Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Solar wind acceleration o The acceleration of the solar wind is considered with emphasis on the fast solar wind that is known to originate on open field lines in coronal holes, and in the smaller-scale coronal funnels. o Acceleration processes leading to slow solar wind and to transient flows driven by solar eruptions such as coronal mass ejections will only be shortly addressed. o The acceleration by the pressure gradient exerted on the ambient flow by waves and turbulence will be discussed, and some recent developments in theory and multi-fluid modeling be addressed. o Particular attention is given to wave dissipation via kinetic effects and wave particle interactions, which lead to plasma heating and wave damping. Solar corona and solar wind 23 December 1996 • Composite image: Innermost region in Fe XV 28.4 nm showing the corona above the disk at a temperature of about 2 M K, middle region showing the Sun's outer atmosphere as it appears in ultraviolet light in O VI 103.2 nm of oxygen ions flowing away from the Sun to form the solar wind, and extended white-light corona as recorded by the coronagraph. Solar wind types I 1. Fast wind near activity minimum High speed Low density Low particle flux Helium content Source Signatures 400 - 800 kms-1 3 cm-3 2 x 108 cm-2 s-1 3.6%, stationary coronal holes (magnetically open) stationary for long times (weeks) 2. Slow wind near activity minimum Low speed High density High particle flux Helium content Source Signatures Schwenn, 1990 250 - 400 km s-1 10 cm-3 3.7 x 108 cm-2 s-1 below 2%, highly variable helmet streamers (closed) and current sheet sector boundaries embedded Solar wind types II 3. Slow wind near activity maximum Similar characteristics as 2., except for Helium content Source Signatures 4. 4%, highly variable active regions (magnetically closed) and small CHs shock waves, often embedded Solar ejecta (CMEs), often associated with shocks High speed Helium content Other heavy ions Signatures Schwenn, 1990 400 - 2000 kms-1 high, up to 30% often Fel6+ ions, in rare cases He+ often magnetic clouds, about 30% of the cases related with erupting prominences Coronal mass ejections - magnetically driven - origin and acceleration - Lorentz force essential - longitudinal-latitudinal spreading - interplanetary propagation Light bulb CME LASCO/SOHO Helical CME W (103 erg cm-2s-1) The solar wind energy flux I Le Chat et al., Solar Phys. 2012 27.2-day averages scaled to 1AU The solar wind energy flux II Ulysses fluxes are scaled to 1AU Le Chat et al., Solar Phys. 2012 (x 1 erg cm-2s-1) Solar wind scaling law Schwadron and McComas, ApJ 2003 Energetics of the fast solar wind • Energy flux density at 1 RS: F = 5 105 erg cm-2 s-1 • Power ( A(Rs) = 1m2 ): P = 500 W • Speed beyond 10 RS: Vp = (700 - 800) km s-1 • Temperatures at 1.1 Rs: Te ≈ Tp ≈ 1-2 106 K 1 AU: Tp = 3 105 K ; Tα = 106 K ; Te = 1.5 105 K • Heavy ions: Ti ≅ mi / mp Tp ; Vi - Vp = VA γ/(γ-1) 2kBTS = 1/2mp(V∞2 + V2) γ=5/3, V∞=618 kms-1, TS=107 K for Vp=700 kms-1 --> 5 keV Lorentz force (in 2-order of the fluctuations) -> wave pressure Solar wind acceleration Cranmer, Liv. Rev. Solar Phys., 2009 UVCS Doppler dimming determinations for protons (red; Kohl et al., 2006) and O5+ ions (green; Cranmer et al., 2008) are shown for polar coronal holes, and are compared with theoretical models of the solar wind at solar minimum (black curves; Cranmer et al., 2007) and the speeds of blobs above equatorial streamers (open circles; Sheeley Jr et al., 1997). Solar coronal-hole and wind temperature Helios Cranmer, Liv. Rev. Solar