Download Outcome Based Performance Evaluation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Behavioral economics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Outcome Based
Performance
Evaluation
Patricia Ritter, Ph.D., CCC/SLP
Emily Kinsler, CCC/SLP.D.
ASHA, November 2006
Development of
Merit Pay System
„ Differential
„ Reward
compensation
outstanding performance
„ Meet agency objectives
„ Utilize outcome based
measurement system
Components of
Merit System
„
Key End Results
„ outcomes
„
„
that an employee is expected
to perform
Measurement of Key End Results
„ yardstick applied to the outcomes
Targets
„ level of outcomes to be achieved
Key End Results
„ Quality
„ Innovation
„ Service
Teamwork
„ Growth
„ Workplace
Behavior
Quality
„
Speech
„ Examples
Outcomes measures as determined by
ASHA/NOMS
„ A consumer satisfaction survey, based on a fivepoint scale is used to determine each clinician’s
average survey results.
„
„
„
„
„
„
„
Questions address:
Clinical knowledge
Level of comfort
Communication skills
Quality and timeliness of reports
Organization and preparation
Quality
„ Audiology
„ Example
„ Acceptance
of amplification improvement in
functioning as measured by sound field
word recognition scores (aided/nonaided)
Innovation
„
„
An initiative that impacts consumer
satisfaction, cost reduction or service
growth
Examples of innovations include:
Database of parent recommendations
„ Templates for evaluation tools
„ Parent resource center
„ Oral-motor feeding protocol
„
Service Teamwork
„
„
„
„
A survey of 8 behavioral teaming measures
judged on a five-point scale by the supervisor
Attend meetings and
„ Interacts, addresses
complete assignments
issues, and provides input
into discussions
Share equally in workload
„ Takes responsibility for
Communicate honestly
own actions
and directly
„ Participates in conflict
Listen and value
resolution and supports
members contributions
group decisions
„ Willingly makes sacrifices
for the good of the team
Growth
„
„
„
Measured in contribution to the financial
well-being of the agency
Financial growth in resources
Examples
Productivity
„ Percentage of hearing aid returns
„ Client cancellation rate
„
Workplace Behavior
A survey of 8 behavioral teaming measures
judged on a five-point scale by the supervisor
-Professional Growth
-Positive Attitude
-Communication
-Sharing Responsibility
-Adaptability
-Consumer Interactions
-Time Management
-Accountability of
Supplies & Equipment
Scoring
„
„
„
„
Staff are rated on all Key End Measures at
one of three levels, threshold, target, or
outstanding.
Targets are set by management team
Targets must be reasonable and able to
be reached
Expectations are that employees would
reach target level
Threshold,
Target, and
Outstanding
Threshold is considered the lowest level, paid
at minimum raise and could result in
progressive counseling
„ Target is acceptable performance and paid at
the rate set in budget by the agency
„ Outstanding ratings are paid a bonus to the
employee plus the rate set by the agency.
„
Additional Elements
„ Performance
Narrative
„ Yearly individual goals
Advantages to a
Merit Pay System
„
„
„
„
„
Defining employee expectations (e.g., job
descriptions, outcomes)
Identifying productivity and financial
growth through measurable outcomes
Opportunities for new or better programs
Providing managers and supervisors a tool
for discussing employee behavior
Increasing accountability
Challenges to a
Merit Pay system
„
Subjectivity of some measures
„
Consumer Satisfaction Survey
„
„
„
„
„
may be based on unhappiness with diagnosis rather than
clinical skills
Behavioral measures
Measurement of outcomes is not always
sensitive to the complexity of the clients and is
one of the biggest weaknesses of the system.
Measurement tools are not always standardized
Measurement depends on an adequate sample
size
Ongoing Modifications
Currently considering competencies
as a measurement of quality
„ Adjustment of percentages based on
benchmarks
„ Input from Board of Directors
„
Contact Information
The Treatment And Learning Centers
2301 Research Boulevard
Suite 110
Rockville, Maryland 20850
301-424-5200
Patricia Ritter, Ph.D., CCC/SLP
[email protected]
Emily Kinsler, CCC/SLP.D
[email protected]