Download African Insurance Organisation Harmonisation in Insurance

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Insurance wikipedia , lookup

Moral hazard wikipedia , lookup

Financialization wikipedia , lookup

Life settlement wikipedia , lookup

Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup

Actuary wikipedia , lookup

History of insurance wikipedia , lookup

Insurance in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
African Insurance Organisation
Harmonisation in Insurance
Regulation
Clem Booth
June 2017
Insurance
Financial Planning
Retirement
Investments
Wealth
Agenda for the Session
Introduction
Regulatory
Globalisation
Focus on
Africa
Questions
Introduction
Historical Perspective
Global
insurance
supervision
and the IAIS
Development
of prudential
regulations
Development
of anti-money
laundering
regulations
Historical Perspective: Insurance Supervision
International
Association of
Insurance
Supervisors
(IAIS)
200
jurisdictions
in nearly
140 countries
Insurance
Core
Principles
(ICPs)
World Bank
and IMF uses
ICPs to
evaluate
supervisory
regimes
International
Capital
Standard for
insurers
Insurance
supervision
remains
regional and
country specific
Historical Perspective: Prudential Supervision
Prudential Regulations for Banks
⧁ Common capital framework
⧁ Basel I - 1988
⧁ Basel II - 2004
⧁ Basel III – 2013 to 2017
Historical Perspective: Prudential Supervision
Prudential Regulations for Insurers
⧁ Less global coordination
⧁ Europe Solvency I Directive
⧁ Solvency II Directive
⧁ Three pillar approach
⧁ US on different approach
⧁ Similar regimes
Historical Perspective: Financial Crime
Anti-Money Laundering (AML)
⧁ 1980’s “war on drugs”
⧁ Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
⧁ After 9/11
⧁ 4th EU AML Directive
⧁ IMF funding
Regulatory
Globalisation
Development of Harmonisation
⧁ Global reach of the International Association of
Insurance Supervisors and Solvency II
⧁ Harmonising prudential regimes Solvency II and the
International Capital Standard
⧁ Realities and consequences of global harmonisation
⧁ Threats to harmonisation
Current Situation: Global Reach of IAIS and Solvency II
European
Union
2016
Canada
2014
Guernsey
2015
Switzerland
2015
USA 2015
*State Dependent
Japan
2015
China
2015
Bermuda
2011
South
Korea
Hong Kong
2017
incrementaly 2015-2018
Singapore
Tier 1 2014
Others 2015 Malaysia
2012
South Africa
2016
Member of the IAIS
Have implemented ORSA framework
(including implementation date required by regulators)
Australia
2013
Members of the EU
Current Situation: Solvency II and Harmonisation
⧁ Solvency II (SII)
⧁ Implementation across Eurpoe
⧁ Third country equivalence
⧁ Full equivalence
⧁ Temporary equivalence
⧁ South Africa also applying for equivalence
⧁ Third country equivalence promotes harmonisation
Current Situation: International Capital Standard
⧁ 9 Multinational insurance groups
⧁ Three types of policy measures
⧁ Expanded to include Internationally Active Insurance
Groups (IAIGs)
⧁ IAIGs to apply ICS by 2019
⧁ Currently field testing phase
Harmonisation – Some Realities
⧁ Financial Crime – FATF promotes harmonisation
⧁ Bribery and Corruption Acts – reduce opportunity for regulatory
arbitrage
⧁ Solvency II and market conduct group supervision approaches
promotes harmonisation
⧁ Strain on capital under SII also promotes harmonisation
Harmonisation – Some Advantages
⧁ Easier cross border business
⧁ Easier finding investors
⧁ People development
⧁ International deployment of people
⧁ Level playing field and opportunities for expansion into new markets
⧁ Cost benefits from centralised models and systems
⧁ Regulatory arbitrage and exploitation more difficult
Harmonisation – Some Disadvantages
⧁ Rules based implementation of principles based regulation
⧁ “Developed world” regulations for “developing markets”
⧁ Cost of compliance
⧁ Potential disinvestments
Threats to Global Harmonisation
⧁ Rise of nationalism and fundamentalism globally risks undoing
common developed regulation and cooperation
⧁ Regional monetary areas, but little regional supervision
⧁ Political agendas
⧁ Fit-for-purpose implementation
⧁ Lack of industry participation and consultation
⧁ Lack of skills
Focus on Africa
Unique African Challenges
Lack of
skilled
resources
Low levels
of funding
General
population
participation
Potential for
regulatory
arbitrage
Regulatory
An African
Insurer’s
perspective
Focus on African Issues: Skill shortage
⧁ Absence of skills
⧁ A challenge but also an opportunity
⧁ Development of in-country skills
⧁ Benefit from skills and experience of others
⧁ Cooperation between government and business is key
⧁ Secondment opportunities
⧁ Transfer knowledge and experience
Focus on African Issues: Lack of Funding
⧁ Self-funding supervisory model
⧁ Central government funding needed
⧁ Insurance industry’s role
⧁ Regulator’s role
⧁ This challenge makes harmonisation difficult
Focus on African Issues: Financial Inclusion
⧁ Low financial inclusion and insurance penetration
⧁ Increasing market penetration
⧁ Industry responsibility
⧁ Regulators responsibility
⧁ This challenge makes harmonisation difficult
Focus on African Issues: Regulatory Arbitrage
⧁ Increasingly more difficult
⧁ Window is closing
⧁ Corporate risk and compliance culture and ethical behaviour
⧁ Reputational risk for insurers
⧁ Harmonisation closes the window for arbitrage
Looking Forward: Common Trends in African Regulation
⧁ Risk Based Supervision and risk profiling of insurers
⧁ Risk Based Capital
⧁ Governance and Risk Management
⧁ Anti-Money Laundering
⧁ Consumer Protection
An African Insurer's Perspective
⧁ Sanlam is a truly African company
⧁ Increasing footprint and investment
⧁ Regulatory compliance – licence to do business
⧁ Opportunities for skills development
⧁ African people becoming competitive internationally
⧁ Build relationships and assist in regulatory development
⧁ Participate in regulatory developments
⧁ Cost of compliance
⧁ Consistency of reporting data
questions