Download CASE STUDY 4 Background A worker received a fatal electric shock

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Portable appliance testing wikipedia , lookup

Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup

Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Triode wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CASE STUDY 4
Background
A worker received a fatal electric shock while carrying out a.c. arc welding work on
a metal structure in a factory.
Cause of the accident
The welder used an alternating current (a.c.) arc welding set. Investigation
showed that:
a. the welding electrode holder was not fully insulated;
b. the insulation on the handle of the welding electrode holder was damaged;
c. the voltage measured between the exposed metallic parts of the welding
electrode holder and the metal structure where the welding work was carried
out was 70 volts; and
d. there was no low voltage shock preventor incorporated in the welding set.
Results of studies given in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
Report Publication 479 shows that an adult person coming into contact with 70
volts a.c. would have a current of between 35 mA (milli-ampere) and 70 mA
passing through his body and he would be exposed to risk of ventricular fibrillation;
the higher the current, the higher the risk.
Damaged insulation
Exposed metallic part
How this accident could have been prevented?

Direct current (d.c.) welding set should be used as far as practicable for all
welding works. D.C. welding set operates at 60 V d.c., which is far below the
safe (touch) voltage of 120 V d.c.

Statistics show that the incorporation of a low voltage shock preventor in an
a.c. welding set does not totally eliminate the risk of electrical shock. The
main reason is that the reduction of open circuit secondary voltage of an arc
welding set may takes about 2 to 3 seconds before it reduced to a safe level.
During this transition period, any direct contact to the live electrode might still
cause electric shock or electrocution.

All welding sets and the associated tools and accessories should be properly
maintained and checked regularly to ensure that they are safe for use.

When the use of a.c. welding set is inevitable for special welding work, the
following safety procedures should be observed:
(i)
Every a.c. welding set should be equipped with an effective low voltage
shock preventor (LVSP). The LVSP should effectively reduce the open
circuit secondary voltage to a safe level not exceeding 25 volts;
(ii)
The LVSP should be of the built-in type. The workpiece should be
connected to the return terminal of the welding set through a proper
return conductor;
(iii)
The LVSP should be inspected and tested by a competent person once
every six months; and
(iv)
Every welding work involving a.c. welding set should be carried out
under the direct supervision of a supervisor, as far as practicable. The
supervisor and welder should ensure that all safety precautions are
observed at all times.