Download Pleiotropy of leptin receptor signalling is defined by distinct roles of

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cell culture wikipedia , lookup

Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup

Phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Tyrosine kinase wikipedia , lookup

Protein phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Purinergic signalling wikipedia , lookup

G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup

SULF1 wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

Cannabinoid receptor type 1 wikipedia , lookup

VLDL receptor wikipedia , lookup

Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Pleiotropy of leptin receptor signalling is defined
by distinct roles of the intracellular tyrosines
Paul Hekerman1, Julia Zeidler1, Simone Bamberg-Lemper1, Holger Knobelspies1, Delphine Lavens2,
Jan Tavernier2, Hans-Georg Joost3 and Walter Becker1
1 Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty of the Aachen University, Germany
2 The Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology, Department of Medical Protein Research (VIB9), Ghent University, Belgium
3 German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE) Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany
Keywords
leptin; leptin receptor; STAT; luciferase;
insulinoma
Correspondence
W. Becker, Institut fuer Pharmakologie und
Toxikologie, Medizinische Fakultät der
RWTH Aachen, Wendlingweg 2, 52074
Aachen, Germany
Fax: +49 241 8082433
Tel: +49 241 8089136
E-mail: [email protected]
(Received 14 July 2004, revised 9 September
2004, accepted 13 September 2004)
doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04391.x
The leptin receptor (LEPR) is a class I cytokine receptor signalling via
both the janus kinase ⁄ signal transducer and activator of transcription
(JAK ⁄ STAT) and the MAP kinase pathways. In addition, leptin has been
shown previously to activate AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) in skeletal
muscle. To enable a detailed analysis of leptin signalling in pancreatic beta
cells, LEPR point mutants with single or combined exchanges of the three
intracellular tyrosines were expressed in HIT-T15 insulinoma cells. Western
blots with activation state-specific antibodies recognizing specific signalling
molecules revealed that the wild-type receptor activated STAT1, STAT3,
STAT5 and ERK1 ⁄ 2 but failed to alter the phosphorylation of AMPK.
Each of the three intracellular tyrosine residues in LEPR exhibited different
signalling capacities: Tyr985 was necessary and sufficient for leptin-induced
activation of ERK1 ⁄ 2; Tyr1077 induced tyrosyl phosphorylation of
STAT5; and Tyr1138 was capable of activating STAT1, STAT3 and
STAT5. Consistent results were obtained in reporter gene assays with
STAT3 or STAT5-responsive promoter constructs, respectively. Furthermore, the sequence motifs surrounding the three tyrosine residues are
conserved in LEPR from mammals, birds and in a LEPR-like cytokine receptor from pufferfish. Mutational analysis of the box3 motif
around Tyr1138 identified Met1139 and Gln1141 as important determinants that define specificity towards the different STAT factors. These
data indicate that all three conserved tyrosines are involved in LEPR function and define the pleiotropy of signal transduction via STAT1 ⁄ 3, STAT5
or ERK kinases. Activation and inhibition of AMPK appears to require
additional components of the signalling pathways that are not present in
beta cells.
Leptin is an adipocyte-secreted hormone that informs
the brain about the status of the body’s energy stores.
It regulates energy homeostasis through effects on satiety and energy expenditure and deficiencies of leptin or
the leptin receptor in humans or rodents result in
severe obesity, infertility, impaired growth and insulin
resistance [1]. In db ⁄ db mice that lack the signalling active, long splice variant of the leptin receptor (LEPRb),
this syndrome was largely corrected by neuron-specific
transgenic complementation of LEPRb deficiency [2],
supporting the notion that leptin acts predominantly
on central pathways. However, a number of peripheral
Abbreviations
AMPK, AMP-activated kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GH, growth hormone; JAK, janus kinase; LEPR, leptin receptor;
SH2, src-homology 2; SOCS3, suppressor of cytokine signalling 3; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
109
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
actions of leptin have also been described [3]. Two
effects have been particularly well studied: the stimulation of proinflammatory immune responses by direct
action on T-lymphocytes [4,5], and the inhibition of
insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells [6–9].
As a class I cytokine receptor, LEPRb activates the
janus kinase ⁄ signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK ⁄ STAT) signalling pathway [10,11]. Ligand binding to LEPRb results in the activation of
JAK2 by transphosphorylation and subsequent phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic part
of LEPRb [10,12,13]. These phosphorylated tyrosines
provide docking sites for signalling proteins with srchomology 2 (SH2) domains. A short splicing variant
of the leptin receptor (LEPRa) is abundantly expressed
in most tissues but lacks tyrosine residues and appears
to be signalling-inactive [14]. Murine LEPRb contains
three intracellular tyrosine residues that are conserved
in mammals and birds [15,16]. Tyr1138 is located in a
canonical box3 motif (Tyr-x-x-Gln) and recruits the
transcription factor STAT3, which is subsequently
phosphorylated by JAK2, dimerizes and translocates
to the nucleus. Here it binds to the promoter regions
of target genes. Leptin-induced phosphorylation and
nuclear translocation of STAT3 has been demonstrated in vivo in the hypothalamus [17,18], in isolated
T-lymphocytes [19] and in insulin secreting cells
[20,21]. Mice with a targeted mutation of Tyr1138
(leprS1138) are hyperphagic and obese, underscoring the
essential role of STAT3 in energy homeostasis [22].