Phys., 2009 Black: Turbulence driven coronal heating model (Cranmer et al., ApJ 2007) Empirical constraints on solar wind heating Combined data from Helios and Ulysses, 0.29-5.4 AU Cranmer et al., ApJ, 2009 Funnels merging in coronal hole Cranmer and van Ballegoijen, ApJS, 2005 Field lines in (c) are plotted at 2.1° intervals at the solar surface, and thus each pair encompasses 1–2 funnels. Byhring et al., ApJ, 2008 One-dimensional fluid equations • Mass flux: • Magnetic flux: FM = ρ V A ρ = npmp+nimi FB = B A • Stream/flux-tube cross section: A(r) • Total momentum equation: ρ V d/dr V = - d/dr (p + pw) - ρ GMS/r2 + aw • Thermal pressure: p = npkBTp + nekBTe + nikBTi • Alfvén wave pressure: pw = (δB)2/(8π) • Kinetic wave acceleration: aw = ρpap + ρiai MHD equations for the 3-D solar wind The dependent variables are ρ, v, B, P, and Є, which is the plasma density, flow velocity in the frame rotating with the Sun, magnetic field, thermal pressure, and the Alfvén wave energy density, respectively. M⊙ is the solar mass, Ω the solar angular velocity vector, γ the polytropic index, t the time, and r the radial distance. We use P ∼ n-γ. L is the wave damping length, and VA the Alfvén velocity. Usmanov et al., JGR 105, 12675, 2000 Radial model profiles of the solar wind poles - equator - wind speed proton density thermal pressure wave energy Usmanov et al., JGR 105, 12675, 2000 Gyrokinetic transport equations I Density Flux tube area A(r) Speed Collisional friction, thermal force Parallel temperature Parallel heating Q║(r), Perpendicular temperature Perpendicular heating Q┴(r) Heat flux Heat exchange q(r) Killie et al. ApJ, 2004; Janse et al., J. Plasma Phys., 2005 No waves! Gyrokinetic transport equations II Multi-fluid, species index s Echim, Lemaire, and Lie-Svendsen, Surv Geophys, 32, 1-70, 2011 Magnetic funnels as solar wind source polar hole funnel Tu, Zhou, Marsch, et al., Science and SW11, 2005 Constraints on funnel geometry Normalized line emissivity • Area factor 4 • Expansion occurs above emission height of Ne VIII Byhring et al., ApJL, 673, 2008 Effects of helium on funnel flow Two states Fms0 = 390 W; r1i = 1.03 Rs Hmi = 0.4 Rs Slow flow: High coronal He abundance slow flow: 20% He heating fast flow: heating 5 % He Janse et al., A&A, 2007 Lateral mass and energy supply Sketch to illustrate the scenario of the solar wind origin and mass supply through reconnection. The supergranular convection is the driver of solar wind outflow in coronal funnels. Sizes and shapes of funnels and loops shown are drawn to scale. He, Tu and Marsch, Solar Phys., 2008 Chromospheric Alfvén waves FW = 100 W/m2 T = 150 – 350 s Hinode SOT CaII H 396.8 nm 1 Spicular transverse motion δv = 20 km/s Numerical simulation 2 VA = 200 km/s DePontieu et al. Science, 2007 Alfvén waves from reconnection in magnetic network Simulations of Alfvén waves: • Self-consistent 3D radiative MHD simulation, ranging from the convection zone up to the corona. The field lines (red) are continuously shaken and carry Alfvén waves (movie). Periods are 100-500 s. Wave energy flux is about 100 Wm-2. De Pontieu et al. Science, 2007 • The coloring shows the plasma temperature from lower chromospheric (red) to higher transition-region values (green). Fast solar wind acceleration by magnetic flux emergence Fisk et al., JGR 104, 19765, 1999 Connecting photosphere and solar wind I Nonuniform magnetic field - photosphere: B= 2.8 kG - corona: B= 4 G at 4 Mm - radiative losses - nonlinear wave coupling - injection of white noise with V=1km/s - frequency 2(10-4 – 10-5) Hz Comparison between direct