* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Annotated bib final
Effects of pornography wikipedia , lookup
Sexuality and disability wikipedia , lookup
Sexual objectification wikipedia , lookup
Hookup culture wikipedia , lookup
Homosexuality wikipedia , lookup
Incest taboo wikipedia , lookup
Sexual assault wikipedia , lookup
Human sexual activity wikipedia , lookup
Adolescent sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Blanchard's transsexualism typology wikipedia , lookup
Human male sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Sexual selection wikipedia , lookup
Sexual racism wikipedia , lookup
Age of consent wikipedia , lookup
Ages of consent in South America wikipedia , lookup
Erotic plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Sex and sexuality in speculative fiction wikipedia , lookup
Sexual addiction wikipedia , lookup
Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women wikipedia , lookup
Sexual abstinence wikipedia , lookup
Sexual fluidity wikipedia , lookup
Sexological testing wikipedia , lookup
Sexual dysfunction wikipedia , lookup
Sex in advertising wikipedia , lookup
Sexual stimulation wikipedia , lookup
Ego-dystonic sexual orientation wikipedia , lookup
Heterosexuality wikipedia , lookup
Penile plethysmograph wikipedia , lookup
Sexual reproduction wikipedia , lookup
Human female sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Rochdale child sex abuse ring wikipedia , lookup
Lesbian sexual practices wikipedia , lookup
Human sexual response cycle wikipedia , lookup
Slut-shaming wikipedia , lookup
History of human sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Female promiscuity wikipedia , lookup
Environment and sexual orientation wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Kat Bailey UNIV 112 November 4, 2015 Professor Dempster Annotated Bibliography Research Question: What is Asexuality? What are the myths about it? Is it a valid sexuality? What can be done to aid the asexual community? Source 1: “How is asexuality different from hypoactive sexual desire disorder?” by Andrew Hinderliter. MLA: Hinderliter, Andrew. "How Is Asexuality Different from Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder?" Psychology & Sexuality 2.4 (2010): 167-178. Taylor & Francis Journals Complete. Web. 01 Nov. 2015. Qualifications: Andrew Hinderliter is a Ph.D. student at the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign currently working on his dissertation on online asexual discourse. He has made multiple publications regarding the classification of sexual disorders, asexuality, and other psychological topics. These include (but are not limited to) “The six essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis,” a widely cited essay. Main Claim: Asexuality and hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) have some things in common and are often grouped together, but they have important distinctions that separate asexuality as an identity rather than a disorder. Neither concept is going away any time soon, and we must accept the fact that they can both exist (even in the same individual) without one neutralizing the other. Subclaim 1: The asexual community is working to bring asexuality into the mainstream “norm.” Evidence: 2008-2009: members of the asexual community formed the ‘AVEN DSM Taskforce’ and interviewed experts in human sexuality. A report was submitted afterwards recommending that HSDD have an explicit exception for asexuals. “A major goal of the asexual community is for asexuality to be seen as a part of the ‘normal variation’ that exists in human sexuality rather than a disorder to be cured. As HSDD labels lack of sexual interest (at least sometimes) as a disorder, this is problematic for that goal.” (167) Subclaim 2: The rise of knowledge and awareness about asexuality arose in the 90s to early twenty-first century partly or wholly due to the correlating rise in studies and pharmaceuticals regarding female sexual dysfunction and other sexual problems Evidence: A Yahoo group called “Haven for the human amoeba” was created in 2000. In 2001, AVEN (Asexual Visibility and Education Network) the website was created by a college freshman named David Jay. He defined asexual as: ‘A person who is sexually attracted to neither gender.’ This was later changed to ‘A person who does not experience sexual attraction’ in order to be more inclusive of the idea of a gender spectrum. These events began taking place a few years after the 90’s, during which time there was a boom in the pharmaceutical role in treating sexual disorders and the term female sexual dysfunction (FSD) was coined. “Many women cannot/do not distinguish between sexual desire and subjective sexual arousal, drawing into question whether it makes any sense to treat these as distinct phenomena.”