However, whereas db ⁄ db mice are infertile, short and
diabetic, leprS1138 mice are fertile, longer and appear to
be less hyperglycemic. This result clearly indicates that
STAT3-independent pathways play an important role
in LEPRb signalling. Of the two other intracellular
tyrosine residues in LEPRb, Tyr985 can recruit either
the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 or suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) [15,23–26]. Binding of
SOCS3 to Tyr-985 attenuates leptin signalling by inhibition of the receptor-associated JAK kinase [25]. In
contrast, recruitment of SHP-2 does not alter JAK2
activity but results in GRB2 binding to SHP-2 and
activation of the RAS ⁄ RAF ⁄ ERK pathway [26,27]. In
contrast to Tyr985 and Tyr1138, the role of Tyr1077
in leptin signalling is not yet clear.
More recently, it has been shown that AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) appears to be a downstream mediator of leptin signalling. Leptin directly
stimulates phosphorylation and activation of the a2
catalytic subunit of AMPK in muscle [28]. In contrast,
leptin suppresses a2 AMPK activity in secondary
hypothalamic neurons indirectly via activation of
agouti-related protein (AGRP) neurons [29].
110
P. Hekerman et al.
The aim of this study was to analyse the contribution of the intracellular tyrosine residues to LEPRbmediated effects on STAT factors, MAP kinase and
AMPK. These data show that LEPRb is capable of
activating a broader range of STAT factors than other
cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and growth hormone (GH). Analysis of point mutants revealed that
each of the individual tyrosine residues in the intracellular part of LEPRb exhibits a different signalling
capacity. In particular, our data identify Tyr1077 as a
docking site for STAT5.
Results
Leptin receptor signal transduction in HIT-T15
and RINm5F insulinoma cells
We used HIT-T15 insulinoma cells as a model system
to characterize leptin receptor signalling in pancreatic
beta cells. The cells were stimulated either with leptin,
IL-6 or GH to compare the activation of downstream
signalling pathways by the different cytokines.
Although HIT-T15 cells have previously been reported
to be leptin responsive [30,31] we observed no leptininduced phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT3, STAT5
or ERK1 ⁄ ERK2 in untransfected cells (Fig. 1A). IL-6
and GH elicited the expected responses, i.e. tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT5, respectively.
In HIT-T15 cells transfected with cDNA of LEPRb,
phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT3, STAT5 and the
ERK kinases was induced by leptin. The weak
response of STAT5 to leptin compared to that elicited
by GH can be partially explained by the rather ineffective transfection of the HIT-T15 cells (estimated at
10–20% of transfected cells). Cells expressing the short
splice variant of the leptin receptor (LEPRa) showed
no detectable response to leptin.
We used rat RINm5F cells as a second insulinoma
cell line to confirm these results. Contrary to published
data [20], treatment of nontransfected cells with leptin
failed to elicit a detectable reponse to leptin (data not
shown). Therefore, we constructed a retroviral vector
in which the MuMLV long-terminal repeat controlled
the expression of murine LEPRb. Infection of RINm5F
cells with the recombinant retrovirus generated polyclonal pools of cells stably expressing LEPRb. In these
cells (Fig. 1B), leptin and IL-6 stimulated tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT3 to a similar degree, but leptin again induced activation of a broader spectrum of
STAT factors (STAT1, STAT3, STAT5, STAT6).
Leptin has recently been reported to activate AMPK
in muscle cells, thereby stimulating expression
of enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation [28].
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
P. Hekerman et al.
A
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
B
C
Fig. 1. Leptin signalling in insulinoma cell lines. (A) HIT-T15 cells were transfected with expression plasmid encoding either the short
(LEPRa) or the long splicing variant (LEPRb) of the leptin receptor or were not transfected. Cells were serum-starved for 22 h and stimulated
with the indicated cytokine (Lep, leptin; sIL-6R, soluble IL-6 receptor; GH, growth hormone) for 15 min. Total cellular lysates were used for
Western blot analysis with phospho-specific antibodies against STAT1, STAT3, STAT5A ⁄ B, and ERK1 ⁄ 2. The STAT5 antibody does not discriminate between STAT5A and STAT5B. (B) RINm5F cells stably expressing LEPRb were stimulated with cytokines for 15 min. Nuclear
extracts (left panels) or total cellular lysates (right panels) were subjected to Western blot analysis with the indicated phospho-specific antibodies. The phospho-STAT6 antibody crossreacted with phospho-STAT5 (indicated by asterisks). (C) HIT-T15 cells (left panels) or RINm5F
cells (right panels) ectopically expressing LEPRb were treated with leptin (Lep) or with vehicle alone (Ø). The activating phosphorylation of
AMPK was detected by immunoblotting with a phosphospecific antibody. As positive controls for AMPK activation, HIT-T15 cells were glucose deprived for 15 min in phosphate buffered saline, and RINm5F cells were starved by overnight-incubation without change of the medium. Tyrosyl phosphorylation of STAT3 is shown as a positive control for the leptin effect (lower panel).
Previously, leptin has also been shown to prevent lipotoxicity in pancreatic islets by upregulating expression
of fatty acid oxidation-related enzymes (carnitine
palmitoyl transferase, acyl CoA oxidase) [32,33].
Therefore, we analysed the effect of leptin on AMPK
in the insulinoma cell lines. As shown in Fig. 1C, leptin treatment failed to alter the activating phosphorylation of AMPK in HIT-T15 cells or in RINm5F cells.
