Download Sample normalisation with RNAGEM™ Tissue

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Artificial cell wikipedia , lookup

Somatic cell nuclear transfer wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

Miltenyi Biotec wikipedia , lookup

Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Real-time polymerase chain reaction wikipedia , lookup

Ehud Shapiro wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
RNAGEM™ Tissue
Antarctica - the source of RNAGEM™ (Camp, Ross Ice Shelf )
Sample normalisation with RNAGEM™ Tissue
Michelle Miles and David Saul. ZyGEM Corporation Ltd, Waikato Innovation Park, Ruakura Road, Hamilton, New Zealand
Introduction
Sample normalisation
When working with low cell counts or cell lysates, most rapid
methods designed for estimating total RNA quantity (such as
optical density or fluorescent dyes) are insufficiently sensitive or
affected by material in unpurified lysates.
When calculating the copy number of an mRNA, or using an analytical method with a narrow tolerance for sample variation, it is important to normalise samples before the analysis is performed. With
normalised samples, failure rates are reduced and comparative
measures are more reliable.
An alternative way to normalise samples is to rely on the cell
numbers in the starting material. These can be measured with a cell
counter or by using a microscope and haemocytometer. However,
with low counts, small sample volumes or high-throughput analysis,
direct cell counting is impractical and unreliable and so other
methods must be used.
One solution is to use the DNA in the extracts. qPCR can precisely
quantify DNA and this in turn can be used to estimate cell numbers.
Ploidy and cell growth-phase need to be accounted for in calculating cell numbers from gene copy number, but in general, DNA
quantification provides an accurate way to normalise samples particularly for high-throughput systems using 96 or 384-well
plates.
To use this approach, DNA must be present in the lysate in a readily
amplifiable form and there must be a linear relationship between
cell numbers and DNA yield over the expected working range.
RNAGEM and DNA extraction for cell number estimation
RNAGEM is a whole nucleic acid extraction kit that gives linear yields
of DNA between <10 cells and ~50,000 cells when using the recommended method (figure 1). If larger samples are needed, then the
method is easily scaled (see www.zygem.com for details).
The amount of RNA in a sample can be normalised using an RTqPCR. Either a reference housekeeping mRNA, rRNA or a synthetic
molecule can be used to provide an estimate of the total RNA
concentration. The advantages and disadvantages of these
methods are reviewed in Hugget et al. 2005. However, if RNA and
DNA are simultaneously co-extracted with similar efficiencies, then
gDNA copies can also provide a simple and direct estimate of cell
numbers which in turn provides a normalisation factor for total RNA
quantity.
A prerequisite for using this approach is that the extraction
efficiency of both DNA and RNA is consistent over the range of cell
numbers likely to be encountered. Furthermore, this consistency
must apply to both low and high copy mRNAs.
To demonstrate RNAGEM‘s ability to produce RNA and DNA in consistent, linear proportions, 10-10000 HeLa cells were extracted using
RNAGEM Tissue. The mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using qScript
cDNA Supermix. DNA was quantified using a qPCR withPerfeCTA®
SYBR® Green FastMix®, ROX™ (Quanta Biosciences) - figure 2.
100000000
1000000
100000
100000
10000
Copies
Gene copies
10000000
1000
ACTB
BRCA1
10000
GAPDH
1000
GAPDH
gene
100
100
10
10
1
1
1
Cell Number
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Figure 1: The number of BRCA1 gene copies detected from the gDNA
co-extracted from HeLa cells using RNAGEM.
This linearity means that the DNA present in the lysate produced by
RNAGEM can be used to determine the original cell number by qPCR.
Because different primers and PCR reagents have different amplification efficiencies, it is advisable to calibrate the DNA yields from a
range of counted cells. Also, it is essential to consider the copy
number of the gene, the presence of pseudogenes and the growth
cell cycle all of which can affect the outcome.
ZyGEM APPLICATION NOTE 108
10
100
1000
10000
Cells
Figure 2: Copies of the human GAPDH gene detected by qPCR plotted
alongside copies detected by RT-qPCR of three mRNAs. ACTB = 366 copies
per cell; GAPDH = 2607 copies per cell; BRCA1 26 copies per cell.
Extraction linearity is seen for both low and high copy mRNA and
also DNA. This ability means that it is possible to normalise RNAGEM
extracts using a qPCR rather than an RT-qPCR - a simpler and less
costly method.
Reference
Hugget et al. (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes and Immunity. 6:279-284
Z01071
For more information visit:
or email:
www.zygem.com
[email protected]