numerical MHD simulation and observations; averages over space and time (30 min.); steady state after ½ hour Matsumoto and Suzuki, 2012 Connecting photosphere and solar wind II Some results: - Alfven (A), fast (T) and slow (L) wave coupling - Mode conversion and decay with compressibility - Dissipation via shocks Matsumoto and Suzuki, 2012 Acceleration of solar wind ions Three-fluid model Preferential heavy ion heating Ofman, LRSP, 2010 Equal heating Wave driven wind Coronal model ion temperature profiles He H Wave-driven wind with wave dissipation by strongly enhanced (numerical hyper-) resistivity and viscosity Ofman, JGR, 2004 Three-fluid model Radial profile of Alfvén wave amplitude ± 3 km/s Cranmer and van Ballegooijen, ApJS, 2005 Sources: (1) VAL Model, (2),(3) SUMER, (4) UVCS, (5), (6) Radio scintillations, (7) Helios, Ulysses Model magnetic field fluctuations Calculated model spectrum at 18 Rs obtained in 3-fluid model Ofman, JGR, 2004 Alfvén-cyclotron-wave turbulence 5/3 α 1 Ulysses Turbulence spectrum: Horbury et al., JGR 101, 405, 1996 e±(f) = 1/2 (δZ±)2 ∼ (f/f0)-α Empirical in situ correlations Scatter plot of the mean (0.008- 0.1 Hz) wave amplitude versus proton (radial) temperature 4 years of ACE data at 1 AU Scatter plot of the proton temperature versus speed Vasquez et al., JGR, 2007 Heating rate for turbulent cascade ACE data at 1 AU Vsw [km/s] Expected heating rate accounting for in situ proton temperature Vasquez et al., JGR, 2007 Kinetic damping of plasma waves Marsch, Liv. Rev. Solar Phys. 2004 Free energy source Kinetic wave mode Proton anisotropy Ion cyclotron wave Proton beam Ion acoustic wave Ion differential streaming Magnetosonic wave Pitch-angle diffusion plateau VA=109 km/s Helios core beam vy vy Protons 0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3, 0.1, 0.03, 0.01, 0.003 vx (km/s) V=614 km/s vx (km/s) Heuer and Marsch, JGR, 2007 Ωp= 1.1 Hz Parametric decay of Alfvén wave • Linear Vlasov theory and 1-D hybrid simulations to study the parametric instabilities of a circularly polarized parallelpropagating Alfvén wave. • Linear and weakly nonlinear instabilities of the Alfvén wave drive ion acoustic-like and cyclotron waves, leading to beam and anisotropic core. Pitch-angle scattering and energy diffusion in micro-turbulent wave fields Araneda, Marsch, and Viñas, PRL, 2008 Resonant diffusion and ion heating Isenberg and Vasquez, ApJ, 668, 2007 T┴ = 4 T║ Resonant diffusion of O5+ ions, exhibiting perpendicular cyclotron heating. These results are for equal sunward and anti-sunward wave intensities, and a power spectrum index of - 5/3. Color contours show the velocity-space density, normalized in each panel to the maximum value at the origin. At left is the initial, isotropic distribution. Adjacent panels show the time development for three later times, where τ is proportional to the normalized wave intensity. Some conclusions • Fast solar wind is mainly driven by wave forces. • Waves are responsible for ion acceleration and heating. • Parametric decay of Alfvén waves produces cyclotron and acoustic waves shaping the protons (beam, core). • Heavy ions are driven by the mirror force stemming from preferential (resonant) perpendicular heating. • Mass and energy are supplied through reconnection between funnels and adjacent small loops in the network. • Origin and acceleration of the slow wind (may involve reconnection) remains less clear (compositional signatures: Helium depletion and FIP fractionation). • Transients and CMEs are driven by large-scale Lorentz forces arising from magnetic flux emergence and eruption.