As a positive control, AMPK phosphorylation was
readily stimulated in glucose-depleted cells, indicating
that essential components of the AMPK pathway were
present in these cell lines.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
Role of the intracellular tyrosine residues
in LEPRb
To determine the role of the three intracellular tyrosine
residues (Tyr985, Tyr1077, Tyr1138) in LEPR-mediated activation of downstream signalling events, constructs in which phenylalanine(s) replaced either one of
the three tyrosines or combinations of them were
expressed in HIT-T15 cells. The specific signalling
capacities of each tyrosine residue in the intracellular
domain of LEPRb can be deduced from the results
presented in Fig. 2. Tyr985 is necessary and sufficient
111
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
P. Hekerman et al.
Fig. 2. Signalling by leptin receptor mutants in HIT-T15 cells. HIT-T15 cells were transfected with expression plasmids for the indicated
LEPRb point mutants (left panels, single point mutants; right panels, double mutants) and for STAT5B. Cells were treated with 100 ngÆmL)1
leptin or vehicle for 15 min before nuclear extracts were prepared. Leptin-induced phosphorylation of downstream signalling molecules was
assayed by Western blotting and immunodetection with phospho-specific antibodies. Postnuclear supernatants were probed with a LEPRspecific antibody to verify comparable expression of the LEPRb mutants. One representative experiment out of three is shown.
for activation of ERK1 ⁄ ERK2, either Tyr1077 or
Tyr1138 is required for leptin-induced tyrosyl phosphorylation of STAT5, and Tyr1138 is essential for
activation of STAT1 and STAT3. Note that leptininduced STAT5 phosphorylation was weakly detectable in cells transfected with the triple mutant of
LEPRb (FFF); this effect was variable in its magnitude
and may be due the overexpression of STAT5B in this
experiment.
We next studied the capacity of the LEPRb point
mutants to induce reporter gene activity driven by
STAT response elements. Two different reporter constructs were used. In the first one (a2M), luciferase
expression is driven by the IL-6 responsive element of
the a2-macroglobulin promoter, which is controlled
by STAT3 [34]. The second reporter plasmid (spi2.1)
contains the GH-responsive element of the rat serine
protease inhibitor 2.1 (spi2.1) gene, whose expression
is controlled by STAT5 [35]. Assays with the different
promoter constructs were performed under identical
conditions to analyse the ability of the LEPR point
112
mutants to specifically activate STAT3- and STAT5driven promoter activity (Fig. 3). Consistent with the
detection of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT factors by
Western blot analysis, all LEPRb constructs containing the Tyr1138fiPhe mutation (YYF, FYF, YFF,
FFF) were severely reduced in their capacity to stimulate a2M reporter gene activity. It is likely that
the residual activation by the mutants retaining
Tyr1077 (YYF, FYF) can be explained by the action
of STAT5. Spi2.1 promoter activity was stimulated
by all constructs containing either Tyr1077 or
Tyr1138, in full agreement with the presumed control
by STAT5. As expected, Tyr985 was not able to
induce reporter gene activity driven by STAT-dependent promoters. Interestingly, the data point to an
inhibitory function of Tyr1138 in these assays, as the
mutation of Tyr1138 enhanced luciferase activity
(YYF vs. WT, P < 0.001, double-sided t-test). This
result is consistent with the known requirement of
Tyr1138 for induction of the feedback-inhibitor protein SOCS3 [27].
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
P. Hekerman et al.
Fig. 3. Effects of leptin receptor mutants on STAT-responsive promoter elements. HIT-T15 cells on six-well plates were transfected
with luciferase reporter constructs driven by the IL-6-response element of the a2 macroglobulin promoter (a2M) or by the GHresponse element of serine protease inhibitor 2.1 promoter (spi2.1),
b-galactosidase reporter control plasmid, and the indicated LEPRb
expression plasmids. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells
were treated or untreated with leptin (100 ngÆmL)1) for 18 h. The
luciferase activity was determined and normalized to coexpressed
b-galactosidase activity. Data are expressed as fold stimulation relative to unstimulated cells. Bars reflect means ± SEM of three
(a2M) or four to five independent experiments (spi2.1). The bottom
panel of Fig. 2 provides an expression control for the different
LEPR mutants as aliquots of the same DNA samples were transfected in this experiment.
Structural basis for the recruitment of different
STAT factors by Tyr1138
The unusual capacity of the box3 motif in LEPRb to
mediate activation of STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5
stimulated us to characterize the structural determinants required for binding of each of these proteins.
Four point mutations targeting the residues C-terminal
of Tyr1138 were generated to test their potential role
in binding of the different STAT factors (Fig. 4). A
glutamine found three amino acids after the phosphorylated tyrosine (position P+3, where P is the phosphorylation site), fitting the consensus STAT3-binding
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
motif (YXXQ) [36], was exchanged for valine, which is
found in this position in the Tyr1077 motif. A proline
residue at P+2 has been proposed to be important for
binding of STAT1 by the IL-6 receptor gp130 [37] and
was exchanged for glycine. A consensus sequence for
binding of STAT5 has not yet been explicitly defined
but in most cases the phosphorylated tyrosine is followed by an aliphatic hydrophobic residue such as leucine, isoleucine, valine or methionine [38–41]. The
constructs were transiently expressed in HIT-T15 cells,
and leptin-induced activation of STAT factors was
monitored by Western blot analysis with phospho-specific antibodies and by reporter gene assays (Fig. 4).
Consistent with the established consensus sequence for
binding of STAT3, mutation of Gln1141 abolished leptin-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 and decreased
the activation of the a2M-derived promoter but did
not affect STAT5 phosphorylation or induction of the
spi2.1 promoter. In contrast, exchange of Met1139 for
alanine or arginine eliminated phosphorylation of
STAT5 and reduced induction of the spi2.1 promoter
construct. This promoter is probably also responsive
to STAT1 and ⁄ or STAT3. Mutation of Pro1140
strongly reduced activation of all three STAT proteins.
