Download NA-APM - EFCOG

NNSA Project Reviews
NNSA Office of Project Analysis, Oversight, and Review
(NA-APM-1.1)
June 7, 2017
Dwight Henderson, Director
[email protected]
(301) 903-4393// GTN A-119
APM-1.1 Origin, Mission, & Function
A mission support organization that ensures NNSA projects
deliver safe, quality construction on budget.
• Project Reviews are with us to stay
o NNSA is required by DOE Order 413.3B to conduct reviews of Capital
Asset Projects
• NA-APM-1.1 was established in 2011 to address DOE/NNSA/
Congress/GAO concerns
• Independent from the requirements owner (NA-10, 20, 50, etc.)
• Independent from Project Execution (NA-APM-1, 20)
• NNSA BOP 06.04 identifies three (3) classes of reviews to meet these
requirements:
o Independent Project Reviews (IPRs),
o Annual Peer Reviews (APRs), and
o Technical Independent Project Reviews (TIPRs)
• Responsible for reviews on Capital Asset Projects > the GPP threshold
2
NA-APM Organization Chart
Principal Deputy
Administrator
NA-2
William ‘Ike’ White
Associate
Administrator
NA-APM
Bob Raines
Office of
Acquisition
Management
NA-APM-10
Kim Gallegos
Office of Project Analysis,
Oversight and Review
NA-APM-1.1
Dwight Henderson
Office of
Enterprise
Project
Management
UPF
Project
Management
Office
MOX
Project
Management
Office
CMRR
Project
Management
Office
NA-APM-20
Cameron Manning
NA-APM-1.3
Dale Christenson
NA-APM-1.4
Scott Cannon
NA-APM-1.5
Everett Trollinger
3
3
Planning for Project Reviews
• APM-1.1’s Review Schedule is done annually, updated
quarterly
• Review Committees are staffed in a continuous process
o
Participate as a Review Subcommittee Member or as an
Observer
• Project Reviews are added and sometimes deleted from
our schedule
o
FPD’s are responsible to make the dates work for them
• Charge Memo will be prepared six (6) weeks prior to a
review and sent to the Program Office and FPD for
concurrence
4
Project
Location
1.
LAFO
2.
Y-12
3.
LAFO
Scheduled Review Dates—2017
TPC $M
Name
Review
Type
35-83
Exascale Class Computing
Cooling Equipment (EC3E)
CD-1 IPR
Program
Office
NA-10
4.
LFO
5.
6.
7.
8.
LAFO
Y-12
Y-12
Y-12
20.4-33.6 Fire Station
CD-1 IPR
NA-50
TA-3 Substation
28.2
APR
NA-50
Replacement
Expand Elect. Distr. System
13.7-54.8
CD-2/3 IPR NA-50
(EEDS)
LAFO-FOM
92.7
TRP II, Phase C
APR
58.6-76.7 Electrorefining (ER)
TIPR
NA-194
36.5-46.4 Calciner
TIPR
NPO
20.4-33.6 EOC
CD-2/3 IPR
NA-50
9.
Pantex
100-155
10.
LFO
50-90
11.
LAFO
1027.3
12.
SRFO
136-376
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
SFO 183-250.9
NFO
156-195
LFO
23-49
LAFO
82.7
NFO
28-35.3
18.
LAFO
35-83
19.
Y-12
20-37
NNSA ABQ Complex Project
APR
UCEP
TIPR
LLNL EOC
CD-1 IPR
RLWTF LLW
APR
DAF Argus Phase A
APR
Exascale Class Computing
CD-2/3 IPR
Cooling Equipment (EC3E)
Y-12 Fire Station
CD-2/3 IPR
LAFO
62-96
RLWTF TLW
Y-12
Y-12
Y-12
Y-12
High Explosive Science &
APR
Engineering (HES&E)
Exascale Computing Facility
CD-1 IPR
Modernization (ECFM)
CMRR PF-4 Equip Install
Phase 1 (PEI1) ) & RLUOB
APR
Equip Install Phase 2 (REI2)
Tritium Production Capability
CD-1 IPR
(TPC)
4200-6500 UPF
UPF Process Support
60
Facilities (PSF)
UPF Main Process Building
4300
(MPB)
UPF Salvage and
1330
Accountability Bldg. (SAB)
Jan
Feb
Mar
Q2 FY 2017
April
May
June
Q3 FY 2017
July
Aug
Sept
Q4 FY 2017
Oct
Nov
Dec
Q1 FY 2018
24-27
7-10
21-24
7-10
21-24
15-19
19-23
27-30
NA-19
11-14
NA-10
25-28
NA-1
7-11
NA-10
22-25
NA-1
NA-10
NA-50
NA-10
NA-70
12-15
25-29
17-20
10/31-11/3
14-17
NA-10
5-8
19-22
EIR
NA-50
NA-10
EIR
S-2
EIR
S-2
5-9
EIR
S-2
5-9
EIR
S-2
5-9
16-20
Notes:
1. Completed reviews are shaded in gray.
2. Although EIRs are performed by DOE PM, they are included for convenience.
5/23/17
5
6
Project Reviews by Calendar Year
NA-APM-1.1 Project Reviews
By Calendar Year (2014 – 2018)
30
Project Reviews
25
20
15
10
5
0
Reviews
2014
7
2015
12
2016
16
2017
19
2018
26
7
Project Review Subcommittees:
Areas of Focus
•
•
•
Project reviews allow
opportunities for
continuous improvement
across these five (5) areas
of focus.
Project Reviews help the
FPD maintain confidence
that project systems,
processes, and technical
efforts are integrated and
effectively coordinated.
Reviews also ensure that
the project is progressing
in step with established
baselines.
1
Technical
Subcommittee
Project Team
led by
FPD/IPT
2
Cost, Schedule,
Risk (CSR)
Subcommittee
Project Review
Committee
led by
Chairperson
3
Management and
Acquisition (M&A)
Subcommittee
5
Commissioning
Subcommittee
4
Environment,
Safety, Health
and Quality
Assurance
(ESH&QA)
Subcommittee
8
Technical Subcommittee
• Technology, design, and
nuclear safety
• Confinement and
Ventilation/Containers
• Design/Construction
• Safety in Design
• Fire Protection
• Rad Protection
• Nuclear Safety Basis
• Construction Management
• ALARA process
• Hazards Analysis
• Physical Security
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Bulk Chemical Systems
Structural and Seismic, NPH
Engineering and Design
Civil/Structural
Electrical Power Systems,
I&C
Construction Management
Technological Readiness
Criticality Safety
Chemical Safety
Mining Engineering
LEED and Sustainable
Design
9
CSR Subcommittee
• Cost estimating
• Funding analysis
• Schedule estimating
• Risk Identification and Management
o Risk Analysis
• EVMS
10
M&A Subcommittee
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Project Management Systems, Controls, and Planning
Subcontractor Management and Oversight
Capital Asset Acquisition
Acquisition Planning
Contract Administration
Long Lead Procurements
Experience working with IAs and other Federal partners
(e.g., USACE)
• Configuration Management and Document Control,
Project Controls
• Experience with contract types, including CPFF, CPIF,
CPAF, FFP and T&M
11
ESH&QA Subcommittee
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Nuclear Quality (NQA-1) and Quality Assurance
Commercial Dedication and Grading
Environmental Management, NEPA
Permitting (NPDES, State and Local)
QA Programs and Procedures
Worker Safety and Health, Industrial Hygiene
Safeguards and Security
10 CFR 851
12
Cx Subcommittee
• Startup and Turnover
• Transition to Operations
• RCAPTS
• Project Closeout
• Demolition and Decommissioning (D&D)
13