaller with a smaller potential rate of increase 40 bummer, man fewer fish... smaller, younger fish... Hutchings & Baum 2005 more on drift what will happen? • serial colonization and founders effects • new habitats? • what do you predict? 49 change in allele frequency ∆p tells us about the effective population size in a different way from diversity (π) the larger the population that is being sampled from, the smaller the change from one generation to next! fixation • if allele frequency goes to 0 or 1, there is no longer any variation, polymorphism, segregation.... it STAYS there • until mutation causes new polymorphism • probability that any given allele goes to fixation (frequency 1.0) is equal to its frequency – if allele A is at frequency p=0.7, then there is 70% chance that allele will fix 53 Starts at high HETEROZYGOSITY Ends with low HETEROZYGOSITY And 50/50 fixation of types 16 9! effective population size • Ne (effective population size) is lower than N (actual number of individuals) because of variance in reproductive success • imbalance in males/females means not all of the more common gender get to reproduce • “bottleneck” - a temporary reduction in population size - means that all the diversity descends from a smaller number of original individuals • different habitat quality, etc. diversity is transient • without mutation, in a finite population heterozygosity will decline every generation – Hg+1 = Hg[1-(1/2N)] – decline is faster with small N • selection can speed this loss (directional selection) or slow it down (balancing, frequency-dependent) • migration, mating patterns also affect rate 58