Taken together, these results indicate that the combination of a hydrophobic residue in the P+1 position
and the glutamine in P+3 allows the binding of either
STAT1, STAT3 or STAT5 to pTyr-1138 in LEPRb.
Discussion
Class I cytokine receptors such as LEPRb transmit
extracellular signals by recruiting SH2 domain-containing proteins to phosphorylated tyrosine residues. Until
now, only two of the three conserved tyrosines in
LEPRb (Tyr985 and Tyr1138) have been demonstrated
to play a role in leptin signalling [22–27]. Our analysis
of LEPRb point mutants in insulinoma cell lines indicates that the presence of Tyr1077 as the only intracellular tyrosine residue was sufficient to induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT5 (in HIT-T15 and RINm5F
cells), and to stimulate STAT5-driven reporter gene
activity (in HIT-T15 cells). These results establish that
all of the three intracellular tyrosines in murine LEPRb participate in leptin signal transduction and have
different capacities to activate downstream signalling
pathways. Tyr985 is required for the activation of the
RAS ⁄ RAF ⁄ ERK pathway, Tyr1077 mediates the activation of STAT5, and Tyr1138 can stimulate tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT3 or STAT5.
Leptin has previously been reported to stimulate
AMPK in muscle and, more recently, to inhibit the
kinase in hypothalamic nuclei [28,29]. We therefore
113
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
P. Hekerman et al.
A
B
Fig. 4. Mutational analysis of the box3 motif and sequence conservation of the intracellular tyrosine motifs in LEPRb. (A) Mutations of the
amino acids following Tyr1138 were introduced into LEPRb-FFY. HIT-T15 cells were transfected with the LEPRb constructs indicated by the
sequence of the wild type (YMPQ, identical with FFY in Figs 2 and 3) or mutated box3 motif (YRPQ, YAPQ, YMGQ, YMPV, and FMPQ,
which is identical with FFF). Western blot analysis of STAT phosphorylation in nuclear extracts (left panels) and reporter gene assays (right
diagrams) were performed as described in the legends to Figs 2 and 3. Expression levels of the overexpressed proteins were assessed by
Western blot analysis of postnuclear supernatants (STAT5, LEPR). Luciferase activities are represented as percent of the YMPQ construct.
Bars (open bars, no leptin; filled bars, 100 ngÆmL)1 leptin) reflect means ± SD of three to five independent experiments (except n ¼ 2 for
YAPQ). (B) Sequences from murine, human, chicken and pufferfish (Tetraodon nigroviridans) LEPR are shown as representatives for mammals, birds and fish. Consensus sequences are given in the bottom line (/, hydrophic residue). The localization of the tyrosines in murine
LEPRb is illustrated (985, 1077, 1138). Proteins recruited to the phosphotyrosine motifs are indicated below the alignments. NCBI protein
database accession numbers for the LEPR sequences are P48356 (mouse); NP_002294 (human), AAF31355 (chicken) and AAR25693
(Tetraodon).
expected to observe a reduced or increased phosphorylation of AMPK in response to leptin in the pancreatic
beta cell lines. However, concentrations of leptin that
maximally activated STAT3 failed to alter AMPK phosphorylation (Fig. 1C). Glucose deprivation induced the
anticipated activation of AMPK, indicating that the
upstream kinase is present in the cells. Consistent with
our results, Leclerc et al. [42] recently reported that
leptin did not change AMPK activity in murine MIN6
insulinoma cells and in isolated rat islets. Thus, we
conclude that pancreatic beta cells lack a component
114
required for leptin-induced activation of AMPK, possibly the c3 subunit of AMPK which appears to specifically expressed in skeletal muscle [42].
Our conclusion that Tyr1077 in murine LEPRb
plays an important role in leptin signalling is
supported by the fact that the surrounding sequence is
strikingly conserved in mammals and birds [15],
although the intracellular domains of murine and
chicken LEPRb show little overall sequence similarity
(25% of identical amino acids distal of the JAK kinase
binding motif). Moreover, our database searches for
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
P. Hekerman et al.
LEPR homologues in more distantly related vertebrates identified LEPR-related sequences from green
pufferfish (Tetraodon nigroviridans; NCBI protein
accession AAR25693) and zebrafish (Danio rerio;
ENSEMBL predicted protein ENSDARP00000011908)
containing the three tyrosine phosphorylation motifs
(Fig. 4B). Sequence comparisons indicated that these
proteins are more closely related with LEPR than with
any other mammalian cytokine receptor: the sequence
from pufferfish contains 30% of identical amino acids
with murine LEPRb and 27% with murine gp130, the
signal transducing subunit of the IL-6 receptor (gaps
> 50 amino acids were not penalized). The intracellular domain shows no significant similarity with any
known mammalian protein except for LEPRb.
Tyr-1077 has previously been shown to play a role
in down-regulation of LEPRb signalling, presumably
by serving as a docking site for SOCS3 [15]. The conservation of the aliphatic hydrophobic residue in the
P+1 position after Tyr-1077 is also compatible with
the known requirements of STAT5-binding as determined in different receptors [38,40,41]. Leptin-induced
activation of STAT5 has already been described in the
first papers reporting STAT signalling by the LEPRb
[10,43]. Later, in vivo studies suggested that only
STAT3 is activated upon leptin administration in the
hypothalamus of mice and rats [17,44]. However,
leptin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation has been
observed in various cell types, e.g. hypothalamic GT17 cells [45], intestinal L-cells [46], enterocyte-like
CaCo-2 cell line [47], and H-35 hepatoma cells [48].