(170) Subclaim 3: Masturbating and even experiencing a sex drive does not negate the possibility of someone being asexual. Evidence: This is really sort of a subjective/up to interpretation still. However, the definition of asexuality on AVEN’s page today only defines asexuality by a lack of sexual attraction to others. The website “The Official Asexual Society” maintained that masturbation excluded one from being asexual; however it later changed its name to “The Official Nonlibidoism Society.” “As David Jay's primary interest was in constructing asexuality as an identity that people found to be helpful in making sense of their lives and navigating relationships, he strongly believed that anyone who felt that identifying as asexual made sense for them should be allowed to do so.” (171) “Feeling that what people do or do not do in private with respect to masturbation has little consequence for their social relationships, he held that it made perfect sense for masturbation to be consistent with an asexual identity.” (171) Subclaim 4: Asexuality cannot be diagnosed like a disorder; only the individual can decide whether or not to identify themselves as asexual. Evidence: AVEN refuses to directly answer questions along the lines of “am I asexual?” because it firmly maintains this position. There is no “official” way to diagnose asexuality, but there are ways that clinicians diagnose HSDD. “This contrast involves differences in the locus of expert knowledge. For HSDD, it is the clinician who possesses it. For asexuality, it is the individual who possesses it.” (173) “One of the most important differences between asexuality and HSDD is their valuation of lack of sexual interest/attraction. HSDD regards lack of sexual interest as negative, whereas asexuality values lack of sexual attraction as neutral or positive. The goal with HSDD is, if possible, to get the person (more) interested in sex, whereas asexuality aims at self-acceptance, viewing asexuality as something that does not need to be ‘cured.’” (173) Why use this source: This source maintains that asexuality is a valid identify separate from the closest related sexual disorder (HSDD.) It details the rise of the asexual community and awareness about asexuality, which I can use to provide background and show that there is a lot of support for asexuality as an identity. The first quote under subclaim 3 is also one that I really like and will almost definitely use because it ties into the moral aspect we are supposed to include. Research Question: What is Asexuality? What are the myths about it? Is it a valid sexuality? What can be done to aid the asexual community? Source 2: “Biological Markers of Asexuality: Handedness, Birth Order, and Finger Length Ratios in Self-identified Asexual Men and Women” by Morag A. Yule et al. MLA: Yule, Morag A., Lori A. Brotto and Boris B. Gorzalka. “Biological Markers of Asexuality: Handedness, Birth Order, and Finger Length Ratios in Self-identified Asexual Men and Women.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 26.1 (1997): 299-310. Springer Standard Collection. Web. 01 Nov. 2015. Qualifications: Authors Morag A. Yule and Lori A. Brotto are affiliated with the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of British Columbia, and are the researchers who performed one of the key studies discussed in the article. Author Boris B. Gorzalka is affiliated with the department of Psychology at the University of British Columbia. Main Claim: There are certain markers which are indicative of asexuality as well as other deviant sexualities, suggesting that they are similar in development and impact on the individual’s life more so than asexuality is similar to a dysfunction. Subclaim 1: Our highly sexualized culture demonstrates an “intolerance of waning sexual desire” (299) which may create a climate in which asexual people are misunderstood, leading to attempts at diagnoses and treatment. Evidence: Tucker Carlson, a popular news anchor who works for Fox News today, hypothesized that all asexual individuals have HSDD (a distressing lack of sexual fantasies or sex drive) during an interview with David Jay (the founder of AVEN). This interview took place during Carlson’s segment on a national broadcast called The Situation in 2006. Asexuals have been “treated” accordingly by doctors, therapists and psychologists who thought similarly to Carlson. There were (and still are) sex clinics intended to induce sexual desire through counseling, activities, diet changes and drug therapy treatments. Subclaim 2: Asexuality differs from a sexual disorder not only because it does not (in and of itself) cause distress to the individual, but also because it does not physically manifest itself like other sexual dysfunctions. Evidence: In 2011, researchers Brotto and Yule performed a study to measure physical arousal in women of different sexual orientations. Bisexual, heterosexual, homosexual and asexual women were all shown the same erotic films. The women all experienced comparable levels of physical arousal, including the ones who identified as asexual. However, asexualidentified women did not report an increase in sexual attraction during or after the viewing, while the other women did. This demonstrates that attraction and physical response operate separately of one another, supporting the idea that asexuality is an orientation and not a dysfunction. “In a direct test of whether asexuality might be explained by a dysfunctional sexual arousal response, asexual, heterosexual, lesbian, and bisexual women were compared and found not to differ from one another in the genital sexual arousal response to erotic films (Brotto & Yule, 2011). This lack of group difference in genital response is consistent with a growing body of evidence that women, regardless of stated sexual preferences and type of erotic material, respond in a similar manner with regard to their genital sexual response.” (300) Subclaim 3: There are multiple characteristics which are more prevalent in asexual individuals, indicating that the development of asexuality may have to do with biological pathways. These traits are also