Download Media Release

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Ancestry.com wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A media alert for Current Biology.
Media Contact: Joseph Caputo | Cell Press
617-397-2802 | [email protected] | [email protected]
EMBARGOED PRESS RELEASE
STRICTLY UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 12:00PM NOON ET (US) ON MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016
Region(s) of Interest: United States, Massachusetts, California
Institution(s): Harvard Medical School/Broad Institute; UCLA
A world map of Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in modern humans
Most non-Africans possess at least a little bit Neanderthal DNA.
But a new map of archaic ancestry--published March 28 in
Current Biology--suggests that many bloodlines around the
world, particularly of South Asian descent, may actually be a bit
more Denisovan, a mysterious population of hominids that lived
around the same time as the Neanderthals. The analysis also
proposes that modern humans interbred with Denisovans about
100 generations after their trysts with Neanderthals.
The Harvard Medical School/UCLA research team that created the map also used comparative genomics to
make predictions about where Denisovan and Neanderthal genes may be impacting modern human biology.
While there is still much to uncover, Denisovan genes can potentially be linked to a more subtle sense of smell
in Papua New Guineans and high-altitude adaptions in Tibetans. Meanwhile, Neanderthal genes found in
people around the world most likely contribute to tougher skin and hair.
"There are certain classes of genes that modern humans inherited from the archaic humans with whom they
interbred, which may have helped the modern humans to adapt to the new environments in which they
arrived," says senior author David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School and the Broad Institute. "On
the flip side, there was negative selection to systematically remove ancestry that may have been problematic
from modern humans. We can document this removal over the 40,000 years since these admixtures occurred."
Reich and lab members, Swapan Mallick and Nick Patterson, teamed up with previous laboratory member
Sriram Sankararaman, now an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, on the project,
which found evidence that both Denisovan and Neanderthal ancestry has been lost from the X chromosome, as
well as genes expressed in the male testes. They theorize that this has contributed to reduced fertility in males,
which is commonly observed in other hybrids between two highly divergent groups of the same species.
The researchers collected their data by comparing known Neanderthal and Denisovan gene sequences across
more than 250 genomes from 120 non-African populations publically available through the Simons Genome
Diversity Project (there is little evidence for Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in Africans). The analysis
was carried out by a machine-learning algorithm that could differentiate between components of both kinds of
ancestral DNA, which are more similar to one another than to modern humans.
The results showed that individuals from Oceania possess the highest percentage of archaic ancestry and south
Asians possess more Denisovan ancestry than previously believed. This reveals previously unknown
interbreeding events, particularly in relation to Denisovans. In contrast, Western Eurasians are the nonAfricans least likely to have Neanderthal or Denisovan genes. "The interactions between modern humans and
archaic humans are complex and perhaps involved multiple events," Reich says.
The study's main limitation is that it relies on the current library of ancient genomes available. The researchers
caution against drawing any conclusions about our extinct human ancestors based on the genetics and possible
traits that they left behind. "We can't use this data to make claims about what the Denisovans or Neanderthals
looked like, what they ate, or what kind of diseases they were susceptible to," says Sankararaman, first author
on the paper. "We are still very far from understanding that."
###
The authors were supported by the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the
Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Current Biology, Sankararaman et al.: "The Combined Landscape of Denisovan and Neanderthal Ancestry in
Present-Day Humans" http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.037. Link to the paper
at: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)30247-0
Related Files
This Dropbox contains a PDF of the paper proof, supplemental info, and Figure 2a
map: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/o6nvvzrxs2sd09t/AADdUEKJLXRgSgpAyI1F3gpVa?dl=0
Author Contacts:
David Reich
Harvard Medical School/Broad Institute
+1 617-432-6548
[email protected]
Sriram Sankararaman
UCLA
+1 510-813-9888
[email protected]
Media Contacts:
Angela Alberti
Harvard Medical School
617-432-3038
[email protected]
Matthew Chin
UCLA
+1 310-206-0680
[email protected]