Our results are also consistent with earlier reports that
mutant constructs of the human LEPRb either with a
substitution of Tyr1141 for phenylalanine or with a
deletion of the C-terminus including Tyr1141 were still
able to induce DNA binding of overexpressed
STAT5B in electrophoretic mobility shift assays
[10,49]. It should be noted that leptin-induced activation of STAT5 in the insulinoma cell lines was detectable with endogenous levels of STAT factors (Figs 1, 3
and 4). Changing the ratio of STAT factors in a cell
can strikingly alter the downstream effects of a receptor, particularly when different STATs compete for
binding to the same tyrosine residue [50].
In pancreatic b-cells, prolactin and growth hormone
are physiological inducers of STAT5 [51]. Both hormones stimulate insulin production and b-cell proliferation via STAT5-dependent pathways [52] and may
contribute to islet hyperplasia in pregnancy [51]. Interestingly, leptin has also been reported to stimulate proliferation and suppress apoptosis of islet cells [53–55].
It is conceivable that this effect of leptin is mediated
by activation of STAT5.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
An unexpected finding was the capability of Tyr1138,
which is located within a canonical box3 consensus
motif, to mediate activation of STAT5. The results of
our mutational analysis are consistent with findings
obtained with other cytokine receptors: the position
after the phosphotyrosine (P +1) is critical for binding
of STAT5 but not of STAT1 or STAT3, whereas the
glutamine in position P +3 is required for binding of
STAT1 and STAT3, but is not relevant for STAT5. This
result is consistent with the fact that residues C-terminal
of the phosphotyrosine are important for binding of
SH2 domains [55a]. Equivalent results have been
obtained by mutational analysis of the STAT binding
motif of the IL-9 receptor TyrLeuProGln(367–370),
which is also capable to activate STAT1, STAT3, and
STAT5 [39,56]. It should be noted, however, that the
same sequence motifs in gp130 [TyrLeuProGln(905–
908)] and [TyrMetProGln(915–918)] do not activate
STAT5, indicating that the hydrophobic residue in
P +1 is not the only residue required for binding of
STAT5.
Experimental procedures
Reagents
Recombinant murine leptin was obtained from PeproTec
(London, UK) and GH from Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland). Recombinant human IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor
were kindly provided by Gerhard Müller-Newen (Department of Biochemistry, Aachen University). The following
primary antibodies were used: polyclonal rabbit antibodies
against p(Y701)-STAT1, p(Y705)-STAT3, p(Y694)-STAT5,
p(Y641)-STAT6, STAT1, STAT3, p(T172)-AMPK, antiAMPK, anti-pTyr Ig PY100, and phospho p42 ⁄ 44 MAP
kinase from Cell Signalling Technology (Beverly, MA),
anti-STAT5A ⁄ B from Upstate (Charlottesville, VA, USA),
goat anti-(mouse LEPR) Ig from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany), antibody against phosphorylated JAK2
(pYpY1007 ⁄ 1008) from BioSource Technologies (Camarillo, CA) and anti-pTyr Igs PY20 from Transduction
Laboratories, Inc. (San Diego, CA). Horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-(rabbit IgG) (IgG-POD) was obtained
from Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, IL), anti-(mouse
IgG-POD) from Amersham (Buckinghamshire, UK), and
anti-(goat IgG-POD) from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany).
Cell culture, transient transfection, and retroviral
infection
HIT-T15 hamster insulinoma cells (gift of A. Schürmann,
Potsdam) and RINm5F rat insulinoma cells (gift of D. Meyer
zu Heringdorf, Essen) were cultivated in RPMI 1640
115
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
medium with l-glutamine, 10% (v ⁄ v) fetal bovine serum,
100 unitsÆmL)1 penicillin, and 100 mgÆmL)1 streptomycin.
The medium was further supplemented with 5% (v ⁄ v) horse
serum for culture of HIT-T15 cells. For analysis of total
cell lysates (Fig. 1), 4 · 105 HIT-T15 cells on six-well plates
plates were transfected with 1.0 lg of pSVL-LEPR plasmids [14]. For preparation of nuclear extracts (Fig. 2),
1 · 106 cells on 6-cm plates were transfected with 1.5 lg of
pMET7-mLRlo constructs [57] using the JET-PEI transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection, Illkirch, France). If
indicated (Fig. 2), 1.0 lg of pECE-STAT5B expression
plasmid was cotransfected. Point mutants targeting the residues C-terminal of Tyr1138 in LEPRb were generated with
the help of the QuikChangeTM Site-Directed Mutagenesis
Kit (Stratagene).
For stable expression in RINm5F cells, LEPRb was subcloned from pSVL-LEPRb into the retroviral vector
pWZL-Neo. Viruses were produced in 293T cells, and confluent RINm5F cells were infected with pWZL-neo-LEPR
viruses [58]. Selection was performed for 14 days in
1 mgÆmL)1 of G418.
Western blot analysis and EMSA
Cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 18–22 h
before leptin (100 ngÆmL)1), IL-6 (200 U mL)1), or GH
(500 ngÆmL)1) was added for 15 min. All assays of transiently transfected HIT-T15 cells were performed 48 h after
transfection. Nuclear extracts were prepared by hypotonic
lysis [34]. To prepare total cellular lysates, cells were
washed with phosphate buffered saline and lysed in 1%
(w ⁄ v) SDS, 20 mm Tris ⁄ HCl pH 7.4 in a boiling water bath
for 5 min. For Western blot analysis, protein samples were
separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE (8% gels), blotted on to nitrocellulose, and specific proteins were detected by chemiluminescence using the primary antibodies mentioned above and
horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody. Blots
were re-used after stripping the primary antibody by incubation in 2% (w ⁄ v) SDS, 50 mm Tris ⁄ HCl, 150 mm NaCl,
pH 7.4 in the presence of 100 mm 2-mercaptoethanol.