associated with other non-heterosexual identities. Evidence: Researcher Bogaert performed a study in 2004 which concluded that short stature and late menarche are predictive of asexuality. Non-right-handedness is associated, not only with asexuality, but with all deviant sexualities. Having multiple older siblings, particularly brothers, is also more common among non-heterosexuals than it is among heterosexuals. This is a very important piece of information because it represents the very real possible of a detectable neurological similarity between asexuality and other sexualities, thereby “proving” (as much as it is possible to prove) that asexuality is a valid sexuality akin to heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality, as it seems to develop similarly and have similar manifestations in other seemingly unrelated aspects. “Novel to this study was the finding of a significant relationship between number of older siblings, both sisters and brothers, and asexuality.” (307) “Prenatal stress might play a role…” (307) Why use this source: This source details a study explicitly intended to test whether or not asexuality is a sexual dysfunction and declares that it is not. It also relates multiple studies which find a relationship between all forms of non-heterosexuality, including asexuality, and certain other traits, specifically handedness and sibling order. This indicates that asexuality is a neurological state much the same as homosexuality or bisexuality. This study is basically the best “proof” of validity as is academically possible. The source also makes a brief hypothesis about the role of prenatal stress in the development of deviant sexualities, which I may or may not look for further sources on depending on the availability of further research on the topic. Research Question: What is Asexuality? What are the myths about it? Is it a valid sexuality? What can be done to aid the asexual community? Source 3: “Asexuality: A Mixed-Methods Approach” by Lori Brotto et al. MLA: Brotto, Lori A., Gail Knudson, Jess Inskip, Katherine Rhodes and Yvonne Erskine. “Asexuality: a Mixed-Methods Approach.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 26.1 (2010): 599-618. Springer Standard Collection. Web. 01 Nov. 2015. Main Claim: It is important that asexuality is recognized by the mainstream worlds of media and academics and that people become educated on the subject of asexuality. Subclaim 1: There is a stigma against people who self-identify as asexual, and a complex exists in the efforts to draw hard lines around what exactly asexuality is which might cause distress to people who feel they are asexual but are challenged to “prove” their asexuality and maintain it throughout their lifetimes, lest their identity be challenged and/or denied. Evidence: Over one third of asexual participants in Bogaert’s study demonstrated more reluctance talking about masturbation habits than their sexual counterparts, or refused to discuss them altogether. While the subject is generally an uncomfortable one, asexual-identified individuals seemed to display an abnormal amount of discomfort and squeamishness. “One might posit that such reluctance around talking about masturbation might be even more pronounced than in the sexual person given that an open admission of masturbatory activity could threaten one’s asexual identity.” (612) In other words, the author hypothesized that the existence of a gatekeeper complex around asexual identity and the asexual community stifles asexual-identified individuals because they are afraid to express certain things for fear of being stripped of their identity. There is no solid research on this, but it is a valid point worthy of consideration regardless. Subclaim 2: Asexuality is an “invisible” sexuality, meaning it has very little exposure and mainstream attention. The lack of awareness around asexuality is very much a negative thing; it even hinders some asexual individuals because they may not even be aware that asexuality exists as a viable identity that they can claim. Evidence: Participants in this study made multiple claims along the lines of: “I am very keen on getting the word out because had I known years ago my life could have been so different.” (613). “Some talked about a great sense of relief upon discovering AVEN, particularly in finding that many others had also experienced a non-distressing lack of sexual attraction like them.” (613) and “…I never heard of asexuality. I didn’t realize that I could say, hey, I’m asexual, you know…go away.” (613-614). I would also like to corroborate this with a touch of a personal story in my paper; I didn’t even learn about the existence of asexuality and the asexual community until my late teens, and struggled a lot with attempting to find an identity that felt right. Subclaim 3: There is as much variation among asexuals in terms of sexual activity, fantasy and masturbation habits as there is among sexuals. Evidence: Demographically speaking, asexual participants in this study and online surveys cited in the essay reported a wide variety of habits and feelings, falling on a spectrum anywhere from total sex repulsion to typical enjoyment. Some asexuals report masturbating or even having sex simply because they enjoy the physical sensation, even though they do not experience sexual attraction; this is important because it demonstrates the difference between sexual attraction and sexual drive, or libido; it must be noted