Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Define “frequency dependent selection”, and describe some of the ways it can arise in nature. Give examples whenever possible. In the natural habitats of populations of organisms, there are always many different reasons behind a change in the frequency of a particular phenotype, whether there are specific selection pressures such as competition, predation, environmental conditions or simply due to random drift. This can often make it hard for us to predict which phenotypes are most likely to be selected for. For some characteristics, we cannot judge which allele will be selected for without collecting data on the whole population. Frequency-dependent selection describes an evolutionary process whereby the fitness of individual phenotypes depends on the frequency of other alleles in that population. The two different forms of frequency dependent selection are positive and negative. The positive form is when the fitness of the phenotype increases as it becomes more common. This is usually because there is no significant benefit of the phenotype until this point, forming a stabilising selection curve where the mean phenotype is most favoured. This can be taken to the extreme and be compared to the Allee effect, which describes how new species or sub species may be steadily reduced in number until extinction. Conversely, with negative frequency dependent selection, the fitness of a phenotype decreases as it becomes more common; rare phenotypes are favoured, forming a disruptive selective curve, where phenotypes further away from the mean increase in frequency. Due to the high rate of mutation of genes and randomly occurring drift, new phenotypes can occur very frequently. These new phenotypes are not usually advantageous to the organism and sometimes they can decrease the fitness of the individual. In this case it would be to the detriment of the population to allow the frequency of this disadvantageous allele to increase. Positive frequencydependency selection ensures that only new alleles which increase the fitness of the organism will increase to a high frequency. A common example of this is Batesian mimicry, where a harmless species takes on the characteristics of a harmful species in order to dissuade predators from attacking them. This is seen in many organisms such as the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) and Viceroy (Limenitis archippus) butterflies. Monarch butterflies are poisonous to their predators due to the presence of cardiac glycosides in their bloodstreams. They are also very brightly coloured and this is thought to be a warning sign to predators who will associate those particular colours with danger; they are the model species. The Viceroy butterflies have become the mimic species as they are not themselves harmful to any predators but have evolved to mimic the bright 'warning' colours of the Monarch butterflies. Their predators still associate the colouring with danger and so less of the Viceroy butterflies are eaten. Following the steps of this evolution, we can see how positive frequency-dependent selection has achieved this. Originally, the Viceroy would have looked completely different to the Monarch. However, there was a random mutation which made an individual Viceroy look more similar to a Monarch. This would already have been advantageous, as it would have slightly decreased the chance of the individual being eaten. This rare phenotype would have increased in abundance slowly due to the evolutionary advantage. As the new phenotype became more common, positive frequency-dependent selection would have acted upon the phenotype and rapidly increased its frequency. This was because the new phenotype had a much higher fitness than the old phenotype. Eventually the whole population become the new mimic phenotype. Often it is the case that the positive form shifts the phenotype of the population to a much fitter version. By contrast, the negative form can arise in nature as a method of improving the survival rates of the whole population by decreasing intra-specific competition. It can maintain two or more separate phenotypes in the population. An example of negative frequency-dependent selection is found in the African cichlid (Perissodus microlepis), a species of fish from Lake Tanganyika, which feeds on the scales of a larger species of fish. The African cichlid appear to have two distinct phenotypes: one has their mouth bent to the left and the other to the right. The former can only feed on the right side scales of their prey and vice versa. Over a period of time, the ratio of the genotypes averages at 1:1. This is attributed to negative frequency-dependent selection. If we consider a sudden increase in left sided fish, the prey will be attacked more frequently on their right sides. Not only does this mean a decrease in the amount of scales available to the African cichlids, but also the prey will become much more wary of predators approaching from the right and are therefore more likely to spot the oncoming predators and escape. Overall, there will be much less food available to the left sided fish; they will be less likely to survive and begin to decrease in numbers. Meanwhile, the right sided fish are able to continue attacking the prey on their left sides, as the prey is only wary of predators approaching from the right. Consequentially, more food is available to the right sided fish, so they have a higher fitness and are more likely to survive, reproduce and pass on the allele for the right sided phenotype. Over time, the frequency of right sided fish returns to around 50% and the left sided fish will reduce in number to around 50% and so the 1:1 stable population ratio is maintained over time. The African cichlids are a good example of these, as the phenotypes are controlled by only two alleles at a single locus. Negative frequency-dependent selection can also arise in a totally different way in a population. Instead of maintaining a stable population of just two phenotypes, it can give rise to an extremely high variety of phenotypes which are constantly changing. The advantage to this is that predators can often associate a certain appearance with their prey. They attempt to seek out this learned appearance repeatedly for their food source. Therefore, it is advantageous for the prey to have high variety in its appearance as they are less likely to be eaten. Bryan Clarke described this phenomenon in his paper based on frequency-dependent selection in 1962. He observed that the high colour and band pattern polymorphism, in British snails, seemed to enable a greater chance of survival. As seen in the previous example, we can see that frequency-dependent selection is extremely important in the continual survival of many species. At first glance, it appears as though the positive and negative forms are complete opposites. However, I would challenge that statement. I believe that both forms have arisen in all modern day organisms. If this were not the case, their lineage would have become extinct. The positive form appears to be the major cause of evolutionary branching, by changing the phenotype of whole populations to a more evolutionarily advantageous, fitter phenotype. However, the initial stage of these evolutionary changes began with an individual with a mutated phenotype. This means that originally the phenotype was extremely rare and could not have increased via positive frequency-dependent selection. Instead the negative form must have acted first. If this individual had a fitter phenotype than the rest of the population, it would have easily been able to thrive compared to the rest of the organisms. Therefore, it would have gone on to survive longer, successfully reproduce more and so increase the frequency of the phenotype. Therefore, I believe that both the negative and positive forms of frequency-dependent selection are vital for the evolution of all organisms.