Reporter gene assays
Luciferase reporter constructs contained the promoter
region )215 to +8 of the rat a2-macroglobulin gene
(pGL3a2 m-215Luc; kindly provided by P. C. Heinrich,
Department of Biochemistry, Aachen, Germany) for assays
of STAT3-driven promoter activity [59] or six copies of
the GH-responsive GAS-like element (GLE) from the
rat spi2.1 gene (pSpi-GLE-Luc, gift of L.-A. Haldosen,
Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden) for assays of
STAT5-dependent promoter activity [35]. HIT-T15 cells on
six-well plates (3.5 · 105 cells per well) were transfected
with 0.3 lg of pMET7-LEPRb expression plasmids along
with 0.75 lg each of the luciferase reporter construct and
116
P. Hekerman et al.
the b-galactosidase reporter control plasmid pSVb-gal
(Promega). Transcription of the lacZ gene in this control
vector is driven by the SV40 early promoter and enhancer.
Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were stimulated with 100 ngÆmL)1 leptin for 22 h in serum-free medium. Luciferase activities were determined from duplicate
wells with the help of a commercial kit (Promega), and
data were normalized to b-galactosidase activities.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs Lars-Arne Haldosen, Gerhard MüllerNewen, Peter C. Heinrich, Annette Schürmann, Dagmar Meyer zu Heringdorf for generous donations of
reagents and cell lines. This work was supported by
the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 542).
References
1 Friedman JM & Halaas JL (1998) Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 395, 763–770.
2 Kowalski TJ, Liu SM, Leibel RL & Chua SC Jr (2001)
Transgenic complementation of leptin-receptor
deficiency. I. Rescue of the obesity ⁄ diabetes phenotype
of LEPR-null mice expressing a LEPR-B transgene.
Diabetes 50, 425–435.
3 Margetic S, Gazzola C, Pegg GG & Hill RA (2002)
Leptin: a review of its peripheral actions and interactions. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26, 1407–1433.
4 Lord GM, Matarese G, Howard JK, Baker RJ, Bloom
SR & Lechler RI (1998) Leptin modulates the T-cell
immune response and reverses starvation-induced
immunosuppression. Nature 394, 897–901.
5 Lord GM, Matarese G, Howard JK, Bloom SR &
Lechler RI (2002) Leptin inhibits the anti-CD3-driven
proliferation of peripheral blood T cells but enhances
the production of proinflammatory cytokines. J Leukoc
Biol 72, 330–338.
6 Kulkarni RN, Wang ZL, Wang RM, Hurley JD,
Smith DM, Ghatei MA, Withers DJ, Gardiner JV,
Bailey CJ & Bloom SR (1997) Leptin rapidly suppresses insulin release from insulinoma cells, rat and
human islets and, in vivo, in mice. J Clin Invest 100,
2729–2736.
7 Ookuma M, Ookuma K & York DA (1998) Effects of
leptin on insulin secretion from isolated rat pancreatic
islets. Diabetes 47, 219–223.
8 Kieffer TJ & Habener JF (2000) The adipoinsular axis:
effects of leptin on pancreatic beta-cells. Am J Physiol
Endocrinol Metab 278, E1–E14.
9 Seufert J, Kieffer TJ & Habener JF (1999) Leptin inhibits insulin gene transcription and reverses hyperinsulinemia in leptin-deficient ob ⁄ ob mice. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 96, 674–679.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
P. Hekerman et al.
10 Baumann H, Morella KK, White DW, Dembski M,
Bailon PS, Kim H, Lai CF & Tartaglia LA (1996) The
full-length leptin receptor has signalling capabilities of
interleukin 6-type cytokine receptors. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 93, 8374–8378.
11 Tartaglia LA (1997) The leptin receptor. J Biol Chem
272, 6093–6096.
12 Bjørbaek C, Uotani S, da Silva B & Flier JS (1997)
Divergent signaling capacities of the long and short
isoforms of the leptin receptor. J Biol Chem 272,
32686–32695.
13 Ghilardi N & Skoda RC (1997) The leptin receptor activates janus kinase 2 and signals for proliferation in a
factor-dependent cell line. Mol Endocrinol 11, 393–369.
14 Bahrenberg G, Behrmann I, Barthel A, Hekerman P,
Heinrich PC, Joost HG & Becker W (2002) Identification of the critical sequence elements in the cytoplasmic
domain of leptin receptor isoforms required for Janus
kinase ⁄ signal transducer and activator of transcription
activation by receptor heterodimers. Mol Endocrinol
16, 859–872.
15 Eyckerman S, Broekaert D, Verhee A, Vandekerckhove J & Tavernier J (2000) Identification of the Y985
and Y1077 motifs as SOCS3 recruitment sites in the
murine leptin receptor. FEBS Lett 486, 33–37.
16 Horev G, Einat P, Aharoni T, Eshdat Y & FriedmanEinat M (2000) Molecular cloning and properties of
the chicken leptin-receptor (CLEPR) gene. Mol Cell
Endocrinol 162, 95–106.
17 Vaisse C, Halaas JL, Horvath CM, Darnell JE Jr,
Stoffel M & Friedman JM (1996) Leptin activation of
Stat3 in the hypothalamus of wild-type and ob ⁄ ob
mice but not db ⁄ db mice. Nat Genet 14, 95–97.