that individuals may have both, neither, or one without the other. Some asexuals report feeling an attraction to other people, just not in a sexual way, while others report no attractions whatsoever at any point in their lives. Additionally, the level and degree of the presence of sexual fantasy, masturbation and sex is widely varied among individuals in the asexual community. Why use this source: This source has a lot of personal, unaltered quotes from asexual individuals who agreed to discuss their personal lives, giving another, more human dimension to impersonal discussions about the validity of asexuality and those who have incorporated it into their identities. Also, while this source supports my position (that asexuality is valid and should not be left up to the individual to determine for themselves, not determined by a rigid set of rules), in subclaims 1 and 2 it also delves into the opposing side that people have taken against asexuality and discusses the stigma against it and the way that ace invisibility could be hurting people. This could be really important and helpful because it can help to answer the last piece of my research question, ways in which the asexual community can be helped. Research Question: What is Asexuality? What are the myths about it? Is it a valid sexuality? What can be done to aid the asexual community? Source 4: “Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality” by CJ DeLuzio Chasin MLA: Chasin, CJ DeLuzio. “Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 40.4 (2011): 713-723. Springer Standard Collection. Web. 01 Nov. 2015. Main Claim: Asexuality is a multi-faceted phenomenon and researchers attempting to study it need to be mindful of this fact. There are several factors that make studying the asexual population and manifestations of asexuality in separate individuals tricky. Subclaim 1: There is a pattern of inconsistency regarding asexual sexual orientation-related selfidentification when given forced-answer question, leading to questions and confusion on the part of researchers and academics as to how to properly sort, filter and evaluate information and participants in studies they perform. This makes it more difficult to study asexuality as a single phenomenon. Evidence: When given forced-answer questions, self-identified asexual people in studies consistently have a percentage which do not mark themselves “asexual,” even when it is presented to them as an option. In 2007 a study by Prause and Graham found that out of 41 selfidentified asexual participants, only 22 chose “asexual” from a forced answer form. A study by Brotto in 2010 came across similar difficulties: 47 out of 187 self-identified asexuals chose a sexuality other than asexual on a forced-answer question. This demonstrates the necessity to differentiate between sexual and romantic attraction; when given a box to clarify an answer of “other,” participants would specify such orientations as “homoasexual” and “biromantic asexual.” This took care of the discrepancy almost completely. “…the association between physiological genital arousal and sexual attraction is neither simple nor straightforward.” (717) Subclaim 2: The distinction between sexual and romantic orientation is a key aspect to any study on asexuality and to understanding the diversity within the asexual community. Evidence: The study cited in subclaim 1 demonstrated this importance; it is impossible to study asexuality without acknowledging this dichotomy because, like any other population of people, asexual-identified individuals are not one unanimous entity with the same feelings. Failure to acknowledge this diversity within the asexual population will lead to confusion, conflicting information, and skewed data, not to mention the negative response such studies might receive from the asexual community should it be brought to the mainstream attention. “Given the apparent heterogeneity of asexuals, it makes little theoretical sense to approach asexual people as though they represent a single, homogeneous, and unitary population.” (715) “The asexual sample required for this type of comparison (i.e., the representative sample) must be sensitive to diversity within the asexual population.” (715) “Even if the category of asexual (just like other categories of people, such as gay, White, or woman) may not be rooted in an objective, substantive reality, the category itself has a social reality, with a very real impact on people.” (718) Why use this source: This is the only (academic) source I have found which discusses the distinction between romantic and sexual orientation, which I definitely want to discuss as I feel that it is really important to keep in mind when studying or even just discussing the nature of asexuality and/or the diversity within the self-identified asexual population. I also think that this distinction is very much under the radar in our culture today, with many people – a majority, even – completely unaware that it exists and has meaning in plenty of people’s lives. It also has some solid, workable quotes on diversity and the importance of population samples that represent that diversity accurately that I will definitely work those into my paper, because that perspective works as a call to action and is a great example of how research on asexuality can be improved upon constantly. It also helps to answer the last part of my research question by giving a simple example of one thing that can aid the asexual