18 Hübschle T, Thom E, Watson A, Roth J, Klaus S &
Meyerhof W (2001) Leptin-induced nuclear translocation of STAT3 immunoreactivity in hypothalamic
nuclei involved in body weight regulation. J Neurosci
21, 2413–2424.
19 Maccarrone M, Di Rienzo M, Finazzi-Agro A & Rossi
A (2003) Leptin activates the anandamide hydrolase
promoter in human T lymphocytes through STAT3.
J Biol Chem 278, 13318–13324.
20 Morton NM, Emilsson V, de Groot P, Pallett AL &
Cawthorne MA (1999) Leptin signalling in pancreatic
islets and clonal insulin-secreting cells. J Mol Endocrinol 22, 173–184.
21 Briscoe CP, Hanif S, Arch. JR & Tadayyon M (2001)
Fatty acids inhibit leptin signalling in BRIN-BD11
insulinoma cells. J Mol Endocrinol 26, 145–154.
22 Bates SH, Stearns WH, Dundon TA, Schubert M, Tso
AW, Wang Y, Banks AS, Lavery HJ, Haq AK, Maratos-Flier E, Neel BG, Schwartz MW & Myers MG Jr
(2003) STAT3 signalling is required for leptin regulation of energy balance but not reproduction. Nature
421, 856–859.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
23 Carpenter LR, Farruggella TJ, Symes A, Karow ML,
Yancopoulos GD & Stahl N (1998) Enhancing leptin
response by preventing SH2–containing phosphatase 2
interaction with Ob receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 95, 6061–6066.
24 Li C & Friedman JM (1999) Leptin receptor activation
of SH2 domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 modulates Ob receptor signal transduction. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 9677–9682.
25 Bjørbaek C, Lavery HJ, Bates SH, Olson RK, Davis
SM, Flier JS & Myers MG Jr (2000) SOCS3 mediates
feedback inhibition of the leptin receptor via Tyr985.
J Biol Chem 275, 40649–40657.
26 Bjørbaek C, Buchholz RM, Davis SM, Bates SH,
Pierroz DD, Gu H, Neel BG, Myers MG Jr & Flier JS
(2001) Divergent roles of SHP-2 in ERK activation by
leptin receptors. J Biol Chem 276, 4747–4755.
27 Banks AS, Davis SM, Bates SH & Myers MG Jr
(2000) Activation of downstream signals by the long
form of the leptin receptor. J Biol Chem 275, 14563–
14572.
28 Minokoshi Y, Kim YB, Peroni OD, Fryer LG, Muller
C, Carling D & Kahn BB (2002) Leptin stimulates
fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 415, 339–343.
29 Minokoshi Y, Alquier T, Furukawa N, Kim YB,
Lee A, Xue B, Mu J, Foufelle F, Ferre P, Birnbaum
MJ, Stuck BJ & Kahn BB (2004) AMP-kinase regulates food intake by responding to hormonal and
nutrient signals in the hypothalamus. Nature 428,
569–574.
30 Shimizu H, Ohtani K, Tsuchiya T, Takahashi H,
Uehara Y, Sato N & Mori M (1997) Leptin stimulates
insulin secretion and synthesis in HIT-T 15 cells. Peptides 18, 1263–1266.
31 Tsiotra PC, Tsigos C & Raptis SA (2001) TNFalpha
and leptin inhibit basal and glucose-stimulated insulin
secretion and gene transcription in the HIT-T15 pancreatic cells. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25, 1018–
1026.
32 Zhou YT, Shimabukuro M, Koyama K, Lee Y, Wang
MY, Trieu F, Newgard CB & Unger RH (1997) Induction by leptin of uncoupling protein-2 and enzymes of
fatty acid oxidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94,
6386–6390.
33 Zhou YT, Shimabukuro M, Wang MY, Lee Y, Higa
M, Milburn JL, Newgard CB & Unger RH (1998)
Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
alpha in disease of pancreatic beta cells. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 95, 8898–8903.
34 Wegenka UM, Buschmann J, Lütticken C, Heinrich
PC & Horn F (1993) Acute-phase response factor, a
nuclear factor binding to acute-phase response elements, is rapidly activated by interleukin-6 at the posttranslational level. Mol Cell Biol 13, 276–288.
117
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
35 Wood TJ, Sliva D, Lobie PE, Goullieux F, Mui AL,
Groner B, Norstedt G & Haldosen LA (1997)
Specificity of transcription enhancement via the STAT
responsive element in the serine protease inhibitor 2.1
promoter. Mol Cell Endocrinol 130, 69–81.
36 Stahl N, Farruggella TJ, Boulton TG, Zhong Z,
Darnell JE Jr & Yancopoulos GD (1995) Choice of
STATs and other substrates specified by modular tyrosine-based motifs in cytokine receptors. Science 267,
1349–1353.
37 Gerhartz C, Heesel B, Sasse J, Hemmann U, Landgraf
C, Schneider-Mergener J, Horn F, Heinrich PC &
Graeve L (1996) Differential activation of acute phase
response factor ⁄ STAT3 and STAT1 via the cytoplasmic domain of the interleukin 6 signal transducer
gp130. I. Definition of a novel phosphotyrosine motif
mediating STAT1 activation. J Biol Chem 271, 12991–
11298.
38 May P, Gerhartz C, Heesel B, Welte T, Doppler W,
Graeve L, Horn F & Heinrich PC (1996) Comparative
study on the phosphotyrosine motifs of different cytokine receptors involved in STAT5 activation. FEBS
Lett 394, 221–226.
39 Demoulin JB, Uyttenhove C, Van Roost E, DeLestre B,
Donckers D, Van Snick J & Renauld JC (1996) A single
tyrosine of the interleukin-9 (IL-9) receptor is required
for STAT activation, antiapoptotic activity, and growth
regulation by IL-9. Mol Cell Biol 16, 4710–4716.
40 Pezet A, Ferrag F, Kelly PA & Edery M (1997) Tyrosine docking sites of the rat prolactin receptor required
for association and activation of STAT5. J Biol Chem
272, 25043–25050.
41 Mayr S, Welte T, Windegger M, Lechner J, May P,
Heinrich PC, Horn F & Doppler W (1998) Selective
coupling of STAT factors to the mouse prolactin
receptor. Eur J Biochem 258, 784–793.
42 Leclerc I, Woltersdorf WW, Da Silva Xavier G, Rowe
RL, Cross SE, Korbutt GS, Rajotte RV, Smith R. &
Rutter GA (2004) Metformin, but not leptin, regulates
AMP-activated protein kinase in pancreatic islets:
impact on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Am J
Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286, E1023–E1031.
43 Ghilardi N, Ziegler S, Wiestner A, Stoffel R., Heim
MH & Skoda RC (1996) Defective STAT signaling by
the leptin receptor in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 93, 6231–6235.
44 McCowen KC, Chow JC & Smith RJ (1998) Leptin
signaling in the hypothalamus of normal rats in vivo.
Endocrinology 139, 4442–4447.
45 Kaszubska W, Falls HD, Schaefer VG, Haasch D,
Frost L, Hessler P, Kroeger PE, White DW, Jirousek
MR & Trevillyan JM (2002) Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B negatively regulates leptin signaling in a
hypothalamic cell line. Mol Cell Endocrinol 195, 109–
118.
118
P. Hekerman et al.
46 Anini Y & Brubaker PL (2003) Role of leptin in the
regulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion. Diabetes 52, 252–259.
47 Morton NM, Emilsson V, Liu YL & Cawthorne MA
(1998) Leptin action in intestinal cells. J Biol Chem
273, 26194–26201.
48 Wang Y, Kuropatwinski KK, White DW, Hawley TS,
Hawley RG, Tartaglia LA & Baumann H (1997) Leptin receptor action in hepatic cells. J Biol Chem 272,
16216–16223.
49 White DW, Kuropatwinski KK, Devos R., Baumann
H & Tartaglia LA (1997) Leptin receptor (OB-R.) signaling. Cytoplasmic domain mutational analysis and
evidence for receptor homo-oligomerization. J Biol
Chem 272, 4065–4071.
50 Costa-Pereira AP, Tininini S, Strobl B, Alonzi T,
Schlaak JF, Is’harc H, Gesualdo I, Newman SJ, Kerr
IM & Poli V (2002) Mutational switch of an IL-6
response to an interferon-gamma-like response. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 8043–8047.
51 Nielsen JH, Svensson C, Galsgaard ED, Moldrup A &
Billestrup N (1999) Beta cell proliferation and growth
factors. J Mol Med 77, 62–66.
52 Friedrichsen BN, Richter HE, Hansen JA, Rhodes CJ,
Nielsen JH, Billestrup N & Moldrup A (2003) Signal
transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation is
sufficient to drive transcriptional induction of cyclin
D2 gene and proliferation of rat pancreatic beta-cells.
Mol Endocrinol 17, 945–958.
53 Shimabukuro M, Wang MY, Zhou YT, Newgard CB
& Unger RH (1998) Protection against lipoapoptosis of
beta cells through leptin-dependent maintenance of Bcl2 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 9558–9561.
54 Islam MS, Sjoholm A & Emilsson V (2000) Fetal pancreatic islets express functional leptin receptors and
leptin stimulates proliferation of fetal islet cells. Int J
Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 1246–1253.
55 Okuya S, Tanabe K, Tanizawa Y & Oka Y (2001)
Leptin increases the viability of isolated rat pancreatic
islets by suppressing apoptosis. Endocrinology 142,
4827–4830.
55a Waksman G, Shoelson SE, Pant N, Cowburn D &
Kuriyan J (1993) Binding of a high affinity phosphotyrosyl peptide to the Src SH2 domain: crystal structures of the complexed and peptide-free forms. Cell 72,
779–790.
56 Demoulin JB, Van Roost E, Stevens M, Groner B &
Renauld JC (1999) Distinct roles for STAT1, STAT3,
and STAT5 in differentiation gene induction and apoptosis inhibition by interleukin-9. J Biol Chem 274,
25855–25861.
57 Eyckerman S, Waelput W, Verhee A, Broekaert D,
Vandekerckhove J & Tavernier J (1999) Analysis of
Tyr to Phe and fa ⁄ fa leptin receptor mutations in the
PC12 cell line. Eur Cytokine Netw 10, 549–556.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
P. Hekerman et al.
58 Kohn AD, Barthel A, Kovacina KS, Boge A, Wallach
B, Summers SA, Birnbaum MJ, Scott PH, Lawrence
JC Jr & Roth RA (1998) Construction and characterization of a conditionally active version of the
serine ⁄ threonine kinase Akt. J Biol Chem 273, 11937–
11943.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 109–119 ª 2004 FEBS
Pleiotropic leptin receptor signalling
59 Schaper F, Gendo C, Eck M, Schmitz J, Grimm C,
Anhuf D, Kerr IM & Heinrich PC (1998) Activation
of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 via the
interleukin-6 signal transducing receptor protein gp130
requires tyrosine kinase Jak1 and limits acute-phase
protein expression. Biochem J 335, 557–565.
119