community; better academic research and studies are a stepping stone to better information and acceptance, creating a better climate for the population as a whole. Research Question: What is Asexuality? What are the myths about it? Is it a valid sexuality? What can be done to aid the asexual community? Source 5: “Combating the stigma against asexuals and aromantics” by Hao-Han Pan MLA: Pan, Hao-Han. “Combating the stigma against asexuals and aromantics.” Studlife.com. Washington University, 18 Feb. 2015. Web. 01 Nov. 2015. Qualifications: The author of this article is a student and therefore has no particular qualifications. The paper, “Student Life,” is a University paper published by Washington University, a private research university in St. Louis, Missouri. This is one of the nation’s oldest student run papers, established in 1878. They have a team of 76 undergraduate students working on writing, editing, and fact-checking the paper. Each edition prints 6,000 copies due to its popularity and reputation. They do not seem to exhibit any particular bias. The author is biased because she references personal relationships she has with asexual individuals. Main Claim: Asexuals are the “minority within the minority”, and subsequently they are frequently marginalized not only by the mainstream culture but even within the LGBTQ community. As a result of this marginalization there is a pervasive stigma and wealth of misinformation about asexuality and asexual-identifying individuals. Subclaim 1: Myths include: 1) asexuality is a choice, like celibacy. 2) Having sex means you are no longer asexual. 3) Asexuality and aromanticism are the same thing. 4) Asexuality and aromanticism are caused by physical dysfunction, such as hormone imbalance. Evidence: The author does not really give any specific evidence for these claims. (This is a result of this being a less academic/credible source; I’ll discuss in my final section, why to use the source, why I am including it in this annotated bibliography and planning on working it into my paper.) Because the author is a young student at a university, it is implied that these are myths which she herself has seen or experienced. “There are many reasons why asexuals may have sex—to have children, to bond with non-asexual spouses or even simply because they enjoy the physical sensation of it, even if they’re not attracted to their partners.” “It is entirely possible for an asexual to be in a romantic relationship and for an aromantic to experience sexual attraction.” Subclaim 2: The stigma against asexuality is real, alive, and harmful. Evidence: First kisses, first boyfriends/girlfriends, losing virginity, etc. are common rites of passage in our modern society for youths and young adults, and without these rites individuals are often widely looked down on and treated as if they are not “real” adults. Our media is obsessed with sex and love; they make up an entire, main genre of film and literature, as well as the sub-plots in the vast majority of works in the public mainstream today. They also pervade the arts, such as music, photography, and illustration. This alienates asexual individuals from any feeling of inclusion in their culture and community, leading to many asexuals believing they are “broken.” This mindset is also not at all discouraged by the general public, who are quick to accuse asexual individuals of just being “attention seeking.” “To delay these rites is pitiful, though understandable – to opt out of them entirely and say ‘no thank you, pass the chocolate’ is inconceivable.” “Flying under the radar doesn’t mean you won’t be shot down.” Subclaim 3: The LGBTQ community is widely guilty of contributing to the stigma against and marginalization of asexual individuals and the asexual community as a whole. Evidence: A landmark case in 2012 conducted by Brock University researchers declared that across the board, people of all sexualities were most likely to participate in discrimination and hateful language towards asexual-identified individuals. Asexuals who are active on the internet often become victims of threats of violence and/or “corrective rape.” “In the drive to let people freely love whom they love and do what they do, those uninterested in sex or romantic love all too often fall by the wayside.” Why use this source: I know that this is not the most technically “good” or reputable source that I have. It is published by youths, not academic professionals. However I think it is important to have at least one source that reflects the common person’s point of view, considering that is a large part of my research question (relating to what myths exist and whether it is “valid”), and a paper published by a University seemed like the best source to gather information along the lines of popular opinion, which can’t really be studied in an academic setting. Or at least it hasn’t been studied in the case of asexuality. This is also the only source I found which devoted the majority of its body to discussion of the existence of a stigma against asexuals and aromantics; my academic sources mention this, or mention conflict regarding what qualifies someone as an asexual, but do not delve into any great detail on the topic. Again, I believe that this is most likely due to difficulty in studying the topic. It may also be related to the fact that many academics are still simply arguing that asexuality exists, and not focusing on their treatment or social reform as of yet.